You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jackrabbit.apache.org by Apache Hudson Server <hu...@hudson.zones.apache.org> on 2010/03/24 15:00:44 UTC

Hudson build is still unstable: Jackrabbit-trunk » Jackrabbit Core #1094

See <http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Jackrabbit-trunk/org.apache.jackrabbit$jackrabbit-core/1094/>



Hudson build is back to stable : Jackrabbit-trunk » Jackrabbit Core #1096

Posted by Apache Hudson Server <hu...@hudson.zones.apache.org>.
See <http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Jackrabbit-trunk/org.apache.jackrabbit$jackrabbit-core/1096/>



Hudson build is still unstable: Jackrabbit-trunk » Jackrabbit Core #1095

Posted by Apache Hudson Server <hu...@hudson.zones.apache.org>.
See <http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Jackrabbit-trunk/org.apache.jackrabbit$jackrabbit-core/1095/>



Re: Hudson build is still unstable: Jackrabbit-trunk » Jackrabbit Core #1094

Posted by Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>.
Hi,

On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Apache Hudson Server
<hu...@hudson.zones.apache.org> wrote:
> See <http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Jackrabbit-trunk/org.apache.jackrabbit$jackrabbit-core/1094/>

It's the DataStoreAPITest that's again complaining about a missing
security workspace. I filed JCR-2583 [1] for this.

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2583

BR,

Jukka Zitting

Re: Hudson build is still unstable: Jackrabbit-trunk » Jackrabbit Core #1094

Posted by Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>.
Hi,

On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Michael Dürig <mi...@day.com> wrote:
> AFAIK Hudson should detect the SVN changes and start a build then. However
> somethings broken. See
> http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Jackrabbit-trunk/scmPollLog/
>
> Jukka, could you have a look?

I'm restarting the Hudson instance.

BR,

Jukka Zitting

Re: Hudson build is still unstable: Jackrabbit-trunk » Jackrabbit Core #1094

Posted by Michael Dürig <mi...@day.com>.
AFAIK Hudson should detect the SVN changes and start a build then. 
However somethings broken. See 
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Jackrabbit-trunk/scmPollLog/

Jukka, could you have a look?

Michael

Last Subversion Polling Log

Started on Mar 26, 2010 8:01:08 AM
SSH channel is closed. (Close requested by remote)
java.io.IOException: SSH channel is closed. (Close requested by remote)
	at 
com.trilead.ssh2.channel.ChannelManager.sendData(ChannelManager.java:383)
	at 
com.trilead.ssh2.channel.ChannelOutputStream.write(ChannelOutputStream.java:63)
	at 
java.io.ObjectOutputStream$BlockDataOutputStream.drain(ObjectOutputStream.java:1838)
	at 
java.io.ObjectOutputStream$BlockDataOutputStream.writeByte(ObjectOutputStream.java:1876)
	at 
java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeFatalException(ObjectOutputStream.java:1537)
	at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject(ObjectOutputStream.java:329)
	at hudson.remoting.Channel.send(Channel.java:417)
	at hudson.remoting.Request.call(Request.java:105)
	at hudson.remoting.Channel.call(Channel.java:551)
	at hudson.scm.SubversionSCM.pollChanges(SubversionSCM.java:1054)
	at hudson.model.AbstractProject.pollSCMChanges(AbstractProject.java:1076)
	at hudson.triggers.SCMTrigger$Runner.runPolling(SCMTrigger.java:319)
	at hudson.triggers.SCMTrigger$Runner.run(SCMTrigger.java:346)
	at 
hudson.util.SequentialExecutionQueue$QueueEntry.run(SequentialExecutionQueue.java:118)
	at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:441)
	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:303)
	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:138)
	at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:885)
	at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:907)
	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
Done. Took 0.18 sec
No changes


On 3/26/10 8:39 AM, Tobias Bocanegra wrote:
> when/how is hudson triggered to build jackrabbit again?
> the last build is 1 1/2 days old.
>
> regards, toby
>
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Tobias Bocanegra<tr...@day.com>  wrote:
>> i'll have a look at it.
>> regards, toby
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Michael Dürig<mi...@day.com>  wrote:
>>>
>>> These test failures seem to be caused by the changes done in JCR-2582.
>>> Michael
>>>
>>> On 3/24/10 3:00 PM, Apache Hudson Server wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> See<http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Jackrabbit-trunk/org.apache.jackrabbit$jackrabbit-core/1094/>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>


Re: Hudson build is still unstable: Jackrabbit-trunk » Jackrabbit Core #1094

Posted by Tobias Bocanegra <tr...@day.com>.
when/how is hudson triggered to build jackrabbit again?
the last build is 1 1/2 days old.

regards, toby

On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Tobias Bocanegra <tr...@day.com> wrote:
> i'll have a look at it.
> regards, toby
>
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Michael Dürig <mi...@day.com> wrote:
>>
>> These test failures seem to be caused by the changes done in JCR-2582.
>> Michael
>>
>> On 3/24/10 3:00 PM, Apache Hudson Server wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> See<http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Jackrabbit-trunk/org.apache.jackrabbit$jackrabbit-core/1094/>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>

Re: Hudson build is still unstable: Jackrabbit-trunk » Jackrabbit Core #1094

Posted by Tobias Bocanegra <tr...@day.com>.
i'll have a look at it.
regards, toby

On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Michael Dürig <mi...@day.com> wrote:
>
> These test failures seem to be caused by the changes done in JCR-2582.
> Michael
>
> On 3/24/10 3:00 PM, Apache Hudson Server wrote:
>>
>>
>> See<http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Jackrabbit-trunk/org.apache.jackrabbit$jackrabbit-core/1094/>
>>
>>
>
>

Re: Hudson build is still unstable: Jackrabbit-trunk » Jackrabbit Core #1094

Posted by Michael Dürig <mi...@day.com>.
These test failures seem to be caused by the changes done in JCR-2582.
Michael

On 3/24/10 3:00 PM, Apache Hudson Server wrote:
> See<http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Jackrabbit-trunk/org.apache.jackrabbit$jackrabbit-core/1094/>
>
>