You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@daffodil.apache.org by Steve Lawrence <sl...@apache.org> on 2021/05/14 19:26:39 UTC
[VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2
Hi all,
I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2.
All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/daffodil/3.1.0-rc2/
Staging artifacts can be found at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1023/
This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661,
corresponding to slawrence@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS
file here:
https://downloads.apache.org/daffodil/KEYS
The release candidate has been tagged in git with v3.1.0-rc2.
For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 3.1.0:
https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-3.1.0
For a summary of the changes in this release, see:
https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/3.1.0/
Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours
(Monday, 17 May 2021, 4pm EST).
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2
Posted by Olabusayo Kilo <ok...@owlcyberdefense.com>.
+1
I checked:
[OK] links in email are correct
[OK] verified Summary of Changes pages (maven, sbt and download)
[OK] JavaDoc and ScalaDoc are correct
[OK] RAT check passes
On 5/14/21 3:26 PM, Steve Lawrence wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2.
>
> All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> found at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/daffodil/3.1.0-rc2/
>
> Staging artifacts can be found at:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1023/
>
> This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661,
> corresponding to slawrence@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS
> file here:
>
> https://downloads.apache.org/daffodil/KEYS
>
> The release candidate has been tagged in git with v3.1.0-rc2.
>
> For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 3.1.0:
>
> https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-3.1.0
>
> For a summary of the changes in this release, see:
>
> https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/3.1.0/
>
> Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours
> (Monday, 17 May 2021, 4pm EST).
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
--
Best Regards,
Lola K.
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2
Posted by "Thompson, Dave" <dt...@owlcyberdefense.com>.
Vote +1
Verified and closed all "Resolved" v3.1.0 JIRA tickets.
Verified all Daffodil sub-project SBT test suites execute successfully.
Verified all nightly performance test schemas compile and save successfully on java 8, 11 and 16.
Verified the nightly performance test suite successfully executed with java 8, 11 and 16.
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Lawrence
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2021 3:27 PM
To: dev@daffodil.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2
Hi all,
I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2.
All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/daffodil/3.1.0-rc2/
Staging artifacts can be found at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1023/
This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661, corresponding to slawrence@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS file here:
https://downloads.apache.org/daffodil/KEYS
The release candidate has been tagged in git with v3.1.0-rc2.
For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 3.1.0:
https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-3.1.0
For a summary of the changes in this release, see:
https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/3.1.0/
Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (Monday, 17 May 2021, 4pm EST).
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2
Posted by Steve Lawrence <sl...@apache.org>.
I've talked to a couple others that are still reviewing and planning to
vote. Just giving a chance for extra votes to come in and make sure
there are no issues. Especially since much of the 72 hours was over the
weekend and people may not have had time yesterday.
On 5/18/21 9:24 AM, Interrante, John A (GE Research, US) wrote:
> More than 72 hours have passed and we're up to 5 +1's now with no 0's or -1's. When will the release come out? :-)
>
> John
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Wass <jw...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2021 8:55 AM
> To: dev@daffodil.apache.org
> Subject: EXT: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2
>
> +1
>
> I checked
>
> [OK] RPM install in centos 8 and fedora 32 [OK] spot check schematron validation and svrl output [OK] misc CLI operations [OK] hash of each download matches [OK] rat check passes [OK] use of staged artifacts in existing applications
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 3:26 PM Steve Lawrence <sl...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2.
>>
>> All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
>> found at:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/daffodil/3.1.0-rc2/
>>
>> Staging artifacts can be found at:
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1
>> 023/
>>
>> This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661,
>> corresponding to slawrence@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS
>> file here:
>>
>> https://downloads.apache.org/daffodil/KEYS
>>
>> The release candidate has been tagged in git with v3.1.0-rc2.
>>
>> For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 3.1.0:
>>
>> https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-3.1.0
>>
>> For a summary of the changes in this release, see:
>>
>> https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/3.1.0/
>>
>> Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours
>> (Monday, 17 May 2021, 4pm EST).
>>
>> [ ] +1 approve
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>>
[VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2
Posted by "Interrante, John A (GE Research, US)" <Jo...@ge.com>.
More than 72 hours have passed and we're up to 5 +1's now with no 0's or -1's. When will the release come out? :-)
John
-----Original Message-----
From: John Wass <jw...@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2021 8:55 AM
To: dev@daffodil.apache.org
Subject: EXT: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2
+1
I checked
[OK] RPM install in centos 8 and fedora 32 [OK] spot check schematron validation and svrl output [OK] misc CLI operations [OK] hash of each download matches [OK] rat check passes [OK] use of staged artifacts in existing applications
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 3:26 PM Steve Lawrence <sl...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2.
>
> All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> found at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/daffodil/3.1.0-rc2/
>
> Staging artifacts can be found at:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1
> 023/
>
> This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661,
> corresponding to slawrence@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS
> file here:
>
> https://downloads.apache.org/daffodil/KEYS
>
> The release candidate has been tagged in git with v3.1.0-rc2.
