You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to slide-dev@jakarta.apache.org by Daniel Florey <da...@web.de> on 2005/02/23 13:00:07 UTC
SVN migration
Hi folks,
Any news regarding the SVN-migration? Did we already decide to go for it?
As far as I remember we wanted to
1. Move the existing repository structure to subversion trying to keep the
file history (using cvs2svn).
2. Restructure the repository layout so that it look somehow like this:
/jakarta
/slide
/server
/branches
/tags
/trunk
/src (content of current jararta-slide/src)
/docs (content of current jararta-slide/docs)
/lib (content of current jararta-slide/lib)
(the other directories go to other locations)
/clientlib
/branches
/tags
/trunk (partial content of current
jararta-slide/webdavclient/clientlib)
files in current jararta-slide/webdavclient/clientlib
/src (content of current jararta-slide/webdavclient/src)
/lib (content of current jararta-slide/webdavclient/lib)
/ant
/branches
/tags
/trunk (content of current jararta-slide/webdavclient/ant)
/commandline
/branches
/tags
/trunk (content of current ararta-slide/webdavclient/commandline)
/connector
/branches
/tags
/trunk (content of current jararta-slide/webdavclient/connector)
/src
/example
/conf (content of current jararta-slide/webdavclient/etc/conf)
/wck
/branches
/tags
/trunk (content of current jararta-slide/wck)
/projector
/branches
/tags
/trunk (content of current jararta-slide/projector)
/testsuite
/branches
/tags
/trunk (content of current jararta-slide/testsuite)
/proposals
/branches
/tags
/trunk (content of current jararta-slide/proposals)
/indexing
/jcrri
/taglib
/tamino
/wvcm
3. Get this working with ant and/or migrate to maven as build tool
Anyone working on this topic? I could help to get this done if appreciated.
Should we start a vote on this?
Cheers,
Daniel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: slide-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: slide-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: AW: SVN migration
Posted by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>.
Bumping this back onto the awareness of the list. Looks like you were
about to have a vote :)
cvs2svn does a fine job of migrating branches/tags. Also, we've good
access to SVN experts at Apache, so let Infrastructure worry about the
difficulty/problems :)
That said, migrating the current structure over and then thinking
about what to do is probably best as it gets it over and done with
before the community debate rather than afterwards.
Hen
On 2/24/05, James Mason <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> Keep in mind that unlike CVS, it's insanely easy to move stuff around in
> SVN. We could start with an initial SVN repository that resembles what
> we have in CVS (something like Stefan's suggestion) then just move
> everything to where we want it after the migration. That should
> certainly make the cvs2svn step easier.
>
> -James
>
> On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 15:16 +0100, Daniel Florey wrote:
> > I've no clue how to convert tags and branches to svn, if cvs2svn is capable
> > of doing so.
> > I'd propose to achieve a structure close to the commons project as we might
> > have several subprojects that can be released independently in future.
> > So we should have a closer look at the commons svn structure when doing the
> > migration.
> >
> > Daniel
> >
> > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > > Von: slide-dev-return-15977-daniel.florey=web.de@jakarta.apache.org
> > > [mailto:slide-dev-return-15977-daniel.florey=web.de@jakarta.apache.org] Im
> > > Auftrag von Stefan Lützkendorf
> > > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 24. Februar 2005 10:52
> > > An: Slide Developers Mailing List
> > > Betreff: Re: SVN migration
> > >
> > > Yes we should have a vote about this.
> > >
> > > I like the idea to maintain the current structure in svn in the first
> > > step.
> > > But then we should choose the inital structure tha we want to create in
> > > svn.
> > >
> > > Quite ugly would be :
> > >
> > > /jakarta
> > > /slide
> > > /old-branches (contains branches reflecting the old structure)
> > > /old-tags (contains tags reflecting the old structure)
> > > /old-trunk
> > >
> > > Any better ideas?
> > >
> > > Cheers, Stefan
> > >
> > > James Mason wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think Stefan volunteered to do the migration, but I probably scared
> > > > him off with all my nitpicking about the structure :).
