You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@solr.apache.org by Anshum Gupta <an...@apache.org> on 2026/02/02 06:07:44 UTC
Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.0.0 RC3
Hi Rahul,
Thanks for all of your effort in addressing the issues related to
running/testing Solr on Windows.
It doesn’t seem like the current issues call for a new RC to be built and
voted on. They still need to be fixed (in the next release) but the current
RC shouldn’t cause actual issues.
What are your thoughts?
Anshum Gupta
On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 8:33 AM Rahul Goswami <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> UPDATE: I was finally able to fix the smokeTester on Windows (PR incoming).
> The tests for RC3 run fine on Windows (minus couple of flakey tests), which
> is what I mainly wanted to ensure.
>
> Among the basic sanity checks I did manually, inability to run an example
> in user-managed mode is the only open issue I could find (fixed on main and
> branch_10x).
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 3:39 AM Arrieta, Alejandro <
> aarrieta@perrinsoftware.com> wrote:
>
> > amd64 on Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
> > temurin Temurin-21.0.10+7 SUCCESS! [0:57:43.107730]
> > azul Zulu21.48+15-CA SUCCESS! [0:57:21.412434]
> > oracle 2025-10-21 LTS SUCCESS! [0:56:43.795738]
> > ubuntu openjdk build 21.0.9+10-Ubuntu-124.04 SUCCESS! [0:56:35.598028]
> > microsoft jdk Microsoft-12574458 SUCCESS! [0:55:39.946492]
> > graalvm GraalVM CE 21.0.9+10.1 SUCCESS! [0:56:42.202942]
> >
> > aarch64 on Raspberry Pi 5 Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
> > ubuntu openjdk build 21.0.9+10-Ubuntu-124.04 SUCCESS! [2:44:01.665537]
> >
> > +1 non binding
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 11:19 PM Andrey Ukhanov (BLOOMBERG/ 919 3RD A) <
> > aukhanov@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > SUCCESS! [0:50:10.558971]
> > >
> > > From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 01/21/26 17:17:35 UTC-5:00To:
> > > dev@solr.apache.org
> > > Subject: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.0.0 RC3
> > >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > Thank you for your patience with the multiple release candidates for
> > > releasing Solr 10.
> > >
> > > Please vote for *Release Candidate 3* for Solr 10.0.0
> > >
> > > If you already voted for RC2, please note that there are *no code
> changes
> > > in this RC as compared to the previous one* and it'd be great if you
> > could
> > > cast your vote for this one as well.
> > >
> > > *An important note for non-committers:* Your vote counts! Please test
> and
> > > vote for this RC and help us in releasing a candidate that's tested by
> > > multiple people, across multiple platforms, on a variety of machines
> and
> > > JVMs.
> > >
> > > Thank you for your vote and involvement in the Apache Solr project.
> > >
> > > The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb
> > > 1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac
> > > <
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac
> > >
> > >
> > > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> > >
> > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb
> > > 1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac
> > > <
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac
> > >
> > >
> > > You can build a release-candidate of the official docker images (full &
> > > slim) using the following command:
> > >
> > > SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER=
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb
> > > 1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac/solr
> > > <
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac/solr
> > >
> > > && \
> > > docker build
> > $SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER/10.0.0/docker/Dockerfile.official-full
> > > \
> > > --build-arg SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER=$SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER \
> > > -t solr-rc:10.0.0-3 && \
> > > docker build
> > $SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER/10.0.0/docker/Dockerfile.official-slim
> > > \
> > > --build-arg SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER=$SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER \
> > > -t solr-rc:10.0.0-3-slim
> > >
> > > The
> > > *vote will be open for at least 5 days i.e. until 2026-01-26 23:00
> UTC.*
> > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > >
> > > Here is my +1.
> > > SUCCESS! [0:48:11.146422]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.0.0 RC3
Posted by Anshum Gupta <an...@apache.org>.
Thank you everyone for the votes. Here is the vote tally:
+1 11 (9 binding)
0 0
-1 0
We will however need another round of voting with a new RC that fixes the
security issue that was recently identified.
*This vote has FAILED.*
On Fri, Feb 6, 2026 at 4:27 AM Jason Gerlowski <ge...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> JIRA Ticket: SOLR-18102
>
> PR here: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/4110
>
> It's a very easy fix to test out; if folks can review I'd love to get
> this merged and backported in time for test runs over the weekend.
> Hopefully that'd clear the path to RC4 nicely.
>
> Sorry again to all for the bug!
>
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2026 at 2:42 PM Jason Gerlowski <ge...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > I can reproduce : (
> >
> > I suspect this is something I broke recently. As a part of SOLR-18054
> > I added some path-normalization to fix an issue reported to our
> > security@ list (and that eventually resulted in CVE-2026-22022), and
> > the Admin UI 401 bug disappears if I go back before that change of
> > mine.
> >
> > The AI-suggested fix looks correct to me given my understanding of the
> > original issue; I'll open a PR for it shortly.
> >
> > Sorry all!
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 5, 2026 at 10:39 AM Anshum Gupta <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks for letting me know, Eric. I haven’t tested this but this
> doesn’t
> > > make much sense but I’ll hold off on announcing the result until after
> more
> > > of us have tested this in a few hours.
> > >
> > > Anshum Gupta
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 5, 2026 at 05:22 Eric Pugh <ep...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think we might have a blocker! On ApacheSolr slack we got a bug
> report
> > > > about not being able to log in with Basic Auth. Rahul looked into
> a bit.
> > > >
> > > > To reproduce on branch_10_0 (and I think on main)
> > > >
> > > > bin/solr start
> > > > bin/solr auth enable --type basicAuth --credentials name:password
> > > >
> > > > Then go to localhost:8983/solr and you will see a 401 error. The
> cycle
> > > > for logging in never happens.
> > > >
> > > > With the help of Claude, this patch fixes it:
> > > >
> > > > diff --git
> a/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/servlet/HttpSolrCall.java
> > > > b/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/servlet/HttpSolrCall.java
> > > > index 1350decd702..a5ef763972d 100644
> > > > --- a/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/servlet/HttpSolrCall.java
> > > > +++ b/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/servlet/HttpSolrCall.java
> > > > @@ -605,8 +605,10 @@ public class HttpSolrCall {
> > > > private boolean shouldAuthorize() {
> > > > if (PublicKeyHandler.PATH.equals(path)) return false;
> > > > // admin/info/key is the path where public key is exposed . it
> is
> > > > always unsecured
> > > > - if ("/".equals(path) || "/solr/".equals(path))
> > > > + // Empty path also needs to bypass (happens when accessing
> /solr/)
> > > > + if ("/".equals(path) || "/solr/".equals(path) ||
> path.isEmpty()) {
> > > > return false; // Static Admin UI files must always be served
> > > > + }
> > > > if (cores.getPkiAuthenticationSecurityBuilder() != null &&
> > > > req.getUserPrincipal() != null) {
> > > > boolean b =
> > > > cores.getPkiAuthenticationSecurityBuilder().needsAuthorization(req);
> > > > log.debug("PkiAuthenticationPlugin says authorization
> required : {}
> > > > ", b);
> > > >
> > > > I don't know what changed to need the path.isEmpty however... The
> person
> > > > who first found the bug is going to try and test the patch.
> > > >
> > > > Eric
> > > >
> > > > On 2026/02/04 18:41:01 Rahul Goswami wrote:
> > > > > I was conflicted between a 0 and a +1. So was refraining from
> voting
> > > > again.
> > > > > I'd like to change my vote to +1 for reasons mentioned earlier.
> > > > >
> > > > > And thanks for your work with this release.
> > > > >
> > > > > Rahul
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2026 at 11:28 AM Anshum Gupta <
> anshum@anshumgupta.net>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > @Rahul - Do you plan to change the vote in that case? Or would
> you
> > > > want to
> > > > > > stick with the -1?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Feb 3, 2026 at 10:12 AM Rahul Goswami <
> rahul196452@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hey Anshum, sorry I missed the previous email. Thanks for the
> > > > reminder.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > After fixing the build issues and smoke tester on Windows, and
> being
> > > > able
> > > > > > > to run the tests on RC3, the only open application issue I
> could spot
> > > > > > while
> > > > > > > kicking the tires is with running an example in standalone mode
> > > > (i.e. it
> > > > > > > always launches example in solrcloud). This isn't a production
> > > > blocker,
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > I verified that starting the server in standalone mode with
> usual
> > > > > > > parameters still works fine on Windows.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Agreed this doesn't warrant another RC.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Rahul
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 3, 2026 at 12:57 PM Anshum Gupta <
> anshum@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Rahul, checking in again in case you missed the previous
> email.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 2, 2026 at 12:21 AM Houston Putman <
> houston@apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > SUCCESS! [1:39:05.919541]
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - Houston
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Sun, Feb 1, 2026 at 10:08 PM Anshum Gupta <
> anshum@apache.org>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Hi Rahul,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thanks for all of your effort in addressing the issues
> related
> > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > running/testing Solr on Windows.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > It doesn’t seem like the current issues call for a new
> RC to be
> > > > > > built
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > voted on. They still need to be fixed (in the next
> release)
> > > > but the
> > > > > > > > > current
> > > > > > > > > > RC shouldn’t cause actual issues.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > What are your thoughts?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Anshum Gupta
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 8:33 AM Rahul Goswami <
> > > > > > rahul196452@gmail.com
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > UPDATE: I was finally able to fix the smokeTester on
> Windows
> > > > (PR
> > > > > > > > > > incoming).
