Committer love needed

[Henry Jen <he...@ztune.net>]

As the new branches got create, I am wondering if anyone can have a look at
this patch.

Also there is a patch for thread pool at bugzilla[1] I think is worth to
commit.

[1] https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43876

Cheers,
Henry

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Henry Jen <he...@ztune.net>
Date: Mon, Dec 3, 2007 at 11:22 PM
Subject: [PATCH] Solaris port fix (bug 43000)
To: APR Developer List <de...@apr.apache.org>


Hi,

It's holiday season and things may be moving slower than it usually
is. The patch have been available for a while, and it fixes the port
code for Solaris which I really like to get it in.

It could be somewhat controversial for the atomic code used to defer
the port_associate in apr_pollset_add in order to pass the testpoll
code, which is the needed fix if we consider the semantic of
apr_pollset_poll should be giving accumulated events; Otherwise, we
should revise the test/testpoll.c.

With that said, I break the patch into two, the first port_1203-1.diff
fix bugs of:

1. Return APR_SUCCESS if the poll removed from pollset is in the
add_ring, which means the poll had been added but is current
disassociated because an event.
2. In apr_pollcb_poll, call apr_pollcb_add to ensure port_associate.

And the port_1203-2.diff is the fix to pass testpoll given current
situation, which is less a concern as I consider in most apps,
apr_pollset_poll is called in a loop.

Any comments are welcomed.

Cheers,
Henry

Re: Committer love needed

[Paul Querna <ch...@force-elite.com>]

Henry Jen wrote:
> As the new branches got create, I am wondering if anyone can have a look 
> at this patch.

I agree the pollset patches should go in.  Its partly my fault for not 
getting to them earlier... but if someone else has time, please 
review+commit them.

> Also there is a patch for thread pool at bugzilla[1] I think is worth to 
> commit.
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43876

However, this one seems to mix new APIs with bug fixes/race conditions, 
which makes it very hard ti handle imo.

-Paul


> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: *Henry Jen* <henryjen@ztune.net <ma...@ztune.net>>
> Date: Mon, Dec 3, 2007 at 11:22 PM
> Subject: [PATCH] Solaris port fix (bug 43000)
> To: APR Developer List <dev@apr.apache.org <ma...@apr.apache.org>>
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> It's holiday season and things may be moving slower than it usually
> is. The patch have been available for a while, and it fixes the port
> code for Solaris which I really like to get it in.
> 
> It could be somewhat controversial for the atomic code used to defer
> the port_associate in apr_pollset_add in order to pass the testpoll
> code, which is the needed fix if we consider the semantic of
> apr_pollset_poll should be giving accumulated events; Otherwise, we
> should revise the test/testpoll.c.
> 
> With that said, I break the patch into two, the first port_1203-1.diff
> fix bugs of:
> 
> 1. Return APR_SUCCESS if the poll removed from pollset is in the
> add_ring, which means the poll had been added but is current
> disassociated because an event.
> 2. In apr_pollcb_poll, call apr_pollcb_add to ensure port_associate.
> 
> And the port_1203-2.diff is the fix to pass testpoll given current
> situation, which is less a concern as I consider in most apps,
> apr_pollset_poll is called in a loop.
> 
> Any comments are welcomed.
> 
> Cheers,
> Henry
>