> > > >
> > > > I don't see a vote thread (and I don't remember one, but that's no
> > > > guarantee), so calling a vote seems like a good idea.
> > > >
> > > > -James
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 13:00 +0100, Daniel Florey wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>Hi folks,
> > > >>Any news regarding the SVN-migration? Did we already decide to go for
> > > it?
> > > >>As far as I remember we wanted to
> > > >>1. Move the existing repository structure to subversion trying to keep
> > > the
> > > >>file history (using cvs2svn).
> > > >>2. Restructure the repository layout so that it look somehow like this:
> > > >>
> > > >>/jakarta
> > > >> /slide
> > > >> /server
> > > >> /branches
> > > >> /tags
> > > >> /trunk
> > > >> /src (content of current jararta-slide/src)
> > > >> /docs (content of current jararta-slide/docs)
> > > >> /lib (content of current jararta-slide/lib)
> > > >> (the other directories go to other locations)
> > > >>
> > > >> /clientlib
> > > >> /branches
> > > >> /tags
> > > >> /trunk (partial content of current
> > > >> jararta-slide/webdavclient/clientlib)
> > > >> files in current jararta-slide/webdavclient/clientlib
> > > >> /src (content of current jararta-slide/webdavclient/src)
> > > >> /lib (content of current jararta-slide/webdavclient/lib)
> > > >> /ant
> > > >> /branches
> > > >> /tags
> > > >> /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/webdavclient/ant)
> > > >> /commandline
> > > >> /branches
> > > >> /tags
> > > >> /trunk (content of current ararta-
> > > slide/webdavclient/commandline)
> > > >> /connector
> > > >> /branches
> > > >> /tags
> > > >> /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/webdavclient/connector)
> > > >> /src
> > > >> /example
> > > >> /conf (content of current jararta-
> > > slide/webdavclient/etc/conf)
> > > >>
> > > >> /wck
> > > >> /branches
> > > >> /tags
> > > >> /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/wck)
> > > >> /projector
> > > >> /branches
> > > >> /tags
> > > >> /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/projector)
> > > >> /testsuite
> > > >> /branches
> > > >> /tags
> > > >> /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/testsuite)
> > > >> /proposals
> > > >> /branches
> > > >> /tags
> > > >> /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/proposals)
> > > >> /indexing
> > > >> /jcrri
> > > >> /taglib
> > > >> /tamino
> > > >> /wvcm
> > > >>
> > > >>3. Get this working with ant and/or migrate to maven as build tool
> > > >>
> > > >>Anyone working on this topic? I could help to get this done if
> > > appreciated.
> > > >>
> > > >>Should we start a vote on this?
> > > >>
> > > >>Cheers,
> > > >>Daniel
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: slide-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > > >>For additional commands, e-mail: slide-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: slide-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: slide-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: slide-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: slide-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: slide-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: slide-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: slide-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: slide-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: slide-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: slide-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: AW: SVN migration
Posted by James Mason <ma...@apache.org>.
Keep in mind that unlike CVS, it's insanely easy to move stuff around in
SVN. We could start with an initial SVN repository that resembles what
we have in CVS (something like Stefan's suggestion) then just move
everything to where we want it after the migration. That should
certainly make the cvs2svn step easier.
-James
On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 15:16 +0100, Daniel Florey wrote:
> I've no clue how to convert tags and branches to svn, if cvs2svn is capable
> of doing so.
> I'd propose to achieve a structure close to the commons project as we might
> have several subprojects that can be released independently in future.
> So we should have a closer look at the commons svn structure when doing the
> migration.
>
> Daniel
>
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: slide-dev-return-15977-daniel.florey=web.de@jakarta.apache.org
> > [mailto:slide-dev-return-15977-daniel.florey=web.de@jakarta.apache.org] Im
> > Auftrag von Stefan Lützkendorf
> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 24. Februar 2005 10:52
> > An: Slide Developers Mailing List
> > Betreff: Re: SVN migration
> >
> > Yes we should have a vote about this.
