You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@servicemix.apache.org by "saravanan.t" <sa...@hotmail.com> on 2009/04/21 13:57:41 UTC
SMX4: exposing a pojo externally with cxf-bc
Hello,
I have a (beginner) question on fronting a pojo with CXF-BC. Can I do this:
1) using servicemix-bean component, expose this pojo.
2) front this endpoint using CXF-BC
or
Do I have to create a CXF-SE (with annotated pojo) and only then i can front
it using CXF-BC?
Thanks and have a nice day!
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SMX4%3A-exposing-a-pojo-externally-with-cxf-bc-tp23154504p23154504.html
Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: SMX4: exposing a pojo externally with cxf-bc
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi,
yes you can :
- expose a POJO implementing MessageListener interface using bean component
- publish operations using HTTP or CXF-BC components
Regards
JB
saravanan.t wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a (beginner) question on fronting a pojo with CXF-BC. Can I do this:
>
> 1) using servicemix-bean component, expose this pojo.
> 2) front this endpoint using CXF-BC
>
> or
>
> Do I have to create a CXF-SE (with annotated pojo) and only then i can front
> it using CXF-BC?
>
> Thanks and have a nice day!
>
>
Re: SMX4: exposing a pojo externally with cxf-bc
Posted by "saravanan.t" <sa...@hotmail.com>.
The idea was to package POJO + xbeans as an OSGI bundle, just to be able to
dynamically deploy/undeploy it. I am now wondering what the difference is
between:
1. package it as OSGI bundle myself (using maven-bundle plugin)
2. create a JBI packaging as SA + SU and deploy so it is implicitly
converted to a bundle.
Other than having to maintain SA and its pom.
But, I cannot seem to make (1) work!
Thanks!
saravanan.t wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It doesn't really work.
>
> When I keep it as xbeans.xml inside resources folder, endpoint is not
> activated. But the osgi bundle is started!
>
> And when I keep it under resources/META-INF/spring folder as you
> mentioned, I get deployment error:
>
> SAXParseException: cvc-complex-type.2.4.c: The matching wildcard is
> strict, but no declaration can be found for element 'bean:endpoint'
>
> Note that I am trying to deploy a POJO on servicemix-bean component and
> packing it as OSGI bundle.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
>
> Freeman Fang wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> You need add
>> <bean class="org.apache.servicemix.common.osgi.EndpointExporter" />
>> in your xbean.xml
>> We have example shipped with SMX 4.0 to demostrate it, take a look at
>> examples/simple in the kit.
>> Freeman
>>
>> saravanan.t wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Its kind of very late in following up...hope you don't mind.
>>>
>>> You mentioned that I could make a OSGI bundle for servicemix bean
>>> component.
>>> It seems I cannot use the xbeans.xml file as such, can you tell me what
>>> is
>>> wrong here please.
>>>
>>> I have a valid bundle with Import/Exports, and this xbeans.xml file:
>>>
>>> <beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
>>> xmlns:bean="http://servicemix.apache.org/bean/1.0"
>>> xmlns:beanservice="http://www.moodysanalytics.com/beanservice"
>>> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
>>> xmlns:esb="http://esbinaction.com/examples"
>>> xmlns:jms="http://servicemix.apache.org/jms/1.0"
>>>
>>> xmlns:osgix="http://www.springframework.org/schema/osgi-compendium"
>>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
>>>
>>> http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-2.0.xsd">
>>>
>>>
>>> <bean:endpoint service="beanservice:service2" endpoint="endpoint2">
>>> <bean:bean>
>>> <bean class="com.pocproject.provider.Service2SmxImpl"/>
>>> </bean:bean>
>>> </bean:endpoint>
>>>
>>> </beans>
>>>
>>> I kept this first under META-INF/spring, but I got some error. If i keep
>>> it
>>> under resources the spring configuration seem to be inactive and there
>>> is no
>>> endpoints! Any clue...?
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ashwin Karpe wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> The answer is that both are possible if you are using Servicemix 4
>>>> OSGi.
>>>> As for which one to follow, Option A with 2 SU's is the traditional way
>>>> and if you prefer being JBI spec compliant then that is the way to go.
>>>>
>>>> If not, then option 2 is perfectly ok and rather simpler too.
>>>> Personally I
>>>> find the JBI spec overly controlling with respect to packaging and can
>>>> be
>>>> rather painful when dealing with a large set of SU's/SA's in
>>>> conjunction
>>>> with Maven.
>>>>
>>>> I would personally prefer option 2 since you are fully compliant with
>>>> JBI
>>>> in all things except packing for which you rely on Spring/OSGi.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Ashwin...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> saravanan.t wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks guys for your quick responses!
