You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@weex.apache.org by sospartan <so...@apache.org> on 2017/05/18 05:49:54 UTC
Release Vote about 0.12 RC4
Hi Rapheal,
The vote received 1 +1 binding, and the time is pass 72 hours as I declared
in the first mail.
Should I announce the vote is failed? Or 1 +1 is enough to pass the release
vote?
--
Best Regards!
sospartan
http://weex.apache.org/ <https://weex-project.io>
Re: Release Vote about 0.12 RC4
Posted by Raphael Bircher <rb...@gmail.com>.
Use the same RC name but write in the second attempt into the subject.
Am .05.2017, 10:42 Uhr, schrieb sospartan <so...@gmail.com>:
> Okay. Should I use the same RC version or a new one?
>
> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Raphael Bircher
> <rb...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Sospartan,
>>
>> Maybe call for a new vote on Incubator. Now. they are back from the
>> ApacheCon, so you have a good chance to get answer.
>>
>> Regards, Raphael
>>
>>
>> Am .05.2017, 10:08 Uhr, schrieb sospartan <so...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> Hi raphael,
>>> There still needs more +1 vote.
>>> Would you like help us to appeal the IPMC members to review this
>>> release?
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 5:43 PM, Raphael Bircher <
>>> rbircherapache@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> You can just download the tarball during the build process. this is
>>>> done
>>>> by many other Apache process. That would probably solve this problem.
>>>>
>>>> Regards, Raphael
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Am .05.2017, 11:31 Uhr, schrieb sospartan <so...@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>> Another related problem: Since all binary files and pre-build files
>>>> were
>>>>
>>>>> removed, which
>>>>> will add more steps to build from source we released. For example,
>>>>> people
>>>>> have to
>>>>> install gradle first because gradle warpper is not come with the
>>>>> source
>>>>> tarball.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 5:20 PM, sospartan <so...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> The binaries were all excluded in this release.
>>>>>
>>>>>> In previous release we do include a gradle wrapper jar and v8
>>>>>> library
>>>>>> (a
>>>>>> .so file). I've double
>>>>>> checked this issue in current release. This is no longer a problem.
>>>>>> :P
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Raphael Bircher <
>>>>>> rbircherapache@gmail.com
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Sospartan
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> leave it open a little bit longer, remember, many peoples are at
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> ApacheCon.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A question about the release. Is it true that you have a binary
>>>>>>> tar.gz
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>> the release folder? under witch license are this binaries? As far
>>>>>>> as I
>>>>>>> know, the normal way under Apache is to host such binaries outside
>>>>>>> ASF
>>>>>>> infrastructure.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards, Raphael
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am .05.2017, 07:49 Uhr, schrieb sospartan <so...@apache.org>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Rapheal,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The vote received 1 +1 binding, and the time is pass 72 hours as I
>>>>>>>> declared
>>>>>>>> in the first mail.
>>>>>>>> Should I announce the vote is failed? Or 1 +1 is enough to pass
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>> vote?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> My introduction https://youtu.be/Ln4vly5sxYU
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Best Regards!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> sospartan
>>>>>> http://weex.apache.org/ <https://weex-project.io/>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> My introduction https://youtu.be/Ln4vly5sxYU
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> My introduction https://youtu.be/Ln4vly5sxYU
>>
>
>
>
--
My introduction https://youtu.be/Ln4vly5sxYU
Re: Release Vote about 0.12 RC4
Posted by sospartan <so...@gmail.com>.
Okay. Should I use the same RC version or a new one?
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Raphael Bircher <rb...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Sospartan,
>
> Maybe call for a new vote on Incubator. Now. they are back from the
> ApacheCon, so you have a good chance to get answer.
>
> Regards, Raphael
>
>
> Am .05.2017, 10:08 Uhr, schrieb sospartan <so...@gmail.com>:
>
> Hi raphael,
>> There still needs more +1 vote.
>> Would you like help us to appeal the IPMC members to review this release?
>>
>> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 5:43 PM, Raphael Bircher <
>> rbircherapache@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> You can just download the tarball during the build process. this is done
>>> by many other Apache process. That would probably solve this problem.
>>>
>>> Regards, Raphael
>>>
>>>
>>> Am .05.2017, 11:31 Uhr, schrieb sospartan <so...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> Another related problem: Since all binary files and pre-build files were
>>>
>>>> removed, which
>>>> will add more steps to build from source we released. For example,
>>>> people
>>>> have to
>>>> install gradle first because gradle warpper is not come with the source
>>>> tarball.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 5:20 PM, sospartan <so...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The binaries were all excluded in this release.
