You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2001/02/04 20:11:58 UTC

[Bug 266] New - Session encodeURL not working in 3.2beta8 with SSL and mod_jk BugRat Report#477

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=266

*** shadow/266	Sun Feb  4 11:11:58 2001
--- shadow/266.tmp.2755	Sun Feb  4 11:11:58 2001
***************
*** 0 ****
--- 1,26 ----
+ +============================================================================+
+ | Session encodeURL not working in 3.2beta8 with SSL and mod_jk BugRat Repor |
+ +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+ |        Bug #: 266                         Product: Tomcat 3                |
+ |       Status: UNCONFIRMED                 Version: 3.2 Final               |
+ |   Resolution:                            Platform: All                     |
+ |     Severity: Normal                   OS/Version: All                     |
+ |     Priority: High                      Component: Connectors              |
+ +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+ |  Assigned To: danmil@shore.net                                             |
+ |  Reported By: tomcat-bugs@cortexity.com                                    |
+ |      CC list: Cc:                                                          |
+ +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+ |          URL:                                                              |
+ +============================================================================+
+ |                              DESCRIPTION                                   |
+ Session management without cookies, by
+ URL-rewriting is not working with mod_jk in an SSL Connection
+ 
+ It works fine again in 3.2beta8 (Using Apache and mod_jk(ajp12) as frontend)
+ unless SSL (by apache not tomcat) is used.
+ In this case the URL don't get rewritten.
+ I first thought it was the unfortuneatly less maintained mod_jk but it seems
+ to be in Tomcat code.
+ (Because it depends on the tomcat version(3.2beta5:ok 3.2beta8:fails) not
+ the mod_jk version)