You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to server-dev@james.apache.org by Norman Maurer <no...@apache.org> on 2008/04/05 11:16:56 UTC
[VOTE] jSPF-0.9.6 (seconds try....)
Hi all,
I just rebuilded the 0.9.6 files for jspf. The release now contains the
pom file changes suggested by Stefano. So I hope the VOTE will now pass
and we get the release out soon ;-)
Please review and VOTE:
http://people.apache.org/~norman/staging-repository/org/apache/james/apache-jspf/
VOTE:
[ ] +1 Yes plz make this release official!
[ ] +0 Cool to see the release
[ ] -0 Anyway I don't care to much..
[ ] -1 No.. I don't want a new release for some reason!
Cheers
Norman
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] jSPF-0.9.6 (second try....)
Posted by Norman Maurer <no...@apache.org>.
> > [x] +1 Yes plz make this release official!
Cheers
Norman
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] jSPF-0.9.6 (seconds try....)
Posted by Norman Maurer <no...@apache.org>.
Am Samstag, den 05.04.2008, 11:16 +0200 schrieb Norman Maurer:
> Hi all,
>
> I just rebuilded the 0.9.6 files for jspf. The release now contains the
> pom file changes suggested by Stefano. So I hope the VOTE will now pass
> and we get the release out soon ;-)
>
> Please review and VOTE:
> http://people.apache.org/~norman/staging-repository/org/apache/james/apache-jspf/
>
> VOTE:
> [ ] +1 Yes plz make this release official!
> [ ] +0 Cool to see the release
> [ ] -0 Anyway I don't care to much..
> [ ] -1 No.. I don't want a new release for some reason!
>
> Cheers
> Norman
The VOTE will end at 08.04.08 12:00 CEST
Cheers,
Norman
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] jSPF-0.9.6 (seconds try....)
Posted by Stefano Bagnara <ap...@bago.org>.
Norman Maurer ha scritto:
> Hi all,
>
> I just rebuilded the 0.9.6 files for jspf. The release now contains the
> pom file changes suggested by Stefano. So I hope the VOTE will now pass
> and we get the release out soon ;-)
>
> Please review and VOTE:
> http://people.apache.org/~norman/staging-repository/org/apache/james/apache-jspf/
>
> VOTE:
[X] +1 Yes plz make this release official!
Stefano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] jSPF-0.9.6 (seconds try....)
Posted by Stefano Bagnara <ap...@bago.org>.
Norman Maurer ha scritto:
> Hi all,
>
> I just rebuilded the 0.9.6 files for jspf. The release now contains the
> pom file changes suggested by Stefano. So I hope the VOTE will now pass
> and we get the release out soon ;-)
>
> Please review and VOTE:
> http://people.apache.org/~norman/staging-repository/org/apache/james/apache-jspf/
>
> VOTE:
> [ ] +1 Yes plz make this release official!
> [ ] +0 Cool to see the release
> [ ] -0 Anyway I don't care to much..
> [ ] -1 No.. I don't want a new release for some reason!
>
> Cheers
> Norman
I don't know what's happening but I have very big issues with ASF
servers. I can't even download small files from svn or people, so I
cannot check the release, now.
One thing that come to my mind is that I left this version in build.xml:
<property name="maven.build.final.name" value="jspf-0.9.7-SNAPSHOT"/>
Because I thought we was going to fail "0.9.6" and try 0.9.7 later..
Not sure if this should be a blocker or if we can ignore it.
IMO the fact that the result artifact of an unofficial offline build
tool is 0.9.7-SNAPSHOT instead of 0.9.6 is NOT an issue.
That said I'll check the packages you prepared in the next days (as soon
as I will be able to download them!).
Thank you,
Stefano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] jSPF-0.9.6 (seconds try....)
Posted by Soren Hilmer <sh...@widetrail.dk>.
[X] +0 Cool to see the release
On Saturday 05 April 2008 11:16, Norman Maurer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just rebuilded the 0.9.6 files for jspf. The release now contains the
> pom file changes suggested by Stefano. So I hope the VOTE will now pass
> and we get the release out soon ;-)
>
> Please review and VOTE:
> http://people.apache.org/~norman/staging-repository/org/apache/james/apache
>-jspf/
>
> VOTE:
> [ ] +1 Yes plz make this release official!
> [ ] +0 Cool to see the release
> [ ] -0 Anyway I don't care to much..
> [ ] -1 No.. I don't want a new release for some reason!
>
> Cheers
> Norman
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
--
Søren Hilmer, M.Sc., M.Crypt.
wideTrail Phone: +45 25481225
Pilevænget 41 Email: sh@widetrail.dk
DK-8961 Allingåbro Web: www.widetrail.dk
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] jSPF-0.9.6 (seconds try....)
Posted by Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini <vi...@praxis.it>.
[x] +0 Cool to see the release
Vincenzo
Re: [VOTE] jSPF-0.9.6 (seconds try....)
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@gmail.com>.
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Norman Maurer <no...@apache.org> wrote:
<snip>
> VOTE:
> [X] +1 Yes plz make this release official!
> [ ] +0 Cool to see the release
> [ ] -0 Anyway I don't care to much..
> [ ] -1 No.. I don't want a new release for some reason!
BTW i have few release related quibbles but i'm willing to patch these later
- robert