You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@apr.apache.org by Greg Ames <gr...@remulak.net> on 2001/08/06 22:05:07 UTC

[PATCH] Darwin typo?

I assume that this is just a typo.  However, I have no way to test it. 
But it seems it wasn't tested as well as you might hope before it was
committed.

Greg

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Index: srclib/apr/include//apr_portable.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/apache/apr/include/apr_portable.h,v
retrieving revision 1.65
diff -u -d -b -r1.65 apr_portable.h
--- apr_portable.h      2001/08/02 20:44:43     1.65
+++ apr_portable.h      2001/08/06 19:36:49
@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@
 #if defined(HPUX) || defined(HPUX10) || defined(HPUX11)
 #include <dl.h>
 typedef shl_t                 apr_os_dso_handle_t;
-#elif defined(DRAWIN)
+#elif defined(DARWIN)
 typedef NSModule              apr_os_dso_handle_t;
 #else
 typedef void *                apr_os_dso_handle_t;

Re: [PATCH] Darwin typo?

Posted by Jeff Trawick <tr...@attglobal.net>.
Greg Ames <gr...@remulak.net> writes:

> I assume that this is just a typo.  However, I have no way to test it. 
> But it seems it wasn't tested as well as you might hope before it was
> committed.

I'd assume that too.  Let me see what happens if the typo is fixed.
It may be that a header file would then be missing.

I do know that if dsos are disabled we compile okay on Darwin now
(well, last week :) ).

-- 
Jeff Trawick | trawick@attglobal.net | PGP public key at web site:
       http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/
             Born in Roswell... married an alien...