> > > > > > > > > > > The tests for RC3 run fine on Windows (minus couple of
> flakey
> > > > > > > tests),
> > > > > > > > > > which
> > > > > > > > > > > is what I mainly wanted to ensure.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Among the basic sanity checks I did manually,
> inability to
> > > > run an
> > > > > > > > > example
> > > > > > > > > > > in user-managed mode is the only open issue I could
> find
> > > > (fixed
> > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > main
> > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > branch_10x).
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 3:39 AM Arrieta, Alejandro <
> > > > > > > > > > > aarrieta@perrinsoftware.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > amd64 on Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
> > > > > > > > > > > > temurin Temurin-21.0.10+7 SUCCESS! [0:57:43.107730]
> > > > > > > > > > > > azul Zulu21.48+15-CA SUCCESS! [0:57:21.412434]
> > > > > > > > > > > > oracle 2025-10-21 LTS SUCCESS! [0:56:43.795738]
> > > > > > > > > > > > ubuntu openjdk build 21.0.9+10-Ubuntu-124.04 SUCCESS!
> > > > > > > > > [0:56:35.598028]
> > > > > > > > > > > > microsoft jdk Microsoft-12574458 SUCCESS!
> [0:55:39.946492]
> > > > > > > > > > > > graalvm GraalVM CE 21.0.9+10.1 SUCCESS!
> [0:56:42.202942]
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > aarch64 on Raspberry Pi 5 Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
> > > > > > > > > > > > ubuntu openjdk build 21.0.9+10-Ubuntu-124.04 SUCCESS!
> > > > > > > > > [2:44:01.665537]
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > +1 non binding
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 11:19 PM Andrey Ukhanov
> > > > (BLOOMBERG/ 919
> > > > > > > 3RD
> > > > > > > > > A)
> > > > > > > > > > <
> > > > > > > > > > > > aukhanov@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > SUCCESS! [0:50:10.558971]
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 01/21/26 17:17:35
> > > > UTC-5:00To:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > dev@solr.apache.org
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.0.0 RC3
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for your patience with the multiple
> release
> > > > > > > candidates
> > > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > > > > releasing Solr 10.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Please vote for *Release Candidate 3* for Solr
> 10.0.0
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > If you already voted for RC2, please note that
> there are
> > > > *no
> > > > > > > code
> > > > > > > > > > > changes
> > > > > > > > > > > > > in this RC as compared to the previous one* and
> it'd be
> > > > great
> > > > > > > if
> > > > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > > > > > could
> > > > > > > > > > > > > cast your vote for this one as well.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > *An important note for non-committers:* Your vote
> counts!
> > > > > > > Please
> > > > > > > > > test
> > > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > vote for this RC and help us in releasing a
> candidate
> > > > that's
> > > > > > > > tested
> > > > > > > > > > by
> > > > > > > > > > > > > multiple people, across multiple platforms, on a
> variety
> > > > of
> > > > > > > > > machines
> > > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > JVMs.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for your vote and involvement in the
> Apache
> > > > Solr
> > > > > > > > project.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac
> > > > > > > > > > > > > <
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > You can run the smoke tester directly with this
> command:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac
> > > > > > > > > > > > > <
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > You can build a release-candidate of the official
> docker
> > > > > > images
> > > > > > > > > > (full &
> > > > > > > > > > > > > slim) using the following command:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER=
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac/solr
> > > > > > > > > > > > > <
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac/solr
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > && \
> > > > > > > > > > > > > docker build
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > $SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER/10.0.0/docker/Dockerfile.official-full
> > > > > > > > > > > > > \
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --build-arg
> > > > SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER=$SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER \
> > > > > > > > > > > > > -t solr-rc:10.0.0-3 && \
> > > > > > > > > > > > > docker build
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > $SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER/10.0.0/docker/Dockerfile.official-slim
> > > > > > > > > > > > > \
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --build-arg
> > > > SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER=$SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER \
> > > > > > > > > > > > > -t solr-rc:10.0.0-3-slim
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > The
> > > > > > > > > > > > > *vote will be open for at least 5 days i.e. until
> > > > 2026-01-26
> > > > > > > > 23:00
> > > > > > > > > > > UTC.*
> > > > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > > > > > > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Here is my +1.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > SUCCESS! [0:48:11.146422]
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Anshum Gupta
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.0.0 RC3
Posted by Jason Gerlowski <ge...@gmail.com>.
JIRA Ticket: SOLR-18102
PR here: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/4110
It's a very easy fix to test out; if folks can review I'd love to get
this merged and backported in time for test runs over the weekend.
Hopefully that'd clear the path to RC4 nicely.
Sorry again to all for the bug!
On Thu, Feb 5, 2026 at 2:42 PM Jason Gerlowski <ge...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I can reproduce : (
>
> I suspect this is something I broke recently. As a part of SOLR-18054
> I added some path-normalization to fix an issue reported to our
> security@ list (and that eventually resulted in CVE-2026-22022), and
> the Admin UI 401 bug disappears if I go back before that change of
> mine.
>
> The AI-suggested fix looks correct to me given my understanding of the
> original issue; I'll open a PR for it shortly.
>
> Sorry all!
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2026 at 10:39 AM Anshum Gupta <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for letting me know, Eric. I haven’t tested this but this doesn’t
> > make much sense but I’ll hold off on announcing the result until after more
> > of us have tested this in a few hours.
> >
> > Anshum Gupta
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 5, 2026 at 05:22 Eric Pugh <ep...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > I think we might have a blocker! On ApacheSolr slack we got a bug report
> > > about not being able to log in with Basic Auth. Rahul looked into a bit.
> > >
> > > To reproduce on branch_10_0 (and I think on main)
> > >
> > > bin/solr start
> > > bin/solr auth enable --type basicAuth --credentials name:password
> > >
> > > Then go to localhost:8983/solr and you will see a 401 error. The cycle
> > > for logging in never happens.
> > >
> > > With the help of Claude, this patch fixes it:
> > >
> > > diff --git a/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/servlet/HttpSolrCall.java
> > > b/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/servlet/HttpSolrCall.java
> > > index 1350decd702..a5ef763972d 100644
> > > --- a/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/servlet/HttpSolrCall.java
> > > +++ b/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/servlet/HttpSolrCall.java
> > > @@ -605,8 +605,10 @@ public class HttpSolrCall {
> > > private boolean shouldAuthorize() {
> > > if (PublicKeyHandler.PATH.equals(path)) return false;
> > > // admin/info/key is the path where public key is exposed . it is
> > > always unsecured
> > > - if ("/".equals(path) || "/solr/".equals(path))
> > > + // Empty path also needs to bypass (happens when accessing /solr/)
> > > + if ("/".equals(path) || "/solr/".equals(path) || path.isEmpty()) {
> > > return false; // Static Admin UI files must always be served
> > > + }
> > > if (cores.getPkiAuthenticationSecurityBuilder() != null &&
> > > req.getUserPrincipal() != null) {
> > > boolean b =
> > > cores.getPkiAuthenticationSecurityBuilder().needsAuthorization(req);
> > > log.debug("PkiAuthenticationPlugin says authorization required : {}
> > > ", b);
> > >
> > > I don't know what changed to need the path.isEmpty however... The person
> > > who first found the bug is going to try and test the patch.
> > >
> > > Eric
> > >
> > > On 2026/02/04 18:41:01 Rahul Goswami wrote:
> > > > I was conflicted between a 0 and a +1. So was refraining from voting
> > > again.
> > > > I'd like to change my vote to +1 for reasons mentioned earlier.
> > > >
> > > > And thanks for your work with this release.
> > > >
> > > > Rahul
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2026 at 11:28 AM Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > @Rahul - Do you plan to change the vote in that case? Or would you
> > > want to
> > > > > stick with the -1?
