You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org by Helmut Denk <he...@gmx.de> on 2009/02/25 12:09:17 UTC

is it save to use 'svn-trunk' for docbook2pdf-generation ?

hi fop-community,

i am quite new to fop and wanted to know, in 
what state of quality 'trunk' is ...
 
is it save, to use 'fop built from the svn-trunk'
to process standard docbook -> fo -> pdf chain ?
(using saxon9 for xslt)

what are the main differences between 0.95
and trunk ? 

thank you & have a nice day
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/is-it-save-to-use-%27svn-trunk%27-for-docbook2pdf-generation---tp22200793p22200793.html
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org

Re: is it save to use 'svn-trunk' for docbook2pdf-generation ?

Posted by Chris Bowditch <bo...@hotmail.com>.
Helmut Denk wrote:

> hi fop-community,
> 
> i am quite new to fop and wanted to know, in 
> what state of quality 'trunk' is ...

The quality of trunk is good thanks to a large automated test suite and 
per review.

>  
> is it save, to use 'fop built from the svn-trunk'
> to process standard docbook -> fo -> pdf chain ?
> (using saxon9 for xslt)

I believe so. I use FOP trunk in my application with no adverse affects.

> 
> what are the main differences between 0.95
> and trunk ? 

Changes between v0.95 and trunk are listed here:

http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/changes.html#version_FOP%20Trunk

Chris



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org

Re: is it save to use 'svn-trunk' for docbook2pdf-generation ?

Posted by Helmut Denk <he...@gmx.de>.
very helpful. thank you.


cbowditch wrote:
> 
> Helmut Denk wrote:
> 
>> hi fop-community,
>> 
>> i am quite new to fop and wanted to know, in 
>> what state of quality 'trunk' is ...
> 
> The quality of trunk is good thanks to a large automated test suite and 
> per review.
> 
>>  
>> is it save, to use 'fop built from the svn-trunk'
>> to process standard docbook -> fo -> pdf chain ?
>> (using saxon9 for xslt)
> 
> I believe so. I use FOP trunk in my application with no adverse affects.
> 
>> 
>> what are the main differences between 0.95
>> and trunk ? 
> 
> Changes between v0.95 and trunk are listed here:
> 
> http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/changes.html#version_FOP%20Trunk
> 
> Chris
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/is-it-save-to-use-%27svn-trunk%27-for-docbook2pdf-generation---tp22200793p22384328.html
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org