You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@struts.apache.org by Wendy Smoak <ja...@wendysmoak.com> on 2005/10/03 21:42:21 UTC
Re: 1.3.0 Release - Next Steps
The usual Monday update. :)
The tiles-documentation webapp now builds and (mostly) works, but it's not
included in the overall 'build-all' goal. Right now it lives in
tiles/tiles-documentation, and I don't immediately see how to get Maven to
build it as part of Tiles.
There's a similar situation (a jar plus a webapp) in EL, but that's not done
quite right either-- there you have to convince Maven to include a second
directory of source code, which it doesn't like to do. Both Tiles and EL
probably need to be reorganized to work better with Maven.
The Cactus tests for EL still need attention. I'll open a bug ticket for it
in a few days.
--
Wendy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: 1.3.0 Release - Next Steps
Posted by Ted Husted <te...@gmail.com>.
There is still more to do with the Core documention for Building
Components and Configuration Applications sections. We tweaked the
product names, but I don't know that the background text is still in
synch with the new distribution paradigm. I do know that the Request
Processor section still refers to the 1.2.x version.
Site seems OK ow, and after Core, next in line would be Taglibs. The
developer guides are already over there, but they need to be reviewed,
and we could also use a better introduction page. There's a copy of
the original "Building_View" page there. We need to scavage from that
the sectiosn that do not already appear in the Core version.
-Ted.
On 10/5/05, Christian Meder <ch...@absolutegiganten.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 07:50 -0400, Ted Husted wrote:
> > Thanks, Wendy.
> >
> > I've had to spend some of my volunteer hours elsewhere lately, but
> > things should be getting back on track for me now. I'm planning to
> > work on the Applications/MailReader project next, and then get back to
> > the Core documentation.
>
> Hi Ted,
>
> I'm willing to spend some cycles helping out with the todos. Now just to
> avoid duplicated efforts: Which todo should I have a look at ?
>
>
> Christian
> >
> > We've always had troubles with the tiles-documentation webapp.
> > Overall, I would suggest that we
> >
> > * Make the MailReader a true best-practices application, including the
> > use of Tiles.
> > * Add the Struts Cookbook.
> > * See if we can move some of the content of tiles-documentation into
> > the Cookbook.
> > * Also see if the struts-examples content can be moved to the
> > cookbook, so that maybe we can get the webapps down to blank,
> > cookbook, exercises, and mailreader. (Plus whatever Shale and
> > standalone Tiles want to do.)
> >
> > If in the meantime, we want to consider moving tiles-documentation
> > into the sandbox, until it can be repaired, refactored, or disbursed
> > into other applications.
> >
> > I haven't looked at EL, but it might be the same situation:
> > Programming examples that we are trying to carry in a solo app might
> > be better handled by the Cookbook.
> >
> > -Ted.
> >
> > On 10/3/05, Wendy Smoak <ja...@wendysmoak.com> wrote:
> > > The usual Monday update. :)
> > >
> > > The tiles-documentation webapp now builds and (mostly) works, but it's not
> > > included in the overall 'build-all' goal. Right now it lives in
> > > tiles/tiles-documentation, and I don't immediately see how to get Maven to
> > > build it as part of Tiles.
> > >
> > > There's a similar situation (a jar plus a webapp) in EL, but that's not done
> > > quite right either-- there you have to convince Maven to include a second
> > > directory of source code, which it doesn't like to do. Both Tiles and EL
> > > probably need to be reorganized to work better with Maven.
> > >
> > > The Cactus tests for EL still need attention. I'll open a bug ticket for it
> > > in a few days.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Wendy
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >
> --
> Christian Meder, email: chris@absolutegiganten.org
>
> The Way-Seeking Mind of a tenzo is actualized
> by rolling up your sleeves.
>
> (Eihei Dogen Zenji)
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
--
HTH, Ted.
http://www.husted.com/poe/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: 1.3.0 Release - Next Steps
Posted by Christian Meder <ch...@absolutegiganten.org>.