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Feb 3, 2026 at 10:12 AM Rahul Goswami <ra...@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hey Anshum, sorry I missed the previous email. Thanks for the
> > > reminder.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > After fixing the build issues and smoke tester on Windows, and being
> > > able
> > > > > > to run the tests on RC3, the only open application issue I could spot
> > > > > while
> > > > > > kicking the tires is with running an example in standalone mode
> > > (i.e. it
> > > > > > always launches example in solrcloud). This isn't a production
> > > blocker,
> > > > > and
> > > > > > I verified that starting the server in standalone mode with usual
> > > > > > parameters still works fine on Windows.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Agreed this doesn't warrant another RC.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Rahul
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Feb 3, 2026 at 12:57 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Rahul, checking in again in case you missed the previous email.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 2, 2026 at 12:21 AM Houston Putman <houston@apache.org
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > SUCCESS! [1:39:05.919541]
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > - Houston
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Sun, Feb 1, 2026 at 10:08 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@apache.org>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hi Rahul,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks for all of your effort in addressing the issues related
> > > to
> > > > > > > > > running/testing Solr on Windows.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > It doesn’t seem like the current issues call for a new RC to be
> > > > > built
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > voted on. They still need to be fixed (in the next release)
> > > but the
> > > > > > > > current
> > > > > > > > > RC shouldn’t cause actual issues.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > What are your thoughts?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Anshum Gupta
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 8:33 AM Rahul Goswami <
> > > > > rahul196452@gmail.com
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > UPDATE: I was finally able to fix the smokeTester on Windows
> > > (PR
> > > > > > > > > incoming).
> > > > > > > > > > The tests for RC3 run fine on Windows (minus couple of flakey
> > > > > > tests),
> > > > > > > > > which
> > > > > > > > > > is what I mainly wanted to ensure.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Among the basic sanity checks I did manually, inability to
> > > run an
> > > > > > > > example
> > > > > > > > > > in user-managed mode is the only open issue I could find
> > > (fixed
> > > > > on
> > > > > > > main
> > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > branch_10x).
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 3:39 AM Arrieta, Alejandro <
> > > > > > > > > > aarrieta@perrinsoftware.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > amd64 on Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
> > > > > > > > > > > temurin Temurin-21.0.10+7 SUCCESS! [0:57:43.107730]
> > > > > > > > > > > azul Zulu21.48+15-CA SUCCESS! [0:57:21.412434]
> > > > > > > > > > > oracle 2025-10-21 LTS SUCCESS! [0:56:43.795738]
> > > > > > > > > > > ubuntu openjdk build 21.0.9+10-Ubuntu-124.04 SUCCESS!
> > > > > > > > [0:56:35.598028]
> > > > > > > > > > > microsoft jdk Microsoft-12574458 SUCCESS! [0:55:39.946492]
> > > > > > > > > > > graalvm GraalVM CE 21.0.9+10.1 SUCCESS! [0:56:42.202942]
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > aarch64 on Raspberry Pi 5 Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
> > > > > > > > > > > ubuntu openjdk build 21.0.9+10-Ubuntu-124.04 SUCCESS!
> > > > > > > > [2:44:01.665537]
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > +1 non binding
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 11:19 PM Andrey Ukhanov
> > > (BLOOMBERG/ 919
> > > > > > 3RD
> > > > > > > > A)
> > > > > > > > > <
> > > > > > > > > > > aukhanov@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > SUCCESS! [0:50:10.558971]
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 01/21/26 17:17:35
> > > UTC-5:00To:
> > > > > > > > > > > > dev@solr.apache.org
> > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.0.0 RC3
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for your patience with the multiple release
> > > > > > candidates
> > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > > > releasing Solr 10.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Please vote for *Release Candidate 3* for Solr 10.0.0
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > If you already voted for RC2, please note that there are
> > > *no
> > > > > > code
> > > > > > > > > > changes
> > > > > > > > > > > > in this RC as compared to the previous one* and it'd be
> > > great
> > > > > > if
> > > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > > > > could
> > > > > > > > > > > > cast your vote for this one as well.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > *An important note for non-committers:* Your vote counts!
> > > > > > Please
> > > > > > > > test
> > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > vote for this RC and help us in releasing a candidate
> > > that's
> > > > > > > tested
> > > > > > > > > by
> > > > > > > > > > > > multiple people, across multiple platforms, on a variety
> > > of
> > > > > > > > machines
> > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > JVMs.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for your vote and involvement in the Apache
> > > Solr
> > > > > > > project.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb
> > > > > > > > > > > > 1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac
> > > > > > > > > > > > <
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb
> > > > > > > > > > > > 1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac
> > > > > > > > > > > > <
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > You can build a release-candidate of the official docker
> > > > > images
> > > > > > > > > (full &
> > > > > > > > > > > > slim) using the following command:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER=
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb
> > > > > > > > > > > > 1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac/solr
> > > > > > > > > > > > <
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac/solr
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > && \
> > > > > > > > > > > > docker build
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > $SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER/10.0.0/docker/Dockerfile.official-full
> > > > > > > > > > > > \
> > > > > > > > > > > > --build-arg
> > > SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER=$SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER \
> > > > > > > > > > > > -t solr-rc:10.0.0-3 && \
> > > > > > > > > > > > docker build
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > $SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER/10.0.0/docker/Dockerfile.official-slim
> > > > > > > > > > > > \
> > > > > > > > > > > > --build-arg
> > > SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER=$SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER \
> > > > > > > > > > > > -t solr-rc:10.0.0-3-slim
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > The
> > > > > > > > > > > > *vote will be open for at least 5 days i.e. until
> > > 2026-01-26
> > > > > > > 23:00
> > > > > > > > > > UTC.*
> > > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > > > > > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Here is my +1.
> > > > > > > > > > > > SUCCESS! [0:48:11.146422]
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Anshum Gupta
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
> > >
> > >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.0.0 RC3
Posted by Jason Gerlowski <ge...@gmail.com>.
I can reproduce : (
I suspect this is something I broke recently. As a part of SOLR-18054
I added some path-normalization to fix an issue reported to our
security@ list (and that eventually resulted in CVE-2026-22022), and
the Admin UI 401 bug disappears if I go back before that change of
mine.
The AI-suggested fix looks correct to me given my understanding of the
original issue; I'll open a PR for it shortly.
Sorry all!
On Thu, Feb 5, 2026 at 10:39 AM Anshum Gupta <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Thanks for letting me know, Eric. I haven’t tested this but this doesn’t
> make much sense but I’ll hold off on announcing the result until after more
> of us have tested this in a few hours.
>
> Anshum Gupta
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2026 at 05:22 Eric Pugh <ep...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I think we might have a blocker! On ApacheSolr slack we got a bug report
> > about not being able to log in with Basic Auth. Rahul looked into a bit.
> >
> > To reproduce on branch_10_0 (and I think on main)
> >
> > bin/solr start
> > bin/solr auth enable --type basicAuth --credentials name:password
> >
> > Then go to localhost:8983/solr and you will see a 401 error. The cycle
> > for logging in never happens.
> >
> > With the help of Claude, this patch fixes it:
> >
> > diff --git a/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/servlet/HttpSolrCall.java
> > b/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/servlet/HttpSolrCall.java
> > index 1350decd702..a5ef763972d 100644
> > --- a/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/servlet/HttpSolrCall.java
> > +++ b/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/servlet/HttpSolrCall.java
> > @@ -605,8 +605,10 @@ public class HttpSolrCall {
> > private boolean shouldAuthorize() {
> > if (PublicKeyHandler.PATH.equals(path)) return false;
> > // admin/info/key is the path where public key is exposed . it is
> > always unsecured
> > - if ("/".equals(path) || "/solr/".equals(path))
> > + // Empty path also needs to bypass (happens when accessing /solr/)
> > + if ("/".equals(path) || "/solr/".equals(path) || path.isEmpty()) {
> > return false; // Static Admin UI files must always be served
> > + }
> > if (cores.getPkiAuthenticationSecurityBuilder() != null &&
> > req.getUserPrincipal() != null) {
> > boolean b =
> > cores.getPkiAuthenticationSecurityBuilder().needsAuthorization(req);
> > log.debug("PkiAuthenticationPlugin says authorization required : {}
> > ", b);
> >
> > I don't know what changed to need the path.isEmpty however... The person
> > who first found the bug is going to try and test the patch.
> >
> > Eric
> >
> > On 2026/02/04 18:41:01 Rahul Goswami wrote:
> > > I was conflicted between a 0 and a +1. So was refraining from voting
> > again.
> > > I'd like to change my vote to +1 for reasons mentioned earlier.
> > >
> > > And thanks for your work with this release.
> > >
> > > Rahul
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2026 at 11:28 AM Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > @Rahul - Do you plan to change the vote in that case? Or would you
> > want to
> > > > stick with the -1?
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Feb 3, 2026 at 10:12 AM Rahul Goswami <ra...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hey Anshum, sorry I missed the previous email. Thanks for the
> > reminder.
