You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@couchdb.apache.org by Dave Cottlehuber <dc...@jsonified.com> on 2012/11/28 16:23:26 UTC
Packagers, Maintainers & 1.3.0 release
Hi Packagers/Maintainers,
Thanks for the efforts you put into wrapping CouchDB! We'd like to
sort out any packaging or distribution issues early in our 1.3.0
release cycle. Those of you whom I know of, or are interested, I've
BCCd.
Could you either reply back to the list (or directly to me if you
prefer) so we have a direct contact for you during this release
- are you happy to be added to the wiki as a maintainer?
- alternatively, a link to bugtracker (or where we can identify the
maintainer) would be fine
- is the link below correct for your platform?
If you have any issues with 1.3.x please get them into JIRA so we can
track them.
http://packages.ubuntu.com/precise/couchdb (or quantal..)
http://packages.debian.org/sid/couchdb (or squeeze/wheezy..) or
http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/couchdb.html
http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=databases&portname=couchdb
http://mirror.karneval.cz/pub/linux/fedora/epel/6/i386/repoview/couchdb.html
http://openports.se/databases/apache-couchdb
https://github.com/cloudnode/couchdbx-app
http://packages.gentoo.org/package/dev-db/couchdb
http://slackbuilds.org/repository/14.0/development/couchdb/
AFAICT These distros are missing packages - feel free to pick them up!
ArchLinux
NetBSD
OpenSolaris & friends
A+
Dave
Re: Packagers, Maintainers & 1.3.0 release
Posted by Hans J Schroeder <hs...@cloudno.de>.
Great news. The last test build I did went ok.
- Hans
On Sunday, December 2, 2012, Noah Slater wrote:
> Hans,
>
> When we cut the 1.3 release in the next few days (we are blocked on one
> bug) will you be able to co-ordinate with me and Dave to produce an OS X
> package. I am hoping that you are able to build this from the release
> artefact, and then we can upload it to our regular dist directory. (I have
> checked with Infra, and this is perfectly cromulent.)
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> On 29 November 2012 21:16, Hans J Schroeder <hs@cloudno.de <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Nov 28, 2012, at 4:23 PM, Dave Cottlehuber <dch@jsonified.com<javascript:;>>
> wrote:
> >
> > > - are you happy to be added to the wiki as a maintainer?
> >
> > yes, for Mac OS X
> >
> > > - alternatively, a link to bugtracker (or where we can identify the
> > > maintainer) would be fine
> > > - is the link below correct for your platform?
> >
> > yes, link is correct.
> >
> > - Hans
>
>
>
>
> --
> NS
>
Re: Packagers, Maintainers & 1.3.0 release
Posted by Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org>.
Hans,
When we cut the 1.3 release in the next few days (we are blocked on one
bug) will you be able to co-ordinate with me and Dave to produce an OS X
package. I am hoping that you are able to build this from the release
artefact, and then we can upload it to our regular dist directory. (I have
checked with Infra, and this is perfectly cromulent.)
Thanks,
On 29 November 2012 21:16, Hans J Schroeder <hs...@cloudno.de> wrote:
>
> On Nov 28, 2012, at 4:23 PM, Dave Cottlehuber <dc...@jsonified.com> wrote:
>
> > - are you happy to be added to the wiki as a maintainer?
>
> yes, for Mac OS X
>
> > - alternatively, a link to bugtracker (or where we can identify the
> > maintainer) would be fine
> > - is the link below correct for your platform?
>
> yes, link is correct.
>
> - Hans
--
NS
Re: Packagers, Maintainers & 1.3.0 release
Posted by Hans J Schroeder <hs...@cloudno.de>.
On Nov 28, 2012, at 4:23 PM, Dave Cottlehuber <dc...@jsonified.com> wrote:
> - are you happy to be added to the wiki as a maintainer?
yes, for Mac OS X
> - alternatively, a link to bugtracker (or where we can identify the
> maintainer) would be fine
> - is the link below correct for your platform?
yes, link is correct.
- Hans
Re: Packagers, Maintainers & 1.3.0 release
Posted by Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org>.
I’m game.
On Dec 6, 2012, at 23:30 , Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hans, cool.
>
> I've spoken with infra, and what I propose is that once I call the VOTE,
> you point Jan to the source for your package. Jan and build it, and then
> upload it to our packages dist dir. [1] (Does this sound sensible? I only
> propose that Jan build it because he is the guy uploading it. But whatever
> Jan is comfortable putting his name on is okay with me.)
>
> Post 1.3, would you like to submit a few patches to us to get this work
> included into our official repository? If you did, we could grant you
> committer rights, and you will be able to do this yourself for the next
> release.
>
> Dirkjan, gotcha. Thanks.
>
> [1] http://www.apache.org/dist/couchdb/packages/
>
>
>
> On 3 December 2012 09:59, Dirkjan Ochtman <dj...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Can you clarify?
>>
>> COUCHDB-1458. Then, similar things for yajl, and preferably also for
>> the Erlang dependencies (ejson, mochiweb, ibrowse), making sure that
>> there are upstream versions that work with CouchDB.
>>
>> But AIUI this is part of Benoit's build system overhaul plan for 1.4.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Dirkjan
>>
>
>
>
> --
> NS
Re: Packagers, Maintainers & 1.3.0 release
Posted by Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org>.
Great!
On 7 December 2012 07:15, Hans J Schroeder <hs...@cloudno.de> wrote:
> On Thursday, December 6, 2012, Noah Slater wrote:
>
> > Hans, cool.
> >
> > I've spoken with infra, and what I propose is that once I call the VOTE,
> > you point Jan to the source for your package. Jan and build it, and then
> > upload it to our packages dist dir. [1] (Does this sound sensible? I only
> > propose that Jan build it because he is the guy uploading it. But
> whatever
> > Jan is comfortable putting his name on is okay with me.)
