You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to server-dev@james.apache.org by Serge Knystautas <se...@lokitech.com> on 2001/06/30 20:46:49 UTC

JDBC version

Is it ok if the JDBC repository to require JDBC 2.0 drivers?

If I can, then I can use Blob objects, which should let me find out the
length of a message without reading the enter field into memory.  This is
particularly useful to making POP access fast.

Serge Knystautas
Loki Technologies
http://www.lokitech.com/


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: james-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: james-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org

Re: JDBC version

Posted by Oki DZ <ok...@pindad.com>.

Serge Knystautas wrote:
> 
> Is it ok if the JDBC repository to require JDBC 2.0 drivers?

There is MM driver for MySQL which is available for download. So I think
it would be all right.
Feature-wise, they would be better. Price-wise, James+database would
still be free. So, there's no reason not to implement JDBC 2.0 in James.

Oki

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: james-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: james-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org