You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cloudstack.apache.org by Chiradeep Vittal <Ch...@citrix.com> on 2013/03/27 06:37:09 UTC
[QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute
Following the discussion [1], we have QuickCloud in a rough-but-ready state for developers to try out
Instructions for developers to try it out with DevCloud2 here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/QuickCloud
For now only Mac / Unix developers can use this workflow since NFS mounts are required.
[1] http://markmail.org/thread/ajw7b6arhluqcuv2
Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute
Posted by David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us>.
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
<Ch...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>Wow this is awesome. Will you consider writing a blog post about this?
>
> Yes, sure.
>
> One thing that is not 'ready' is the operational / packaging side of
> things.
> Copying systemvm.zip around and starting daemons without some kind of init
> script isn't ideal.
>
> Also the UI still shows "0" system vms and won't display the state of
> these services.
>
Can you create a packaging bug for this, what's particularly important
is knowing what needs to go where, daemons that will exist, etc. (I'm
guessing we'd create another package specifically for the sysvm
services)
--David
Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute
Posted by Outback Dingo <ou...@gmail.com>.
you did see my previous email before the one about the error correct?
or am i hunting down the right path here, or heading off into complete
and vastly unkown territory not yet explored
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com> wrote:
> Sorry about that. I switched to the quickcloud2 branch last Friday in
> order to get a clean patch on master. Can you try that one out?
>
>
> On 4/8/13 2:21 PM, "Outback Dingo" <ou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
> >Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Can you post your build error on paste.cloudstack.org ?
> >>
> >
> >Here ya go! :) didnt know it existed
> > http://paste.cloudstack.org/kqi0/
>
>
Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute
Posted by Outback Dingo <ou...@gmail.com>.
[INFO] Apache CloudStack DevCloud ........................ SUCCESS [0.655s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack DevCloud-KVM .................... SUCCESS [0.295s]
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time: 4:53.292s
[INFO] Finished at: Mon Apr 08 17:46:52 EDT 2013
[INFO] Final Memory: 47M/200M
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com> wrote:
> Sorry about that. I switched to the quickcloud2 branch last Friday in
> order to get a clean patch on master. Can you try that one out?
>
>
> On 4/8/13 2:21 PM, "Outback Dingo" <ou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
> >Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Can you post your build error on paste.cloudstack.org ?
> >>
> >
> >Here ya go! :) didnt know it existed
> > http://paste.cloudstack.org/kqi0/
>
>
Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute
Posted by Outback Dingo <ou...@gmail.com>.
so clone quickcloud2 ???
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com> wrote:
> Sorry about that. I switched to the quickcloud2 branch last Friday in
> order to get a clean patch on master. Can you try that one out?
>
>
> On 4/8/13 2:21 PM, "Outback Dingo" <ou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
> >Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Can you post your build error on paste.cloudstack.org ?
> >>
> >
> >Here ya go! :) didnt know it existed
> > http://paste.cloudstack.org/kqi0/
>
>
Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute
Posted by Chiradeep Vittal <Ch...@citrix.com>.
Sorry about that. I switched to the quickcloud2 branch last Friday in
order to get a clean patch on master. Can you try that one out?
On 4/8/13 2:21 PM, "Outback Dingo" <ou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
>Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>> Can you post your build error on paste.cloudstack.org ?
>>
>
>Here ya go! :) didnt know it existed
> http://paste.cloudstack.org/kqi0/
Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute
Posted by Outback Dingo <ou...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com> wrote:
> Can you post your build error on paste.cloudstack.org ?
>
Here ya go! :) didnt know it existed
http://paste.cloudstack.org/kqi0/
Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute
Posted by Chiradeep Vittal <Ch...@citrix.com>.
Can you post your build error on paste.cloudstack.org ?
From: Outback Dingo <ou...@gmail.com>>
Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>" <de...@cloudstack.apache.org>>
Date: Sunday, April 7, 2013 12:01 PM
To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>" <de...@cloudstack.apache.org>>
Cc: Phong Nguyen <pn...@gilt.com>>
Subject: Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Outback Dingo <ou...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <Ch...@citrix.com>> wrote:
>>
>so looking at this it all seems to be vitual box based, is that correct ??