> > > > >
> > > > > After fixing the build issues and smoke tester on Windows, and being
> > able
> > > > > to run the tests on RC3, the only open application issue I could spot
> > > > while
> > > > > kicking the tires is with running an example in standalone mode
> > (i.e. it
> > > > > always launches example in solrcloud). This isn't a production
> > blocker,
> > > > and
> > > > > I verified that starting the server in standalone mode with usual
> > > > > parameters still works fine on Windows.
> > > > >
> > > > > Agreed this doesn't warrant another RC.
> > > > >
> > > > > Rahul
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Feb 3, 2026 at 12:57 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Rahul, checking in again in case you missed the previous email.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Feb 2, 2026 at 12:21 AM Houston Putman <houston@apache.org
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > SUCCESS! [1:39:05.919541]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > - Houston
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sun, Feb 1, 2026 at 10:08 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi Rahul,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks for all of your effort in addressing the issues related
> > to
> > > > > > > > running/testing Solr on Windows.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > It doesn’t seem like the current issues call for a new RC to be
> > > > built
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > voted on. They still need to be fixed (in the next release)
> > but the
> > > > > > > current
> > > > > > > > RC shouldn’t cause actual issues.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > What are your thoughts?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Anshum Gupta
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 8:33 AM Rahul Goswami <
> > > > rahul196452@gmail.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > UPDATE: I was finally able to fix the smokeTester on Windows
> > (PR
> > > > > > > > incoming).
> > > > > > > > > The tests for RC3 run fine on Windows (minus couple of flakey
> > > > > tests),
> > > > > > > > which
> > > > > > > > > is what I mainly wanted to ensure.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Among the basic sanity checks I did manually, inability to
> > run an
> > > > > > > example
> > > > > > > > > in user-managed mode is the only open issue I could find
> > (fixed
> > > > on
> > > > > > main
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > branch_10x).
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 3:39 AM Arrieta, Alejandro <
> > > > > > > > > aarrieta@perrinsoftware.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > amd64 on Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
> > > > > > > > > > temurin Temurin-21.0.10+7 SUCCESS! [0:57:43.107730]
> > > > > > > > > > azul Zulu21.48+15-CA SUCCESS! [0:57:21.412434]
> > > > > > > > > > oracle 2025-10-21 LTS SUCCESS! [0:56:43.795738]
> > > > > > > > > > ubuntu openjdk build 21.0.9+10-Ubuntu-124.04 SUCCESS!
> > > > > > > [0:56:35.598028]
> > > > > > > > > > microsoft jdk Microsoft-12574458 SUCCESS! [0:55:39.946492]
> > > > > > > > > > graalvm GraalVM CE 21.0.9+10.1 SUCCESS! [0:56:42.202942]
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > aarch64 on Raspberry Pi 5 Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
> > > > > > > > > > ubuntu openjdk build 21.0.9+10-Ubuntu-124.04 SUCCESS!
> > > > > > > [2:44:01.665537]
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > +1 non binding
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 11:19 PM Andrey Ukhanov
> > (BLOOMBERG/ 919
> > > > > 3RD
> > > > > > > A)
> > > > > > > > <
> > > > > > > > > > aukhanov@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > SUCCESS! [0:50:10.558971]
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 01/21/26 17:17:35
> > UTC-5:00To:
> > > > > > > > > > > dev@solr.apache.org
> > > > > > > > > > > Subject: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.0.0 RC3
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for your patience with the multiple release
> > > > > candidates
> > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > > releasing Solr 10.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Please vote for *Release Candidate 3* for Solr 10.0.0
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > If you already voted for RC2, please note that there are
> > *no
> > > > > code
> > > > > > > > > changes
> > > > > > > > > > > in this RC as compared to the previous one* and it'd be
> > great
> > > > > if
> > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > > > could
> > > > > > > > > > > cast your vote for this one as well.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > *An important note for non-committers:* Your vote counts!
> > > > > Please
> > > > > > > test
> > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > vote for this RC and help us in releasing a candidate
> > that's
> > > > > > tested
> > > > > > > > by
> > > > > > > > > > > multiple people, across multiple platforms, on a variety
> > of
> > > > > > > machines
> > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > JVMs.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for your vote and involvement in the Apache
> > Solr
> > > > > > project.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb
> > > > > > > > > > > 1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac
> > > > > > > > > > > <
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb
> > > > > > > > > > > 1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac
> > > > > > > > > > > <
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > You can build a release-candidate of the official docker
> > > > images
> > > > > > > > (full &
> > > > > > > > > > > slim) using the following command:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER=
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb
> > > > > > > > > > > 1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac/solr
> > > > > > > > > > > <
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac/solr
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > && \
> > > > > > > > > > > docker build
> > > > > > > > > >
> > $SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER/10.0.0/docker/Dockerfile.official-full
> > > > > > > > > > > \
> > > > > > > > > > > --build-arg
> > SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER=$SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER \
> > > > > > > > > > > -t solr-rc:10.0.0-3 && \
> > > > > > > > > > > docker build
> > > > > > > > > >
> > $SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER/10.0.0/docker/Dockerfile.official-slim
> > > > > > > > > > > \
> > > > > > > > > > > --build-arg
> > SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER=$SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER \
> > > > > > > > > > > -t solr-rc:10.0.0-3-slim
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > The
> > > > > > > > > > > *vote will be open for at least 5 days i.e. until
> > 2026-01-26
> > > > > > 23:00
> > > > > > > > > UTC.*
> > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > > > > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Here is my +1.
> > > > > > > > > > > SUCCESS! [0:48:11.146422]
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Anshum Gupta
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
> >
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.0.0 RC3
Posted by Anshum Gupta <an...@apache.org>.
Thanks for letting me know, Eric. I haven’t tested this but this doesn’t
make much sense but I’ll hold off on announcing the result until after more
of us have tested this in a few hours.
Anshum Gupta
On Thu, Feb 5, 2026 at 05:22 Eric Pugh <ep...@apache.org> wrote:
> I think we might have a blocker! On ApacheSolr slack we got a bug report
> about not being able to log in with Basic Auth. Rahul looked into a bit.
>
> To reproduce on branch_10_0 (and I think on main)
>
> bin/solr start
> bin/solr auth enable --type basicAuth --credentials name:password
>
> Then go to localhost:8983/solr and you will see a 401 error. The cycle
> for logging in never happens.
>
> With the help of Claude, this patch fixes it:
>
> diff --git a/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/servlet/HttpSolrCall.java
> b/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/servlet/HttpSolrCall.java
> index 1350decd702..a5ef763972d 100644
> --- a/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/servlet/HttpSolrCall.java
> +++ b/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/servlet/HttpSolrCall.java
> @@ -605,8 +605,10 @@ public class HttpSolrCall {
> private boolean shouldAuthorize() {
> if (PublicKeyHandler.PATH.equals(path)) return false;
> // admin/info/key is the path where public key is exposed . it is
> always unsecured
> - if ("/".equals(path) || "/solr/".equals(path))
> + // Empty path also needs to bypass (happens when accessing /solr/)
> + if ("/".equals(path) || "/solr/".equals(path) || path.isEmpty()) {
> return false; // Static Admin UI files must always be served
> + }
> if (cores.getPkiAuthenticationSecurityBuilder() != null &&
> req.getUserPrincipal() != null) {
> boolean b =
> cores.getPkiAuthenticationSecurityBuilder().needsAuthorization(req);
> log.debug("PkiAuthenticationPlugin says authorization required : {}
> ", b);
>
> I don't know what changed to need the path.isEmpty however... The person
> who first found the bug is going to try and test the patch.
>
> Eric
>
> On 2026/02/04 18:41:01 Rahul Goswami wrote:
> > I was conflicted between a 0 and a +1. So was refraining from voting
> again.
> > I'd like to change my vote to +1 for reasons mentioned earlier.
> >
> > And thanks for your work with this release.
> >
> > Rahul
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 4, 2026 at 11:28 AM Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
> wrote:
> >
> > > @Rahul - Do you plan to change the vote in that case? Or would you
> want to
> > > stick with the -1?
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 3, 2026 at 10:12 AM Rahul Goswami <ra...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hey Anshum, sorry I missed the previous email. Thanks for the
> reminder.
> > > >
> > > > After fixing the build issues and smoke tester on Windows, and being
> able
> > > > to run the tests on RC3, the only open application issue I could spot
> > > while
> > > > kicking the tires is with running an example in standalone mode
> (i.e. it
> > > > always launches example in solrcloud). This isn't a production
> blocker,
> > > and
> > > > I verified that starting the server in standalone mode with usual
> > > > parameters still works fine on Windows.
> > > >
> > > > Agreed this doesn't warrant another RC.
