You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jmeter.apache.org by Woonsan Ko <wo...@apache.org> on 2017/02/16 14:41:35 UTC
Re: Proposition for contribution
Hi folks,
Is there anyone working in unit tests for JDBC protocol?
If not, I'd like to take a look into it next week.
Cheers,
Woonsan
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Philippe Mouawad
<ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> Thanks for your proposal.
> Yes it is still up to date.
>
> You can have a look at our Sonar report to know what needs testing:
>
> - https://builds.apache.org/analysis/
>
> Our priorities regarding tests:
>
> - JDBC protocol (more the NON Gui classes)
> - HTTP (more non gui classes)
> - org.apache.jmeter.assertions:
> - .HTMLAssertion
> - JSR223Assertion
> - org.apache.jmeter.core.report
> - org.apache.jmeter.visualizers.backend.graphite
> - core/org/apache/jmeter/control
>
> Note coverage is not only related to JUnit tests but also to tests builds
> with JMX plans and ran with Jacoco agent.
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Sébastien Col <se...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I would like to contribute to the project and I thought I could start
>> working on the task #41118bb8 related to test suite enhancement and
>> migration to JUnit 4.
>> I found it from the helpwanted.apache.org site.
>> Is it still up-to-date?
>> Regards,
>> Sebastien
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cordialement.
> Philippe Mouawad.
Re: Proposition for contribution
Posted by Graham Russell <gr...@ham1.co.uk>.
As Philippe said I've started a test for the JDBCSampler and
AbstractJDBCTestElement using Spock:
https://github.com/ham1/jmeter/blob/spock/test/src/org/apache/jmeter/protocol/jdbc/sampler/JDBCSamplerSpec.groovy
but until we decide which Mocking/testing framework to use it would be
great to get some test coverage on the current trunk.
Thanks
Graham
On 16 February 2017 at 14:46, Philippe Mouawad
<ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Great !
> I think you can go ahead
> There was a discussion about a mocking framework to use.
> Graham started something around spock,
> Felix proposed jmockit, I don't know if he started something.
> And I mentioned mockito2 but without producing anything ;)
>
> But maybe your work does not need a mocking framework.
>
> Regards
>
> On Thursday, February 16, 2017, Woonsan Ko <woonsan@apache.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','woonsan@apache.org');>> wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> Is there anyone working in unit tests for JDBC protocol?
>> If not, I'd like to take a look into it next week.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Woonsan
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Philippe Mouawad
>> <ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> > Thanks for your proposal.
>> > Yes it is still up to date.
>> >
>> > You can have a look at our Sonar report to know what needs testing:
>> >
>> > - https://builds.apache.org/analysis/
>> >
>> > Our priorities regarding tests:
>> >
>> > - JDBC protocol (more the NON Gui classes)
>> > - HTTP (more non gui classes)
>> > - org.apache.jmeter.assertions:
>> > - .HTMLAssertion
>> > - JSR223Assertion
>> > - org.apache.jmeter.core.report
>> > - org.apache.jmeter.visualizers.backend.graphite
>> > - core/org/apache/jmeter/control
>> >
>> > Note coverage is not only related to JUnit tests but also to tests builds
>> > with JMX plans and ran with Jacoco agent.
>> >
>> > Regards
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Sébastien Col <se...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >> I would like to contribute to the project and I thought I could start
>> >> working on the task #41118bb8 related to test suite enhancement and
>> >> migration to JUnit 4.
>> >> I found it from the helpwanted.apache.org site.
>> >> Is it still up-to-date?
>> >> Regards,
>> >> Sebastien
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Cordialement.
>> > Philippe Mouawad.
>>
>
>
> --
> Cordialement.
> Philippe Mouawad.
Proposition for contribution
Posted by Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>.
Great !
I think you can go ahead
There was a discussion about a mocking framework to use.
Graham started something around spock,
Felix proposed jmockit, I don't know if he started something.
And I mentioned mockito2 but without producing anything ;)
But maybe your work does not need a mocking framework.
Regards
On Thursday, February 16, 2017, Woonsan Ko <woonsan@apache.org
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','woonsan@apache.org');>> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Is there anyone working in unit tests for JDBC protocol?
> If not, I'd like to take a look into it next week.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Woonsan
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Philippe Mouawad
> <ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> > Thanks for your proposal.
> > Yes it is still up to date.
> >
> > You can have a look at our Sonar report to know what needs testing:
> >
> > - https://builds.apache.org/analysis/
> >
> > Our priorities regarding tests:
> >
> > - JDBC protocol (more the NON Gui classes)
> > - HTTP (more non gui classes)
> > - org.apache.jmeter.assertions:
> > - .HTMLAssertion
> > - JSR223Assertion
> > - org.apache.jmeter.core.report
> > - org.apache.jmeter.visualizers.backend.graphite
> > - core/org/apache/jmeter/control
> >
> > Note coverage is not only related to JUnit tests but also to tests builds
> > with JMX plans and ran with Jacoco agent.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Sébastien Col <se...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >> I would like to contribute to the project and I thought I could start
> >> working on the task #41118bb8 related to test suite enhancement and
> >> migration to JUnit 4.
> >> I found it from the helpwanted.apache.org site.
> >> Is it still up-to-date?
> >> Regards,
> >> Sebastien
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cordialement.
> > Philippe Mouawad.
>
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.