SOAP bindings questions: Http and JMS

[Mike DuVall <mi...@hotmail.com>]

My understanding of the SOAP bindings situation is as follows:

The official SOAP specification provides a standard binding for how to 
communicate SOAP messages over Http.  This is the reason that different SOAP 
over Http providers can expect to interoperate; because there is a defined 
standard on how to do things.

Further, it is my understanding that there is no official standard binding 
for how to do SOAP over JMS.  This means if that any two parties develop 
there own mechanism for doing SOAP over JMS, there is no reason to expect 
these two different implementations to interoperate.  In fact, one should 
expect that they would NOT interoperate.

More specifically, if a company was to independantly come up with a 
mechanism for doing SOAP over JMS, they should expect that it would not 
interoperate with the Axis implementation of doing SOAP over JMS.

Can someone knowledgable in this area please confirm whether the above is 
correct?  And if it is not correct, where have I gone amiss?

Thanks,
Mike

_________________________________________________________________
Get fast, reliable access with MSN 9 Dial-up. Click here for Special Offer! 
http://click.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200361ave/direct/01/

Re: SOAP bindings questions: Http and JMS

[Kartik <pa...@yahoo.com>]

Hi Mike,

I am not sure about the standards, but IONA's Artix
provides transports for SOAP or HTTP, JMS, CORBA and
others, may be checking out a few articles on their
site would be beneficial.

Thanks.
Kartik

--- Mike DuVall <mi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> My understanding of the SOAP bindings situation is
> as follows:
> 
> The official SOAP specification provides a standard
> binding for how to 
> communicate SOAP messages over Http.  This is the
> reason that different SOAP 
> over Http providers can expect to interoperate;
> because there is a defined 
> standard on how to do things.
> 
> Further, it is my understanding that there is no
> official standard binding 
> for how to do SOAP over JMS.  This means if that any
> two parties develop 
> there own mechanism for doing SOAP over JMS, there
> is no reason to expect 
> these two different implementations to interoperate.
>  In fact, one should 
> expect that they would NOT interoperate.
> 
> More specifically, if a company was to independantly
> come up with a 
> mechanism for doing SOAP over JMS, they should
> expect that it would not 
> interoperate with the Axis implementation of doing
> SOAP over JMS.
> 
> Can someone knowledgable in this area please confirm
> whether the above is 
> correct?  And if it is not correct, where have I
> gone amiss?
> 
> Thanks,
> Mike
> 
>
_________________________________________________________________
> Get fast, reliable access with MSN 9 Dial-up. Click
> here for Special Offer! 
>
http://click.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200361ave/direct/01/
> 


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Get better spam protection with Yahoo! Mail.
http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools