[Lucene.Net] [jira] Commented: (LUCENENET-380) Evaluate Sharpen as a port tool

["Alex Thompson (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13001475#comment-13001475 ] 

Alex Thompson commented on LUCENENET-380:
-----------------------------------------

So db4o did get back to me. They would need typical things like contribution agreements and full review control. You can see the response here:
http://developer.db4o.com/Forums/tabid/98/aft/10503/Default.aspx

I'm kinda leaning towards a fork but what does everyone think about their constraints?


> Evaluate Sharpen as a port tool
> -------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENENET-380
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-380
>             Project: Lucene.Net
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Build Automation, Lucene.Net Contrib, Lucene.Net Core, Lucene.Net Demo, Lucene.Net Test
>            Reporter: George Aroush
>            Assignee: Alex Thompson
>         Attachments: 3.0.2_JavaToCSharpConverter_AfterPostProcessing.zip, 3.0.2_JavaToCSharpConverter_NoPostProcessing.zip, IndexWriter.java, Lucene.Net.3_0_3_Sharpen20110106.zip, Lucene.Net.Sharpen20101104.zip, Lucene.Net.Sharpen20101114.zip, NIOFSDirectory.java, QueryParser.java, TestBufferedIndexInput.java, TestDateFilter.java
>
>
> This task is to evaluate Sharpen as a port tool for Lucene.Net.
> The files to be evaluated are attached.  We need to run those files (which are off Java Lucene 2.9.2) against Sharpen and compare the result against JLCA result.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira