You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@trafficserver.apache.org by Alan Carroll <so...@oath.com.INVALID> on 2019/01/10 17:10:13 UTC
proxy.config.http.request_buffer_enabled
During some documentation build repair (#4783) I came upon this overridable
configuration. What is odd is that there is no entry in "RecordsConfig.cc"
for it. I had to guess what it did from the code, so if anyone knows what
this is supposed to do, either do a doc fix PR or let me know. More
importantly, is this lack of a records.config value by design, or an
oversight? It doesn't seem a valid situation to me.
--
*Beware the fisherman who's casting out his line in to a dried up riverbed.*
*Oh don't try to tell him 'cause he won't believe. Throw some bread to the
ducks instead.*
*It's easier that way. *- Genesis : Duke : VI 25-28
Re: proxy.config.http.request_buffer_enabled
Posted by Alan Carroll <so...@oath.com.INVALID>.
You should approve #4738 so I can merge that, then make a PR for the
configuration along with updated documentation. Thanks!
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 1:24 PM CrazyCow <zh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the info. I'll add the missing entry.
>
> Susan Hinrichs <sh...@apache.org> 于2019年1月10日周四 上午9:32写道：
>
> > Looks like the request_buffer_enabled was added by zizhong.
> > 78cb6c9bf86e8d72c79a9084604bc25520ef57d7
> >
> > If there is no RecordsConfig.cc entry does that mean it is override only?
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 11:10 AM Alan Carroll
> > <so...@oath.com.invalid> wrote:
> >
> > > During some documentation build repair (#4783) I came upon this
> > overridable
> > > configuration. What is odd is that there is no entry in
> > "RecordsConfig.cc"
> > > for it. I had to guess what it did from the code, so if anyone knows
> what
> > > this is supposed to do, either do a doc fix PR or let me know. More
> > > importantly, is this lack of a records.config value by design, or an
> > > oversight? It doesn't seem a valid situation to me.
> > >
> > > --
> > > *Beware the fisherman who's casting out his line in to a dried up
> > > riverbed.*
> > > *Oh don't try to tell him 'cause he won't believe. Throw some bread to
> > the
> > > ducks instead.*
> > > *It's easier that way. *- Genesis : Duke : VI 25-28
> > >
> >
>
--
*Beware the fisherman who's casting out his line in to a dried up riverbed.*
*Oh don't try to tell him 'cause he won't believe. Throw some bread to the
ducks instead.*
*It's easier that way. *- Genesis : Duke : VI 25-28
Re: proxy.config.http.request_buffer_enabled
Posted by CrazyCow <zh...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for the info. I'll add the missing entry.
Susan Hinrichs <sh...@apache.org> 于2019年1月10日周四 上午9:32写道：
> Looks like the request_buffer_enabled was added by zizhong.
> 78cb6c9bf86e8d72c79a9084604bc25520ef57d7
>
> If there is no RecordsConfig.cc entry does that mean it is override only?
>
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 11:10 AM Alan Carroll
> <so...@oath.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> > During some documentation build repair (#4783) I came upon this
> overridable
> > configuration. What is odd is that there is no entry in
> "RecordsConfig.cc"
> > for it. I had to guess what it did from the code, so if anyone knows what
> > this is supposed to do, either do a doc fix PR or let me know. More
> > importantly, is this lack of a records.config value by design, or an
> > oversight? It doesn't seem a valid situation to me.
> >
> > --
> > *Beware the fisherman who's casting out his line in to a dried up
> > riverbed.*
> > *Oh don't try to tell him 'cause he won't believe. Throw some bread to
> the
> > ducks instead.*
> > *It's easier that way. *- Genesis : Duke : VI 25-28
> >
>
Re: proxy.config.http.request_buffer_enabled
Posted by Susan Hinrichs <sh...@apache.org>.
Looks like the request_buffer_enabled was added by zizhong.
78cb6c9bf86e8d72c79a9084604bc25520ef57d7
If there is no RecordsConfig.cc entry does that mean it is override only?
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 11:10 AM Alan Carroll
<so...@oath.com.invalid> wrote:
> During some documentation build repair (#4783) I came upon this overridable
> configuration. What is odd is that there is no entry in "RecordsConfig.cc"
> for it. I had to guess what it did from the code, so if anyone knows what
> this is supposed to do, either do a doc fix PR or let me know. More
> importantly, is this lack of a records.config value by design, or an
> oversight? It doesn't seem a valid situation to me.
>
> --
> *Beware the fisherman who's casting out his line in to a dried up
> riverbed.*
> *Oh don't try to tell him 'cause he won't believe. Throw some bread to the
> ducks instead.*
> *It's easier that way. *- Genesis : Duke : VI 25-28
>