Re: [sa-list] OT: Spammers' reactions to rejection

[ha...@t-online.de]

>> Return-Path: <wo...@amadeus3>
>> X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2
>> Mailing-List: contact users-help@spamassassin.apache.org; run by ezmlm
>> Precedence: bulk
>> list-help: <ma...@spamassassin.apache.org>
>> list-unsubscribe: <ma...@spamassassin.apache.org>
>> List-Post: <ma...@spamassassin.apache.org>
>> List-Id: <users.spamassassin.apache.org>
>> Delivered-To: mailing list users@spamassassin.apache.org
>> X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
>> 	tests=SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
>> Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of maillists@conactive.com designates 212.202.99.227 as permitted sender)
>> Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 15:31:24 +0100
>> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [sa-list] OT: Spammers' reactions to rejection
>> X-Mailer: Virtual Access Open Source http://www.virtual-access.org/
>> Mime-Version: 1.0
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>> In-Reply-To: <43...@vianet.ca>
>> References: <43...@lysator.liu.se> <43...@evi-inc.com> <11...@piper.danybrooks.com> <43...@free.fr> <20...@prime.gushi.org> <43...@vianet.ca>
>> From: "Kai Schaetzl" <ma...@conactive.com>
>> Reply-To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>> X-Rcpt-To: <us...@spamassassin.apache.org>
>> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
>> X-TOI-SPAM: u;0;2005-11-19T14:32:15Z
>> X-TOI-VIRUSSCAN: unchecked
>> X-TOI-MSGID: bf38862f-9cb6-429a-b742-3a6a6b980fed
>> X-Seen: false
>> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on amadeus3.local
>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham 
>> 	version=3.0.4
>> X-Spam-Level: 
>> 
>> Kris Deugau wrote on Fri, 18 Nov 2005 12:54:54 -0500:
>> 
>> > A nice thought, but absolutely useless in the case where you receive any 
>> > volume of mail from a host running qmail.  :(
>> 
>> Doesn't it try to deliver the rest a bit later? After all, it should 
>> recognize that it was able to deliver a few ...
>> 
>> Kai
>> 
Hi,

in practice, if the recipient says "try later" with a 4xx response, the sender will try a little later.
If the sender does not get connected at all, due to firewalling, it might try the backup mxes
instead

Wolfgang Hamann