>id be curious if it was possible to convert the vbox image to xen, and
>create
>say an Devcloud/XEN QuickCLoud since i see virtual box as overhead since
>im
>already running XEN under my desktop
>
Absolutely. You don't even need DevCloud
Follow the "non-Maven" flow in the wiki.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/clnVAQ#QuickCloud-howto2
Okay, getting back to this, essential this would/does require i install a management server?? Basically my thoughts are
installed Kubuntu 13.04, install XEN and XCP based on the kronos work, configure xcp kronos for ubuntu (this is all done)
so now im booting into a XEN/XCP kronos based system, with the kde ui on top...... should i then just install the management server
on the host xen/xcp os? and then follow the quickcloud docs? or should i follow the building a devcloud, only do it on the host OS ??
following the doc you posted, it states find /usr/share -name systemvm.zip ....... i have not deployed a management server as of yet
whats my best path to follow ??
also note while trying to build quickcloud it errored out with the following, im on Kubuntu 13.04
Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute
Posted by Outback Dingo <ou...@gmail.com>.
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Outback Dingo <ou...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
> Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> >>
>> >so looking at this it all seems to be vitual box based, is that correct
>> ??
>> >id be curious if it was possible to convert the vbox image to xen, and
>> >create
>> >say an Devcloud/XEN QuickCLoud since i see virtual box as overhead since
>> >im
>> >already running XEN under my desktop
>> >
>>
>> Absolutely. You don't even need DevCloud
>> Follow the "non-Maven" flow in the wiki.
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/clnVAQ#QuickCloud-howto2
>>
>>
> Okay, getting back to this, essential this would/does require i install a
> management server?? Basically my thoughts are
>
> installed Kubuntu 13.04, install XEN and XCP based on the kronos work,
> configure xcp kronos for ubuntu (this is all done)
> so now im booting into a XEN/XCP kronos based system, with the kde ui on
> top...... should i then just install the management server
> on the host xen/xcp os? and then follow the quickcloud docs? or should i
> follow the building a devcloud, only do it on the host OS ??
>
> following the doc you posted, it states find /usr/share -name
> systemvm.zip ....... i have not deployed a management server as of yet
>
> whats my best path to follow ??
>
>
also note while trying to build quickcloud it errored out with the
following, im on Kubuntu 13.04
Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute
Posted by Outback Dingo <ou...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>
> >>
> >so looking at this it all seems to be vitual box based, is that correct ??
> >id be curious if it was possible to convert the vbox image to xen, and
> >create
> >say an Devcloud/XEN QuickCLoud since i see virtual box as overhead since
> >im
> >already running XEN under my desktop
> >
>
> Absolutely. You don't even need DevCloud
> Follow the "non-Maven" flow in the wiki.
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/clnVAQ#QuickCloud-howto2
>
>
Okay, getting back to this, essential this would/does require i install a
management server?? Basically my thoughts are
installed Kubuntu 13.04, install XEN and XCP based on the kronos work,
configure xcp kronos for ubuntu (this is all done)
so now im booting into a XEN/XCP kronos based system, with the kde ui on
top...... should i then just install the management server
on the host xen/xcp os? and then follow the quickcloud docs? or should i
follow the building a devcloud, only do it on the host OS ??
following the doc you posted, it states find /usr/share -name systemvm.zip
....... i have not deployed a management server as of yet
whats my best path to follow ??
Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute
Posted by Chiradeep Vittal <Ch...@citrix.com>.
>>
>so looking at this it all seems to be vitual box based, is that correct ??
>id be curious if it was possible to convert the vbox image to xen, and
>create
>say an Devcloud/XEN QuickCLoud since i see virtual box as overhead since
>im
>already running XEN under my desktop
>
Absolutely. You don't even need DevCloud
Follow the "non-Maven" flow in the wiki.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/clnVAQ#QuickCloud-howto2
Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute
Posted by Outback Dingo <ou...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 4:51 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Edison Su <Ed...@citrix.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com]
> >> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 1:34 PM
> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> Cc: Phong Nguyen
> >> Subject: Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 3/28/13 1:04 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal" <Ch...@citrix.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>Wow this is awesome. Will you consider writing a blog post about this?