On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 07:50 -0400, Ted Husted wrote:
> Thanks, Wendy.
>
> I've had to spend some of my volunteer hours elsewhere lately, but
> things should be getting back on track for me now. I'm planning to
> work on the Applications/MailReader project next, and then get back to
> the Core documentation.
Hi Ted,
I'm willing to spend some cycles helping out with the todos. Now just to
avoid duplicated efforts: Which todo should I have a look at ?
Christian
>
> We've always had troubles with the tiles-documentation webapp.
> Overall, I would suggest that we
>
> * Make the MailReader a true best-practices application, including the
> use of Tiles.
> * Add the Struts Cookbook.
> * See if we can move some of the content of tiles-documentation into
> the Cookbook.
> * Also see if the struts-examples content can be moved to the
> cookbook, so that maybe we can get the webapps down to blank,
> cookbook, exercises, and mailreader. (Plus whatever Shale and
> standalone Tiles want to do.)
>
> If in the meantime, we want to consider moving tiles-documentation
> into the sandbox, until it can be repaired, refactored, or disbursed
> into other applications.
>
> I haven't looked at EL, but it might be the same situation:
> Programming examples that we are trying to carry in a solo app might
> be better handled by the Cookbook.
>
> -Ted.
>
> On 10/3/05, Wendy Smoak <ja...@wendysmoak.com> wrote:
> > The usual Monday update. :)
> >
> > The tiles-documentation webapp now builds and (mostly) works, but it's not
> > included in the overall 'build-all' goal. Right now it lives in
> > tiles/tiles-documentation, and I don't immediately see how to get Maven to
> > build it as part of Tiles.
> >
> > There's a similar situation (a jar plus a webapp) in EL, but that's not done
> > quite right either-- there you have to convince Maven to include a second
> > directory of source code, which it doesn't like to do. Both Tiles and EL
> > probably need to be reorganized to work better with Maven.
> >
> > The Cactus tests for EL still need attention. I'll open a bug ticket for it
> > in a few days.
> >
> > --
> > Wendy
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
--
Christian Meder, email: chris@absolutegiganten.org
The Way-Seeking Mind of a tenzo is actualized
by rolling up your sleeves.
(Eihei Dogen Zenji)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: 1.3.0 Release - Next Steps
Posted by Ted Husted <te...@gmail.com>.
Thanks, Wendy.
I've had to spend some of my volunteer hours elsewhere lately, but
things should be getting back on track for me now. I'm planning to
work on the Applications/MailReader project next, and then get back to
the Core documentation.
We've always had troubles with the tiles-documentation webapp.
Overall, I would suggest that we
* Make the MailReader a true best-practices application, including the
use of Tiles.
* Add the Struts Cookbook.
* See if we can move some of the content of tiles-documentation into
the Cookbook.
* Also see if the struts-examples content can be moved to the
cookbook, so that maybe we can get the webapps down to blank,
cookbook, exercises, and mailreader. (Plus whatever Shale and
standalone Tiles want to do.)
If in the meantime, we want to consider moving tiles-documentation
into the sandbox, until it can be repaired, refactored, or disbursed
into other applications.
I haven't looked at EL, but it might be the same situation:
Programming examples that we are trying to carry in a solo app might
be better handled by the Cookbook.
-Ted.
On 10/3/05, Wendy Smoak <ja...@wendysmoak.com> wrote:
> The usual Monday update. :)
>
> The tiles-documentation webapp now builds and (mostly) works, but it's not
> included in the overall 'build-all' goal. Right now it lives in
> tiles/tiles-documentation, and I don't immediately see how to get Maven to
> build it as part of Tiles.
>
> There's a similar situation (a jar plus a webapp) in EL, but that's not done
> quite right either-- there you have to convince Maven to include a second
> directory of source code, which it doesn't like to do. Both Tiles and EL
> probably need to be reorganized to work better with Maven.
>
> The Cactus tests for EL still need attention. I'll open a bug ticket for it
> in a few days.
>
> --
> Wendy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org