You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@accumulo.apache.org by Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> on 2015/03/13 18:24:07 UTC
More jenkins results
For those who don't know, I run a Jenkins instance on a VPS I own. I've
been running ITs for 1.6 and master nightly for some time now and it's
been really nice to get these results. It has just enough resources to
run through them reliably (some of the really heavy-handed tests fail on
it), but personally it feels like a good baseline for ensuring the tests
are runnable by anyone.
If others feel like they might get value from it, I can set up emails to
be sent to the notifications@accumulo.apache.org list instead of just to
myself.
Thoughts/Opinions?
Re: More jenkins results
Posted by Mike Drob <md...@mdrob.com>.
I think it's valuable to see the failure notifications even without being
able to make changes. I know that I generally ignore the ASF Jenkins at
this point because it is (was?) too underpowered.
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Christopher <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
> That might only be valuable if we could log on to it to view the test
> results and/or configure the jobs.
>
> --
> Christopher L Tubbs II
> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > For those who don't know, I run a Jenkins instance on a VPS I own. I've
> been
> > running ITs for 1.6 and master nightly for some time now and it's been
> > really nice to get these results. It has just enough resources to run
> > through them reliably (some of the really heavy-handed tests fail on it),
> > but personally it feels like a good baseline for ensuring the tests are
> > runnable by anyone.
> >
> > If others feel like they might get value from it, I can set up emails to
> be
> > sent to the notifications@accumulo.apache.org list instead of just to
> > myself.
> >
> > Thoughts/Opinions?
>
Re: More jenkins results
Posted by Christopher <ct...@apache.org>.
The kinds of changing I was thinking, though, were changes to the
profiles/system properties which affect build behavior. Things like
build property names changing, or new build profiles being created in
the POM.
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Christopher <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
> Looks fine in Chrome to me (but my Chrome is using my shared NSS
> certificate store for my system).
>
> I can't think of anything immediately to configure... just speculating
> that it might add utility when needed. At the very least, I would want
> more than one person with the ability to turn off / modify the email
> to the mailing list, if necessary.
>
> Being able to view the results without configuration permissions would
> still be added value on its own, though.
>
> --
> Christopher L Tubbs II
> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Maybe this will help too. Last night's builds:
>>
>> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-1.6-Integration-Tests/325/
>>
>> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-Master-Integration-Tests/272/
>>
>> If you use Chrome, I don't think they accept StartCom SSL certs as trusted
>> (so you'll get the crazy-scary red warning page), but it should be trusted
>> by default in FF.
>>
>>
>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>
>>> Presently, you can see the full workspace for the last job that was run.
>>>
>>> I'd have to look into Jenkins permissions, but what exactly do you think
>>> you would need to configure?
>>>
>>> Christopher wrote:
>>>>
>>>> That might only be valuable if we could log on to it to view the test
>>>> results and/or configure the jobs.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> For those who don't know, I run a Jenkins instance on a VPS I own.
>>>>> I've been
>>>>> running ITs for 1.6 and master nightly for some time now and it's been
>>>>> really nice to get these results. It has just enough resources to run
>>>>> through them reliably (some of the really heavy-handed tests fail on
>>>>> it),
>>>>> but personally it feels like a good baseline for ensuring the tests are
>>>>> runnable by anyone.
>>>>>
>>>>> If others feel like they might get value from it, I can set up emails
>>>>> to be
>>>>> sent to the notifications@accumulo.apache.org list instead of just to
>>>>> myself.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thoughts/Opinions?
Re: More jenkins results
Posted by Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com>.
+1 Thanks for doing this Josh.
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, I figured out how to do jenkins roles so that I can limit things down
> to a specific set of jobs.
>
> I'll change my nightly 1.6 and master branch IT jobs to send to
> notifications@ and we can go from there. I won't duplicate normal UT jobs
> from apache jenkins.
>
>
> Mike Drob wrote:
>
>> If it goes to notifications@ that is inherently a noisy list and I'm not
>> worried about Josh taking a week off and a nightly build failing and
>> sending an email.
>>
>> Christopher, would a set of keys held in escrow cover your concerns?
