You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@groovy.apache.org by "Eric Milles (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/11/27 15:37:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-9064) STC: explicit declared variable
type ignored in favor of assigned value type(s)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16983633#comment-16983633 ]
Eric Milles commented on GROOVY-9064:
-------------------------------------
See also GROOVY-7763
> STC: explicit declared variable type ignored in favor of assigned value type(s)
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GROOVY-9064
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9064
> Project: Groovy
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Eric Milles
> Priority: Major
>
> Follow up to GROOVY-9058. Consider the following:
> {code:groovy}
> List getSomeRows() { ... }
> @groovy.transform.CompileStatic
> void meth() {
> List<Object[]> rows = getSomeRows()
> rows.each { row ->
> def col = row[0]
> }
> }
> {code}
> The inferred type of {{rows}} is {{List}} and not {{List<Object[]>}} even though the assignment cleared type checking. This causes the inferred type of {{row}} to be {{Object}} instead of {{Object[]}}.
> Similarly, {{List<String> list = []}} infers as {{ArrayList<String>}} instead of the explicit declared type, and {{Map<String, ?> map = [:]}} infers to {{LinkedHasMap<...>}} instead of the declared type. In general, I think as long as the assignment is compatible, the variable should retain its explicitly declared type regardless of assignments.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)