You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@tapestry.apache.org by hari ks <ha...@yahoo.com> on 2005/12/28 04:14:06 UTC
framework architecture documentation
hi,
Is there a well written tapestry framework
architecture document?
JSF has its architecture documented in its J2EE
tutorial 1.4. I am able to understand how things work
inside jsf because of this.
Tapestry has much easier component development. Other
than that, what are other significant advantages in
tapestry? (With facelets and exadel's studio pro, html
type of view is made possible in JSF for any
thirdparty components. ).
Hari.
__________________________________
Yahoo! for Good - Make a difference this year.
http://brand.yahoo.com/cybergivingweek2005/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: framework architecture documentation
Posted by Jesse Kuhnert <jk...@gmail.com>.
Damn, every time I get excited about another framework I always find
something equally unexciting, like JSF. arghh
Still though, I agree that providing a very clear and easy to use path for
making using things like hibernate with tap apps is a must. It's on my todo
list to be sure that either the right hivemind/hibernate projects are
promoted or to start a new one focusing on this.
We'll see where it goes ;)
jesse
On 1/10/06, Carlos Terra <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I have not seem an architecture document for tapestry 4. In tapestry
> 3, the yellow book (Howard's) was basically an architecture document.
> I have not heard of plans for Howard to write a new edition for
> tapestry 4, it's possible that Ken Tong does it, but have not heard of
> it.
>
> Your best documentation is really Ken's Enojoying Web development with
> Tapestry, he made final changes for tapestry 4 final. You should
> have a link for this from Ken, if you don't let me know.
>
> I still feel Tapestry has a role to play because of its excellent
> architecture. However, if standards are a most, then SEAM would be my
> choice.
>
> Take care
>
> On 12/27/05, hari ks <ha...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > hi,
> > Is there a well written tapestry framework
> > architecture document?
> > JSF has its architecture documented in its J2EE
> > tutorial 1.4. I am able to understand how things work
> > inside jsf because of this.
> >
> > Tapestry has much easier component development. Other
> > than that, what are other significant advantages in
> > tapestry? (With facelets and exadel's studio pro, html
> > type of view is made possible in JSF for any
> > thirdparty components. ).
> >
> > Hari.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Yahoo! for Good - Make a difference this year.
> > http://brand.yahoo.com/cybergivingweek2005/
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Peace and Grace, Carlos
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
Re: framework architecture documentation
Posted by Carlos Terra <ch...@gmail.com>.
I have not seem an architecture document for tapestry 4. In tapestry
3, the yellow book (Howard's) was basically an architecture document.
I have not heard of plans for Howard to write a new edition for
tapestry 4, it's possible that Ken Tong does it, but have not heard of
it.
Your best documentation is really Ken's Enojoying Web development with
Tapestry, he made final changes for tapestry 4 final. You should
have a link for this from Ken, if you don't let me know.
I still feel Tapestry has a role to play because of its excellent
architecture. However, if standards are a most, then SEAM would be my
choice.
Take care
On 12/27/05, hari ks <ha...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> hi,
> Is there a well written tapestry framework
> architecture document?
> JSF has its architecture documented in its J2EE
> tutorial 1.4. I am able to understand how things work
> inside jsf because of this.
>
> Tapestry has much easier component development. Other
> than that, what are other significant advantages in
> tapestry? (With facelets and exadel's studio pro, html
> type of view is made possible in JSF for any
> thirdparty components. ).
>
> Hari.
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Yahoo! for Good - Make a difference this year.
> http://brand.yahoo.com/cybergivingweek2005/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
--
Peace and Grace, Carlos
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org