>>>>
>>>>> In previous release we do include a gradle wrapper jar and v8 library
>>>>> (a
>>>>> .so file). I've double
>>>>> checked this issue in current release. This is no longer a problem. :P
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Raphael Bircher <
>>>>> rbircherapache@gmail.com
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Sospartan
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> leave it open a little bit longer, remember, many peoples are at the
>>>>>> ApacheCon.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A question about the release. Is it true that you have a binary tar.gz
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> the release folder? under witch license are this binaries? As far as I
>>>>>> know, the normal way under Apache is to host such binaries outside ASF
>>>>>> infrastructure.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards, Raphael
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am .05.2017, 07:49 Uhr, schrieb sospartan <so...@apache.org>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Rapheal,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The vote received 1 +1 binding, and the time is pass 72 hours as I
>>>>>>> declared
>>>>>>> in the first mail.
>>>>>>> Should I announce the vote is failed? Or 1 +1 is enough to pass the
>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>> vote?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> My introduction https://youtu.be/Ln4vly5sxYU
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Best Regards!
>>>>>
>>>>> sospartan
>>>>> http://weex.apache.org/ <https://weex-project.io/>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> My introduction https://youtu.be/Ln4vly5sxYU
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> My introduction https://youtu.be/Ln4vly5sxYU
>
--
Best Regards!
sospartan
http://weex.apache.org/ <https://weex-project.io/>
Re: Release Vote about 0.12 RC4
Posted by Raphael Bircher <rb...@gmail.com>.
Hi Sospartan,
Maybe call for a new vote on Incubator. Now. they are back from the
ApacheCon, so you have a good chance to get answer.
Regards, Raphael
Am .05.2017, 10:08 Uhr, schrieb sospartan <so...@gmail.com>:
> Hi raphael,
> There still needs more +1 vote.
> Would you like help us to appeal the IPMC members to review this release?
>
> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 5:43 PM, Raphael Bircher
> <rb...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> You can just download the tarball during the build process. this is done
>> by many other Apache process. That would probably solve this problem.
>>
>> Regards, Raphael
>>
>>
>> Am .05.2017, 11:31 Uhr, schrieb sospartan <so...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> Another related problem: Since all binary files and pre-build files were
>>> removed, which
>>> will add more steps to build from source we released. For example,
>>> people
>>> have to
>>> install gradle first because gradle warpper is not come with the
>>> source
>>> tarball.
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 5:20 PM, sospartan <so...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> The binaries were all excluded in this release.
>>>> In previous release we do include a gradle wrapper jar and v8 library
>>>> (a
>>>> .so file). I've double
>>>> checked this issue in current release. This is no longer a problem. :P
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Raphael Bircher <
>>>> rbircherapache@gmail.com
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Sospartan
>>>>>
>>>>> leave it open a little bit longer, remember, many peoples are at the
>>>>> ApacheCon.
>>>>>
>>>>> A question about the release. Is it true that you have a binary
>>>>> tar.gz
>>>>> in
>>>>> the release folder? under witch license are this binaries? As far as
>>>>> I
>>>>> know, the normal way under Apache is to host such binaries outside
>>>>> ASF
>>>>> infrastructure.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards, Raphael
>>>>>
>>>>> Am .05.2017, 07:49 Uhr, schrieb sospartan <so...@apache.org>:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Rapheal,
>>>>>
>>>>>> The vote received 1 +1 binding, and the time is pass 72 hours as I
>>>>>> declared
>>>>>> in the first mail.
>>>>>> Should I announce the vote is failed? Or 1 +1 is enough to pass the
>>>>>> release
>>>>>> vote?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> My introduction https://youtu.be/Ln4vly5sxYU
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Best Regards!
>>>>
>>>> sospartan
>>>> http://weex.apache.org/ <https://weex-project.io/>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> My introduction https://youtu.be/Ln4vly5sxYU
>>
>
>
>
--
My introduction https://youtu.be/Ln4vly5sxYU
Re: Release Vote about 0.12 RC4
Posted by sospartan <so...@gmail.com>.
Hi raphael,
There still needs more +1 vote.
Would you like help us to appeal the IPMC members to review this release?
