You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@servicemix.apache.org by Brian Taylor <br...@briantaylor.us> on 2010/03/04 19:00:36 UTC
ServiceMix CXF BC 2009.01: CXF Version
Hello,
What version of CXF is the CXF BC 2009.01 component using? I believe we need
to specify this in the pom.xml when building the SUs for both SE and BC, no?
Brian
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/ServiceMix-CXF-BC-2009.01%3A-CXF-Version-tp27784344p27784344.html
Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: ServiceMix CXF BC 2009.01: CXF Version
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi Brian,
ServiceMix components 2009.02 (which uses CXF 2.2.5) are not included in
any ServiceMix releases. However, you can install on ServiceMix 3.3.1
without problem.
Concerning ServiceMix components 2010.01 (which uses CXF 2.2.6), it's
not yet released. I plan to release it tomorrow evening.
It will be included in ServiceMix 3.3.2 and ServiceMix 4.2.
Regards
JB
Brian Taylor wrote:
> Thx JB,
>
> Does the 2010.01 version come with a version of ServiceMix?
>
>
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>> Hi Brian,
>>
>> servicemix-cxf-bc 2009.01 uses CXF 2.1.4.
>> You don't need to expicitly define it in your POM as it's transitively
>> provided by servicemix-cxf-bc pom.
>>
>> FYI, servicemix-cxf-bc 2010.01 uses CXF 2.2.6.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> Brian Taylor wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> What version of CXF is the CXF BC 2009.01 component using? I believe we
>>> need
>>> to specify this in the pom.xml when building the SUs for both SE and BC,
>>> no?
>>>
>>> Brian
>>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré (Nanthrax)
BuildProcess/AutoDeploy Project Leader
http://buildprocess.sourceforge.net
jb@nanthrax.net
PGP : 17D4F086
Re: ServiceMix CXF BC 2009.01: CXF Version
Posted by Brian Taylor <br...@briantaylor.us>.
Thx JB,
Does the 2010.01 version come with a version of ServiceMix?
Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi Brian,
>
> servicemix-cxf-bc 2009.01 uses CXF 2.1.4.
> You don't need to expicitly define it in your POM as it's transitively
> provided by servicemix-cxf-bc pom.
>
> FYI, servicemix-cxf-bc 2010.01 uses CXF 2.2.6.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> Brian Taylor wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> What version of CXF is the CXF BC 2009.01 component using? I believe we
>> need
>> to specify this in the pom.xml when building the SUs for both SE and BC,
>> no?
>>
>> Brian
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/ServiceMix-CXF-BC-2009.01%3A-CXF-Version-tp27784344p27784505.html
Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: ServiceMix CXF BC 2009.01: CXF Version
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi Brian,
servicemix-cxf-bc 2009.01 uses CXF 2.1.4.
You don't need to expicitly define it in your POM as it's transitively
provided by servicemix-cxf-bc pom.
FYI, servicemix-cxf-bc 2010.01 uses CXF 2.2.6.
Regards
JB
Brian Taylor wrote:
> Hello,
>
> What version of CXF is the CXF BC 2009.01 component using? I believe we need
> to specify this in the pom.xml when building the SUs for both SE and BC, no?
>
> Brian