> >> >
> >> >Yes, sure.
> >> >
> >> >One thing that is not 'ready' is the operational / packaging side of
> >> >things.
> >> >Copying systemvm.zip around and starting daemons without some kind of
> >> >init script isn't ideal.
> >> >
> >> >Also the UI still shows "0" system vms and won't display the state of
> >> >these services.
> >>
> >> Along these lines, I would like QuickCloud to be the "default"
> >> out-of-the-box experience for CloudStack. For e.g., one downloads Apache
> >> (the Web server) and starts it and you get an index page.
> >> For CloudStack
> >> * download & install binaries for your hypervisor
> >> * start the MS, SS and CP daemons
> >
> > Is it possible to remove these SS and CP daemons? Including them in MS?
> Make the packager and setup easier.
> >
>
>
> Just thinking out loud here - but if I were to do the packaging - I'd
> probably have a meta-package (perhaps the root cloudstack package)
> that would require cloudstack-sysdaemons. A person would still be able
> to 'yum install cloudstack-server and not get those dameons, but the
> 'default' install (yum install cloudstack) would have SS/CP as a
> dependency and thus have it installed and started.
>
>
so looking at this it all seems to be vitual box based, is that correct ??
id be curious if it was possible to convert the vbox image to xen, and
create
say an Devcloud/XEN QuickCLoud since i see virtual box as overhead since im
already running XEN under my desktop
> --David
>
Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute
Posted by David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us>.
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Edison Su <Ed...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 1:34 PM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Cc: Phong Nguyen
>> Subject: Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute
>>
>>
>>
>> On 3/28/13 1:04 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal" <Ch...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >>
>> >>Wow this is awesome. Will you consider writing a blog post about this?
>> >
>> >Yes, sure.
>> >
>> >One thing that is not 'ready' is the operational / packaging side of
>> >things.
>> >Copying systemvm.zip around and starting daemons without some kind of
>> >init script isn't ideal.
>> >
>> >Also the UI still shows "0" system vms and won't display the state of
>> >these services.
>>
>> Along these lines, I would like QuickCloud to be the "default"
>> out-of-the-box experience for CloudStack. For e.g., one downloads Apache
>> (the Web server) and starts it and you get an index page.
>> For CloudStack
>> * download & install binaries for your hypervisor
>> * start the MS, SS and CP daemons
>
> Is it possible to remove these SS and CP daemons? Including them in MS? Make the packager and setup easier.
>
Just thinking out loud here - but if I were to do the packaging - I'd
probably have a meta-package (perhaps the root cloudstack package)
that would require cloudstack-sysdaemons. A person would still be able
to 'yum install cloudstack-server and not get those dameons, but the
'default' install (yum install cloudstack) would have SS/CP as a
dependency and thus have it installed and started.
--David
RE: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute
Posted by Edison Su <Ed...@citrix.com>.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 1:34 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Phong Nguyen
> Subject: Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute
>
>
>
> On 3/28/13 1:04 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal" <Ch...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >>
> >>Wow this is awesome. Will you consider writing a blog post about this?
> >
> >Yes, sure.
> >
> >One thing that is not 'ready' is the operational / packaging side of
> >things.
> >Copying systemvm.zip around and starting daemons without some kind of
> >init script isn't ideal.
> >
> >Also the UI still shows "0" system vms and won't display the state of
> >these services.
>
> Along these lines, I would like QuickCloud to be the "default"
> out-of-the-box experience for CloudStack. For e.g., one downloads Apache
> (the Web server) and starts it and you get an index page.
> For CloudStack
> * download & install binaries for your hypervisor
> * start the MS, SS and CP daemons
Is it possible to remove these SS and CP daemons? Including them in MS? Make the packager and setup easier.
> * login via the UI
> * start your first vm
>
> This is much like Dave's run book [1] but skips the systemvm installation step
>
> [1] http://people.apache.org/~ke4qqq/runbook/
> --
> Chiradeep
Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute
Posted by Chiradeep Vittal <Ch...@citrix.com>.
