You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@cayenne.apache.org by "Tomas Jura (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/11/04 23:19:00 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (CAY-2638) Cayennne sends commit

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAY-2638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Tomas Jura updated CAY-2638:
----------------------------
    Attachment: commit_log.txt

> Cayennne sends commit
> ---------------------
>
>                 Key: CAY-2638
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAY-2638
>             Project: Cayenne
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Core Library
>    Affects Versions: 4.1.RC2
>            Reporter: Tomas Jura
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: commit_log.txt
>
>
> The cayenne sends the commits to the database ( after a lazy fetch, ... ). The transaction boundaries are defined by a superior business logic and ORM must not corrupt this logic and boundaries. Imagine for example that the Cayenne is part of an XA transaction, where the commit is controled by a transaction manager and the commit guided by two phase commit protocol. I'm afraid that any attempt to control transaction boundaries from ORM sooner or later clash with required boundaries.
> This design feature, automaticaly reject using cayenne as an ORM for any bit complex project which want to use savepoint/rollback/commit commands. As far as I remember Cayenne 3 did not touched the transaction state. Why Cayenne 4 touching the transaction?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)