You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de> on 2013/06/20 16:02:08 UTC
What to do with lucene.ao/core/old_versioned_docs ?
Hi,
while updating the javadocs to not expose the frame injection javascript bug (as recommended by infra), I noticed that we still have the very special case of old_versioned_docs which is *not* part of the main website tree. It’s a separate SVN checkout without using the CMS. This folder contains old javadocs and version-specific forrest-sites of Lucene versions 2.9.0 to 3.5.x. 3.6.x (also forrest) is already as extpath in the new tree.
We have two possibilities to clean this up:
- revert the old_versioned_docs extra folder and add the included javadocs as extpath like we do since 3.6.0
- delete 2.9 to 3.5 alltogether. Please note that we did this before, too. We no longer have the old forrest pages of lucene versions prior 2.9.
I have no special preference, I can manage to do the task (especially deactivate the special "old_versioned_docs" hack in svnpubsub). Infra was also not very happy about that in IRC... Both options above can be done in SVN and reverting the redirect hacks done by Grant at that time (extpath.txt was not available at that time, I think).
Uwe
-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
RE: What to do with lucene.ao/core/old_versioned_docs ?
Posted by Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de>.
I will for now clean this up. We can remove older javadocs later. I just want to get rid of the crazy old_versioned_docs extra path in svn
- I changed extpaths.txt to have new entries for all those old versions.
- I changed .htaccess t do redirect correctly (so back from the temporary path to where they should be)
- I SVN copied the docs
Uwe
-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:uwe@thetaphi.de]
> Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 6:31 PM
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: What to do with lucene.ao/core/old_versioned_docs ?
>
> The forrest page is still there. It would look like
> http://lucene.apache.org/core/3_6_2/index.html
>
> No change at all.
>
> -----
> Uwe Schindler
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Steve Rowe [mailto:sarowe@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 6:26 PM
> > To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: What to do with lucene.ao/core/old_versioned_docs ?
> >
> > I think we should keep javadocs around for versions people are using,
> > and judging from recent user questions, 3.X still qualifies.
> >
> > > - revert the old_versioned_docs extra folder and add the included
> > > javadocs as extpath like we do since 3.6.0
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Some of the Forrest site documentation will be lost as a result. E.g.
> > there won't be an index page for all the different javadocs, like the new
> stuff has.
> > How hard would it be to use the new documentation building logic
> > against the old versions?
> >
> > Steve
> >
> > On Jun 20, 2013, at 10:02 AM, Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > while updating the javadocs to not expose the frame injection
> > > javascript
> > bug (as recommended by infra), I noticed that we still have the very
> > special case of old_versioned_docs which is *not* part of the main
> > website tree. It’s a separate SVN checkout without using the CMS. This
> > folder contains old javadocs and version-specific forrest-sites of Lucene
> versions 2.9.0 to 3.5.x.
> > 3.6.x (also forrest) is already as extpath in the new tree.
> > >
> > > We have two possibilities to clean this up:
> > > - revert the old_versioned_docs extra folder and add the included
> > > javadocs as extpath like we do since 3.6.0
> > > - delete 2.9 to 3.5 alltogether. Please note that we did this
> > > before, too. We
> > no longer have the old forrest pages of lucene versions prior 2.9.
> > >
> > > I have no special preference, I can manage to do the task
> > > (especially
> > deactivate the special "old_versioned_docs" hack in svnpubsub). Infra
> > was also not very happy about that in IRC... Both options above can be
> > done in SVN and reverting the redirect hacks done by Grant at that
> > time (extpath.txt was not available at that time, I think).
> > >
> > > Uwe
> > >
> > > -----
> > > Uwe Schindler
> > > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de
> > > eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For
> > > additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional
> > commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: What to do with lucene.ao/core/old_versioned_docs ?
Posted by Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com>.
Oh, okay, cool!
On Jun 20, 2013, at 12:31 PM, "Uwe Schindler" <uw...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
> The forrest page is still there. It would look like http://lucene.apache.org/core/3_6_2/index.html
>
> No change at all.
>
> -----
> Uwe Schindler
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Steve Rowe [mailto:sarowe@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 6:26 PM
>> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: What to do with lucene.ao/core/old_versioned_docs ?
>>
>> I think we should keep javadocs around for versions people are using, and
>> judging from recent user questions, 3.X still qualifies.
>>
>>> - revert the old_versioned_docs extra folder and add the included
>>> javadocs as extpath like we do since 3.6.0
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Some of the Forrest site documentation will be lost as a result. E.g. there
>> won't be an index page for all the different javadocs, like the new stuff has.
>> How hard would it be to use the new documentation building logic against
>> the old versions?