> >
> > I like the idea to maintain the current structure in svn in the first
> > step.
> > But then we should choose the inital structure tha we want to create in
> > svn.
> >
> > Quite ugly would be :
> >
> > /jakarta
> > /slide
> > /old-branches (contains branches reflecting the old structure)
> > /old-tags (contains tags reflecting the old structure)
> > /old-trunk
> >
> > Any better ideas?
> >
> > Cheers, Stefan
> >
> > James Mason wrote:
> >
> > > I think Stefan volunteered to do the migration, but I probably scared
> > > him off with all my nitpicking about the structure :).
> > >
> > > I don't see a vote thread (and I don't remember one, but that's no
> > > guarantee), so calling a vote seems like a good idea.
> > >
> > > -James
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 13:00 +0100, Daniel Florey wrote:
> > >
> > >>Hi folks,
> > >>Any news regarding the SVN-migration? Did we already decide to go for
> > it?
> > >>As far as I remember we wanted to
> > >>1. Move the existing repository structure to subversion trying to keep
> > the
> > >>file history (using cvs2svn).
> > >>2. Restructure the repository layout so that it look somehow like this:
> > >>
> > >>/jakarta
> > >> /slide
> > >> /server
> > >> /branches
> > >> /tags
> > >> /trunk
> > >> /src (content of current jararta-slide/src)
> > >> /docs (content of current jararta-slide/docs)
> > >> /lib (content of current jararta-slide/lib)
> > >> (the other directories go to other locations)
> > >>
> > >> /clientlib
> > >> /branches
> > >> /tags
> > >> /trunk (partial content of current
> > >> jararta-slide/webdavclient/clientlib)
> > >> files in current jararta-slide/webdavclient/clientlib
> > >> /src (content of current jararta-slide/webdavclient/src)
> > >> /lib (content of current jararta-slide/webdavclient/lib)
> > >> /ant
> > >> /branches
> > >> /tags
> > >> /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/webdavclient/ant)
> > >> /commandline
> > >> /branches
> > >> /tags
> > >> /trunk (content of current ararta-
> > slide/webdavclient/commandline)
> > >> /connector
> > >> /branches
> > >> /tags
> > >> /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/webdavclient/connector)
> > >> /src
> > >> /example
> > >> /conf (content of current jararta-
> > slide/webdavclient/etc/conf)
> > >>
> > >> /wck
> > >> /branches
> > >> /tags
> > >> /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/wck)
> > >> /projector
> > >> /branches
> > >> /tags
> > >> /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/projector)
> > >> /testsuite
> > >> /branches
> > >> /tags
> > >> /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/testsuite)
> > >> /proposals
> > >> /branches
> > >> /tags
> > >> /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/proposals)
> > >> /indexing
> > >> /jcrri
> > >> /taglib
> > >> /tamino
> > >> /wvcm
> > >>
> > >>3. Get this working with ant and/or migrate to maven as build tool
> > >>
> > >>Anyone working on this topic? I could help to get this done if
> > appreciated.
> > >>
> > >>Should we start a vote on this?
> > >>
> > >>Cheers,
> > >>Daniel
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: slide-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > >>For additional commands, e-mail: slide-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: slide-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: slide-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: slide-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: slide-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: slide-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: slide-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: slide-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: slide-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
AW: SVN migration
Posted by Daniel Florey <da...@web.de>.
I've no clue how to convert tags and branches to svn, if cvs2svn is capable
of doing so.
I'd propose to achieve a structure close to the commons project as we might
have several subprojects that can be released independently in future.
So we should have a closer look at the commons svn structure when doing the
migration.
Daniel
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: slide-dev-return-15977-daniel.florey=web.de@jakarta.apache.org
> [mailto:slide-dev-return-15977-daniel.florey=web.de@jakarta.apache.org] Im
> Auftrag von Stefan Lützkendorf
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 24. Februar 2005 10:52
> An: Slide Developers Mailing List
> Betreff: Re: SVN migration
>
> Yes we should have a vote about this.