>>
>> Josh, thanks for doing this and keeping it running on your own dime. A
>> real
>> mensch!
>> On Mar 13, 2015 2:43 PM, "Christopher"<ct...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> I'm not suggesting to impose external control. I just think it'd be
>>> nice to know that, if the worst were to happen, and the service
>>> started behaving badly while you were on vacation, we'd have some
>>> recourse to control the automated notices to the email lists.
>>>
>>> [ If you do get hit by a truck, I *will* call you out on it ;) ]
>>>
>>> --
>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> If I wasn't clear the first time, anyone can view the results right now.
>>>>
>>>> I'm still not sure why you feel the need to impose external control over
>>>>
>>> a
>>>
>>>> system that I'm paying for and offering to provide as a service to the
>>>> project. Unless I get hit by a truck, it's not like I won't be
>>>>
>>> responsive --
>>>
>>>> and if I do rescind on that promise, you are more than welcome to call
>>>> me
>>>> out on it. Being unresponsive is one criticism that I don't think I've
>>>>
>>> been
>>>
>>>> given WRT Accumulo.
>>>>
>>>> IMO, the real question here is are people going to be looking at these
>>>> results and doing anything with them? If they're just going to
>>>> /dev/null,
>>>> it's not worth it to me and I'll just do triage/fixing as I find time.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Christopher wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Looks fine in Chrome to me (but my Chrome is using my shared NSS
>>>>> certificate store for my system).
>>>>>
>>>>> I can't think of anything immediately to configure... just speculating
>>>>> that it might add utility when needed. At the very least, I would want
>>>>> more than one person with the ability to turn off / modify the email
>>>>> to the mailing list, if necessary.
>>>>>
>>>>> Being able to view the results without configuration permissions would
>>>>> still be added value on its own, though.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Maybe this will help too. Last night's builds:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-1.6-
>>> Integration-Tests/325/
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-
>>> Master-Integration-Tests/272/
>>>
>>>> If you use Chrome, I don't think they accept StartCom SSL certs as
>>>>>> trusted
>>>>>> (so you'll get the crazy-scary red warning page), but it should be
>>>>>> trusted
>>>>>> by default in FF.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Presently, you can see the full workspace for the last job that was
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> run.
>>>
>>>> I'd have to look into Jenkins permissions, but what exactly do you
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> think
>>>
>>>> you would need to configure?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Christopher wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That might only be valuable if we could log on to it to view the
>>>>>>>> test
>>>>>>>> results and/or configure the jobs.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> For those who don't know, I run a Jenkins instance on a VPS I own.
>>>>>>>>> I've been
>>>>>>>>> running ITs for 1.6 and master nightly for some time now and it's
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> been
>>>
>>>> really nice to get these results. It has just enough resources to
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> run
>>>
>>>> through them reliably (some of the really heavy-handed tests fail on
>>>>>>>>> it),
>>>>>>>>> but personally it feels like a good baseline for ensuring the tests
>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>> runnable by anyone.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If others feel like they might get value from it, I can set up
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> emails
>>>
>>>> to be
>>>>>>>>> sent to the notifications@accumulo.apache.org list instead of just
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> to
>>>
>>>> myself.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thoughts/Opinions?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>
--
Sean
Re: More jenkins results
Posted by Christopher <ct...@apache.org>.
Thank you for your perseverance. It will be very helpful to see
regular build results from full ITs. *fingers crossed*
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 6:36 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, test email from jenkins as "me" went through. Just kicked off ITs for
> 1.6 and master which should go to notifications.
>
> This has blown up to be so much more painful than necessary. Sheesh.
>
>
> Josh Elser wrote:
>>
>> Weird, you did get my message? I thought it had bounced. Odd.
>>
>> I'll see what happens if I try to send with my apache.org.
