You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@spark.apache.org by "Xiangrui Meng (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/10/27 05:48:27 UTC

[jira] [Resolved] (SPARK-11184) Declare most of .mllib code not-Experimental

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Xiangrui Meng resolved SPARK-11184.
-----------------------------------
       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: 1.6.0

Issue resolved by pull request 9169
[https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9169]

> Declare most of .mllib code not-Experimental
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-11184
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11184
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: MLlib
>    Affects Versions: 1.5.1
>            Reporter: Sean Owen
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.6.0
>
>
> Comments please [~mengxr] and [~josephkb]: my proposal is to remove most {{@Experimental}} annotations from the {{.mllib}} code, on the theory that it's not intended to change much more. 
> I can easily take a shot at this, but wanted to collect thoughts before I started. Does the theory sound reasonable? Part of it is a desire to keep this annotation meaningful, and also encourage people to at least view MLlib as stable, because it is.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@spark.apache.org