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 5:43 PM, Raphael Bircher <rb...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> You can just download the tarball during the build process. this is done
> by many other Apache process. That would probably solve this problem.
>
> Regards, Raphael
>
>
> Am .05.2017, 11:31 Uhr, schrieb sospartan <so...@gmail.com>:
>
> Another related problem: Since all binary files and pre-build files were
>> removed, which
>> will add more steps to build from source we released. For example, people
>> have to
>> install gradle first because gradle warpper is not come with the source
>> tarball.
>>
>> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 5:20 PM, sospartan <so...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> The binaries were all excluded in this release.
>>> In previous release we do include a gradle wrapper jar and v8 library (a
>>> .so file). I've double
>>> checked this issue in current release. This is no longer a problem. :P
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Raphael Bircher <
>>> rbircherapache@gmail.com
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Sospartan
>>>>
>>>> leave it open a little bit longer, remember, many peoples are at the
>>>> ApacheCon.
>>>>
>>>> A question about the release. Is it true that you have a binary tar.gz
>>>> in
>>>> the release folder? under witch license are this binaries? As far as I
>>>> know, the normal way under Apache is to host such binaries outside ASF
>>>> infrastructure.
>>>>
>>>> Regards, Raphael
>>>>
>>>> Am .05.2017, 07:49 Uhr, schrieb sospartan <so...@apache.org>:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Rapheal,
>>>>
>>>>> The vote received 1 +1 binding, and the time is pass 72 hours as I
>>>>> declared
>>>>> in the first mail.
>>>>> Should I announce the vote is failed? Or 1 +1 is enough to pass the
>>>>> release
>>>>> vote?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> My introduction https://youtu.be/Ln4vly5sxYU
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best Regards!
>>>
>>> sospartan
>>> http://weex.apache.org/ <https://weex-project.io/>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> My introduction https://youtu.be/Ln4vly5sxYU
>
--
Best Regards!
sospartan
http://weex.apache.org/ <https://weex-project.io/>
Re: Release Vote about 0.12 RC4
Posted by Raphael Bircher <rb...@gmail.com>.
Hi all,
You can just download the tarball during the build process. this is done
by many other Apache process. That would probably solve this problem.
Regards, Raphael
Am .05.2017, 11:31 Uhr, schrieb sospartan <so...@gmail.com>:
> Another related problem: Since all binary files and pre-build files were
> removed, which
> will add more steps to build from source we released. For example,
> people
> have to
> install gradle first because gradle warpper is not come with the source
> tarball.
>
> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 5:20 PM, sospartan <so...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The binaries were all excluded in this release.
>> In previous release we do include a gradle wrapper jar and v8 library (a
>> .so file). I've double
>> checked this issue in current release. This is no longer a problem. :P
>>
>> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Raphael Bircher
>> <rbircherapache@gmail.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Sospartan
>>>
>>> leave it open a little bit longer, remember, many peoples are at the
>>> ApacheCon.
>>>
>>> A question about the release. Is it true that you have a binary tar.gz
>>> in
>>> the release folder? under witch license are this binaries? As far as I
>>> know, the normal way under Apache is to host such binaries outside ASF
>>> infrastructure.
>>>
>>> Regards, Raphael
>>>
>>> Am .05.2017, 07:49 Uhr, schrieb sospartan <so...@apache.org>:
>>>
>>> Hi Rapheal,
>>>> The vote received 1 +1 binding, and the time is pass 72 hours as I
>>>> declared
>>>> in the first mail.
>>>> Should I announce the vote is failed? Or 1 +1 is enough to pass the
>>>> release
>>>> vote?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> My introduction https://youtu.be/Ln4vly5sxYU
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards!
>>
>> sospartan
>> http://weex.apache.org/ <https://weex-project.io/>
>>
>
>
>
--
My introduction https://youtu.be/Ln4vly5sxYU
Re: Release Vote about 0.12 RC4
Posted by sospartan <so...@gmail.com>.
Another related problem: Since all binary files and pre-build files were
removed, which
will add more steps to build from source we released. For example, people
have to
install gradle first because gradle warpper is not come with the source
tarball.
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 5:20 PM, sospartan <so...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The binaries were all excluded in this release.
> In previous release we do include a gradle wrapper jar and v8 library (a
> .so file). I've double
> checked this issue in current release. This is no longer a problem. :P
>
> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Raphael Bircher <rbircherapache@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi Sospartan
>>
>> leave it open a little bit longer, remember, many peoples are at the
>> ApacheCon.