>>
>> Christopher wrote:
>>>
>>> So, I don't think you'd have to use your ASF password unless you
>>> wanted to send using the ASF SMTP. That may not be necessary, unless
>>> the mailing lists check the origin to prevent spam, or something
>>> (would probably need to check with INFRA for info on that). The "From"
>>> line is not actually part of the SMTP protocol itself, so you should
>>> be able to just tell Jenkins to use anything. If there is a check in
>>> place, I *think* all you'd really need to do is subscribe to the list
>>> with the email address you wish to use, and ensure that the MX record
>>> is properly set up for your domain.
>>>
>>> Best thing to do is probably to create an INFRA ticket explaining what
>>> you're trying to do (with the from address you want to use and host
>>> you are trying to send from) and see if they can just whitelist the
>>> address.
>>>
>>> FWIW, I did see your test message from elserj@apache.org to the
>>> notifcations list...
>>>
>>> --
>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I do not want to configure my server to do that, as it would require
>>>> me to
>>>> share my ASF password there. I haven't spent enough time to convince
>>>> myself
>>>> that it's secure enough to do that.
>>>>
>>>> If you can find why exactly it isn't working (I can't even mail from
>>>> elserj@apache.org), I'm all ears. I've just spent too much time
>>>> already (in
>>>> addition to wasting some of Billie's) to continue trying to figure
>>>> out why.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Christopher wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not a fan of putting it on the dev@ list. There must be a way to
>>>>> add the email to a whitelist. Or... can you configure Jenkins to just
>>>>> send as your from address as elserj-builds@apache.org?
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, posts to notifications@ requires an apache.org email addr. I've
>>>>>> lost
>>>>>> interest in trying to make it work any further.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are people interested in getting the notifications to this list
>>>>>> (dev@a.a.o)
>>>>>> instead of notifications@? I figure most people probably use
>>>>>> filters of
>>>>>> some
>>>>>> form to move things around anyways.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LMK, I won't set this up without a general ack from everyone since it
>>>>>> would
>>>>>> increase the traffic here dramatically.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Update on this: I had worked with Billie and little bit to try to get
>>>>>>> ezmlm to accept message from my server (as it's not subscribed
>>>>>>> through
>>>>>>> normal means).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We haven't figured it out yet, but we're both a bit swamped this
>>>>>>> week.
>>>>>>> Hopefully we'll get it figured out eventually.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Meanwhile, 1.6 ITs were blue last night and we only have 7 test
>>>>>>> failures
>>>>>>> on master!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (big ty to Christopher and Eric as they helped those numbers)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Frak.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Realized that I need to make sure ezmlm accepts the emails I send
>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>> my server...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ugh, brain didn't catch up before<enter> was hit.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Send me a ping if you'd like to have control to configure the
>>>>>>>>> Accumulo
>>>>>>>>> jobs and I can add an account for you.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Christopher, I'll send you an email shortly with your credentials
>>>>>>>>> since
>>>>>>>>> you brought up this discussion.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Ok, I figured out how to do jenkins roles so that I can limit
>>>>>>>>>> things
>>>>>>>>>> down to a specific set of jobs.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'll change my nightly 1.6 and master branch IT jobs to send to
>>>>>>>>>> notifications@ and we can go from there. I won't duplicate
>>>>>>>>>> normal UT
>>>>>>>>>> jobs from apache jenkins.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Mike Drob wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If it goes to notifications@ that is inherently a noisy list
>>>>>>>>>>> and I'm
>>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>> worried about Josh taking a week off and a nightly build
>>>>>>>>>>> failing and
>>>>>>>>>>> sending an email.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Christopher, would a set of keys held in escrow cover your
>>>>>>>>>>> concerns?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Josh, thanks for doing this and keeping it running on your own
>>>>>>>>>>> dime.
>>>>>>>>>>> A
>>>>>>>>>>> real
>>>>>>>>>>> mensch!
