Re: Tomcat vs. Resin

[Brill Pappin <br...@jmonkey.com>]

interesting specs...
Did you use the built in Tomcat HTTP server, or Apache?

Personally, I'm finding the built in server a little slow to respond... but
I'd suggest that its because it just hasn't been optimized in any way.

- Brill

----- Original Message -----
From: Griggs, James <gr...@netgenshopper.com>
To: <to...@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2000 3:37 PM
Subject: Tomcat vs. Resin


> I ran an informal test for 9 hours last night on a Win98 PC comparing the
> latest tomcat(apache.org) code and the latest resin
> (caucho.com) both using Suns JDK 1.2.  I used 2 instances of socrates to
> simulate 100 users requesting a hello.jsp file at random intervals.
> Tomcat and Resin were running at the same time on different ports.
>
> Result: Tomcat: Resin:
> Total Requests Handled 26094 6546375
> Total Requests Dropped 4691 0
> Requests per Second .1 195
> Average Latency 98.17 .15
>
> I'm assuming the dramatic difference in requests handled is due to a 60
> second timeout on dropped requests.
>
> I'm wondering if anyone can explain the dramatic difference in the
results?
> Am I doing something wrong here to cripple Tomcat?  (... and since I know
> the question will be asked: I have no affiliation with Caucho ;o)
>
> Jim Griggs
> jim@netgenShopper.com
>