> > > >
> > > > Rahul
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Feb 3, 2026 at 12:57 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Rahul, checking in again in case you missed the previous email.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Feb 2, 2026 at 12:21 AM Houston Putman <houston@apache.org
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > SUCCESS! [1:39:05.919541]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - Houston
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sun, Feb 1, 2026 at 10:08 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Rahul,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks for all of your effort in addressing the issues related
> to
> > > > > > > running/testing Solr on Windows.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It doesn’t seem like the current issues call for a new RC to be
> > > built
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > voted on. They still need to be fixed (in the next release)
> but the
> > > > > > current
> > > > > > > RC shouldn’t cause actual issues.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > What are your thoughts?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Anshum Gupta
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 8:33 AM Rahul Goswami <
> > > rahul196452@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > UPDATE: I was finally able to fix the smokeTester on Windows
> (PR
> > > > > > > incoming).
> > > > > > > > The tests for RC3 run fine on Windows (minus couple of flakey
> > > > tests),
> > > > > > > which
> > > > > > > > is what I mainly wanted to ensure.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Among the basic sanity checks I did manually, inability to
> run an
> > > > > > example
> > > > > > > > in user-managed mode is the only open issue I could find
> (fixed
> > > on
> > > > > main
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > branch_10x).
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 3:39 AM Arrieta, Alejandro <
> > > > > > > > aarrieta@perrinsoftware.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > amd64 on Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
> > > > > > > > > temurin Temurin-21.0.10+7 SUCCESS! [0:57:43.107730]
> > > > > > > > > azul Zulu21.48+15-CA SUCCESS! [0:57:21.412434]
> > > > > > > > > oracle 2025-10-21 LTS SUCCESS! [0:56:43.795738]
> > > > > > > > > ubuntu openjdk build 21.0.9+10-Ubuntu-124.04 SUCCESS!
> > > > > > [0:56:35.598028]
> > > > > > > > > microsoft jdk Microsoft-12574458 SUCCESS! [0:55:39.946492]
> > > > > > > > > graalvm GraalVM CE 21.0.9+10.1 SUCCESS! [0:56:42.202942]
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > aarch64 on Raspberry Pi 5 Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
> > > > > > > > > ubuntu openjdk build 21.0.9+10-Ubuntu-124.04 SUCCESS!
> > > > > > [2:44:01.665537]
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +1 non binding
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 11:19 PM Andrey Ukhanov
> (BLOOMBERG/ 919
> > > > 3RD
> > > > > > A)
> > > > > > > <
> > > > > > > > > aukhanov@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > SUCCESS! [0:50:10.558971]
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 01/21/26 17:17:35
> UTC-5:00To:
> > > > > > > > > > dev@solr.apache.org
> > > > > > > > > > Subject: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.0.0 RC3
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thank you for your patience with the multiple release
> > > > candidates
> > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > releasing Solr 10.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Please vote for *Release Candidate 3* for Solr 10.0.0
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > If you already voted for RC2, please note that there are
> *no
> > > > code
> > > > > > > > changes
> > > > > > > > > > in this RC as compared to the previous one* and it'd be
> great
> > > > if
> > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > > could
> > > > > > > > > > cast your vote for this one as well.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > *An important note for non-committers:* Your vote counts!
> > > > Please
> > > > > > test
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > vote for this RC and help us in releasing a candidate
> that's
> > > > > tested
> > > > > > > by
> > > > > > > > > > multiple people, across multiple platforms, on a variety
> of
> > > > > > machines
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > JVMs.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thank you for your vote and involvement in the Apache
> Solr
> > > > > project.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb
> > > > > > > > > > 1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac
> > > > > > > > > > <
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb
> > > > > > > > > > 1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac
> > > > > > > > > > <
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > You can build a release-candidate of the official docker
> > > images
> > > > > > > (full &
> > > > > > > > > > slim) using the following command:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER=
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb
> > > > > > > > > > 1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac/solr
> > > > > > > > > > <
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac/solr
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > && \
> > > > > > > > > > docker build
> > > > > > > > >
> $SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER/10.0.0/docker/Dockerfile.official-full
> > > > > > > > > > \
> > > > > > > > > > --build-arg
> SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER=$SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER \
> > > > > > > > > > -t solr-rc:10.0.0-3 && \
> > > > > > > > > > docker build
> > > > > > > > >
> $SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER/10.0.0/docker/Dockerfile.official-slim
> > > > > > > > > > \
> > > > > > > > > > --build-arg
> SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER=$SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER \
> > > > > > > > > > -t solr-rc:10.0.0-3-slim
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The
> > > > > > > > > > *vote will be open for at least 5 days i.e. until
> 2026-01-26
> > > > > 23:00
> > > > > > > > UTC.*
> > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > > > > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > > > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Here is my +1.
> > > > > > > > > > SUCCESS! [0:48:11.146422]
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Anshum Gupta
> > >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.0.0 RC3
Posted by Eric Pugh <ep...@apache.org>.
I think we might have a blocker! On ApacheSolr slack we got a bug report about not being able to log in with Basic Auth. Rahul looked into a bit.
To reproduce on branch_10_0 (and I think on main)
bin/solr start
bin/solr auth enable --type basicAuth --credentials name:password
Then go to localhost:8983/solr and you will see a 401 error. The cycle for logging in never happens.
With the help of Claude, this patch fixes it:
diff --git a/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/servlet/HttpSolrCall.java b/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/servlet/HttpSolrCall.java
index 1350decd702..a5ef763972d 100644
--- a/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/servlet/HttpSolrCall.java
+++ b/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/servlet/HttpSolrCall.java
@@ -605,8 +605,10 @@ public class HttpSolrCall {
private boolean shouldAuthorize() {
if (PublicKeyHandler.PATH.equals(path)) return false;
// admin/info/key is the path where public key is exposed . it is always unsecured
- if ("/".equals(path) || "/solr/".equals(path))
+ // Empty path also needs to bypass (happens when accessing /solr/)
+ if ("/".equals(path) || "/solr/".equals(path) || path.isEmpty()) {
return false; // Static Admin UI files must always be served
+ }
if (cores.getPkiAuthenticationSecurityBuilder() != null && req.getUserPrincipal() != null) {
boolean b = cores.getPkiAuthenticationSecurityBuilder().needsAuthorization(req);
log.debug("PkiAuthenticationPlugin says authorization required : {} ", b);
I don't know what changed to need the path.isEmpty however... The person who first found the bug is going to try and test the patch.
Eric
On 2026/02/04 18:41:01 Rahul Goswami wrote:
> I was conflicted between a 0 and a +1. So was refraining from voting again.
> I'd like to change my vote to +1 for reasons mentioned earlier.
>
> And thanks for your work with this release.
>
> Rahul
>
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2026 at 11:28 AM Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> wrote:
>
> > @Rahul - Do you plan to change the vote in that case? Or would you want to
> > stick with the -1?
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 3, 2026 at 10:12 AM Rahul Goswami <ra...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hey Anshum, sorry I missed the previous email. Thanks for the reminder.
> > >
> > > After fixing the build issues and smoke tester on Windows, and being able
> > > to run the tests on RC3, the only open application issue I could spot
> > while
> > > kicking the tires is with running an example in standalone mode (i.e. it
> > > always launches example in solrcloud). This isn't a production blocker,
> > and
> > > I verified that starting the server in standalone mode with usual
> > > parameters still works fine on Windows.
> > >
> > > Agreed this doesn't warrant another RC.
> > >
> > > Rahul
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 3, 2026 at 12:57 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Rahul, checking in again in case you missed the previous email.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Feb 2, 2026 at 12:21 AM Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > SUCCESS! [1:39:05.919541]
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > - Houston
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, Feb 1, 2026 at 10:08 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Rahul,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for all of your effort in addressing the issues related to
> > > > > > running/testing Solr on Windows.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It doesn’t seem like the current issues call for a new RC to be
> > built
> > > > and
> > > > > > voted on. They still need to be fixed (in the next release) but the
> > > > > current
> > > > > > RC shouldn’t cause actual issues.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What are your thoughts?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Anshum Gupta
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 8:33 AM Rahul Goswami <
> > rahul196452@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > UPDATE: I was finally able to fix the smokeTester on Windows (PR
> > > > > > incoming).
> > > > > > > The tests for RC3 run fine on Windows (minus couple of flakey
> > > tests),
> > > > > > which
> > > > > > > is what I mainly wanted to ensure.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Among the basic sanity checks I did manually, inability to run an
> > > > > example
> > > > > > > in user-managed mode is the only open issue I could find (fixed
> > on
> > > > main
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > branch_10x).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 3:39 AM Arrieta, Alejandro <
> > > > > > > aarrieta@perrinsoftware.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > amd64 on Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
> > > > > > > > temurin Temurin-21.0.10+7 SUCCESS! [0:57:43.107730]
> > > > > > > > azul Zulu21.48+15-CA SUCCESS! [0:57:21.412434]
> > > > > > > > oracle 2025-10-21 LTS SUCCESS! [0:56:43.795738]
> > > > > > > > ubuntu openjdk build 21.0.9+10-Ubuntu-124.04 SUCCESS!