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 13, 2015 2:43 PM, "Christopher"<ct...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not suggesting to impose external control. I just think
>>>>>>>>>>>> it'd be
>>>>>>>>>>>> nice to know that, if the worst were to happen, and the service
>>>>>>>>>>>> started behaving badly while you were on vacation, we'd have
>>>>>>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>>>>>> recourse to control the automated notices to the email lists.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> [ If you do get hit by a truck, I *will* call you out on it ;) ]
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Josh
>>>>>>>>>>>> Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If I wasn't clear the first time, anyone can view the results
>>>>>>>>>>>>> right
>>>>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm still not sure why you feel the need to impose external
>>>>>>>>>>>>> control
>>>>>>>>>>>>> over
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> system that I'm paying for and offering to provide as a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> service to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> project. Unless I get hit by a truck, it's not like I won't be
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> responsive --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and if I do rescind on that promise, you are more than
>>>>>>>>>>>>> welcome to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> call me
>>>>>>>>>>>>> out on it. Being unresponsive is one criticism that I don't
>>>>>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> given WRT Accumulo.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> IMO, the real question here is are people going to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> looking at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> these
>>>>>>>>>>>>> results and doing anything with them? If they're just going to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> /dev/null,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's not worth it to me and I'll just do triage/fixing as I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> find
>>>>>>>>>>>>> time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christopher wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Looks fine in Chrome to me (but my Chrome is using my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shared NSS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> certificate store for my system).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can't think of anything immediately to configure... just
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speculating
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that it might add utility when needed. At the very least, I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more than one person with the ability to turn off / modify the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> email
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the mailing list, if necessary.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Being able to view the results without configuration
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> permissions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still be added value on its own, though.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Josh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this will help too. Last night's builds:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-1.6-Integration-Tests/325/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-Master-Integration-Tests/272/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you use Chrome, I don't think they accept StartCom SSL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> certs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trusted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (so you'll get the crazy-scary red warning page), but it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trusted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by default in FF.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Presently, you can see the full workspace for the last
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> job that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> run.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd have to look into Jenkins permissions, but what
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exactly do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you would need to configure?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christopher wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That might only be valuable if we could log on to it to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> view
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> results and/or configure the jobs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Josh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For those who don't know, I run a Jenkins instance on a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> VPS I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> own.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running ITs for 1.6 and master nightly for some time
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> really nice to get these results. It has just enough
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resources to
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> through them reliably (some of the really heavy-handed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fail on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it),
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but personally it feels like a good baseline for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ensuring the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> runnable by anyone.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If others feel like they might get value from it, I can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> set
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> emails
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sent to the notifications@accumulo.apache.org list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instead of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> myself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thoughts/Opinions?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>
Re: More jenkins results
Posted by Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com>.
Looks like it works. Got two notifications this morning.
Yay! Thanks Josh.
--
Sean
On Mar 20, 2015 5:39 PM, "Josh Elser" <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, test email from jenkins as "me" went through. Just kicked off ITs for
> 1.6 and master which should go to notifications.
>
> This has blown up to be so much more painful than necessary. Sheesh.
>
> Josh Elser wrote:
>
>> Weird, you did get my message? I thought it had bounced. Odd.
>>
>> I'll see what happens if I try to send with my apache.org.
>>
>> Christopher wrote:
>>
>>> So, I don't think you'd have to use your ASF password unless you
>>> wanted to send using the ASF SMTP. That may not be necessary, unless
>>> the mailing lists check the origin to prevent spam, or something
>>> (would probably need to check with INFRA for info on that). The "From"
>>> line is not actually part of the SMTP protocol itself, so you should
>>> be able to just tell Jenkins to use anything. If there is a check in
>>> place, I *think* all you'd really need to do is subscribe to the list
>>> with the email address you wish to use, and ensure that the MX record
>>> is properly set up for your domain.
>>>
>>> Best thing to do is probably to create an INFRA ticket explaining what
>>> you're trying to do (with the from address you want to use and host
>>> you are trying to send from) and see if they can just whitelist the
>>> address.
>>>
>>> FWIW, I did see your test message from elserj@apache.org to the
>>> notifcations list...
>>>
>>> --
>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I do not want to configure my server to do that, as it would require
>>>> me to
>>>> share my ASF password there. I haven't spent enough time to convince
>>>> myself
>>>> that it's secure enough to do that.
