You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Lance Norskog (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/10/16 23:24:22 UTC

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (SOLR-2155) Geospatial search using geohash prefixes

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12921761#action_12921761 ] 

Lance Norskog edited comment on SOLR-2155 at 10/16/10 5:23 PM:
---------------------------------------------------------------

The problem with Geohash is that it puts zeros in Greater London and at the Equator, so every computation that uses it has to dodge at these points. More to the point, the Hamming distance trick does not work, so a simple super-fast scan of an array of Lucene Trie-Integers does not work.

On the Aleutian island of Unalaska, there is a longitude which goes through a mountainous region with no roads. The longitude does not touch any other land north of Antarctica.

[Unalaska|http://maps.google.com/maps?q=65%C2%B037%E2%80%B221%E2%80%B3N+168%C2%B020%E2%80%B242%E2%80%B3W]

65°37′21″N 168°20′42″W

If you rotate the geohash frame of reference to latitude North Pole and a longitude through Unalaska, you can cheerfully ignore all of the zero points, at the cost of alienating some Inuit.

Seriously, if you limit Geohash accuracy to land-based services (like maps), with an accuracy warning about comparing Nome and Vladivostok, sacrificing a road-less part of an Aleutian island seems a small price to pay. 

      was (Author: lancenorskog):
    The problem with Geohash is that it puts zeros in Greater London and at the Equator, so every computation that uses it has to dodge at these points. More to the point, the Hamming distance trick does not work, so a simple super-fast scan of an array of Lucene Trie-Integers does not work.

On the Aleutian island of Unalaska, there is a longitude which goes through a mountainous region with no roads. The longitude does not touch any other land north of Antarctica.

[Unalaska|http://maps.google.com/maps?q=65%C2%B037%E2%80%B221%E2%80%B3N+168%C2%B020%E2%80%B242%E2%80%B3W]

65°37′21″N 168°20′42″W

If you rotate the geohash frame of reference to latitude North Pole and a longitude through Unalaska, you can cheerfully ignore all of the zero points, at the cost of alienating some Inuit.

  
> Geospatial search using geohash prefixes
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-2155
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2155
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: David Smiley
>         Attachments: GeoHashPrefixFilter.patch
>
>
> There currently isn't a solution in Solr for doing geospatial filtering on documents that have a variable number of points.  This scenario occurs when there is location extraction (i.e. via a "gazateer") occurring on free text.  None, one, or many geospatial locations might be extracted from any given document and users want to limit their search results to those occurring in a user-specified area.
> I've implemented this by furthering the GeoHash based work in Lucene/Solr with a geohash prefix based filter.  A geohash refers to a lat-lon box on the earth.  Each successive character added further subdivides the box into a 4x8 (or 8x4 depending on the even/odd length of the geohash) grid.  The first step in this scheme is figuring out which geohash grid squares cover the user's search query.  I've added various extra methods to GeoHashUtils (and added tests) to assist in this purpose.  The next step is an actual Lucene Filter, GeoHashPrefixFilter, that uses these geohash prefixes in TermsEnum.seek() to skip to relevant grid squares in the index.  Once a matching geohash grid is found, the points therein are compared against the user's query to see if it matches.  I created an abstraction GeoShape extended by subclasses named PointDistance... and CartesianBox.... to support different queried shapes so that the filter need not care about these details.
> This work was presented at LuceneRevolution in Boston on October 8th.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org