>
> I like the idea to maintain the current structure in svn in the first
> step.
> But then we should choose the inital structure tha we want to create in
> svn.
>
> Quite ugly would be :
>
> /jakarta
> /slide
> /old-branches (contains branches reflecting the old structure)
> /old-tags (contains tags reflecting the old structure)
> /old-trunk
>
> Any better ideas?
>
> Cheers, Stefan
>
> James Mason wrote:
>
> > I think Stefan volunteered to do the migration, but I probably scared
> > him off with all my nitpicking about the structure :).
> >
> > I don't see a vote thread (and I don't remember one, but that's no
> > guarantee), so calling a vote seems like a good idea.
> >
> > -James
> >
> > On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 13:00 +0100, Daniel Florey wrote:
> >
> >>Hi folks,
> >>Any news regarding the SVN-migration? Did we already decide to go for
> it?
> >>As far as I remember we wanted to
> >>1. Move the existing repository structure to subversion trying to keep
> the
> >>file history (using cvs2svn).
> >>2. Restructure the repository layout so that it look somehow like this:
> >>
> >>/jakarta
> >> /slide
> >> /server
> >> /branches
> >> /tags
> >> /trunk
> >> /src (content of current jararta-slide/src)
> >> /docs (content of current jararta-slide/docs)
> >> /lib (content of current jararta-slide/lib)
> >> (the other directories go to other locations)
> >>
> >> /clientlib
> >> /branches
> >> /tags
> >> /trunk (partial content of current
> >> jararta-slide/webdavclient/clientlib)
> >> files in current jararta-slide/webdavclient/clientlib
> >> /src (content of current jararta-slide/webdavclient/src)
> >> /lib (content of current jararta-slide/webdavclient/lib)
> >> /ant
> >> /branches
> >> /tags
> >> /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/webdavclient/ant)
> >> /commandline
> >> /branches
> >> /tags
> >> /trunk (content of current ararta-
> slide/webdavclient/commandline)
> >> /connector
> >> /branches
> >> /tags
> >> /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/webdavclient/connector)
> >> /src
> >> /example
> >> /conf (content of current jararta-
> slide/webdavclient/etc/conf)
> >>
> >> /wck
> >> /branches
> >> /tags
> >> /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/wck)
> >> /projector
> >> /branches
> >> /tags
> >> /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/projector)
> >> /testsuite
> >> /branches
> >> /tags
> >> /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/testsuite)
> >> /proposals
> >> /branches
> >> /tags
> >> /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/proposals)
> >> /indexing
> >> /jcrri
> >> /taglib
> >> /tamino
> >> /wvcm
> >>
> >>3. Get this working with ant and/or migrate to maven as build tool
> >>
> >>Anyone working on this topic? I could help to get this done if
> appreciated.
> >>
> >>Should we start a vote on this?
> >>
> >>Cheers,
> >>Daniel
> >>
> >>
> >>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: slide-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> >>For additional commands, e-mail: slide-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: slide-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: slide-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: slide-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: slide-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: slide-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: slide-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: SVN migration
Posted by Stefan Lützkendorf <lu...@apache.org>.
Yes we should have a vote about this.
I like the idea to maintain the current structure in svn in the first step.
But then we should choose the inital structure tha we want to create in svn.
Quite ugly would be :
/jakarta
/slide
/old-branches (contains branches reflecting the old structure)
/old-tags (contains tags reflecting the old structure)
/old-trunk
Any better ideas?
Cheers, Stefan
James Mason wrote:
> I think Stefan volunteered to do the migration, but I probably scared
> him off with all my nitpicking about the structure :).
>
> I don't see a vote thread (and I don't remember one, but that's no
> guarantee), so calling a vote seems like a good idea.
>
> -James
>
> On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 13:00 +0100, Daniel Florey wrote:
>
>>Hi folks,
>>Any news regarding the SVN-migration? Did we already decide to go for it?
