You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by Paul Libbrecht <pa...@activemath.org> on 2006/05/13 23:06:27 UTC
[jelly] Upgrade to dom4j 1.6.1 ?
Hello Jellyers,
After my two test fixes, which had almost nothing to do with dom4j...
I seem to be happily running everything with dom4j 1.6.1.
Can anyone confirm me this ? It's quite radical but it'd help in many
other places.
paul
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [jelly] Upgrade to dom4j 1.6.1 ?
Posted by Dion Gillard <di...@gmail.com>.
Paul, I had a quick look and I'm +1.
On 6/3/06, Arnaud HERITIER <ah...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> In maven 1.1 beta 3 we'll upgrade to dom4j 1.6.2 (not yet released) which
> fixes a problem with xml entities.
> Thus we are particularly in favor to upgrade your dependency in Jelly. It
> will limit incompabilities between us.
>
> arnaud
>
>
>
> On 6/2/06, Paul Libbrecht <pa...@activemath.org> wrote:
> >
> > I please beg another round of review... or I'll interprete the silence
> > as "no bother" and will do...
> >
> > paul
> >
> > Hans Gilde wrote:
> > > +0
> > >
> > > If the unit tests pass, I'm inclined to say that the latest version
> > should
> > > be used. But I have not tried it.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Paul Libbrecht [mailto:paul@activemath.org]
> > > Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2006 5:06 PM
> > > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> > > Subject: [jelly] Upgrade to dom4j 1.6.1 ?
> > >
> > > Hello Jellyers,
> > >
> > > After my two test fixes, which had almost nothing to do with dom4j...
> > > I seem to be happily running everything with dom4j 1.6.1.
> > > Can anyone confirm me this ? It's quite radical but it'd help in
> > many other places.
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
--
http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/
Chuck Norris sleeps with a night light. Not because Chuck Norris is afraid
of the dark, but because the dark is afraid of Chuck Norris
Re: [jelly] Upgrade to dom4j 1.6.1 ?
Posted by Arnaud HERITIER <ah...@gmail.com>.
In maven 1.1 beta 3 we'll upgrade to dom4j 1.6.2 (not yet released) which
fixes a problem with xml entities.
Thus we are particularly in favor to upgrade your dependency in Jelly. It
will limit incompabilities between us.
arnaud
On 6/2/06, Paul Libbrecht <pa...@activemath.org> wrote:
>
> I please beg another round of review... or I'll interprete the silence
> as "no bother" and will do...
>
> paul
>
> Hans Gilde wrote:
> > +0
> >
> > If the unit tests pass, I'm inclined to say that the latest version
> should
> > be used. But I have not tried it.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Paul Libbrecht [mailto:paul@activemath.org]
> > Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2006 5:06 PM
> > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> > Subject: [jelly] Upgrade to dom4j 1.6.1 ?
> >
> > Hello Jellyers,
> >
> > After my two test fixes, which had almost nothing to do with dom4j...
> > I seem to be happily running everything with dom4j 1.6.1.
> > Can anyone confirm me this ? It's quite radical but it'd help in
> many other places.
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
RE: [jelly] Upgrade to dom4j 1.6.1 ?
Posted by Hans Gilde <hg...@gmail.com>.
Ok unit tests I have work, so I'm also +1.
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Libbrecht [mailto:paul@activemath.org]
Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 4:50 PM
To: Hans Gilde
Cc: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List'
Subject: Re: [jelly] Upgrade to dom4j 1.6.1 ?
I please beg another round of review... or I'll interprete the silence
as "no bother" and will do...
paul
Hans Gilde wrote:
> +0
>
> If the unit tests pass, I'm inclined to say that the latest version should
> be used. But I have not tried it.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Libbrecht [mailto:paul@activemath.org]
> Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2006 5:06 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: [jelly] Upgrade to dom4j 1.6.1 ?
>
> Hello Jellyers,
>
> After my two test fixes, which had almost nothing to do with dom4j...
> I seem to be happily running everything with dom4j 1.6.1.
> Can anyone confirm me this ? It's quite radical but it'd help in many
other places.
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [jelly] Upgrade to dom4j 1.6.1 ?
Posted by Paul Libbrecht <pa...@activemath.org>.
I please beg another round of review... or I'll interprete the silence
as "no bother" and will do...
paul
Hans Gilde wrote:
> +0
>
> If the unit tests pass, I'm inclined to say that the latest version should
> be used. But I have not tried it.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Libbrecht [mailto:paul@activemath.org]
> Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2006 5:06 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: [jelly] Upgrade to dom4j 1.6.1 ?
>
> Hello Jellyers,
>
> After my two test fixes, which had almost nothing to do with dom4j...
> I seem to be happily running everything with dom4j 1.6.1.
> Can anyone confirm me this ? It's quite radical but it'd help in many other places.
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
RE: [jelly] Upgrade to dom4j 1.6.1 ?
Posted by Hans Gilde <hg...@gmail.com>.
+0
If the unit tests pass, I'm inclined to say that the latest version should
be used. But I have not tried it.
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Libbrecht [mailto:paul@activemath.org]
Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2006 5:06 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [jelly] Upgrade to dom4j 1.6.1 ?
Hello Jellyers,
After my two test fixes, which had almost nothing to do with dom4j...
I seem to be happily running everything with dom4j 1.6.1.
Can anyone confirm me this ? It's quite radical but it'd help in many
other places.
paul
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org