>
>
> That's fine with me. At least it's all based on Jan's work.
>
>
> >
> > Post 1.3, would you like to submit a few patches to us to get this work
> > included into our official repository? If you did, we could grant you
> > committer rights, and you will be able to do this yourself for the next
> > release.
>
>
> That sound like a plan. I'm in.
>
> - Hans
>
>
> >
> > Dirkjan, gotcha. Thanks.
> >
> > [1] http://www.apache.org/dist/couchdb/packages/
> >
> >
> >
> > On 3 December 2012 09:59, Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@gentoo.org<javascript:;>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Noah Slater <nslater@apache.org
> <javascript:;>>
> > wrote:
> > > > Can you clarify?
> > >
> > > COUCHDB-1458. Then, similar things for yajl, and preferably also for
> > > the Erlang dependencies (ejson, mochiweb, ibrowse), making sure that
> > > there are upstream versions that work with CouchDB.
> > >
> > > But AIUI this is part of Benoit's build system overhaul plan for 1.4.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Dirkjan
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > NS
> >
>
--
NS
Re: Packagers, Maintainers & 1.3.0 release
Posted by Hans J Schroeder <hs...@cloudno.de>.
On Thursday, December 6, 2012, Noah Slater wrote:
> Hans, cool.
>
> I've spoken with infra, and what I propose is that once I call the VOTE,
> you point Jan to the source for your package. Jan and build it, and then
> upload it to our packages dist dir. [1] (Does this sound sensible? I only
> propose that Jan build it because he is the guy uploading it. But whatever
> Jan is comfortable putting his name on is okay with me.)
That's fine with me. At least it's all based on Jan's work.
>
> Post 1.3, would you like to submit a few patches to us to get this work
> included into our official repository? If you did, we could grant you
> committer rights, and you will be able to do this yourself for the next
> release.
That sound like a plan. I'm in.
- Hans
>
> Dirkjan, gotcha. Thanks.
>
> [1] http://www.apache.org/dist/couchdb/packages/
>
>
>
> On 3 December 2012 09:59, Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@gentoo.org <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Noah Slater <nslater@apache.org<javascript:;>>
> wrote:
> > > Can you clarify?
> >
> > COUCHDB-1458. Then, similar things for yajl, and preferably also for
> > the Erlang dependencies (ejson, mochiweb, ibrowse), making sure that
> > there are upstream versions that work with CouchDB.
> >
> > But AIUI this is part of Benoit's build system overhaul plan for 1.4.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Dirkjan
> >
>
>
>
> --
> NS
>
Re: Packagers, Maintainers & 1.3.0 release
Posted by Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org>.
Hans, cool.
I've spoken with infra, and what I propose is that once I call the VOTE,
you point Jan to the source for your package. Jan and build it, and then
upload it to our packages dist dir. [1] (Does this sound sensible? I only
propose that Jan build it because he is the guy uploading it. But whatever
Jan is comfortable putting his name on is okay with me.)
Post 1.3, would you like to submit a few patches to us to get this work
included into our official repository? If you did, we could grant you
committer rights, and you will be able to do this yourself for the next
release.
Dirkjan, gotcha. Thanks.
[1] http://www.apache.org/dist/couchdb/packages/
On 3 December 2012 09:59, Dirkjan Ochtman <dj...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Can you clarify?
>
> COUCHDB-1458. Then, similar things for yajl, and preferably also for
> the Erlang dependencies (ejson, mochiweb, ibrowse), making sure that
> there are upstream versions that work with CouchDB.
>
> But AIUI this is part of Benoit's build system overhaul plan for 1.4.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dirkjan
>
--
NS
Re: Packagers, Maintainers & 1.3.0 release
Posted by Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org>.
On Dec 3, 2012, at 10:59 , Dirkjan Ochtman <dj...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Can you clarify?
>
> COUCHDB-1458. Then, similar things for yajl, and preferably also for
> the Erlang dependencies (ejson, mochiweb, ibrowse), making sure that
> there are upstream versions that work with CouchDB.
>
> But AIUI this is part of Benoit's build system overhaul plan for 1.4.
Yes, we are slowly working towards something like this :)
Cheers
Jan
--
Re: Packagers, Maintainers & 1.3.0 release
Posted by Dirkjan Ochtman <dj...@gentoo.org>.
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
> Can you clarify?
COUCHDB-1458. Then, similar things for yajl, and preferably also for
the Erlang dependencies (ejson, mochiweb, ibrowse), making sure that
there are upstream versions that work with CouchDB.
But AIUI this is part of Benoit's build system overhaul plan for 1.4.
Cheers,
Dirkjan
Re: Packagers, Maintainers & 1.3.0 release
Posted by Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org>.
On 28 November 2012 15:38, Dirkjan Ochtman <dj...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> It would be really nice if some effort was spent on making it easier
> to use system versions of dependencies, but I believe that is targeted
> for the near future?
>
Can you clarify?
--
NS
Re: Packagers, Maintainers & 1.3.0 release
Posted by Dirkjan Ochtman <dj...@gentoo.org>.
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Dave Cottlehuber <dc...@jsonified.com> wrote:
> - are you happy to be added to the wiki as a maintainer?
Yes, for Gentoo.
> - alternatively, a link to bugtracker (or where we can identify the
> maintainer) would be fine
> - is the link below correct for your platform?
> http://packages.gentoo.org/package/dev-db/couchdb
Yes.
I haven't tested with 1.3 yet -- I generally do so when there's a tarball.
It would be really nice if some effort was spent on making it easier
to use system versions of dependencies, but I believe that is targeted
for the near future?
</packagers-hat>
Cheers,
Dirkjan