>>>>>
>>>>> I have a followup question:
>>>>>
>>>>> what are the options for deployment here?
>>>>>
>>>>> do i need to develop/deploy as JBI: one su for bean and another for
>>>>> cxf-bc?
>>>>>
>>>>> or I can develop/deploy one OSGI service consisting the bean code &
>>>>> cxf-bc config (with POM package as osgi packaging)
>>>>>
>>>>> maybe it is not either/or, and if both ways are possible, which way is
>>>>> recommended. your comments are appreciated.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ashwin Karpe wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You can definately front it with a servicemix bean. It is not
>>>>>> necessary
>>>>>> to have a CXF-SE.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You will need to obviously then consume, transform the payload and
>>>>>> send
>>>>>> an appropriate response via the servicemix-bean. Also, you need to
>>>>>> appropriately handle the different MEPs (In-Only etc) for methods
>>>>>> invoked by the CXF-BC correctly in the POJO.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hope this helps.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ashwin...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> saravanan.t wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have a (beginner) question on fronting a pojo with CXF-BC. Can I
>>>>>>> do
>>>>>>> this:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1) using servicemix-bean component, expose this pojo.
>>>>>>> 2) front this endpoint using CXF-BC
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do I have to create a CXF-SE (with annotated pojo) and only then i
>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>> front it using CXF-BC?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks and have a nice day!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Freeman Fang
>> ------------------------
>> Open Source SOA: http://fusesource.com
>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SMX4%3A-exposing-a-pojo-externally-with-cxf-bc-tp23154504p23759251.html
Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: SMX4: exposing a pojo externally with cxf-bc
Posted by "saravanan.t" <sa...@hotmail.com>.
Hi,
It doesn't really work.
When I keep it as xbeans.xml inside resources folder, endpoint is not
activated. But the osgi bundle is started!
And when I keep it under resources/META-INF/spring folder as you mentioned,
I get deployment error:
SAXParseException: cvc-complex-type.2.4.c: The matching wildcard is strict,
but no declaration can be found for element 'bean:endpoint'
Note that I am trying to deploy a POJO on servicemix-bean component and
packing it as OSGI bundle.
Thanks!
Freeman Fang wrote:
>
> Hi,
> You need add
> <bean class="org.apache.servicemix.common.osgi.EndpointExporter" />
> in your xbean.xml
> We have example shipped with SMX 4.0 to demostrate it, take a look at
> examples/simple in the kit.
> Freeman
>
> saravanan.t wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Its kind of very late in following up...hope you don't mind.
>>
>> You mentioned that I could make a OSGI bundle for servicemix bean
>> component.
>> It seems I cannot use the xbeans.xml file as such, can you tell me what
>> is
>> wrong here please.
>>
>> I have a valid bundle with Import/Exports, and this xbeans.xml file:
>>
>> <beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
>> xmlns:bean="http://servicemix.apache.org/bean/1.0"
>> xmlns:beanservice="http://www.moodysanalytics.com/beanservice"
>> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
>> xmlns:esb="http://esbinaction.com/examples"
>> xmlns:jms="http://servicemix.apache.org/jms/1.0"
>>
>> xmlns:osgix="http://www.springframework.org/schema/osgi-compendium"
>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
>>
>> http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-2.0.xsd">
>>
>>
>> <bean:endpoint service="beanservice:service2" endpoint="endpoint2">
>> <bean:bean>
>> <bean class="com.pocproject.provider.Service2SmxImpl"/>
>> </bean:bean>
>> </bean:endpoint>
>>
>> </beans>
>>
>> I kept this first under META-INF/spring, but I got some error. If i keep
>> it
>> under resources the spring configuration seem to be inactive and there is
>> no
>> endpoints! Any clue...?
>>
>> Thanks a lot!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Ashwin Karpe wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The answer is that both are possible if you are using Servicemix 4 OSGi.
>>> As for which one to follow, Option A with 2 SU's is the traditional way
>>> and if you prefer being JBI spec compliant then that is the way to go.
>>>
>>> If not, then option 2 is perfectly ok and rather simpler too. Personally
>>> I
>>> find the JBI spec overly controlling with respect to packaging and can
>>> be
>>> rather painful when dealing with a large set of SU's/SA's in conjunction
>>> with Maven.
>>>
>>> I would personally prefer option 2 since you are fully compliant with
>>> JBI
>>> in all things except packing for which you rely on Spring/OSGi.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Ashwin...