>>As far as I remember we wanted to
>>1. Move the existing repository structure to subversion trying to keep the
>>file history (using cvs2svn).
>>2. Restructure the repository layout so that it look somehow like this:
>>
>>/jakarta
>> /slide
>> /server
>> /branches
>> /tags
>> /trunk
>> /src (content of current jararta-slide/src)
>> /docs (content of current jararta-slide/docs)
>> /lib (content of current jararta-slide/lib)
>> (the other directories go to other locations)
>>
>> /clientlib
>> /branches
>> /tags
>> /trunk (partial content of current
>> jararta-slide/webdavclient/clientlib)
>> files in current jararta-slide/webdavclient/clientlib
>> /src (content of current jararta-slide/webdavclient/src)
>> /lib (content of current jararta-slide/webdavclient/lib)
>> /ant
>> /branches
>> /tags
>> /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/webdavclient/ant)
>> /commandline
>> /branches
>> /tags
>> /trunk (content of current ararta-slide/webdavclient/commandline)
>> /connector
>> /branches
>> /tags
>> /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/webdavclient/connector)
>> /src
>> /example
>> /conf (content of current jararta-slide/webdavclient/etc/conf)
>>
>> /wck
>> /branches
>> /tags
>> /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/wck)
>> /projector
>> /branches
>> /tags
>> /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/projector)
>> /testsuite
>> /branches
>> /tags
>> /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/testsuite)
>> /proposals
>> /branches
>> /tags
>> /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/proposals)
>> /indexing
>> /jcrri
>> /taglib
>> /tamino
>> /wvcm
>>
>>3. Get this working with ant and/or migrate to maven as build tool
>>
>>Anyone working on this topic? I could help to get this done if appreciated.
>>
>>Should we start a vote on this?
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Daniel
>>
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: slide-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>>For additional commands, e-mail: slide-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: slide-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: slide-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: slide-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: slide-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: SVN migration
Posted by James Mason <ma...@apache.org>.
I think Stefan volunteered to do the migration, but I probably scared
him off with all my nitpicking about the structure :).
I don't see a vote thread (and I don't remember one, but that's no
guarantee), so calling a vote seems like a good idea.
-James
On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 13:00 +0100, Daniel Florey wrote:
> Hi folks,
> Any news regarding the SVN-migration? Did we already decide to go for it?
> As far as I remember we wanted to
> 1. Move the existing repository structure to subversion trying to keep the
> file history (using cvs2svn).
> 2. Restructure the repository layout so that it look somehow like this:
>
> /jakarta
> /slide
> /server
> /branches
> /tags
> /trunk
> /src (content of current jararta-slide/src)
> /docs (content of current jararta-slide/docs)
> /lib (content of current jararta-slide/lib)
> (the other directories go to other locations)
>
> /clientlib
> /branches
> /tags
> /trunk (partial content of current
> jararta-slide/webdavclient/clientlib)
> files in current jararta-slide/webdavclient/clientlib
> /src (content of current jararta-slide/webdavclient/src)
> /lib (content of current jararta-slide/webdavclient/lib)
> /ant
> /branches
> /tags
> /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/webdavclient/ant)
> /commandline
> /branches
> /tags
> /trunk (content of current ararta-slide/webdavclient/commandline)
> /connector
> /branches
> /tags
> /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/webdavclient/connector)
> /src
> /example
> /conf (content of current jararta-slide/webdavclient/etc/conf)
>
> /wck
> /branches
> /tags
> /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/wck)
> /projector
> /branches
> /tags
> /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/projector)
> /testsuite
> /branches
> /tags
> /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/testsuite)
> /proposals
> /branches
> /tags
> /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/proposals)
> /indexing
> /jcrri
> /taglib
> /tamino
> /wvcm
>
> 3. Get this working with ant and/or migrate to maven as build tool
>
> Anyone working on this topic? I could help to get this done if appreciated.
>
> Should we start a vote on this?
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: slide-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: slide-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: slide-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: slide-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org