>>
>> A question about the release. Is it true that you have a binary tar.gz in
>> the release folder? under witch license are this binaries? As far as I
>> know, the normal way under Apache is to host such binaries outside ASF
>> infrastructure.
>>
>> Regards, Raphael
>>
>> Am .05.2017, 07:49 Uhr, schrieb sospartan <so...@apache.org>:
>>
>> Hi Rapheal,
>>> The vote received 1 +1 binding, and the time is pass 72 hours as I
>>> declared
>>> in the first mail.
>>> Should I announce the vote is failed? Or 1 +1 is enough to pass the
>>> release
>>> vote?
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> My introduction https://youtu.be/Ln4vly5sxYU
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards!
>
> sospartan
> http://weex.apache.org/ <https://weex-project.io/>
>
--
Best Regards!
sospartan
http://weex.apache.org/ <https://weex-project.io/>
Re: Release Vote about 0.12 RC4
Posted by Raphael Bircher <rb...@gmail.com>.
Hi sospartan,
I saw this. but the binaries are still distributed over ASF
infrastructure. Gardle is under ALv2 so maybe this is fine for us.
Normally we ship such third party binary outside Apache. But lets wait the
discussion on general@i.a.o.
Regards Raphael
Am .05.2017, 11:20 Uhr, schrieb sospartan <so...@gmail.com>:
> The binaries were all excluded in this release.
> In previous release we do include a gradle wrapper jar and v8 library (a
> .so file). I've double
> checked this issue in current release. This is no longer a problem. :P
>
> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Raphael Bircher
> <rb...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Sospartan
>>
>> leave it open a little bit longer, remember, many peoples are at the
>> ApacheCon.
>>
>> A question about the release. Is it true that you have a binary tar.gz
>> in
>> the release folder? under witch license are this binaries? As far as I
>> know, the normal way under Apache is to host such binaries outside ASF
>> infrastructure.
>>
>> Regards, Raphael
>>
>> Am .05.2017, 07:49 Uhr, schrieb sospartan <so...@apache.org>:
>>
>> Hi Rapheal,
>>> The vote received 1 +1 binding, and the time is pass 72 hours as I
>>> declared
>>> in the first mail.
>>> Should I announce the vote is failed? Or 1 +1 is enough to pass the
>>> release
>>> vote?
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> My introduction https://youtu.be/Ln4vly5sxYU
>>
>
>
>
--
My introduction https://youtu.be/Ln4vly5sxYU
Re: Release Vote about 0.12 RC4
Posted by sospartan <so...@gmail.com>.
The binaries were all excluded in this release.
In previous release we do include a gradle wrapper jar and v8 library (a
.so file). I've double
checked this issue in current release. This is no longer a problem. :P
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Raphael Bircher <rb...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Sospartan
>
> leave it open a little bit longer, remember, many peoples are at the
> ApacheCon.
>
> A question about the release. Is it true that you have a binary tar.gz in
> the release folder? under witch license are this binaries? As far as I
> know, the normal way under Apache is to host such binaries outside ASF
> infrastructure.
>
> Regards, Raphael
>
> Am .05.2017, 07:49 Uhr, schrieb sospartan <so...@apache.org>:
>
> Hi Rapheal,
>> The vote received 1 +1 binding, and the time is pass 72 hours as I
>> declared
>> in the first mail.
>> Should I announce the vote is failed? Or 1 +1 is enough to pass the
>> release
>> vote?
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> My introduction https://youtu.be/Ln4vly5sxYU
>
--
Best Regards!
sospartan
http://weex.apache.org/ <https://weex-project.io/>
Re: Release Vote about 0.12 RC4
Posted by Raphael Bircher <rb...@gmail.com>.
Hi Sospartan
leave it open a little bit longer, remember, many peoples are at the
ApacheCon.
A question about the release. Is it true that you have a binary tar.gz in
the release folder? under witch license are this binaries? As far as I
know, the normal way under Apache is to host such binaries outside ASF
infrastructure.
Regards, Raphael
Am .05.2017, 07:49 Uhr, schrieb sospartan <so...@apache.org>:
> Hi Rapheal,
> The vote received 1 +1 binding, and the time is pass 72 hours as I
> declared
> in the first mail.
> Should I announce the vote is failed? Or 1 +1 is enough to pass the
> release
> vote?
>
--
My introduction https://youtu.be/Ln4vly5sxYU