[jira] [Comment Edited] (MINIFI-326) Explore a different logger library

["marco polo (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFI-326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16031689#comment-16031689 ] 

marco polo edited comment on MINIFI-326 at 5/31/17 6:54 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------

preliminary testing shows great promise for nanolog so far. Some minifi specific logging structs were removed that have to be re-added, but this can be done in the scope of MINIFI-326. 


was (Author: phrocker):
preliminary testing shows great promise for nanolog so far.

> Explore a different logger library
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MINIFI-326
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFI-326
>             Project: Apache NiFi MiNiFi
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: marco polo
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: cpp-0.3.0
>
>
> When testing a PR I replaced spdlog with https://github.com/Iyengar111/NanoLog and g3log. The latter had consistent performance whereas spdlog had large variance. NanoLog seemed faster with my test case, but has other trade offs. We should explore dropping in a different logger since I've seen logging be 1-2% of cpu cycles, which is excessive for my test cases. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)