You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to users@jackrabbit.apache.org by orair <gu...@hotmail.com> on 2011/05/25 15:56:14 UTC

Re: Lucene 2.9

I would like to add a vote on this request.

In our company, there are projects where lucene is managed directly.
Jackrabbit is used just as a storage (get/save) data files.
Otherwise, we have conflicts between the lucene version used directly 3.0
and the lucene version JackRabbit uses.

By the way, would at least be possible to use JCR without lucene?
We use the JCR repository just to add and get contents by path and/or
Identifier.

Regards,
Orair.

--
View this message in context: http://jackrabbit.510166.n4.nabble.com/Lucene-2-9-tp2326973p3549753.html
Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Lucene 2.9

Posted by Thomas Kratz <ei...@googlemail.com>.

I have the same trouble with hibernate search which needs lucene 3.1
thanks to osgi classloading i can have both versions installed.

2011/5/25 orair <gu...@hotmail.com>

> I would like to add a vote on this request.
>
> In our company, there are projects where lucene is managed directly.
> Jackrabbit is used just as a storage (get/save) data files.
> Otherwise, we have conflicts between the lucene version used directly 3.0
> and the lucene version JackRabbit uses.
>
> By the way, would at least be possible to use JCR without lucene?
> We use the JCR repository just to add and get contents by path and/or
> Identifier.
>
> Regards,
> Orair.
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://jackrabbit.510166.n4.nabble.com/Lucene-2-9-tp2326973p3549753.html
> Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>