You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@manifoldcf.apache.org by Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com> on 2015/09/08 00:09:33 UTC
releases 2.2 and 1.10 do not have any documentation
It appears that the release documentation did not build, and the error was
not caught.
I will go ahead and publish the master site, but we really have to fix this.
Unless there's an actual source change we're fixing, the way I think it
should work is as follows:
- Rafa spins new RCs, making sure that the documentation builds.
- We vote on the RCs.
- We promote them if they pass.
Karl
Re: releases 2.2 and 1.10 do not have any documentation
Posted by Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com>.
If you want to work on the scripts to do the check in question, that would
be a welcome change. ;-)
Karl
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 7:39 AM, Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> wrote:
> Oh….I don’t have forrest installed locally….sorry for that. Good to know
> for the next one
>
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Rafa,
> > The release scripts do this already, PROVIDED that you have an existing
> > installation of forrest, and have set your FORREST_HOME environment
> > variable properly.
> > The ant build doesn't complain if FORREST_HOME is not set, because most
> > people out in the world don't want to build the docs anyway. But the
> > release scripts could check for this, yes.
> > Anyway, I'm rebuilding the RC's now; about halfway done...
> > Karl
> > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 7:25 AM, Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> wrote:
> >> Hi Karl,
> >>
> >> Is that something that the release’s scripts should had do?
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Rafa
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> It appears that the release documentation did not build, and the error
> >>> was not caught.
> >>>
> >>> I will go ahead and publish the master site, but we really have to fix
> >>> this.
> >>>
> >>> Unless there's an actual source change we're fixing, the way I think it
> >>> should work is as follows:
> >>>
> >>> - Rafa spins new RCs, making sure that the documentation builds.
> >>> - We vote on the RCs.
> >>> - We promote them if they pass.
> >>>
> >>> Karl
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
Re: releases 2.2 and 1.10 do not have any documentation
Posted by Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org>.
Oh….I don’t have forrest installed locally….sorry for that. Good to know for the next one
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Rafa,
> The release scripts do this already, PROVIDED that you have an existing
> installation of forrest, and have set your FORREST_HOME environment
> variable properly.
> The ant build doesn't complain if FORREST_HOME is not set, because most
> people out in the world don't want to build the docs anyway. But the
> release scripts could check for this, yes.
> Anyway, I'm rebuilding the RC's now; about halfway done...
> Karl
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 7:25 AM, Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Hi Karl,
>>
>> Is that something that the release’s scripts should had do?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Rafa
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> It appears that the release documentation did not build, and the error
>>> was not caught.
>>>
>>> I will go ahead and publish the master site, but we really have to fix
>>> this.
>>>
>>> Unless there's an actual source change we're fixing, the way I think it
>>> should work is as follows:
>>>
>>> - Rafa spins new RCs, making sure that the documentation builds.
>>> - We vote on the RCs.
>>> - We promote them if they pass.
>>>
>>> Karl
>>>
>>>
>>
Re: releases 2.2 and 1.10 do not have any documentation
Posted by Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com>.
Hi Rafa,
The release scripts do this already, PROVIDED that you have an existing
installation of forrest, and have set your FORREST_HOME environment
variable properly.
The ant build doesn't complain if FORREST_HOME is not set, because most
people out in the world don't want to build the docs anyway. But the
release scripts could check for this, yes.
Anyway, I'm rebuilding the RC's now; about halfway done...
Karl
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 7:25 AM, Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Karl,
>
> Is that something that the release’s scripts should had do?
>
> Cheers,
> Rafa
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> It appears that the release documentation did not build, and the error
>> was not caught.
>>
>> I will go ahead and publish the master site, but we really have to fix
>> this.
>>
>> Unless there's an actual source change we're fixing, the way I think it
>> should work is as follows:
>>
>> - Rafa spins new RCs, making sure that the documentation builds.
>> - We vote on the RCs.
>> - We promote them if they pass.
>>
>> Karl
>>
>>
>
Re: releases 2.2 and 1.10 do not have any documentation
Posted by Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org>.
Hi Karl,
Is that something that the release’s scripts should had do?
Cheers,
Rafa
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It appears that the release documentation did not build, and the error was
> not caught.
> I will go ahead and publish the master site, but we really have to fix this.
> Unless there's an actual source change we're fixing, the way I think it
> should work is as follows:
> - Rafa spins new RCs, making sure that the documentation builds.
> - We vote on the RCs.
> - We promote them if they pass.
> Karl