You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by Mike Edwards <mi...@gmail.com> on 2007/06/05 14:40:17 UTC
Re: Reactivating the extension, ready to
go with the latest commits to sandbox
Jean-Sebastien,
OK, with the latest commit to the sandbox, there is a working version of
the Spring implementation. It has the fixes you need, plus a set of
other changes which have got the basic version working.
I'll hold off on further updates until it's in trunk.
The next step is to get References working from the Spring
implementation to some external SCA components.
Yours, Mike.
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
> I reviewed the update of the Spring extension that Mike has put in the
> sandbox and it looks like a good step to get the Spring extension going
> again.
>
> I just had to adjust a few lines to use the 0.90 release SPIs to get it
> building with the level of code in trunk. I'll commit these fixes later
> today.
>
> Then I'd like to replace the old modules/spring-implementation in trunk
> (which is broken) by this update. If there's no objection I'll do that
> sometime tomorrow.
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Reactivating the extension, ready to
go with the latest commits to sandbox
Posted by Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org>.
ant elder wrote:
> On 6/5/07, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> It seems that it breaks the build as the following dependency cannot be
>> resolved:
>>
>> <dependency>
>> <groupId>org.osoa</groupId>
>> <artifactId>sca-api</artifactId>
>> <version>1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT</version>
>> </dependency>
>>
>> I'll fix it to use "org.apache.tuscany.sca" as the group id.
>>
>> A side question, should the group id for sca-api be org.osoa or
>> org.apache.tuscany.sca?
>
>
> It didn't seem right to me for the org.apache.tuscany project to be
> publishing things outside of that namespace. Its worked in the past as we
> publish to the Incubator maven repository but would we even be able to
> publish outside of org.apache when its going to the real maven
> repository?
>
> ...ant
>
Sorry, my fault... it was building for me as I had an old
org.osoa/sca-api artifact in my Maven repository from before the change
to org.apache.tuscany.sca.
+1 for using org.apache.tuscany.sca, as this is what we use in all
modules now.
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Reactivating the extension, ready to go with the latest commits to sandbox
Posted by ant elder <an...@apache.org>.
On 6/5/07, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It seems that it breaks the build as the following dependency cannot be
> resolved:
>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.osoa</groupId>
> <artifactId>sca-api</artifactId>
> <version>1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT</version>
> </dependency>
>
> I'll fix it to use "org.apache.tuscany.sca" as the group id.
>
> A side question, should the group id for sca-api be org.osoa or
> org.apache.tuscany.sca?
It didn't seem right to me for the org.apache.tuscany project to be
publishing things outside of that namespace. Its worked in the past as we
publish to the Incubator maven repository but would we even be able to
publish outside of org.apache when its going to the real maven repository?
...ant
Re: Reactivating the extension, ready to go with the latest commits to sandbox
Posted by Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
It seems that it breaks the build as the following dependency cannot be
resolved:
<dependency>
<groupId>org.osoa</groupId>
<artifactId>sca-api</artifactId>
<version>1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT</version>
</dependency>
I'll fix it to use "org.apache.tuscany.sca" as the group id.
A side question, should the group id for sca-api be org.osoa or
org.apache.tuscany.sca?
Thanks,
Raymond
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <js...@apache.org>
To: <tu...@ws.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 9:48 AM
Subject: Re: Reactivating the <implementation.spring> extension, ready to go
with the latest commits to sandbox
> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
>> Mike Edwards wrote:
>>> Jean-Sebastien,
>>>
>>> OK, with the latest commit to the sandbox, there is a working version of
>>> the Spring implementation. It has the fixes you need, plus a set of
>>> other changes which have got the basic version working.
>>>
>>> I'll hold off on further updates until it's in trunk.
>>>
>>> The next step is to get References working from the Spring
>>> implementation to some external SCA components.
>>>
>>>
>>> Yours, Mike.
>>>
>>> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
>>>> I reviewed the update of the Spring extension that Mike has put in the
>>>> sandbox and it looks like a good step to get the Spring extension going
>>>> again.
>>>>
>>>> I just had to adjust a few lines to use the 0.90 release SPIs to get
>>>> it building with the level of code in trunk. I'll commit these fixes
>>>> later today.
>>>>
>>>> Then I'd like to replace the old modules/spring-implementation in trunk
>>>> (which is broken) by this update. If there's no objection I'll do that
>>>> sometime tomorrow.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Great, Thanks!
>>
>> I'll work on integrating it with the main build in trunk, and will post
>> here once it's ready.
>>
>
> The Spring framework implementation extension is now integrated in the
> main build.
>
> I also did some minor cleanup, removed some old .scdl files and adjusted
> the disclaimer, license and notice.
>
> --
> Jean-Sebastien
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Reactivating the extension, ready to
go with the latest commits to sandbox
Posted by Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org>.
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
> Mike Edwards wrote:
>> Jean-Sebastien,
>>
>> OK, with the latest commit to the sandbox, there is a working version
>> of the Spring implementation. It has the fixes you need, plus a set
>> of other changes which have got the basic version working.
>>
>> I'll hold off on further updates until it's in trunk.
>>
>> The next step is to get References working from the Spring
>> implementation to some external SCA components.
>>
>>
>> Yours, Mike.
>>
>> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
>>> I reviewed the update of the Spring extension that Mike has put in
>>> the sandbox and it looks like a good step to get the Spring
>>> extension going again.
>>>
>>> I just had to adjust a few lines to use the 0.90 release SPIs to
>>> get it building with the level of code in trunk. I'll commit these
>>> fixes later today.
>>>
>>> Then I'd like to replace the old modules/spring-implementation in
>>> trunk (which is broken) by this update. If there's no objection I'll
>>> do that sometime tomorrow.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> Great, Thanks!
>
> I'll work on integrating it with the main build in trunk, and will
> post here once it's ready.
>
The Spring framework implementation extension is now integrated in the
main build.
I also did some minor cleanup, removed some old .scdl files and adjusted
the disclaimer, license and notice.
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Reactivating the extension, ready to
go with the latest commits to sandbox
Posted by Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org>.
Mike Edwards wrote:
> Jean-Sebastien,
>
> OK, with the latest commit to the sandbox, there is a working version
> of the Spring implementation. It has the fixes you need, plus a set
> of other changes which have got the basic version working.
>
> I'll hold off on further updates until it's in trunk.
>
> The next step is to get References working from the Spring
> implementation to some external SCA components.
>
>
> Yours, Mike.
>
> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
>> I reviewed the update of the Spring extension that Mike has put in
>> the sandbox and it looks like a good step to get the Spring extension
>> going again.
>>
>> I just had to adjust a few lines to use the 0.90 release SPIs to get
>> it building with the level of code in trunk. I'll commit these fixes
>> later today.
>>
>> Then I'd like to replace the old modules/spring-implementation in
>> trunk (which is broken) by this update. If there's no objection I'll
>> do that sometime tomorrow.
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
Great, Thanks!
I'll work on integrating it with the main build in trunk, and will post
here once it's ready.
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org