You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@wicket.apache.org by Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> on 2012/08/23 23:13:28 UTC
[VOTE] Release Wicket 6.0.0 final
No fuzz, no separate RC releases. This is the real deal.
Please vote for releasing the following source artifacts after
checking them thoroughly for any misgivings:
- tag: wicket-6.0.0
- release branch: builds/wicket-6.0.0
- artifacts:
- apache-wicket-6.0.0.tar.gz
- apache-wicket-6.0.0.zip
They can be found at my p.a.o place:
http://people.apache.org/~dashorst/wicket-6.0.0
I have uploaded the signatures and hashes as well. I also signed the
release tag (wicket-6.0.0). Probably you can sign the tag as well if
you find the release to be OK (I haven't done such a thing myself, so
you need to look it up somewhere—Emond?)
[ ] +1 release Apache Wicket 6.0.0
[ ] -1 don't release Apache Wicket 6.0.0
This vote lasts for 4 days, due to the weekend coming up. I'll tally
tuesday morning CET.
Martijn
Re: [VOTE] Release Wicket 6.0.0 final
Posted by Pedro Santos <pe...@gmail.com>.
+1
Pedro Santos
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com>wrote:
> +1
>
> -igor
>
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Martijn Dashorst
> <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > No fuzz, no separate RC releases. This is the real deal.
> >
> > Please vote for releasing the following source artifacts after
> > checking them thoroughly for any misgivings:
> >
> > - tag: wicket-6.0.0
> > - release branch: builds/wicket-6.0.0
> > - artifacts:
> > - apache-wicket-6.0.0.tar.gz
> > - apache-wicket-6.0.0.zip
> >
> > They can be found at my p.a.o place:
> > http://people.apache.org/~dashorst/wicket-6.0.0
> >
> > I have uploaded the signatures and hashes as well. I also signed the
> > release tag (wicket-6.0.0). Probably you can sign the tag as well if
> > you find the release to be OK (I haven't done such a thing myself, so
> > you need to look it up somewhere—Emond?)
> >
> > [ ] +1 release Apache Wicket 6.0.0
> > [ ] -1 don't release Apache Wicket 6.0.0
> >
> > This vote lasts for 4 days, due to the weekend coming up. I'll tally
> > tuesday morning CET.
> >
> > Martijn
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Wicket 6.0.0 final
Posted by Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com>.
+1
-igor
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Martijn Dashorst
<ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> No fuzz, no separate RC releases. This is the real deal.
>
> Please vote for releasing the following source artifacts after
> checking them thoroughly for any misgivings:
>
> - tag: wicket-6.0.0
> - release branch: builds/wicket-6.0.0
> - artifacts:
> - apache-wicket-6.0.0.tar.gz
> - apache-wicket-6.0.0.zip
>
> They can be found at my p.a.o place:
> http://people.apache.org/~dashorst/wicket-6.0.0
>
> I have uploaded the signatures and hashes as well. I also signed the
> release tag (wicket-6.0.0). Probably you can sign the tag as well if
> you find the release to be OK (I haven't done such a thing myself, so
> you need to look it up somewhere—Emond?)
>
> [ ] +1 release Apache Wicket 6.0.0
> [ ] -1 don't release Apache Wicket 6.0.0
>
> This vote lasts for 4 days, due to the weekend coming up. I'll tally
> tuesday morning CET.
>
> Martijn
Re: [VOTE] Release Wicket 6.0.0 final
Posted by Sebastien <se...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Martijn Dashorst <
martijn.dashorst@gmail.com> wrote:
> No fuzz, no separate RC releases. This is the real deal.
>
> Please vote for releasing the following source artifacts after
> checking them thoroughly for any misgivings:
>
> - tag: wicket-6.0.0
> - release branch: builds/wicket-6.0.0
> - artifacts:
> - apache-wicket-6.0.0.tar.gz
> - apache-wicket-6.0.0.zip
>
> They can be found at my p.a.o place:
> http://people.apache.org/~dashorst/wicket-6.0.0
>
> I have uploaded the signatures and hashes as well. I also signed the
> release tag (wicket-6.0.0). Probably you can sign the tag as well if
> you find the release to be OK (I haven't done such a thing myself, so
> you need to look it up somewhere—Emond?)
>
> [ ] +1 release Apache Wicket 6.0.0
> [ ] -1 don't release Apache Wicket 6.0.0
>
> This vote lasts for 4 days, due to the weekend coming up. I'll tally
> tuesday morning CET.
