You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@uima.apache.org by Michael Baessler <mb...@michael-baessler.de> on 2007/11/29 14:46:37 UTC
uimaj-2.2.1-03 ready for testing
I have uploaded the latest release candidate for release 2.2.1 to
people.a.o:/home/mbaessler/distributions/uimaj-2.2.1/03
So we can start testing with this level.
--Michael
Re: uimaj-2.2.1-03 ready for testing
Posted by Michael Baessler <mb...@michael-baessler.de>.
Michael Baessler wrote:
> I have uploaded the latest release candidate for release 2.2.1 to
> people.a.o:/home/mbaessler/distributions/uimaj-2.2.1/03
>
> So we can start testing with this level.
>
> --Michael
>
During the release testing, please also check all issues that are in
"resolved" state if they can be closed.
The issue reporter have to close the resolved issues if they are fixed.
-- Michael
Re: uimaj-2.2.1-03 ready for testing
Posted by Thilo Goetz <tw...@gmx.de>.
We have discovered two minor issues since this level
was built: one missing header (doesn't affect testing)
and one failing test case (ok on windows). If you're
not running the test cases, or you're working on windows,
you're still good to test with this level.
--Thilo
Michael Baessler wrote:
> Michael Baessler wrote:
>> I have uploaded the latest release candidate for release 2.2.1 to
>> people.a.o:/home/mbaessler/distributions/uimaj-2.2.1/03
>>
>> So we can start testing with this level.
>>
>> --Michael
>>
> I created the level with the latest SUN Java 5 JVM (1.5.0_14).
>
> -- Michael
Re: uimaj-2.2.1-03 ready for testing
Posted by Michael Baessler <mb...@michael-baessler.de>.
Michael Baessler wrote:
> I have uploaded the latest release candidate for release 2.2.1 to
> people.a.o:/home/mbaessler/distributions/uimaj-2.2.1/03
>
> So we can start testing with this level.
>
> --Michael
>
I created the level with the latest SUN Java 5 JVM (1.5.0_14).
-- Michael
Re: uimaj-2.2.1-03 ready for testing
Posted by Michael Baessler <mb...@michael-baessler.de>.
The message:
'tar: A lone zero block at *'
is just a warning and can be ignored. All content is extracted
correctly. The reason for the message is that newer tar versions expects
two empty records
marking the end of the archive but it seems that our Maven build only
creates one.
I tested with the latest Maven version 2.0.8 but it seems that the error
still occurs.
I also found the following Maven issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2762
-- Michael
Michael Baessler wrote:
> Michael Baessler wrote:
>> I have uploaded the latest release candidate for release 2.2.1 to
>> people.a.o:/home/mbaessler/distributions/uimaj-2.2.1/03
>>
>> So we can start testing with this level.
>>
>> --Michael
>>
> I seems that we have some issues with the tar.gz archives...
>
> With an older version of GNU tar (1.13) all works fine. With a newer
> version (1.15) we got errors while decompressing the archive.
> Can anyone else please verify that?
>
> Thanks Michael
Re: uimaj-2.2.1-03 ready for testing
Posted by Thilo Goetz <tw...@gmx.de>.
Same problem with 1.18, btw.
Michael Baessler wrote:
> Michael Baessler wrote:
>> I have uploaded the latest release candidate for release 2.2.1 to
>> people.a.o:/home/mbaessler/distributions/uimaj-2.2.1/03
>>
>> So we can start testing with this level.
>>
>> --Michael
>>
> I seems that we have some issues with the tar.gz archives...
>
> With an older version of GNU tar (1.13) all works fine. With a newer
> version (1.15) we got errors while decompressing the archive.
> Can anyone else please verify that?
>
> Thanks Michael
Re: uimaj-2.2.1-03 ready for testing
Posted by Michael Baessler <mb...@michael-baessler.de>.
Michael Baessler wrote:
> I have uploaded the latest release candidate for release 2.2.1 to
> people.a.o:/home/mbaessler/distributions/uimaj-2.2.1/03
>
> So we can start testing with this level.
>
> --Michael
>
I seems that we have some issues with the tar.gz archives...
With an older version of GNU tar (1.13) all works fine. With a newer
version (1.15) we got errors while decompressing the archive.
Can anyone else please verify that?
Thanks Michael