You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to common-dev@hadoop.apache.org by "Hemanth Yamijala (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2009/06/25 11:57:07 UTC
[jira] Commented: (HADOOP-6105) Provide a way to automatically
handle backward compatibility of deprecated keys
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12723987#action_12723987 ]
Hemanth Yamijala commented on HADOOP-6105:
------------------------------------------
Initial proposal is to keep it dead simple:
- Keep a static map of keys in the Configuration class that maps the deprecated key to a set of new keys.
- get of the deprecated key will return the value of the first new key in the mapping set.
- set of the deprecated key will set the same value to all new keys in the mapping set.
- There will be a provision to define a custom message in the configuration class whenever access is done on the deprecated keys. Otherwise, a standard message such as: "This key is deprecated. Use this other key instead" will be printed.
- When both old and new keys are defined, the new keys will always take precedence.
> Provide a way to automatically handle backward compatibility of deprecated keys
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-6105
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6105
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: conf
> Reporter: Hemanth Yamijala
>
> There are cases when we have had to deprecate configuration keys. Use cases include, changing the names of variables to better match intent, splitting a single parameter into two - for maps, reduces etc.
> In such cases, we typically provide a backwards compatible option for the old keys. The handling of such cases might typically be common enough to actually add support for it in a generic fashion in the Configuration class. Some initial discussion around this started in HADOOP-5919, but since the project split happened in between we decided to open this issue to fix it in common.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.