>>
>> Steve
>>
>> On Jun 20, 2013, at 10:02 AM, Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> while updating the javadocs to not expose the frame injection javascript
>> bug (as recommended by infra), I noticed that we still have the very special
>> case of old_versioned_docs which is *not* part of the main website tree. It’s
>> a separate SVN checkout without using the CMS. This folder contains old
>> javadocs and version-specific forrest-sites of Lucene versions 2.9.0 to 3.5.x.
>> 3.6.x (also forrest) is already as extpath in the new tree.
>>>
>>> We have two possibilities to clean this up:
>>> - revert the old_versioned_docs extra folder and add the included
>>> javadocs as extpath like we do since 3.6.0
>>> - delete 2.9 to 3.5 alltogether. Please note that we did this before, too. We
>> no longer have the old forrest pages of lucene versions prior 2.9.
>>>
>>> I have no special preference, I can manage to do the task (especially
>> deactivate the special "old_versioned_docs" hack in svnpubsub). Infra was
>> also not very happy about that in IRC... Both options above can be done in
>> SVN and reverting the redirect hacks done by Grant at that time (extpath.txt
>> was not available at that time, I think).
>>>
>>> Uwe
>>>
>>> -----
>>> Uwe Schindler
>>> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>>> http://www.thetaphi.de
>>> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For
>>> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional
>> commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
RE: What to do with lucene.ao/core/old_versioned_docs ?
Posted by Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de>.
The forrest page is still there. It would look like http://lucene.apache.org/core/3_6_2/index.html
No change at all.
-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Rowe [mailto:sarowe@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 6:26 PM
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: What to do with lucene.ao/core/old_versioned_docs ?
>
> I think we should keep javadocs around for versions people are using, and
> judging from recent user questions, 3.X still qualifies.
>
> > - revert the old_versioned_docs extra folder and add the included
> > javadocs as extpath like we do since 3.6.0
>
> +1
>
> Some of the Forrest site documentation will be lost as a result. E.g. there
> won't be an index page for all the different javadocs, like the new stuff has.
> How hard would it be to use the new documentation building logic against
> the old versions?
>
> Steve
>
> On Jun 20, 2013, at 10:02 AM, Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > while updating the javadocs to not expose the frame injection javascript
> bug (as recommended by infra), I noticed that we still have the very special
> case of old_versioned_docs which is *not* part of the main website tree. It’s
> a separate SVN checkout without using the CMS. This folder contains old
> javadocs and version-specific forrest-sites of Lucene versions 2.9.0 to 3.5.x.
> 3.6.x (also forrest) is already as extpath in the new tree.
> >
> > We have two possibilities to clean this up:
> > - revert the old_versioned_docs extra folder and add the included
> > javadocs as extpath like we do since 3.6.0
> > - delete 2.9 to 3.5 alltogether. Please note that we did this before, too. We
> no longer have the old forrest pages of lucene versions prior 2.9.
> >
> > I have no special preference, I can manage to do the task (especially
> deactivate the special "old_versioned_docs" hack in svnpubsub). Infra was
> also not very happy about that in IRC... Both options above can be done in
> SVN and reverting the redirect hacks done by Grant at that time (extpath.txt
> was not available at that time, I think).
> >
> > Uwe
> >
> > -----
> > Uwe Schindler
> > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> > http://www.thetaphi.de
> > eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For
> > additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional
> commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: What to do with lucene.ao/core/old_versioned_docs ?
Posted by Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com>.
I think we should keep javadocs around for versions people are using, and judging from recent user questions, 3.X still qualifies.
> - revert the old_versioned_docs extra folder and add the included javadocs as extpath like we do since 3.6.0
+1
Some of the Forrest site documentation will be lost as a result. E.g. there won't be an index page for all the different javadocs, like the new stuff has. How hard would it be to use the new documentation building logic against the old versions?
Steve
On Jun 20, 2013, at 10:02 AM, Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while updating the javadocs to not expose the frame injection javascript bug (as recommended by infra), I noticed that we still have the very special case of old_versioned_docs which is *not* part of the main website tree. It’s a separate SVN checkout without using the CMS. This folder contains old javadocs and version-specific forrest-sites of Lucene versions 2.9.0 to 3.5.x. 3.6.x (also forrest) is already as extpath in the new tree.
>
> We have two possibilities to clean this up:
> - revert the old_versioned_docs extra folder and add the included javadocs as extpath like we do since 3.6.0
> - delete 2.9 to 3.5 alltogether. Please note that we did this before, too. We no longer have the old forrest pages of lucene versions prior 2.9.
>
> I have no special preference, I can manage to do the task (especially deactivate the special "old_versioned_docs" hack in svnpubsub). Infra was also not very happy about that in IRC... Both options above can be done in SVN and reverting the redirect hacks done by Grant at that time (extpath.txt was not available at that time, I think).
>
> Uwe
>
> -----
> Uwe Schindler
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org