>
> For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 3.1.0:
>
> https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-3.1.0
>
> For a summary of the changes in this release, see:
>
> https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/3.1.0/
>
> Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours
> (Monday, 17 May 2021, 4pm EST).
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2
Posted by John Wass <jw...@gmail.com>.
+1
I checked
[OK] RPM install in centos 8 and fedora 32
[OK] spot check schematron validation and svrl output
[OK] misc CLI operations
[OK] hash of each download matches
[OK] rat check passes
[OK] use of staged artifacts in existing applications
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 3:26 PM Steve Lawrence <sl...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2.
>
> All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> found at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/daffodil/3.1.0-rc2/
>
> Staging artifacts can be found at:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1023/
>
> This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661,
> corresponding to slawrence@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS
> file here:
>
> https://downloads.apache.org/daffodil/KEYS
>
> The release candidate has been tagged in git with v3.1.0-rc2.
>
> For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 3.1.0:
>
> https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-3.1.0
>
> For a summary of the changes in this release, see:
>
> https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/3.1.0/
>
> Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours
> (Monday, 17 May 2021, 4pm EST).
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2
Posted by "Adams, Joshua" <ja...@owlcyberdefense.com>.
+1
I checked
[OK] RPM installs and runs as expected on CentOS 8
[OK] Signatures and hashes for RPM and source are correct
[OK] Correct LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER in src, RPM, JAR files
[OK] Source release matches git tag (minus KEYS file)
[OK] No unexpected binaries in source
[OK] Source compiles and all tests pass
[OK] RAT check passes
Josh
________________________________
From: Steve Lawrence <sl...@apache.org>
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2021 10:21 AM
To: dev@daffodil.apache.org <de...@daffodil.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2
+1
I checked:
[OK] hashes and signatures of source and helper binaries are correct
[OK] signature of git tag is correct
[OK] source release matches git tag (minus KEYS file)
[OK] source compiles and all tests pass (both en_US and de_DE LANG)
[OK] jars in helper binaries and the repository are exactly the same
[OK] jars built from source are exactly the same as helper binary jars
[OK] src, binaries, and jars include correct LICENSE/NOTICE
[OK] RAT check passes
[OK] no unexpected binaries in source
[OK] distributed dependencies in helper binaries are same as from maven
[OK] rpm and msi install and run with basic usage
[OK] ~60 public and private DFDL schema projects pass tests
[OK] No issues found in JavaDoc and ScalaDoc
On 5/17/21 9:55 AM, Interrante, John A (GE Research, US) wrote:
> +1
>
> I checked (for most items, using WSL2/Ubuntu 20.04 on my laptop):
>
> [OK] rpm installs correctly on Fedora Workstation 34
>
> [OK] some daffodil CLI commands work (generate c, test on runtime2 examples)
>
> [OK] signature of git tag is correct
>
> [OK] hash and signature of each download is correct
>
> [OK] src, bins, and jars include correct LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER
>
> [OK] source release matches git tag (minus KEYS file)
>
> [OK] no unexpected binaries in source
>
> [OK] source compiles and all tests pass
>
> [OK] RAT check passes
>
> [OK] jars built from source have the same content as helper binary jars
>
> John
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Lawrence <sl...@apache.org>
> Sent: Friday, May 14, 2021 3:27 PM
> To: dev@daffodil.apache.org
> Subject: EXT: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2.
>
> All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/daffodil/3.1.0-rc2/
>
> Staging artifacts can be found at:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1023/
>
> This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661, corresponding to slawrence@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS file here:
>
> https://downloads.apache.org/daffodil/KEYS
>
> The release candidate has been tagged in git with v3.1.0-rc2.
>
> For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 3.1.0:
>
> https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-3.1.0
>
> For a summary of the changes in this release, see:
>
> https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/3.1.0/
>
> Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (Monday, 17 May 2021, 4pm EST).
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2
Posted by "Beckerle, Mike" <mb...@owlcyberdefense.com>.
+1
I checked:
* all developer tests pass (test, it:test)
* all ibm compatibility tests pass for all known schemas
* includes all the portable ones at github DFDLSchemas, and a few other non-public schemas
* all known schemas pass daffodil tests - excepting vcard - which is a known documented regression
* This includes testing the user-defined-functions feature, which is used by one non-public DFDL schema
* examples like the java API "helloworld" example pass their tests.
* Release notes page looks good.
* Scaladoc/javadoc looks good.
