You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to user@cassandra.apache.org by Lawrence Turcotte <la...@gmail.com> on 2016/08/13 21:32:07 UTC

unsubscibe

Re: unsubscibe

Posted by Branton Davis <br...@spanning.com>.

This may be a silly question, but has anyone considered making
the mailing list accept unsubscribe requests this way?  Or at least filter
them out and auto-respond with a message explaining how to unsubscribe?  Seems
like it should be pretty simple and would make it easier for folks to leave
and less noise for the rest of us.

On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 7:48 PM, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>
wrote:

> I've never noticed the unsubscribe button. That may be a good idea,
> though, to support such a feature. Maybe we should poke infra!
>
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 8:46 PM Russell Bradberry <rb...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> While there is an informative email when you sign up, there are a couple
>> issues with it. First, as you said, people don't read instructions. Second,
>> people forget. I would have to search back to when I signed up for the list
>> in order to find how to unsubscribe. Lastly, gmail and many other apps
>> provide a button that says "unsubscribe" which does little more than send
>> an email to the list. The latter is the reason I am suggesting that this be
>> worked in as an additional way to unsubscribe from the list.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 8:39 PM -0400, "James Carman" <
>> james@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
>>
>> I see the confusion on quite a few lists around the organization. It's
>>> not rampant, but it does happen. Perhaps it would be a good idea to improve
>>> the communication somehow. When you first subscribe, you get a pretty
>>> informative email describing all of the things you can do via email, but
>>> who reads instructions?!?! :). I wonder if infra could force a footer on
>>> the emails or something.
>>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 8:35 PM Russell Bradberry <rb...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think the overall issue here is that there are many apps that provide
>>>> an "unsubscribe" button that automagically sends these emails.
>>>>
>>>> I think the best course of action would be to bring this up to the
>>>> powers that be to possibly decide on supporting this functionality as a
>>>> feature. This, of course, because this method of unsubscribing from lists
>>>> is pretty much standard now.
>>>>
>>>> Im not sure the patronizing responses with Google links help at all.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _____________________________
>>>> From: James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>
>>>> Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2016 8:24 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: unsubscibe
>>>> To: <us...@cassandra.apache.org>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Was the Google stuff really necessary? Couldn't you have just nicely
>>>> told them how to unsubscribe?
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 7:52 PM Alain RODRIGUEZ <ar...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> You did not unsubscribe yet.
>>>>>
>>>>> 'unsubscribe cassandra' in google search:
>>>>>
>>>>> Result 1: http://www.planetcassandra.org/apache-cassandra-mailing-
>>>>> lists/
>>>>> Result 2: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cassandra-user/
>>>>> Result 3: http://cassandra.apache.org/
>>>>>
>>>>> Sending a message to user-unsubscribe@cassandra.apache.org, as
>>>>> mentioned everywhere, should work better and spam less people.
>>>>>
>>>>> Alain
>>>>>
>>>>> 2016-08-13 23:32 GMT+02:00 Lawrence Turcotte <
>>>>> lawrence.turcotte@gmail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>

Re: sstableloader

Posted by Jean Tremblay <je...@zen-innovations.com>.

Thank you for your answer Kai.

On 17 Aug 2016, at 11:34 , Kai Wang <de...@gmail.com>> wrote:

yes, you are correct.

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Jean Tremblay <je...@zen-innovations.com>> wrote:
Hi,

I’m using Cassandra 3.7.

In the documentation for sstableloader I read the following:

<< Note: To get the best throughput from SSTable loading, you can use multiple instances of sstableloader to stream across multiple machines. No hard limit exists on the number of SSTables that sstableloader can run at the same time, so you can add additional loaders until you see no further improvement.>>

Does this mean that I can stream my sstables to my cluster from many instance of sstableloader running simultaneously on many client machines?

I ask because I would like to improve the transfer speed of my stables to my cluster.

Kind regards and thanks for your comments.

Jean

Re: sstableloader

Posted by Kai Wang <de...@gmail.com>.

yes, you are correct.

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Jean Tremblay <
jean.tremblay@zen-innovations.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I’m using Cassandra 3.7.
>
> In the documentation for sstableloader I read the following:
>
> << Note: To get the best throughput from SSTable loading, you can use
> multiple instances of sstableloader to stream across multiple machines. No
> hard limit exists on the number of SSTables that sstableloader can run at
> the same time, so you can add additional loaders until you see no further
> improvement.>>
>
> Does this mean that I can stream my sstables to my cluster from many
> instance of sstableloader running simultaneously on many client machines?
>
> I ask because I would like to improve the transfer speed of my stables to
> my cluster.
>
> Kind regards and thanks for your comments.
>
> Jean
>