>>>
>>>
>>> saravanan.t wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks guys for your quick responses!
>>>>
>>>> I have a followup question:
>>>>
>>>> what are the options for deployment here?
>>>>
>>>> do i need to develop/deploy as JBI: one su for bean and another for
>>>> cxf-bc?
>>>>
>>>> or I can develop/deploy one OSGI service consisting the bean code &
>>>> cxf-bc config (with POM package as osgi packaging)
>>>>
>>>> maybe it is not either/or, and if both ways are possible, which way is
>>>> recommended. your comments are appreciated.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ashwin Karpe wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> You can definately front it with a servicemix bean. It is not
>>>>> necessary
>>>>> to have a CXF-SE.
>>>>>
>>>>> You will need to obviously then consume, transform the payload and
>>>>> send
>>>>> an appropriate response via the servicemix-bean. Also, you need to
>>>>> appropriately handle the different MEPs (In-Only etc) for methods
>>>>> invoked by the CXF-BC correctly in the POJO.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hope this helps.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>> Ashwin...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> saravanan.t wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have a (beginner) question on fronting a pojo with CXF-BC. Can I do
>>>>>> this:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1) using servicemix-bean component, expose this pojo.
>>>>>> 2) front this endpoint using CXF-BC
>>>>>>
>>>>>> or
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do I have to create a CXF-SE (with annotated pojo) and only then i
>>>>>> can
>>>>>> front it using CXF-BC?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks and have a nice day!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Freeman Fang
> ------------------------
> Open Source SOA: http://fusesource.com
>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SMX4%3A-exposing-a-pojo-externally-with-cxf-bc-tp23154504p23754349.html
Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: SMX4: exposing a pojo externally with cxf-bc
Posted by Freeman Fang <fr...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
You need add
<bean class="org.apache.servicemix.common.osgi.EndpointExporter" />
in your xbean.xml
We have example shipped with SMX 4.0 to demostrate it, take a look at
examples/simple in the kit.
Freeman
saravanan.t wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Its kind of very late in following up...hope you don't mind.
>
> You mentioned that I could make a OSGI bundle for servicemix bean component.
> It seems I cannot use the xbeans.xml file as such, can you tell me what is
> wrong here please.
>
> I have a valid bundle with Import/Exports, and this xbeans.xml file:
>
> <beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
> xmlns:bean="http://servicemix.apache.org/bean/1.0"
> xmlns:beanservice="http://www.moodysanalytics.com/beanservice"
> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
> xmlns:esb="http://esbinaction.com/examples"
> xmlns:jms="http://servicemix.apache.org/jms/1.0"
> xmlns:osgix="http://www.springframework.org/schema/osgi-compendium"
> xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
> http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-2.0.xsd">
>
>
> <bean:endpoint service="beanservice:service2" endpoint="endpoint2">
> <bean:bean>
> <bean class="com.pocproject.provider.Service2SmxImpl"/>
> </bean:bean>
> </bean:endpoint>
>
> </beans>
>
> I kept this first under META-INF/spring, but I got some error. If i keep it
> under resources the spring configuration seem to be inactive and there is no
> endpoints! Any clue...?
>
> Thanks a lot!
>
>
>
>
>
> Ashwin Karpe wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The answer is that both are possible if you are using Servicemix 4 OSGi.
>> As for which one to follow, Option A with 2 SU's is the traditional way
>> and if you prefer being JBI spec compliant then that is the way to go.
>>
>> If not, then option 2 is perfectly ok and rather simpler too. Personally I
>> find the JBI spec overly controlling with respect to packaging and can be
>> rather painful when dealing with a large set of SU's/SA's in conjunction
>> with Maven.
>>
>> I would personally prefer option 2 since you are fully compliant with JBI
>> in all things except packing for which you rely on Spring/OSGi.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Ashwin...
>>
>>
>> saravanan.t wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks guys for your quick responses!
>>>
>>> I have a followup question:
>>>
>>> what are the options for deployment here?
>>>
>>> do i need to develop/deploy as JBI: one su for bean and another for
>>> cxf-bc?
>>>
>>> or I can develop/deploy one OSGI service consisting the bean code &
>>> cxf-bc config (with POM package as osgi packaging)
>>>
>>> maybe it is not either/or, and if both ways are possible, which way is
>>> recommended. your comments are appreciated.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>>
>>> Ashwin Karpe wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> You can definately front it with a servicemix bean. It is not necessary
>>>> to have a CXF-SE.
