You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@tapestry.apache.org by Robert <ca...@linuxmail.org> on 2004/04/21 15:30:07 UTC

Groovy + Tapestry?

Has anyone explored using Groovy with Tapestry? I am just wondering how they
would mesh.

Robert




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org


Re: Groovy + Tapestry?

Posted by Robert <ca...@linuxmail.org>.
"Harish Krishnaswamy" <hk...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:40868924.50104@comcast.net...
> Groovy is still in the development phase, I would start off with
> experimental stuff like writing my test cases and config files and build
> tasks before using it for real code, like advocated on their website!
>
> -Harish
>
I have also been reading this:

http://jroller.com/page/pyrasun/20040328#groovy_ambiguities_optional_elements_and

So I am not so sure now...




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org


Re: Groovy + Tapestry?

Posted by Harish Krishnaswamy <hk...@comcast.net>.
Groovy is still in the development phase, I would start off with 
experimental stuff like writing my test cases and config files and build 
tasks before using it for real code, like advocated on their website!

-Harish

Robert wrote:

>"Harish Krishnaswamy" <hk...@comcast.net> wrote in message
>news:408679A1.4070303@comcast.net...
>  
>
>>Can you be a little more specific? Which part are you envisioning
>>replacing with Groovy?
>>
>>-Harish
>>
>>    
>>
>I am guessing, since I am just reading about Groovy, that you could drop it
>in as a "replacement" and write your actual code in Groovy and not Java. I
>am not advocating replacing Groovy for Java as the source language for
>Tapestry.
>
>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
>  
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org


Re: Groovy + Tapestry?

Posted by Robert <ca...@linuxmail.org>.
"Harish Krishnaswamy" <hk...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:408679A1.4070303@comcast.net...
> Can you be a little more specific? Which part are you envisioning
> replacing with Groovy?
>
> -Harish
>
I am guessing, since I am just reading about Groovy, that you could drop it
in as a "replacement" and write your actual code in Groovy and not Java. I
am not advocating replacing Groovy for Java as the source language for
Tapestry.




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org


Re: Groovy + Tapestry?

Posted by Harish Krishnaswamy <hk...@comcast.net>.
Can you be a little more specific? Which part are you envisioning 
replacing with Groovy?

-Harish

Robert wrote:

>Has anyone explored using Groovy with Tapestry? I am just wondering how they
>would mesh.
>
>Robert
>
>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
>  
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org


Re: Groovy + Tapestry?

Posted by Erik Hatcher <er...@ehatchersolutions.com>.
On Apr 21, 2004, at 9:30 AM, Robert wrote:
> Has anyone explored using Groovy with Tapestry? I am just wondering 
> how they
> would mesh.

Groovy is BSF-compliant, so you should be able to use this as a 
<listener-binding> language.

I tried it a month or so ago very briefly and did not have success - it 
seemed to error because of the instrumented classes that Tapestry 
generated - but then again I could have done something wrong by not 
including a dependency Groovy needed.  Or maybe Groovy has fixed 
whatever causes this error since?

	Erik


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org