You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@ratis.apache.org by "Sandeep Nemuri (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/06/07 18:28:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (RATIS-249) Create separated LICENSE AND NOTICE
files for binary and source releases
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16505052#comment-16505052 ]
Sandeep Nemuri commented on RATIS-249:
--------------------------------------
[~elek], Need some inputs on this Jira.
> Create separated LICENSE AND NOTICE files for binary and source releases
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: RATIS-249
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-249
> Project: Ratis
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Elek, Marton
> Assignee: Sandeep Nemuri
> Priority: Blocker
>
> Thanks to [~jmclean] who reported this problem during the 0.2.0 rc1 vote.
> From the mail:
> {quote}It likely that your convenience binary will need a different LICENSE and NOTICE{quote}
> From the [licensing howto|https://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#binary]:
> {quote}As a result, the LICENSE and NOTICE files for a binary distribution may well differ from those in the source distribution it was built from.
> In any case, the principle remains the same: LICENSE and NOTICE must exactly represent the contents of the distribution they reside in.
> {quote}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)