> > > > > [0:56:35.598028]
> > > > > > > > microsoft jdk Microsoft-12574458 SUCCESS! [0:55:39.946492]
> > > > > > > > graalvm GraalVM CE 21.0.9+10.1 SUCCESS! [0:56:42.202942]
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > aarch64 on Raspberry Pi 5 Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
> > > > > > > > ubuntu openjdk build 21.0.9+10-Ubuntu-124.04 SUCCESS!
> > > > > [2:44:01.665537]
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1 non binding
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 11:19 PM Andrey Ukhanov (BLOOMBERG/ 919
> > > 3RD
> > > > > A)
> > > > > > <
> > > > > > > > aukhanov@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > SUCCESS! [0:50:10.558971]
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 01/21/26 17:17:35 UTC-5:00To:
> > > > > > > > > dev@solr.apache.org
> > > > > > > > > Subject: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.0.0 RC3
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thank you for your patience with the multiple release
> > > candidates
> > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > releasing Solr 10.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Please vote for *Release Candidate 3* for Solr 10.0.0
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > If you already voted for RC2, please note that there are *no
> > > code
> > > > > > > changes
> > > > > > > > > in this RC as compared to the previous one* and it'd be great
> > > if
> > > > > you
> > > > > > > > could
> > > > > > > > > cast your vote for this one as well.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > *An important note for non-committers:* Your vote counts!
> > > Please
> > > > > test
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > vote for this RC and help us in releasing a candidate that's
> > > > tested
> > > > > > by
> > > > > > > > > multiple people, across multiple platforms, on a variety of
> > > > > machines
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > JVMs.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thank you for your vote and involvement in the Apache Solr
> > > > project.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb
> > > > > > > > > 1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac
> > > > > > > > > <
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb
> > > > > > > > > 1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac
> > > > > > > > > <
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > You can build a release-candidate of the official docker
> > images
> > > > > > (full &
> > > > > > > > > slim) using the following command:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER=
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb
> > > > > > > > > 1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac/solr
> > > > > > > > > <
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac/solr
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > && \
> > > > > > > > > docker build
> > > > > > > > $SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER/10.0.0/docker/Dockerfile.official-full
> > > > > > > > > \
> > > > > > > > > --build-arg SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER=$SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER \
> > > > > > > > > -t solr-rc:10.0.0-3 && \
> > > > > > > > > docker build
> > > > > > > > $SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER/10.0.0/docker/Dockerfile.official-slim
> > > > > > > > > \
> > > > > > > > > --build-arg SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER=$SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER \
> > > > > > > > > -t solr-rc:10.0.0-3-slim
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The
> > > > > > > > > *vote will be open for at least 5 days i.e. until 2026-01-26
> > > > 23:00
> > > > > > > UTC.*
> > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > > > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Here is my +1.
> > > > > > > > > SUCCESS! [0:48:11.146422]
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Anshum Gupta
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.0.0 RC3
Posted by Rahul Goswami <ra...@gmail.com>.
I was conflicted between a 0 and a +1. So was refraining from voting again.
I'd like to change my vote to +1 for reasons mentioned earlier.
And thanks for your work with this release.
Rahul
On Wed, Feb 4, 2026 at 11:28 AM Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> wrote:
> @Rahul - Do you plan to change the vote in that case? Or would you want to
> stick with the -1?
>
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2026 at 10:12 AM Rahul Goswami <ra...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hey Anshum, sorry I missed the previous email. Thanks for the reminder.
> >
> > After fixing the build issues and smoke tester on Windows, and being able
> > to run the tests on RC3, the only open application issue I could spot
> while
> > kicking the tires is with running an example in standalone mode (i.e. it
> > always launches example in solrcloud). This isn't a production blocker,
> and
> > I verified that starting the server in standalone mode with usual
> > parameters still works fine on Windows.
> >
> > Agreed this doesn't warrant another RC.
> >
> > Rahul
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 3, 2026 at 12:57 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Rahul, checking in again in case you missed the previous email.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 2, 2026 at 12:21 AM Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > SUCCESS! [1:39:05.919541]
> > > >
> > > > +1 (binding)
> > > >
> > > > - Houston
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Feb 1, 2026 at 10:08 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Rahul,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for all of your effort in addressing the issues related to
> > > > > running/testing Solr on Windows.
> > > > >
> > > > > It doesn’t seem like the current issues call for a new RC to be
> built
> > > and
> > > > > voted on. They still need to be fixed (in the next release) but the
> > > > current
> > > > > RC shouldn’t cause actual issues.
> > > > >
> > > > > What are your thoughts?
> > > > >
> > > > > Anshum Gupta
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 8:33 AM Rahul Goswami <
> rahul196452@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > UPDATE: I was finally able to fix the smokeTester on Windows (PR
> > > > > incoming).
> > > > > > The tests for RC3 run fine on Windows (minus couple of flakey
> > tests),
> > > > > which
> > > > > > is what I mainly wanted to ensure.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Among the basic sanity checks I did manually, inability to run an
> > > > example
> > > > > > in user-managed mode is the only open issue I could find (fixed
> on
> > > main
> > > > > and
> > > > > > branch_10x).
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 3:39 AM Arrieta, Alejandro <
> > > > > > aarrieta@perrinsoftware.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > amd64 on Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
> > > > > > > temurin Temurin-21.0.10+7 SUCCESS! [0:57:43.107730]
> > > > > > > azul Zulu21.48+15-CA SUCCESS! [0:57:21.412434]
> > > > > > > oracle 2025-10-21 LTS SUCCESS! [0:56:43.795738]
> > > > > > > ubuntu openjdk build 21.0.9+10-Ubuntu-124.04 SUCCESS!
> > > > [0:56:35.598028]
> > > > > > > microsoft jdk Microsoft-12574458 SUCCESS! [0:55:39.946492]
> > > > > > > graalvm GraalVM CE 21.0.9+10.1 SUCCESS! [0:56:42.202942]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > aarch64 on Raspberry Pi 5 Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
> > > > > > > ubuntu openjdk build 21.0.9+10-Ubuntu-124.04 SUCCESS!
> > > > [2:44:01.665537]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 non binding
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 11:19 PM Andrey Ukhanov (BLOOMBERG/ 919
> > 3RD
> > > > A)
> > > > > <
> > > > > > > aukhanov@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > SUCCESS! [0:50:10.558971]
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 01/21/26 17:17:35 UTC-5:00To:
> > > > > > > > dev@solr.apache.org
> > > > > > > > Subject: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.0.0 RC3
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thank you for your patience with the multiple release
> > candidates
> > > > for
> > > > > > > > releasing Solr 10.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Please vote for *Release Candidate 3* for Solr 10.0.0
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > If you already voted for RC2, please note that there are *no
> > code
> > > > > > changes
> > > > > > > > in this RC as compared to the previous one* and it'd be great
> > if
> > > > you
> > > > > > > could
> > > > > > > > cast your vote for this one as well.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > *An important note for non-committers:* Your vote counts!
> > Please
> > > > test
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > vote for this RC and help us in releasing a candidate that's
> > > tested
> > > > > by
> > > > > > > > multiple people, across multiple platforms, on a variety of
> > > > machines
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > JVMs.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thank you for your vote and involvement in the Apache Solr
> > > project.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb
> > > > > > > > 1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac
> > > > > > > > <
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb
> > > > > > > > 1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac
> > > > > > > > <
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > You can build a release-candidate of the official docker
> images
> > > > > (full &
> > > > > > > > slim) using the following command:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER=
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb
> > > > > > > > 1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac/solr
> > > > > > > > <
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac/solr
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > && \
> > > > > > > > docker build
> > > > > > > $SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER/10.0.0/docker/Dockerfile.official-full
> > > > > > > > \
> > > > > > > > --build-arg SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER=$SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER \
> > > > > > > > -t solr-rc:10.0.0-3 && \
> > > > > > > > docker build
> > > > > > > $SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER/10.0.0/docker/Dockerfile.official-slim
> > > > > > > > \
> > > > > > > > --build-arg SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER=$SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER \
> > > > > > > > -t solr-rc:10.0.0-3-slim
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The
> > > > > > > > *vote will be open for at least 5 days i.e. until 2026-01-26
> > > 23:00
> > > > > > UTC.*
> > > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Here is my +1.
> > > > > > > > SUCCESS! [0:48:11.146422]
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.0.0 RC3
Posted by Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>.
@Rahul - Do you plan to change the vote in that case? Or would you want to
stick with the -1?
On Tue, Feb 3, 2026 at 10:12 AM Rahul Goswami <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey Anshum, sorry I missed the previous email. Thanks for the reminder.