On 3/28/13 1:04 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal" <Ch...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>Wow this is awesome. Will you consider writing a blog post about this?
>
>Yes, sure.
>
>One thing that is not 'ready' is the operational / packaging side of
>things.
>Copying systemvm.zip around and starting daemons without some kind of init
>script isn't ideal.
>
>Also the UI still shows "0" system vms and won't display the state of
>these services.
Along these lines, I would like QuickCloud to be the "default"
out-of-the-box experience for CloudStack. For e.g., one downloads Apache
(the Web server) and starts it and you get an index page.
For CloudStack
* download & install binaries for your hypervisor
* start the MS, SS and CP daemons
* login via the UI
* start your first vm
This is much like Dave's run book [1] but skips the systemvm installation
step
[1] http://people.apache.org/~ke4qqq/runbook/
--
Chiradeep
Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute
Posted by Chiradeep Vittal <Ch...@citrix.com>.
>
>Wow this is awesome. Will you consider writing a blog post about this?
Yes, sure.
One thing that is not 'ready' is the operational / packaging side of
things.
Copying systemvm.zip around and starting daemons without some kind of init
script isn't ideal.
Also the UI still shows "0" system vms and won't display the state of
these services.
Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute
Posted by David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us>.
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Chiradeep Vittal
<Ch...@citrix.com> wrote:
> Following the discussion [1], we have QuickCloud in a rough-but-ready state for developers to try out
> Instructions for developers to try it out with DevCloud2 here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/QuickCloud
>
> For now only Mac / Unix developers can use this workflow since NFS mounts are required.
>
> [1] http://markmail.org/thread/ajw7b6arhluqcuv2
Wow this is awesome. Will you consider writing a blog post about this?
Phong, this should eliminate the need for the non-LXC cluster to
provide sysvms.
--David
Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute
Posted by prasanna <ts...@apache.org>.
This is a significant step no doubt!
One comment - I think the deployDataCenter.py should move out of the
<package> phase of the devcloud/pom.xml. When it runs the install
phase which includes the package phase the build will fail with the
following stack:
https://gist.github.com/vogxn/5264956
In the bvt branch I work around this problem by putting the deploy
into the integration-test phase and into a profile that takes a
property which is the config file of marvin.
On 28 March 2013 05:49, Chiradeep Vittal <Ch...@citrix.com> wrote:
> This should now be usable for production use as well
> Follow instructions here
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/QuickCloud#QuickClou
> d-howto2
>
> From: Ahmad Emneina <ae...@gmail.com>
> Reply-To: "aemneina@gmail.com" <ae...@gmail.com>
> Date: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 10:34 AM
> To: Chiradeep Vittal <ch...@citrix.com>
> Cc: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" <de...@cloudstack.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute
>
>
> +1
> so awesome!
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Chiradeep Vittal
> <Ch...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
> Yes (actually that's what the instructions say)
>
> On 3/26/13 10:46 PM, "Ahmad Emneina" <ae...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>would someone be able to fire up all those services (say for a basic zone)
>>on one host?
>>
>>
>>On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:37 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
>>Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Following the discussion [1], we have QuickCloud in a rough-but-ready
>>> state for developers to try out
>>> Instructions for developers to try it out with DevCloud2 here:
>>>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/QuickCloud
> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/QuickCloud>
>>>
>>> For now only Mac / Unix developers can use this workflow since NFS
>>>mounts
>>> are required.
>>>
>>> [1] http://markmail.org/thread/ajw7b6arhluqcuv2
>>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute
Posted by Outback Dingo <ou...@gmail.com>.
Okay so apparently when i fire off cloudstack-management server it is what
appears to be eating all the available memory and causing the laptop to
swap so im not so sure this is viable at this moment unless i can get CS
management to consume considerably less memory
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com> wrote:
> This should now be usable for production use as well
> Follow instructions here
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/QuickCloud#QuickClou
> d-howto2
>
> From: Ahmad Emneina <ae...@gmail.com>
> Reply-To: "aemneina@gmail.com" <ae...@gmail.com>
> Date: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 10:34 AM
> To: Chiradeep Vittal <ch...@citrix.com>
> Cc: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" <de...@cloudstack.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute
>
>
> +1
> so awesome!