>>>>
>>>> You will need to obviously then consume, transform the payload and send
>>>> an appropriate response via the servicemix-bean. Also, you need to
>>>> appropriately handle the different MEPs (In-Only etc) for methods
>>>> invoked by the CXF-BC correctly in the POJO.
>>>>
>>>> Hope this helps.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Ashwin...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> saravanan.t wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have a (beginner) question on fronting a pojo with CXF-BC. Can I do
>>>>> this:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) using servicemix-bean component, expose this pojo.
>>>>> 2) front this endpoint using CXF-BC
>>>>>
>>>>> or
>>>>>
>>>>> Do I have to create a CXF-SE (with annotated pojo) and only then i can
>>>>> front it using CXF-BC?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks and have a nice day!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
--
Freeman Fang
------------------------
Open Source SOA: http://fusesource.com
Re: SMX4: exposing a pojo externally with cxf-bc
Posted by "saravanan.t" <sa...@hotmail.com>.
Hi,
Its kind of very late in following up...hope you don't mind.
You mentioned that I could make a OSGI bundle for servicemix bean component.
It seems I cannot use the xbeans.xml file as such, can you tell me what is
wrong here please.
I have a valid bundle with Import/Exports, and this xbeans.xml file:
<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
xmlns:bean="http://servicemix.apache.org/bean/1.0"
xmlns:beanservice="http://www.moodysanalytics.com/beanservice"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xmlns:esb="http://esbinaction.com/examples"
xmlns:jms="http://servicemix.apache.org/jms/1.0"
xmlns:osgix="http://www.springframework.org/schema/osgi-compendium"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-2.0.xsd">
<bean:endpoint service="beanservice:service2" endpoint="endpoint2">
<bean:bean>
<bean class="com.pocproject.provider.Service2SmxImpl"/>
</bean:bean>
</bean:endpoint>
</beans>
I kept this first under META-INF/spring, but I got some error. If i keep it
under resources the spring configuration seem to be inactive and there is no
endpoints! Any clue...?
Thanks a lot!
Ashwin Karpe wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The answer is that both are possible if you are using Servicemix 4 OSGi.
> As for which one to follow, Option A with 2 SU's is the traditional way
> and if you prefer being JBI spec compliant then that is the way to go.
>
> If not, then option 2 is perfectly ok and rather simpler too. Personally I
> find the JBI spec overly controlling with respect to packaging and can be
> rather painful when dealing with a large set of SU's/SA's in conjunction
> with Maven.
>
> I would personally prefer option 2 since you are fully compliant with JBI
> in all things except packing for which you rely on Spring/OSGi.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ashwin...
>
>
> saravanan.t wrote:
>>
>> Thanks guys for your quick responses!
>>
>> I have a followup question:
>>
>> what are the options for deployment here?
>>
>> do i need to develop/deploy as JBI: one su for bean and another for
>> cxf-bc?
>>
>> or I can develop/deploy one OSGI service consisting the bean code &
>> cxf-bc config (with POM package as osgi packaging)
>>
>> maybe it is not either/or, and if both ways are possible, which way is
>> recommended. your comments are appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>> Ashwin Karpe wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> You can definately front it with a servicemix bean. It is not necessary
>>> to have a CXF-SE.
>>>
>>> You will need to obviously then consume, transform the payload and send
>>> an appropriate response via the servicemix-bean. Also, you need to
>>> appropriately handle the different MEPs (In-Only etc) for methods
>>> invoked by the CXF-BC correctly in the POJO.
>>>
>>> Hope this helps.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Ashwin...
>>>
>>>
>>> saravanan.t wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I have a (beginner) question on fronting a pojo with CXF-BC. Can I do
>>>> this:
>>>>
>>>> 1) using servicemix-bean component, expose this pojo.
>>>> 2) front this endpoint using CXF-BC
>>>>
>>>> or
>>>>
>>>> Do I have to create a CXF-SE (with annotated pojo) and only then i can
>>>> front it using CXF-BC?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks and have a nice day!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SMX4%3A-exposing-a-pojo-externally-with-cxf-bc-tp23154504p23736972.html
Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: SMX4: exposing a pojo externally with cxf-bc
Posted by Ashwin Karpe <as...@progress.com>.
Hi,
The answer is that both are possible if you are using Servicemix 4 OSGi. As
for which one to follow, Option A with 2 SU's is the traditional way and if
you prefer being JBI spec compliant then that is the way to go.
If not, then option 2 is perfectly ok and rather simpler too. Personally I
find the JBI spec overly controlling with respect to packaging and can be
rather painful when dealing with a large set of SU's/SA's in conjunction
with Maven.