>
> Martijn
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Wicket 6.0.0 final
Posted by Peter Ertl <pe...@gmx.org>.
+1
Am 27.08.2012 um 11:27 schrieb Emond Papegaaij:
> +1
>
> Checked:
> - tag (with signing)
> - zip contents and build
> - selenium tests for a large application
>
> Emond
>
> On Thursday 23 August 2012 23:13:28 Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>> No fuzz, no separate RC releases. This is the real deal.
>>
>> Please vote for releasing the following source artifacts after
>> checking them thoroughly for any misgivings:
>>
>> - tag: wicket-6.0.0
>> - release branch: builds/wicket-6.0.0
>> - artifacts:
>> - apache-wicket-6.0.0.tar.gz
>> - apache-wicket-6.0.0.zip
>>
>> They can be found at my p.a.o place:
>> http://people.apache.org/~dashorst/wicket-6.0.0
>>
>> I have uploaded the signatures and hashes as well. I also signed the
>> release tag (wicket-6.0.0). Probably you can sign the tag as well if
>> you find the release to be OK (I haven't done such a thing myself, so
>> you need to look it up somewhere—Emond?)
>>
>> [ ] +1 release Apache Wicket 6.0.0
>> [ ] -1 don't release Apache Wicket 6.0.0
>>
>> This vote lasts for 4 days, due to the weekend coming up. I'll tally
>> tuesday morning CET.
>>
>> Martijn
Re: [VOTE] Release Wicket 6.0.0 final
Posted by Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>.
Hi Diego,
Any help is welcome. I wasn't able to find a solution.
You may try with https://github.com/ivaynberg/wicket-select2. It is
much better than the autocompleter in wicket-extenstions.
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Diego Fincatto
<di...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4705?
> We have about 10 wicket applications, including an ecommerce website
> running wicket, but we use the autocomplete a lot.
>
> Thanks
>
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Carl-Eric Menzel
> <cm...@wicketbuch.de> wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> I don't have anything major with 6.0 yet so I gave my training
>> application a quick&dirty port to 6.0 from 1.5. Everything seems to
>> work fine after a few adjustments.
>>
>> On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 11:27:10 +0200
>> Emond Papegaaij <em...@topicus.nl> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Checked:
>>> - tag (with signing)
>>> - zip contents and build
>>> - selenium tests for a large application
>>>
>>> Emond
>>>
>>> On Thursday 23 August 2012 23:13:28 Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>>> > No fuzz, no separate RC releases. This is the real deal.
>>> >
>>> > Please vote for releasing the following source artifacts after
>>> > checking them thoroughly for any misgivings:
>>> >
>>> > - tag: wicket-6.0.0
>>> > - release branch: builds/wicket-6.0.0
>>> > - artifacts:
>>> > - apache-wicket-6.0.0.tar.gz
>>> > - apache-wicket-6.0.0.zip
>>> >
>>> > They can be found at my p.a.o place:
>>> > http://people.apache.org/~dashorst/wicket-6.0.0
>>> >
>>> > I have uploaded the signatures and hashes as well. I also signed the
>>> > release tag (wicket-6.0.0). Probably you can sign the tag as well if
>>> > you find the release to be OK (I haven't done such a thing myself,
>>> > so you need to look it up somewhere—Emond?)
>>> >
>>> > [ ] +1 release Apache Wicket 6.0.0
>>> > [ ] -1 don't release Apache Wicket 6.0.0
>>> >
>>> > This vote lasts for 4 days, due to the weekend coming up. I'll tally
>>> > tuesday morning CET.
>>> >
>>> > Martijn
>>
--
Martin Grigorov
jWeekend
Training, Consulting, Development
http://jWeekend.com
Re: [VOTE] Release Wicket 6.0.0 final
Posted by Diego Fincatto <di...@gmail.com>.
What about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4705?
We have about 10 wicket applications, including an ecommerce website
running wicket, but we use the autocomplete a lot.
Thanks
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Carl-Eric Menzel
<cm...@wicketbuch.de> wrote:
> +1
>
> I don't have anything major with 6.0 yet so I gave my training
> application a quick&dirty port to 6.0 from 1.5. Everything seems to
> work fine after a few adjustments.
>
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 11:27:10 +0200
> Emond Papegaaij <em...@topicus.nl> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Checked:
>> - tag (with signing)
>> - zip contents and build
>> - selenium tests for a large application
>>
>> Emond
>>
>> On Thursday 23 August 2012 23:13:28 Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>> > No fuzz, no separate RC releases. This is the real deal.
