You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@santuario.apache.org by Franz Haeuslschmid <ha...@fmi.uni-passau.de> on 2002/11/12 18:10:37 UTC
[Problem] using Apache Soap

Hello to all,

As an example, this is a snippet from the SOAP-message on the client-side:

[..]
                    <ds:X509Data xmlns=""

xmlns:SOAP-SEC="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/security/2000-12"
                        xmlns:ds="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#"
xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2001/12/soap-envelope">
                        <ds:X509Certificate xmlns=""

xmlns:SOAP-SEC="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/security/2000-12"
                            xmlns:ds="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#"

xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2001/12/soap-envelope">

MIICKjCCAegCBD3KiDIwCwYHKoZIzjgEAwUAMGAxCzAJBgNVBAYTAmRlMQ8wDQYDVQQIEwZCYXll

cm4xDzANBgNVBAcTBlBhc3NhdTETMBEGA1UEChMKVW5pIFBhc3NhdTEMMAoGA1UECxMDRk1JMQww

CgYDVQQDEwNCb2IwHhcNMDIxMTA3MTUzNTE0WhcNMDMwMjA1MTUzNTE0WjBgMQswCQYDVQQGEwJk

ZTEPMA0GA1UECBMGQmF5ZXJuMQ8wDQYDVQQHEwZQYXNzYXUxEzARBgNVBAoTClVuaSBQYXNzYXUx

DDAKBgNVBAsTA0ZNSTEMMAoGA1UEAxMDQm9iMIHuMIGmBgUrDgMCDDCBnAJBAMFsutNNR17FOWaV

1pS8i8R+WY4jtanXxc7ILWW2gn1E6VN4SEcwwL/x9MtW9HxuUQVL6JIA8w1D3E/vliTUZlsCFQC3

uBC1jAk09kKHjzYLltfMJrU+TQJATFPHJr2/u6ZUnX5zGTnGyTqGmifF2xe6PKxYnXs+AD+nNfKQ

z9B6PvEPNRVfGi73AzWve2pSEaEQNRj7pE6XGANDAAJAaNzKtX54hK4ml+8TlLypLIPOJx699xV2

ivbk5WpWIcoMz1vv6FJsV47FoM/m2RZagqZyE5Q3qebp/mAhqUrf+jALBgcqhkjOOAQDBQADLwAw

LAIUXsJ+4Uhjle5i64b+K+zXTGVxFTsCFFnrkHfULvtXG7blAvV8Q1fI4VSc
</ds:X509Certificate>
                    </ds:X509Data>
[..]

On the server-side:

[..]
<ds:X509Certificate>
MIICKjCCAegCBD3KiDIwCwYHKoZIzjgEAwUAMGAxCzAJBgNVBAYTAmRlMQ8wDQYDVQQIEwZCYXll
cm4xDzANBgNVBAcTBlBhc3NhdTETMBEGA1UEChMKVW5pIFBhc3NhdTEMMAoGA1UECxMDRk1JMQww
CgYDVQQDEwNCb2IwHhcNMDIxMTA3MTUzNTE0WhcNMDMwMjA1MTUzNTE0WjBgMQswCQYDVQQGEwJk
ZTEPMA0GA1UECBMGQmF5ZXJuMQ8wDQYDVQQHEwZQYXNzYXUxEzARBgNVBAoTClVuaSBQYXNzYXUx
DDAKBgNVBAsTA0ZNSTEMMAoGA1UEAxMDQm9iMIHuMIGmBgUrDgMCDDCBnAJBAMFsutNNR17FOWaV
1pS8i8R
WY4jtanXxc7ILWW2gn1E6VN4SEcwwL/x9MtW9HxuUQVL6JIA8w1D3E/vliTUZlsCFQC3
uBC1jAk09kKHjzYLltfMJrU TQJATFPHJr2/u6ZUnX5zGTnGyTqGmifF2xe6PKxYnXs AD
nNfKQ
z9B6PvEPNRVfGi73AzWve2pSEaEQNRj7pE6XGANDAAJAaNzKtX54hK4ml
8TlLypLIPOJx699xV2
ivbk5WpWIcoMz1vv6FJsV47FoM/m2RZagqZyE5Q3qebp/mAhqUrf
jALBgcqhkjOOAQDBQADLwAw
LAIUXsJ 4Uhjle5i64b K zXTGVxFTsCFFnrkHfULvtXG7blAvV8Q1fI4VSc
</ds:X509Certificate>
[..]

There were some changes to namespaces, but why are the "+" replaced by "
"? The document encoding is UTF-8, I know, that this is not a xmlsec
problem and this list is not the correct place, but I hope that someone
else encountered this situation and can give an answer.

Best regards, Franz.