>
> After fixing the build issues and smoke tester on Windows, and being able
> to run the tests on RC3, the only open application issue I could spot while
> kicking the tires is with running an example in standalone mode (i.e. it
> always launches example in solrcloud). This isn't a production blocker, and
> I verified that starting the server in standalone mode with usual
> parameters still works fine on Windows.
>
> Agreed this doesn't warrant another RC.
>
> Rahul
>
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2026 at 12:57 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Rahul, checking in again in case you missed the previous email.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 2, 2026 at 12:21 AM Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > SUCCESS! [1:39:05.919541]
> > >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > - Houston
> > >
> > > On Sun, Feb 1, 2026 at 10:08 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Rahul,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for all of your effort in addressing the issues related to
> > > > running/testing Solr on Windows.
> > > >
> > > > It doesn’t seem like the current issues call for a new RC to be built
> > and
> > > > voted on. They still need to be fixed (in the next release) but the
> > > current
> > > > RC shouldn’t cause actual issues.
> > > >
> > > > What are your thoughts?
> > > >
> > > > Anshum Gupta
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 8:33 AM Rahul Goswami <rahul196452@gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > UPDATE: I was finally able to fix the smokeTester on Windows (PR
> > > > incoming).
> > > > > The tests for RC3 run fine on Windows (minus couple of flakey
> tests),
> > > > which
> > > > > is what I mainly wanted to ensure.
> > > > >
> > > > > Among the basic sanity checks I did manually, inability to run an
> > > example
> > > > > in user-managed mode is the only open issue I could find (fixed on
> > main
> > > > and
> > > > > branch_10x).
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 3:39 AM Arrieta, Alejandro <
> > > > > aarrieta@perrinsoftware.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > amd64 on Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
> > > > > > temurin Temurin-21.0.10+7 SUCCESS! [0:57:43.107730]
> > > > > > azul Zulu21.48+15-CA SUCCESS! [0:57:21.412434]
> > > > > > oracle 2025-10-21 LTS SUCCESS! [0:56:43.795738]
> > > > > > ubuntu openjdk build 21.0.9+10-Ubuntu-124.04 SUCCESS!
> > > [0:56:35.598028]
> > > > > > microsoft jdk Microsoft-12574458 SUCCESS! [0:55:39.946492]
> > > > > > graalvm GraalVM CE 21.0.9+10.1 SUCCESS! [0:56:42.202942]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > aarch64 on Raspberry Pi 5 Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
> > > > > > ubuntu openjdk build 21.0.9+10-Ubuntu-124.04 SUCCESS!
> > > [2:44:01.665537]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +1 non binding
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 11:19 PM Andrey Ukhanov (BLOOMBERG/ 919
> 3RD
> > > A)
> > > > <
> > > > > > aukhanov@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > SUCCESS! [0:50:10.558971]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 01/21/26 17:17:35 UTC-5:00To:
> > > > > > > dev@solr.apache.org
> > > > > > > Subject: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.0.0 RC3
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thank you for your patience with the multiple release
> candidates
> > > for
> > > > > > > releasing Solr 10.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Please vote for *Release Candidate 3* for Solr 10.0.0
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If you already voted for RC2, please note that there are *no
> code
> > > > > changes
> > > > > > > in this RC as compared to the previous one* and it'd be great
> if
> > > you
> > > > > > could
> > > > > > > cast your vote for this one as well.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > *An important note for non-committers:* Your vote counts!
> Please
> > > test
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > vote for this RC and help us in releasing a candidate that's
> > tested
> > > > by
> > > > > > > multiple people, across multiple platforms, on a variety of
> > > machines
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > JVMs.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thank you for your vote and involvement in the Apache Solr
> > project.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb
> > > > > > > 1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac
> > > > > > > <
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb
> > > > > > > 1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac
> > > > > > > <
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You can build a release-candidate of the official docker images
> > > > (full &
> > > > > > > slim) using the following command:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER=
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb
> > > > > > > 1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac/solr
> > > > > > > <
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac/solr
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > && \
> > > > > > > docker build
> > > > > > $SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER/10.0.0/docker/Dockerfile.official-full
> > > > > > > \
> > > > > > > --build-arg SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER=$SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER \
> > > > > > > -t solr-rc:10.0.0-3 && \
> > > > > > > docker build
> > > > > > $SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER/10.0.0/docker/Dockerfile.official-slim
> > > > > > > \
> > > > > > > --build-arg SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER=$SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER \
> > > > > > > -t solr-rc:10.0.0-3-slim
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The
> > > > > > > *vote will be open for at least 5 days i.e. until 2026-01-26
> > 23:00
> > > > > UTC.*
> > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Here is my +1.
> > > > > > > SUCCESS! [0:48:11.146422]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
--
Anshum Gupta
Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.0.0 RC3
Posted by Rahul Goswami <ra...@gmail.com>.
Hey Anshum, sorry I missed the previous email. Thanks for the reminder.
After fixing the build issues and smoke tester on Windows, and being able
to run the tests on RC3, the only open application issue I could spot while
kicking the tires is with running an example in standalone mode (i.e. it
always launches example in solrcloud). This isn't a production blocker, and
I verified that starting the server in standalone mode with usual
parameters still works fine on Windows.
Agreed this doesn't warrant another RC.
Rahul
On Tue, Feb 3, 2026 at 12:57 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> Rahul, checking in again in case you missed the previous email.
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2026 at 12:21 AM Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > SUCCESS! [1:39:05.919541]
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > - Houston
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 1, 2026 at 10:08 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Rahul,
> > >
> > > Thanks for all of your effort in addressing the issues related to
> > > running/testing Solr on Windows.
> > >
> > > It doesn’t seem like the current issues call for a new RC to be built
> and
> > > voted on. They still need to be fixed (in the next release) but the
> > current
> > > RC shouldn’t cause actual issues.
> > >
> > > What are your thoughts?
> > >
> > > Anshum Gupta
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 8:33 AM Rahul Goswami <ra...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > UPDATE: I was finally able to fix the smokeTester on Windows (PR
> > > incoming).
> > > > The tests for RC3 run fine on Windows (minus couple of flakey tests),
> > > which
> > > > is what I mainly wanted to ensure.
> > > >
> > > > Among the basic sanity checks I did manually, inability to run an
> > example
> > > > in user-managed mode is the only open issue I could find (fixed on
> main
> > > and
> > > > branch_10x).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 3:39 AM Arrieta, Alejandro <
> > > > aarrieta@perrinsoftware.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > amd64 on Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
> > > > > temurin Temurin-21.0.10+7 SUCCESS! [0:57:43.107730]
> > > > > azul Zulu21.48+15-CA SUCCESS! [0:57:21.412434]
> > > > > oracle 2025-10-21 LTS SUCCESS! [0:56:43.795738]
> > > > > ubuntu openjdk build 21.0.9+10-Ubuntu-124.04 SUCCESS!
> > [0:56:35.598028]
> > > > > microsoft jdk Microsoft-12574458 SUCCESS! [0:55:39.946492]
> > > > > graalvm GraalVM CE 21.0.9+10.1 SUCCESS! [0:56:42.202942]
> > > > >
> > > > > aarch64 on Raspberry Pi 5 Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
> > > > > ubuntu openjdk build 21.0.9+10-Ubuntu-124.04 SUCCESS!
> > [2:44:01.665537]
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 non binding
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 11:19 PM Andrey Ukhanov (BLOOMBERG/ 919 3RD
> > A)
> > > <
> > > > > aukhanov@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > SUCCESS! [0:50:10.558971]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 01/21/26 17:17:35 UTC-5:00To:
> > > > > > dev@solr.apache.org
> > > > > > Subject: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.0.0 RC3
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thank you for your patience with the multiple release candidates
> > for
> > > > > > releasing Solr 10.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please vote for *Release Candidate 3* for Solr 10.0.0
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If you already voted for RC2, please note that there are *no code
> > > > changes
> > > > > > in this RC as compared to the previous one* and it'd be great if
> > you
> > > > > could
> > > > > > cast your vote for this one as well.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *An important note for non-committers:* Your vote counts! Please
> > test
> > > > and
> > > > > > vote for this RC and help us in releasing a candidate that's
> tested
> > > by
> > > > > > multiple people, across multiple platforms, on a variety of
> > machines
> > > > and
> > > > > > JVMs.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thank you for your vote and involvement in the Apache Solr
> project.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb
> > > > > > 1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac
> > > > > > <
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb
> > > > > > 1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac
> > > > > > <
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You can build a release-candidate of the official docker images
> > > (full &
> > > > > > slim) using the following command:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER=
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb
> > > > > > 1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac/solr
> > > > > > <
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac/solr
> > > > > >
> > > > > > && \
> > > > > > docker build
> > > > > $SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER/10.0.0/docker/Dockerfile.official-full
> > > > > > \
> > > > > > --build-arg SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER=$SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER \
> > > > > > -t solr-rc:10.0.0-3 && \
> > > > > > docker build
> > > > > $SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER/10.0.0/docker/Dockerfile.official-slim
> > > > > > \
> > > > > > --build-arg SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER=$SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER \
> > > > > > -t solr-rc:10.0.0-3-slim
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The
> > > > > > *vote will be open for at least 5 days i.e. until 2026-01-26
> 23:00
> > > > UTC.*
> > > > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Here is my +1.
