You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@ozone.apache.org by "ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2025/07/14 03:20:00 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (HDDS-2647) Ozone DataNode does not set raft.server.log.corruption.policy to the RaftServer implementation it uses

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-2647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated HDDS-2647:
---------------------------------
    Labels: pull-request-available  (was: )

> Ozone DataNode does not set raft.server.log.corruption.policy to the RaftServer implementation it uses
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDDS-2647
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-2647
>             Project: Apache Ozone
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Ozone Datanode
>            Reporter: István Fajth
>            Priority: Critical
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>
> In the XceiverServerRatis class which is used by the DataNode as well to create the RaftServer implementation that is used, there is a method called newRaftProperties() which is there to set up the RaftProperties object specified for the RaftServer it starts.
> This method is pretty hard to keep in sync with all the ratis properties, and due to an issue where I was turned to RATIS-677 which introduced a new configuration, I was not able to set this new property via the DataNode's ozone-site.xml, as it was not forwarded to the Ratis server.
> On the long run we would need a better implementation that does not need tuning and follow up for every new Ratis property, however at the moment as a wuick fix we can just provide the property. Depending on the implementor, if we go with the easy way, then please create a new JIRA for a better solution after finishing this one. Also if I am wrong, and Ratis properties can be defined for the DN properly elsewhere, please let me know.
> As OM is also using Ratis in HA configuration, this one should be checked there as well, however this one is not really important until RATIS-762 is fixed.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@ozone.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@ozone.apache.org