RE: java.util.logging

[Jochen Hiller <jo...@bauer-partner.de>]

RE: java.util.loggingGreg,

I just did some work to support JSR 047 (hacked partial JSR implementation).
We use now the java.util.logging API in some projects, but the underlying
implementation is completely based on log4j. We use it in EJB and JSP
environments. Works fine for JDK 1.2.2, but some problems with JDK 1.3, as
java.* namespace is reserved for java core packages only.

Workaround: include the jar files in the bootclasspath (uuh, ugly), or
change the security policy (do you know how ?)

I sent one (older) copy of log4j-loggingapi to Ceki, but I would not propose
it to include in the current log4j distribution due to these restrictions
(and other deployment issues with the JSR jar).

But if you are interested, I can you send you some code.

Bye, Jochen

PS: Sorry for late answer, I cannot regularly read this mailing list.
Jochen Hiller
Head of Research
Bauer & Partner AG
Esslenstr. 3
CH-8280 Kreuzlingen
Phone +41 71 67718 00
Mobile +49 171 3396054
Fax +41 71 67718 44
Email jochen.hiller@bauer-partner.de



  -----Original Message-----
  From: Comeau, Greg [mailto:GComeau@creekpath.com]
  Sent: Mittwoch, 21. Februar 2001 22:40
  To: 'LOG4J Users Mailing List'
  Subject: RE: java.util.logging


  The API is published so the implementation could be simulated for the
purposes of developing the adapter. That way the adapter could be ready to
ship soon after J2SE 1.4 is available. Sync'ing with the actual
implementation of java.util.logging shouldn't take too long. It should be a
regression test at that point.

  I was wondering if anybody had taken on that job. No, I'm not
volunteering. <g>



  -----Original Message-----
  From: Ceki Gülcü [mailto:cgu@qos.ch]
  Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 2:33 PM
  To: LOG4J Users Mailing List
  Subject: Re: java.util.logging




  Greg,

  Funny coincidence, this question was asked in a different ML just a few
hours ago. Before writing an adapter for JSR47, its implementation has to be
available somewhere which is not the case for the moment. JSR47 is an
implementation not an interface. Does that answer the question? Ceki

  At 14:05 21.02.2001 -0700, Comeau, Greg wrote:

  >Is anybody working on a Log4j adapter for the Java Logging API? (JSR
#000047)

  ----
  Ceki Gülcü          Web:   http://qos.ch
  av. de Rumine 5     email: cgu@qos.ch (preferred)
  CH-1005 Lausanne           ceki_gulcu@yahoo.com
  Switzerland         Tel: ++41 21 351 23 15



  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-help@jakarta.apache.org