You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to server-dev@james.apache.org by Danny Angus <Da...@slc.co.uk> on 2004/08/18 10:34:11 UTC
Re: PLEASE REVIEW - Proposed Fix for Return-Path handling (subsumes
JAMES-264 mail loop)
Looks OK to me from a theoretical perspective..
But I agree with Noel, it's one of those compliance related changes that
really needs tested with as many cases as we can muster.
d.
|---------+---------------------------->
| | "Noel J. Bergman"|
| | <noel@devtech.com|
| | > |
| | |
| | 17/08/2004 10:27 |
| | PM |
| | Please respond to|
| | "James Developers|
| | List" |
| | |
|---------+---------------------------->
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| |
| To: "James Developers List" <se...@james.apache.org> |
| cc: "Hontvari Jozsef" <ho...@solware.com> |
| Subject: PLEASE REVIEW - Proposed Fix for Return-Path handling (subsumes JAMES-264 mail loop) |
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
> > the root of the problem, the usage of Return-Path header
> > will still be in the code
>
> That is what I've been looking at today. It is a riskier
> change to make on a point release, but might be worthwhile.
I need to test this, and haven't even started. But I'd like to get as many
eyes on this as possible.
--- Noel
***************************************************************************
The information in this e-mail is confidential and for use by the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient (or responsible for delivery of the message to the intended recipient) please notify us immediately on 0141 306 2050 and delete the message from your computer. You may not copy or forward it or use or disclose its contents to any other person. As Internet communications are capable of data corruption Student Loans Company Limited does not accept any responsibility for changes made to this message after it was sent. For this reason it may be inappropriate to rely on advice or opinions contained in an e-mail without obtaining written confirmation of it. Neither Student Loans Company Limited or the sender accepts any liability or responsibility for viruses as it is your responsibility to scan attachments (if any). Opinions and views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and may not reflect the opinions and views of The Student Loans Company Limited.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses.
**************************************************************************
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
RE: PLEASE REVIEW - Proposed Fix for Return-Path handling (subsumes JAMES-264 mail loop)
Posted by "Noel J. Bergman" <no...@devtech.com>.
Danny Angus wrote:
> Looks OK to me from a theoretical perspective.
I found one minor and somewhat subtle bug in the implementation, not the
concept, which I've fixed. Otherwise it is looking good so far.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org