>> >
>> > Please vote for releasing the following source artifacts after
>> > checking them thoroughly for any misgivings:
>> >
>> > - tag: wicket-6.0.0
>> > - release branch: builds/wicket-6.0.0
>> > - artifacts:
>> > - apache-wicket-6.0.0.tar.gz
>> > - apache-wicket-6.0.0.zip
>> >
>> > They can be found at my p.a.o place:
>> > http://people.apache.org/~dashorst/wicket-6.0.0
>> >
>> > I have uploaded the signatures and hashes as well. I also signed the
>> > release tag (wicket-6.0.0). Probably you can sign the tag as well if
>> > you find the release to be OK (I haven't done such a thing myself,
>> > so you need to look it up somewhere—Emond?)
>> >
>> > [ ] +1 release Apache Wicket 6.0.0
>> > [ ] -1 don't release Apache Wicket 6.0.0
>> >
>> > This vote lasts for 4 days, due to the weekend coming up. I'll tally
>> > tuesday morning CET.
>> >
>> > Martijn
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Wicket 6.0.0 final
Posted by Carl-Eric Menzel <cm...@wicketbuch.de>.
+1
I don't have anything major with 6.0 yet so I gave my training
application a quick&dirty port to 6.0 from 1.5. Everything seems to
work fine after a few adjustments.
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 11:27:10 +0200
Emond Papegaaij <em...@topicus.nl> wrote:
> +1
>
> Checked:
> - tag (with signing)
> - zip contents and build
> - selenium tests for a large application
>
> Emond
>
> On Thursday 23 August 2012 23:13:28 Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> > No fuzz, no separate RC releases. This is the real deal.
> >
> > Please vote for releasing the following source artifacts after
> > checking them thoroughly for any misgivings:
> >
> > - tag: wicket-6.0.0
> > - release branch: builds/wicket-6.0.0
> > - artifacts:
> > - apache-wicket-6.0.0.tar.gz
> > - apache-wicket-6.0.0.zip
> >
> > They can be found at my p.a.o place:
> > http://people.apache.org/~dashorst/wicket-6.0.0
> >
> > I have uploaded the signatures and hashes as well. I also signed the
> > release tag (wicket-6.0.0). Probably you can sign the tag as well if
> > you find the release to be OK (I haven't done such a thing myself,
> > so you need to look it up somewhere—Emond?)
> >
> > [ ] +1 release Apache Wicket 6.0.0
> > [ ] -1 don't release Apache Wicket 6.0.0
> >
> > This vote lasts for 4 days, due to the weekend coming up. I'll tally
> > tuesday morning CET.
> >
> > Martijn
Re: [VOTE] Release Wicket 6.0.0 final
Posted by Emond Papegaaij <em...@topicus.nl>.
+1
Checked:
- tag (with signing)
- zip contents and build
- selenium tests for a large application
Emond
On Thursday 23 August 2012 23:13:28 Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> No fuzz, no separate RC releases. This is the real deal.
>
> Please vote for releasing the following source artifacts after
> checking them thoroughly for any misgivings:
>
> - tag: wicket-6.0.0
> - release branch: builds/wicket-6.0.0
> - artifacts:
> - apache-wicket-6.0.0.tar.gz
> - apache-wicket-6.0.0.zip
>
> They can be found at my p.a.o place:
> http://people.apache.org/~dashorst/wicket-6.0.0
>
> I have uploaded the signatures and hashes as well. I also signed the
> release tag (wicket-6.0.0). Probably you can sign the tag as well if
> you find the release to be OK (I haven't done such a thing myself, so
> you need to look it up somewhere—Emond?)
>
> [ ] +1 release Apache Wicket 6.0.0
> [ ] -1 don't release Apache Wicket 6.0.0
>
> This vote lasts for 4 days, due to the weekend coming up. I'll tally
> tuesday morning CET.
>
> Martijn
Re: [VOTE] Release Wicket 6.0.0 final
Posted by Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>.
This vote passes with 8 binding +1's and 1 non-binding +1, no other votes
were cast.
I'll start preparing the mirrors and maven central. The announcement might
have to wait for a PR campaign.
Martijn
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Martijn Dashorst <
martijn.dashorst@gmail.com> wrote:
> No fuzz, no separate RC releases. This is the real deal.
