You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Randy Terbush <ra...@zyzzyva.com> on 1997/01/24 06:55:35 UTC
Re: Countdown to 1.2b5
> On Thu, 23 Jan 1997, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>
> > Do we have a release manager? Well, I'll at least get it started.
> > We already have too many fixes in 1.2b5 to wait too long, so I think
> > we should squeeze it out as soon as the last ready-and-needed patch
> > is applied. That means
>
> Agreed. Hopefully we will be able to make b6 the last beta, but if we end
> up needing b7 due to changes we have to make for b6 and problems they
> cause then we end up needing b7. <sigh>
>
> >
> > RLimit bug fix
> > Status: Patch supplied by Ed Korthof
> > Votes : +1 Roy, ??(I know somebody else reviewed it)
> >
> > Security hole for long ////// URLs
> > Status: No 1.2b4 patch yet. This baby needs an owner. Volunteers?
>
> It is in the tree right now. There have been various suggestions on ways
> to change it, but the only one I am really concerned with is the
> fact that if permission is denied for the index file it will log a
> message in the error log for each and every of the 'DirectoryIndex'es.
> Perhaps another ifdef wrapped if that doesn't log the message if
> the error is EACCES...
>
> And as I mentioned before I hate the log message:
>
> log_printf(r->server, "access to %s failed for client; unable to determine if index file exists (stat() returned unexpected error[%d])", r->filename, errno);
>
> that I wrote. I do not have time to suggest a patch for this stuff
> tonight; I could tomorrow.
>
> >
> > Parameter for sigaction call in http_main.c not being initialized
> > Status: see PR#74 and 98 for patches from two different people.
> > It is possible that using both signal and sigaction is
> > a bad idea, but a larger change can wait.
>
> there are two suexec ones (setuid() before directory checks for
> nfs mounted filesystems and adding TZ to the environment variables
> allowed) which would be good things to fix.
>
I'll try to address these tomorrow.
The Rlimit change has my vote as well.
I have submitted a couple of other patches that probably need to
wait for the next beta in view of the load of stuff that is in
this one.