> > > > > > SUCCESS! [0:48:11.146422]
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.0.0 RC3
Posted by Anshum Gupta <an...@apache.org>.
Rahul, checking in again in case you missed the previous email.
On Mon, Feb 2, 2026 at 12:21 AM Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org> wrote:
> SUCCESS! [1:39:05.919541]
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Houston
>
> On Sun, Feb 1, 2026 at 10:08 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Rahul,
> >
> > Thanks for all of your effort in addressing the issues related to
> > running/testing Solr on Windows.
> >
> > It doesn’t seem like the current issues call for a new RC to be built and
> > voted on. They still need to be fixed (in the next release) but the
> current
> > RC shouldn’t cause actual issues.
> >
> > What are your thoughts?
> >
> > Anshum Gupta
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 8:33 AM Rahul Goswami <ra...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > UPDATE: I was finally able to fix the smokeTester on Windows (PR
> > incoming).
> > > The tests for RC3 run fine on Windows (minus couple of flakey tests),
> > which
> > > is what I mainly wanted to ensure.
> > >
> > > Among the basic sanity checks I did manually, inability to run an
> example
> > > in user-managed mode is the only open issue I could find (fixed on main
> > and
> > > branch_10x).
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 3:39 AM Arrieta, Alejandro <
> > > aarrieta@perrinsoftware.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > amd64 on Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
> > > > temurin Temurin-21.0.10+7 SUCCESS! [0:57:43.107730]
> > > > azul Zulu21.48+15-CA SUCCESS! [0:57:21.412434]
> > > > oracle 2025-10-21 LTS SUCCESS! [0:56:43.795738]
> > > > ubuntu openjdk build 21.0.9+10-Ubuntu-124.04 SUCCESS!
> [0:56:35.598028]
> > > > microsoft jdk Microsoft-12574458 SUCCESS! [0:55:39.946492]
> > > > graalvm GraalVM CE 21.0.9+10.1 SUCCESS! [0:56:42.202942]
> > > >
> > > > aarch64 on Raspberry Pi 5 Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
> > > > ubuntu openjdk build 21.0.9+10-Ubuntu-124.04 SUCCESS!
> [2:44:01.665537]
> > > >
> > > > +1 non binding
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 11:19 PM Andrey Ukhanov (BLOOMBERG/ 919 3RD
> A)
> > <
> > > > aukhanov@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > SUCCESS! [0:50:10.558971]
> > > > >
> > > > > From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 01/21/26 17:17:35 UTC-5:00To:
> > > > > dev@solr.apache.org
> > > > > Subject: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.0.0 RC3
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you for your patience with the multiple release candidates
> for
> > > > > releasing Solr 10.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please vote for *Release Candidate 3* for Solr 10.0.0
> > > > >
> > > > > If you already voted for RC2, please note that there are *no code
> > > changes
> > > > > in this RC as compared to the previous one* and it'd be great if
> you
> > > > could
> > > > > cast your vote for this one as well.
> > > > >
> > > > > *An important note for non-committers:* Your vote counts! Please
> test
> > > and
> > > > > vote for this RC and help us in releasing a candidate that's tested
> > by
> > > > > multiple people, across multiple platforms, on a variety of
> machines
> > > and
> > > > > JVMs.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you for your vote and involvement in the Apache Solr project.
> > > > >
> > > > > The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb
> > > > > 1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac
> > > > > <
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> > > > >
> > > > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb
> > > > > 1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac
> > > > > <
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > You can build a release-candidate of the official docker images
> > (full &
> > > > > slim) using the following command:
> > > > >
> > > > > SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER=
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb
> > > > > 1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac/solr
> > > > > <
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac/solr
> > > > >
> > > > > && \
> > > > > docker build
> > > > $SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER/10.0.0/docker/Dockerfile.official-full
> > > > > \
> > > > > --build-arg SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER=$SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER \
> > > > > -t solr-rc:10.0.0-3 && \
> > > > > docker build
> > > > $SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER/10.0.0/docker/Dockerfile.official-slim
> > > > > \
> > > > > --build-arg SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER=$SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER \
> > > > > -t solr-rc:10.0.0-3-slim
> > > > >
> > > > > The
> > > > > *vote will be open for at least 5 days i.e. until 2026-01-26 23:00
> > > UTC.*
> > > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > > > >
> > > > > Here is my +1.
> > > > > SUCCESS! [0:48:11.146422]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.0.0 RC3
Posted by Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>.
SUCCESS! [1:39:05.919541]
+1 (binding)
- Houston
On Sun, Feb 1, 2026 at 10:08 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Rahul,
>
> Thanks for all of your effort in addressing the issues related to
> running/testing Solr on Windows.
>
> It doesn’t seem like the current issues call for a new RC to be built and
> voted on. They still need to be fixed (in the next release) but the current
> RC shouldn’t cause actual issues.
>
> What are your thoughts?
>
> Anshum Gupta
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 8:33 AM Rahul Goswami <ra...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > UPDATE: I was finally able to fix the smokeTester on Windows (PR
> incoming).
> > The tests for RC3 run fine on Windows (minus couple of flakey tests),
> which
> > is what I mainly wanted to ensure.
> >
> > Among the basic sanity checks I did manually, inability to run an example
> > in user-managed mode is the only open issue I could find (fixed on main
> and
> > branch_10x).
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 3:39 AM Arrieta, Alejandro <
> > aarrieta@perrinsoftware.com> wrote:
> >
> > > amd64 on Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
> > > temurin Temurin-21.0.10+7 SUCCESS! [0:57:43.107730]
> > > azul Zulu21.48+15-CA SUCCESS! [0:57:21.412434]
> > > oracle 2025-10-21 LTS SUCCESS! [0:56:43.795738]
> > > ubuntu openjdk build 21.0.9+10-Ubuntu-124.04 SUCCESS! [0:56:35.598028]
> > > microsoft jdk Microsoft-12574458 SUCCESS! [0:55:39.946492]
> > > graalvm GraalVM CE 21.0.9+10.1 SUCCESS! [0:56:42.202942]
> > >
> > > aarch64 on Raspberry Pi 5 Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
> > > ubuntu openjdk build 21.0.9+10-Ubuntu-124.04 SUCCESS! [2:44:01.665537]
> > >
> > > +1 non binding
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 11:19 PM Andrey Ukhanov (BLOOMBERG/ 919 3RD A)
> <
> > > aukhanov@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > > SUCCESS! [0:50:10.558971]
> > > >
> > > > From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 01/21/26 17:17:35 UTC-5:00To:
> > > > dev@solr.apache.org
> > > > Subject: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.0.0 RC3
> > > >
> > > > Hi everyone,
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for your patience with the multiple release candidates for
> > > > releasing Solr 10.
> > > >
> > > > Please vote for *Release Candidate 3* for Solr 10.0.0
> > > >
> > > > If you already voted for RC2, please note that there are *no code
> > changes
> > > > in this RC as compared to the previous one* and it'd be great if you
> > > could
> > > > cast your vote for this one as well.
> > > >
> > > > *An important note for non-committers:* Your vote counts! Please test
> > and
> > > > vote for this RC and help us in releasing a candidate that's tested
> by
> > > > multiple people, across multiple platforms, on a variety of machines
> > and
> > > > JVMs.
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for your vote and involvement in the Apache Solr project.
> > > >
> > > > The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb
> > > > 1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac
> > > > <
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> > > >
> > > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb
> > > > 1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac
> > > > <
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > You can build a release-candidate of the official docker images
> (full &
> > > > slim) using the following command:
> > > >
> > > > SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER=
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb
> > > > 1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac/solr
> > > > <
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC3-rev-016965ccedaea5bb1261bd772bc4dadd528abbac/solr
> > > >
> > > > && \
> > > > docker build
> > > $SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER/10.0.0/docker/Dockerfile.official-full
> > > > \
> > > > --build-arg SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER=$SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER \
> > > > -t solr-rc:10.0.0-3 && \
> > > > docker build
> > > $SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER/10.0.0/docker/Dockerfile.official-slim
> > > > \
> > > > --build-arg SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER=$SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER \
> > > > -t solr-rc:10.0.0-3-slim
> > > >
> > > > The
> > > > *vote will be open for at least 5 days i.e. until 2026-01-26 23:00
> > UTC.*
> > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > > >
> > > > Here is my +1.
> > > > SUCCESS! [0:48:11.146422]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>