You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@apr.apache.org by Greg Ames <gr...@remulak.net> on 2001/08/06 22:05:07 UTC
[PATCH] Darwin typo?
I assume that this is just a typo. However, I have no way to test it.
But it seems it wasn't tested as well as you might hope before it was
committed.
Greg
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Index: srclib/apr/include//apr_portable.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/apache/apr/include/apr_portable.h,v
retrieving revision 1.65
diff -u -d -b -r1.65 apr_portable.h
--- apr_portable.h 2001/08/02 20:44:43 1.65
+++ apr_portable.h 2001/08/06 19:36:49
@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@
#if defined(HPUX) || defined(HPUX10) || defined(HPUX11)
#include <dl.h>
typedef shl_t apr_os_dso_handle_t;
-#elif defined(DRAWIN)
+#elif defined(DARWIN)
typedef NSModule apr_os_dso_handle_t;
#else
typedef void * apr_os_dso_handle_t;
Re: [PATCH] Darwin typo?
Posted by Jeff Trawick <tr...@attglobal.net>.
Greg Ames <gr...@remulak.net> writes:
> I assume that this is just a typo. However, I have no way to test it.
> But it seems it wasn't tested as well as you might hope before it was
> committed.
I'd assume that too. Let me see what happens if the typo is fixed.
It may be that a header file would then be missing.
I do know that if dsos are disabled we compile okay on Darwin now
(well, last week :) ).
--
Jeff Trawick | trawick@attglobal.net | PGP public key at web site:
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/
Born in Roswell... married an alien...