You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@fineract.apache.org by "Michael Vorburger (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/06/07 11:12:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (FINERACT-1018) Updated more project dependencies

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-1018?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17127596#comment-17127596 ] 

Michael Vorburger commented on FINERACT-1018:
---------------------------------------------

I've looked over [https://github.com/apache/fineract/pull/977/files] again, here's the order of priority in which I would attempt upgrades:
 # commons-io: 1.3.2 is *REALLY* old (ancient) - current is 2.7. [~kaze] (or perhaps [~natashan] ?) IMHO it would be good to do at least that one rather sooner than later... I would consider this (only) blocking a 1.4.0 release
 # Junit yeah IMHO it would be nice to go from 4 to 5 (Jupiter). As far as I know, this normally should be relatively painless?
 # ehcache: 2.10.6 to current 3.8.1 could be "nice" (but not release blocking - depends on effort)

Would you perhaps like to split this 3 up into 3 separate issues, which can be independently schedule?

> Updated more project dependencies
> ---------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FINERACT-1018
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-1018
>             Project: Apache Fineract
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 1.4.0
>            Reporter: Yemdjih Kaze Nasser
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 1.4.0
>
>
> Working on FINERACT-1002, I noticed most the dependencies which were set to + were using deprecated artifactory. I think they were pretty harmless since there were not going to be updated any more. Next thing to do is to update the artifactory and move to the latest versions on the now migrated artifactory for:
> org.apache.commons:commons-io
> net.sf.ehcache:ehcache
> junit:junit(Now I'm not sure if its a good idea to move to junit-jupiter, maybe we should discuss more on that)
>  
> FYI: @nnatarajan, [~vorburger]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)