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Chiradeep Vittal
> <Ch...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
> Yes (actually that's what the instructions say)
>
> On 3/26/13 10:46 PM, "Ahmad Emneina" <ae...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >would someone be able to fire up all those services (say for a basic zone)
> >on one host?
> >
> >
> >On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:37 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
> >Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Following the discussion [1], we have QuickCloud in a rough-but-ready
> >> state for developers to try out
> >> Instructions for developers to try it out with DevCloud2 here:
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/QuickCloud
> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/QuickCloud>
> >>
> >> For now only Mac / Unix developers can use this workflow since NFS
> >>mounts
> >> are required.
> >>
> >> [1] http://markmail.org/thread/ajw7b6arhluqcuv2
> >>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute
Posted by Chiradeep Vittal <Ch...@citrix.com>.
This should now be usable for production use as well
Follow instructions here
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/QuickCloud#QuickClou
d-howto2
From: Ahmad Emneina <ae...@gmail.com>
Reply-To: "aemneina@gmail.com" <ae...@gmail.com>
Date: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 10:34 AM
To: Chiradeep Vittal <ch...@citrix.com>
Cc: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" <de...@cloudstack.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute
+1
so awesome!
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Chiradeep Vittal
<Ch...@citrix.com> wrote:
Yes (actually that's what the instructions say)
On 3/26/13 10:46 PM, "Ahmad Emneina" <ae...@gmail.com> wrote:
>would someone be able to fire up all those services (say for a basic zone)
>on one host?
>
>
>On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:37 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
>Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>> Following the discussion [1], we have QuickCloud in a rough-but-ready
>> state for developers to try out
>> Instructions for developers to try it out with DevCloud2 here:
>>
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/QuickCloud
<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/QuickCloud>
>>
>> For now only Mac / Unix developers can use this workflow since NFS
>>mounts
>> are required.
>>
>> [1] http://markmail.org/thread/ajw7b6arhluqcuv2
>>
Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute
Posted by Ahmad Emneina <ae...@gmail.com>.
+1
so awesome!
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Chiradeep Vittal <
Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com> wrote:
> Yes (actually that's what the instructions say)
>
> On 3/26/13 10:46 PM, "Ahmad Emneina" <ae...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >would someone be able to fire up all those services (say for a basic zone)
> >on one host?
> >
> >
> >On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:37 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
> >Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Following the discussion [1], we have QuickCloud in a rough-but-ready
> >> state for developers to try out
> >> Instructions for developers to try it out with DevCloud2 here:
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/QuickCloud
> >>
> >> For now only Mac / Unix developers can use this workflow since NFS
> >>mounts
> >> are required.
> >>
> >> [1] http://markmail.org/thread/ajw7b6arhluqcuv2
> >>
>
>
Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute
Posted by Chiradeep Vittal <Ch...@citrix.com>.
Yes (actually that's what the instructions say)
On 3/26/13 10:46 PM, "Ahmad Emneina" <ae...@gmail.com> wrote:
>would someone be able to fire up all those services (say for a basic zone)
>on one host?
>
>
>On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:37 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
>Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>> Following the discussion [1], we have QuickCloud in a rough-but-ready
>> state for developers to try out
>> Instructions for developers to try it out with DevCloud2 here:
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/QuickCloud
>>
>> For now only Mac / Unix developers can use this workflow since NFS
>>mounts
>> are required.
>>
>> [1] http://markmail.org/thread/ajw7b6arhluqcuv2
>>
Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute
Posted by Ahmad Emneina <ae...@gmail.com>.
would someone be able to fire up all those services (say for a basic zone)
on one host?
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:37 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com> wrote:
> Following the discussion [1], we have QuickCloud in a rough-but-ready
> state for developers to try out
> Instructions for developers to try it out with DevCloud2 here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/QuickCloud
>
> For now only Mac / Unix developers can use this workflow since NFS mounts
> are required.
>
> [1] http://markmail.org/thread/ajw7b6arhluqcuv2
>