I would personally prefer option 2 since you are fully compliant with JBI in
all things except packing for which you rely on Spring/OSGi.
Cheers,
Ashwin...
saravanan.t wrote:
>
> Thanks guys for your quick responses!
>
> I have a followup question:
>
> what are the options for deployment here?
>
> do i need to develop/deploy as JBI: one su for bean and another for
> cxf-bc?
>
> or I can develop/deploy one OSGI service consisting the bean code &
> cxf-bc config (with POM package as osgi packaging)
>
> maybe it is not either/or, and if both ways are possible, which way is
> recommended. your comments are appreciated.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> Ashwin Karpe wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> You can definately front it with a servicemix bean. It is not necessary
>> to have a CXF-SE.
>>
>> You will need to obviously then consume, transform the payload and send
>> an appropriate response via the servicemix-bean. Also, you need to
>> appropriately handle the different MEPs (In-Only etc) for methods invoked
>> by the CXF-BC correctly in the POJO.
>>
>> Hope this helps.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Ashwin...
>>
>>
>> saravanan.t wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I have a (beginner) question on fronting a pojo with CXF-BC. Can I do
>>> this:
>>>
>>> 1) using servicemix-bean component, expose this pojo.
>>> 2) front this endpoint using CXF-BC
>>>
>>> or
>>>
>>> Do I have to create a CXF-SE (with annotated pojo) and only then i can
>>> front it using CXF-BC?
>>>
>>> Thanks and have a nice day!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
-----
---
Ashwin Karpe, Principal Consultant, PS - Opensource Center of Competence
Progress Software Corporation
14 Oak Park Drive
Bedford, MA 01730
---
+1-972-304-9084 (Office)
+1-972-971-1700 (Mobile)
----
Blog: http://opensourceknowledge.blogspot.com/
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SMX4%3A-exposing-a-pojo-externally-with-cxf-bc-tp23154504p23175418.html
Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: SMX4: exposing a pojo externally with cxf-bc
Posted by "saravanan.t" <sa...@hotmail.com>.
Thanks guys for your quick responses!
I have a followup question:
what are the options for deployment here?
do i need to develop/deploy as JBI: one su for bean and another for
cxf-bc?
or I can develop/deploy one OSGI service consisting the bean code & cxf-bc
config (with POM package as osgi packaging)
maybe it is not either/or, and if both ways are possible, which way is
recommended. your comments are appreciated.
Thanks!
Ashwin Karpe wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> You can definately front it with a servicemix bean. It is not necessary to
> have a CXF-SE.
>
> You will need to obviously then consume, transform the payload and send an
> appropriate response via the servicemix-bean. Also, you need to
> appropriately handle the different MEPs (In-Only etc) for methods invoked
> by the CXF-BC correctly in the POJO.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ashwin...
>
>
> saravanan.t wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have a (beginner) question on fronting a pojo with CXF-BC. Can I do
>> this:
>>
>> 1) using servicemix-bean component, expose this pojo.
>> 2) front this endpoint using CXF-BC
>>
>> or
>>
>> Do I have to create a CXF-SE (with annotated pojo) and only then i can
>> front it using CXF-BC?
>>
>> Thanks and have a nice day!
>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SMX4%3A-exposing-a-pojo-externally-with-cxf-bc-tp23154504p23173408.html
Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: SMX4: exposing a pojo externally with cxf-bc
Posted by Ashwin Karpe <as...@progress.com>.
Hi,
You can definately front it with a servicemix bean. It is not necessary to
have a CXF-SE.
You will need to obviously then consume, transform the payload and send an
appropriate response via the servicemix-bean. Also, you need to
appropriately handle the different MEPs (In-Only etc) for methods invoked by
the CXF-BC correctly in the POJO.
Hope this helps.
Cheers,
Ashwin...
saravanan.t wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a (beginner) question on fronting a pojo with CXF-BC. Can I do
> this:
>
> 1) using servicemix-bean component, expose this pojo.
> 2) front this endpoint using CXF-BC
>
> or
>
> Do I have to create a CXF-SE (with annotated pojo) and only then i can
> front it using CXF-BC?
>
> Thanks and have a nice day!
>
>
>
-----
---
Ashwin Karpe, Principal Consultant, PS - Opensource Center of Competence
Progress Software Corporation
14 Oak Park Drive
Bedford, MA 01730
---
+1-972-304-9084 (Office)
+1-972-971-1700 (Mobile)
----
Blog: http://opensourceknowledge.blogspot.com/
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SMX4%3A-exposing-a-pojo-externally-with-cxf-bc-tp23154504p23154718.html
Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.