________________________________
From: Steve Lawrence <sl...@apache.org>
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2021 10:21 AM
To: dev@daffodil.apache.org <de...@daffodil.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2
+1
I checked:
[OK] hashes and signatures of source and helper binaries are correct
[OK] signature of git tag is correct
[OK] source release matches git tag (minus KEYS file)
[OK] source compiles and all tests pass (both en_US and de_DE LANG)
[OK] jars in helper binaries and the repository are exactly the same
[OK] jars built from source are exactly the same as helper binary jars
[OK] src, binaries, and jars include correct LICENSE/NOTICE
[OK] RAT check passes
[OK] no unexpected binaries in source
[OK] distributed dependencies in helper binaries are same as from maven
[OK] rpm and msi install and run with basic usage
[OK] ~60 public and private DFDL schema projects pass tests
[OK] No issues found in JavaDoc and ScalaDoc
On 5/17/21 9:55 AM, Interrante, John A (GE Research, US) wrote:
> +1
>
> I checked (for most items, using WSL2/Ubuntu 20.04 on my laptop):
>
> [OK] rpm installs correctly on Fedora Workstation 34
>
> [OK] some daffodil CLI commands work (generate c, test on runtime2 examples)
>
> [OK] signature of git tag is correct
>
> [OK] hash and signature of each download is correct
>
> [OK] src, bins, and jars include correct LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER
>
> [OK] source release matches git tag (minus KEYS file)
>
> [OK] no unexpected binaries in source
>
> [OK] source compiles and all tests pass
>
> [OK] RAT check passes
>
> [OK] jars built from source have the same content as helper binary jars
>
> John
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Lawrence <sl...@apache.org>
> Sent: Friday, May 14, 2021 3:27 PM
> To: dev@daffodil.apache.org
> Subject: EXT: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2.
>
> All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/daffodil/3.1.0-rc2/
>
> Staging artifacts can be found at:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1023/
>
> This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661, corresponding to slawrence@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS file here:
>
> https://downloads.apache.org/daffodil/KEYS
>
> The release candidate has been tagged in git with v3.1.0-rc2.
>
> For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 3.1.0:
>
> https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-3.1.0
>
> For a summary of the changes in this release, see:
>
> https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/3.1.0/
>
> Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (Monday, 17 May 2021, 4pm EST).
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2
Posted by Steve Lawrence <sl...@apache.org>.
+1
I checked:
[OK] hashes and signatures of source and helper binaries are correct
[OK] signature of git tag is correct
[OK] source release matches git tag (minus KEYS file)
[OK] source compiles and all tests pass (both en_US and de_DE LANG)
[OK] jars in helper binaries and the repository are exactly the same
[OK] jars built from source are exactly the same as helper binary jars
[OK] src, binaries, and jars include correct LICENSE/NOTICE
[OK] RAT check passes
[OK] no unexpected binaries in source
[OK] distributed dependencies in helper binaries are same as from maven
[OK] rpm and msi install and run with basic usage
[OK] ~60 public and private DFDL schema projects pass tests
[OK] No issues found in JavaDoc and ScalaDoc
On 5/17/21 9:55 AM, Interrante, John A (GE Research, US) wrote:
> +1
>
> I checked (for most items, using WSL2/Ubuntu 20.04 on my laptop):
>
> [OK] rpm installs correctly on Fedora Workstation 34
>
> [OK] some daffodil CLI commands work (generate c, test on runtime2 examples)
>
> [OK] signature of git tag is correct
>
> [OK] hash and signature of each download is correct
>
> [OK] src, bins, and jars include correct LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER
>
> [OK] source release matches git tag (minus KEYS file)
>
> [OK] no unexpected binaries in source
>
> [OK] source compiles and all tests pass
>
> [OK] RAT check passes
>
> [OK] jars built from source have the same content as helper binary jars
>
> John
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Lawrence <sl...@apache.org>
> Sent: Friday, May 14, 2021 3:27 PM
> To: dev@daffodil.apache.org
> Subject: EXT: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2.
>
> All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/daffodil/3.1.0-rc2/
>
> Staging artifacts can be found at:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1023/
>
> This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661, corresponding to slawrence@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS file here:
>
> https://downloads.apache.org/daffodil/KEYS
>
> The release candidate has been tagged in git with v3.1.0-rc2.
>
> For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 3.1.0:
>
> https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-3.1.0
>
> For a summary of the changes in this release, see:
>
> https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/3.1.0/
>
> Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (Monday, 17 May 2021, 4pm EST).
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2
Posted by "Interrante, John A (GE Research, US)" <Jo...@ge.com>.
+1
I checked (for most items, using WSL2/Ubuntu 20.04 on my laptop):
[OK] rpm installs correctly on Fedora Workstation 34
[OK] some daffodil CLI commands work (generate c, test on runtime2 examples)
[OK] signature of git tag is correct
[OK] hash and signature of each download is correct
[OK] src, bins, and jars include correct LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER
[OK] source release matches git tag (minus KEYS file)
[OK] no unexpected binaries in source
[OK] source compiles and all tests pass
[OK] RAT check passes
[OK] jars built from source have the same content as helper binary jars
John
-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Lawrence <sl...@apache.org>
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2021 3:27 PM
To: dev@daffodil.apache.org
Subject: EXT: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2
Hi all,
I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2.
All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/daffodil/3.1.0-rc2/
Staging artifacts can be found at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1023/
This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661, corresponding to slawrence@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS file here:
https://downloads.apache.org/daffodil/KEYS
The release candidate has been tagged in git with v3.1.0-rc2.
For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 3.1.0:
https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-3.1.0
For a summary of the changes in this release, see:
https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/3.1.0/
Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (Monday, 17 May 2021, 4pm EST).
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)