>
> Please vote for releasing the following source artifacts after
> checking them thoroughly for any misgivings:
>
> - tag: wicket-6.0.0
> - release branch: builds/wicket-6.0.0
> - artifacts:
> - apache-wicket-6.0.0.tar.gz
> - apache-wicket-6.0.0.zip
>
> They can be found at my p.a.o place:
> http://people.apache.org/~dashorst/wicket-6.0.0
>
> I have uploaded the signatures and hashes as well. I also signed the
> release tag (wicket-6.0.0). Probably you can sign the tag as well if
> you find the release to be OK (I haven't done such a thing myself, so
> you need to look it up somewhere—Emond?)
>
> [ ] +1 release Apache Wicket 6.0.0
> [ ] -1 don't release Apache Wicket 6.0.0
>
> This vote lasts for 4 days, due to the weekend coming up. I'll tally
> tuesday morning CET.
>
> Martijn
>
--
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
Re: [VOTE] Release Wicket 6.0.0 final
Posted by Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>.
+1 from me. I've tested the quickstart, examples and re-building the
artifacts (zip and tar ball).
Martijn
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Martijn Dashorst
<ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> No fuzz, no separate RC releases. This is the real deal.
>
> Please vote for releasing the following source artifacts after
> checking them thoroughly for any misgivings:
>
> - tag: wicket-6.0.0
> - release branch: builds/wicket-6.0.0
> - artifacts:
> - apache-wicket-6.0.0.tar.gz
> - apache-wicket-6.0.0.zip
>
> They can be found at my p.a.o place:
> http://people.apache.org/~dashorst/wicket-6.0.0
>
> I have uploaded the signatures and hashes as well. I also signed the
> release tag (wicket-6.0.0). Probably you can sign the tag as well if
> you find the release to be OK (I haven't done such a thing myself, so
> you need to look it up somewhere—Emond?)
>
> [ ] +1 release Apache Wicket 6.0.0
> [ ] -1 don't release Apache Wicket 6.0.0
>
> This vote lasts for 4 days, due to the weekend coming up. I'll tally
> tuesday morning CET.
>
> Martijn
--
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
Re: [VOTE] Release Wicket 6.0.0 final
Posted by Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>.
+1 to release
tested :
- pgp signature verification for the tar.gz file
- build a quickstart from the locally installed archetype
- random examples (the old ones)
- relatively big application
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net> wrote:
> +1 release
>
> Sven
>
>
> On 08/23/2012 11:13 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>>
>> No fuzz, no separate RC releases. This is the real deal.
>>
>> Please vote for releasing the following source artifacts after
>> checking them thoroughly for any misgivings:
>>
>> - tag: wicket-6.0.0
>> - release branch: builds/wicket-6.0.0
>> - artifacts:
>> - apache-wicket-6.0.0.tar.gz
>> - apache-wicket-6.0.0.zip
>>
>> They can be found at my p.a.o place:
>> http://people.apache.org/~dashorst/wicket-6.0.0
>>
>> I have uploaded the signatures and hashes as well. I also signed the
>> release tag (wicket-6.0.0). Probably you can sign the tag as well if
>> you find the release to be OK (I haven't done such a thing myself, so
>> you need to look it up somewhere—Emond?)
>>
>> [ ] +1 release Apache Wicket 6.0.0
>> [ ] -1 don't release Apache Wicket 6.0.0
>>
>> This vote lasts for 4 days, due to the weekend coming up. I'll tally
>> tuesday morning CET.
>>
>> Martijn
>
>
--
Martin Grigorov
jWeekend
Training, Consulting, Development
http://jWeekend.com
Re: [VOTE] Release Wicket 6.0.0 final
Posted by Sven Meier <sv...@meiers.net>.
+1 release
Sven
On 08/23/2012 11:13 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> No fuzz, no separate RC releases. This is the real deal.
>
> Please vote for releasing the following source artifacts after
> checking them thoroughly for any misgivings:
>
> - tag: wicket-6.0.0
> - release branch: builds/wicket-6.0.0
> - artifacts:
> - apache-wicket-6.0.0.tar.gz
> - apache-wicket-6.0.0.zip
>
> They can be found at my p.a.o place:
> http://people.apache.org/~dashorst/wicket-6.0.0
>
> I have uploaded the signatures and hashes as well. I also signed the
> release tag (wicket-6.0.0). Probably you can sign the tag as well if
> you find the release to be OK (I haven't done such a thing myself, so
> you need to look it up somewhere—Emond?)
>
> [ ] +1 release Apache Wicket 6.0.0
> [ ] -1 don't release Apache Wicket 6.0.0
>
> This vote lasts for 4 days, due to the weekend coming up. I'll tally
> tuesday morning CET.
>
> Martijn