general/3638: old header still in source ap_config_auto.h. does not belong

[Michael Robinton <mi...@bzs.org>]

>Number:         3638
>Category:       general
>Synopsis:       old header still in source ap_config_auto.h. does not belong
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    apache
>State:          open
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   apache
>Arrival-Date:   Sat Jan  9 16:30:00 PST 1999
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     michael@bzs.org
>Organization:
apache
>Release:        1.3.3
>Environment:
linux various
>Description:
/usr/src/apache/src/include/ap_config.h:76: ap_config_auto.h: No such file or directory

file says:
#ifndef WIN32
#include "ap_config_auto.h"
#else

change log says:

 *) Global renaming of C header files to both get rid of conflicts with third
     party packages and to again reach consistency:
       1. conf.h      -> ap_config.h
       2. conf_auto.h -> ap_config_auto.h \ these are now merged
       3. ap_config.h -> ap_config_auto.h / in the config process
       4. compat.h    -> ap_compat.h
       5. apctype.h   -> ap_ctype.h
     Backward compatibility files for conf.h and compat.h were created.


ap_config_auto.h is a leftover???
>How-To-Repeat:
n/a
>Fix:
Sorry I'm such a dummy, I don't know which header should go in it's place.
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ]
[you need to include <ap...@Apache.Org> in the Cc line ]
[and leave the subject line UNCHANGED.  This is not done]
[automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ]
[If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig-   ]
[nored unless you are responding to an explicit request ]
[from a developer.                                      ]
[Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS!         ]