[jira] Resolved: (WW-2272) ConcurrentModificationException with LocalizedTextUtil.findDefaultText

["Musachy Barroso (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Musachy Barroso resolved WW-2272.
---------------------------------

       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s:     (was: 2.1.4)
                   2.1.3

Fixed on xwork. rv1780

> ConcurrentModificationException with LocalizedTextUtil.findDefaultText
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WW-2272
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2272
>             Project: Struts 2
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.9
>         Environment: Struts 2.0.9
> Tomcat 4
> Java 1.4
>            Reporter: Cyril Gambis
>             Fix For: 2.1.3
>
>
> I get this exception:
> java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
> 	at java.util.AbstractList$Itr.checkForComodification(AbstractList.java:448)
> 	at java.util.AbstractList$Itr.next(AbstractList.java:419)
> 	at com.opensymphony.xwork2.util.LocalizedTextUtil.findDefaultText(LocalizedTextUtil.java:174)
> 	at com.opensymphony.xwork2.util.LocalizedTextUtil.getDefaultMessage(LocalizedTextUtil.java:579)
> 	at com.opensymphony.xwork2.util.LocalizedTextUtil.findText(LocalizedTextUtil.java:461)
> 	at com.opensymphony.xwork2.util.LocalizedTextUtil.findText(LocalizedTextUtil.java:293)
> 	at com.opensymphony.xwork2.TextProviderSupport.getText(TextProviderSupport.java:173)
> 	at com.opensymphony.xwork2.TextProviderSupport.getText(TextProviderSupport.java:88)
> 	at com.opensymphony.xwork2.ActionSupport.getText(ActionSupport.java:71)
> 	at com.MYPROJECT.mobile.action.MYACTION.list(MYACTION.java:402)
> For information, here is the lines calling getText:
> this.forums.add(new Reference(FORUM_NUMBER_1 + "", getText("myproject.forum.label.number1")));
> I can also provide the configuration and externalized strings files, but maybe it's not necessary since it seems to be a concurrent modification exception

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.