You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@forrest.apache.org by Jeff Turner <je...@apache.org> on 2003/02/09 11:20:04 UTC
No cwiki in 0.3.x? (Re: Quirks -> Standards-compliance mode rendering)
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 12:43:11PM +0100, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> Jeff Turner wrote, On 08/02/2003 12.25:
...
> >Btw, want me to merge the cwiki stuff or are you okay with it? With
> >cwiki working, I think we can do a 0.3.1 release.
>
> You mean the latest patch about the final cwiki verycool grammar?
> You wanna do it?
>
> Cool, I like it when others do the work for me :-)
>
> Go go go.
Tried to with an updated chaperon and chaperon block, but I hit this
exception:
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org.apache.excalibur.source.Source.getURI()Ljava/lang/String;
at org.apache.cocoon.transformation.LexicalTransformer.setup(LexicalTransformer.java:193)
at org.apache.cocoon.components.pipeline.AbstractProcessingPipeline.setupPipeline(AbstractProcessingPipeline.java:391)
at org.apache.cocoon.components.pipeline.impl.AbstractCachingProcessingPipeline.setupPipeline(AbstractCachingProcessingPipeline.java:295)
When I try to upgrade just excalibur-sourceresolve, I get this exception:
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org.apache.excalibur.source.Source.discardValidity()V
at org.apache.cocoon.Cocoon.configure(Cocoon.java:339)
at org.apache.cocoon.Cocoon.initialize(Cocoon.java:284)
at org.apache.cocoon.servlet.CocoonServlet.createCocoon(CocoonServlet.java:1340)
So looks like we can't get this wiki stuff working without upgrading
Cocoon, which would break sitemap backwards-compat, which I really don't
think we should do in the 0.3.x series.
So how about:
- release 0.3.1 with cwiki completely removed
- upgrade Cocoon and if everything seems to work, do a 0.4 alpha release
(alpha indicating that sitemap contracts are liable to break).
> BTW, thinking about iguanacharlie, I think that maybe the best thing is
> to kep krysalis-site as-is and move the forrest-site one to CSS. I'd
> prefer we keep a skin that still uses tables. Is that ok?
Wouldn't it be better to have iguanacharlie as a completely independent
forrest-css skin? Seems better to make a clean break, than to gradually
lose forrest-site's compatibility with old browsers.
--Jeff
> --
> Nicola Ken Barozzi nicolaken@apache.org
> - verba volant, scripta manent -
> (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
Re: No cwiki in 0.3.x? (Re: Quirks -> Standards-compliance mode rendering)
Posted by Nicola Ken Barozzi <ni...@apache.org>.
Jeff Turner wrote, On 09/02/2003 11.20:
> On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 12:43:11PM +0100, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>
>>Jeff Turner wrote, On 08/02/2003 12.25:
>
> ...
> Tried to with an updated chaperon and chaperon block, but I hit this
> exception:
>
> java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org.apache.excalibur.source.Source.getURI()Ljava/lang/String;
...
>
> So looks like we can't get this wiki stuff working without upgrading
> Cocoon,
Now you understand my question about merging the FOP branch ;-)
> which would break sitemap backwards-compat, which I really don't
> think we should do in the 0.3.x series.
>
> So how about:
> - release 0.3.1 with cwiki completely removed
> - upgrade Cocoon and if everything seems to work, do a 0.4 alpha release
> (alpha indicating that sitemap contracts are liable to break).
The cwiki stuff now should work, I thought I fixed it, but the
forrestbot.cocoondev still seems to not be working on it %-)
Personally I'd just skip 0.3.1 and go for 0.4 anyway.
>>BTW, thinking about iguanacharlie, I think that maybe the best thing is
>>to kep krysalis-site as-is and move the forrest-site one to CSS. I'd
>>prefer we keep a skin that still uses tables. Is that ok?
>
> Wouldn't it be better to have iguanacharlie as a completely independent
> forrest-css skin? Seems better to make a clean break, than to gradually
> lose forrest-site's compatibility with old browsers.
As we did with the first switch we did, yes. I was talking about a
long-term goal, +1 for your suggestion.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi nicolaken@apache.org
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------