>>>>
>>>> If you can find why exactly it isn't working (I can't even mail from
>>>> elserj@apache.org), I'm all ears. I've just spent too much time
>>>> already (in
>>>> addition to wasting some of Billie's) to continue trying to figure
>>>> out why.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Christopher wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm not a fan of putting it on the dev@ list. There must be a way to
>>>>> add the email to a whitelist. Or... can you configure Jenkins to just
>>>>> send as your from address as elserj-builds@apache.org?
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> So, posts to notifications@ requires an apache.org email addr. I've
>>>>>> lost
>>>>>> interest in trying to make it work any further.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are people interested in getting the notifications to this list
>>>>>> (dev@a.a.o)
>>>>>> instead of notifications@? I figure most people probably use
>>>>>> filters of
>>>>>> some
>>>>>> form to move things around anyways.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LMK, I won't set this up without a general ack from everyone since it
>>>>>> would
>>>>>> increase the traffic here dramatically.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Update on this: I had worked with Billie and little bit to try to get
>>>>>>> ezmlm to accept message from my server (as it's not subscribed
>>>>>>> through
>>>>>>> normal means).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We haven't figured it out yet, but we're both a bit swamped this
>>>>>>> week.
>>>>>>> Hopefully we'll get it figured out eventually.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Meanwhile, 1.6 ITs were blue last night and we only have 7 test
>>>>>>> failures
>>>>>>> on master!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (big ty to Christopher and Eric as they helped those numbers)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Frak.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Realized that I need to make sure ezmlm accepts the emails I send
>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>> my server...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ugh, brain didn't catch up before<enter> was hit.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Send me a ping if you'd like to have control to configure the
>>>>>>>>> Accumulo
>>>>>>>>> jobs and I can add an account for you.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Christopher, I'll send you an email shortly with your credentials
>>>>>>>>> since
>>>>>>>>> you brought up this discussion.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Ok, I figured out how to do jenkins roles so that I can limit
>>>>>>>>>> things
>>>>>>>>>> down to a specific set of jobs.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'll change my nightly 1.6 and master branch IT jobs to send to
>>>>>>>>>> notifications@ and we can go from there. I won't duplicate
>>>>>>>>>> normal UT
>>>>>>>>>> jobs from apache jenkins.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Mike Drob wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If it goes to notifications@ that is inherently a noisy list
>>>>>>>>>>> and I'm
>>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>> worried about Josh taking a week off and a nightly build
>>>>>>>>>>> failing and
>>>>>>>>>>> sending an email.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Christopher, would a set of keys held in escrow cover your
>>>>>>>>>>> concerns?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Josh, thanks for doing this and keeping it running on your own
>>>>>>>>>>> dime.
>>>>>>>>>>> A
>>>>>>>>>>> real
>>>>>>>>>>> mensch!
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 13, 2015 2:43 PM, "Christopher"<ct...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not suggesting to impose external control. I just think
>>>>>>>>>>>> it'd be
>>>>>>>>>>>> nice to know that, if the worst were to happen, and the service
>>>>>>>>>>>> started behaving badly while you were on vacation, we'd have
>>>>>>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>>>>>> recourse to control the automated notices to the email lists.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> [ If you do get hit by a truck, I *will* call you out on it ;) ]
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Josh
>>>>>>>>>>>> Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If I wasn't clear the first time, anyone can view the results
>>>>>>>>>>>>> right
>>>>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm still not sure why you feel the need to impose external
>>>>>>>>>>>>> control
>>>>>>>>>>>>> over
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> system that I'm paying for and offering to provide as a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> service to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> project. Unless I get hit by a truck, it's not like I won't be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> responsive --
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and if I do rescind on that promise, you are more than
>>>>>>>>>>>>> welcome to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> call me
>>>>>>>>>>>>> out on it. Being unresponsive is one criticism that I don't
>>>>>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> been
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> given WRT Accumulo.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> IMO, the real question here is are people going to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> looking at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> these
>>>>>>>>>>>>> results and doing anything with them? If they're just going to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> /dev/null,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's not worth it to me and I'll just do triage/fixing as I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> find
>>>>>>>>>>>>> time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christopher wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Looks fine in Chrome to me (but my Chrome is using my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shared NSS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> certificate store for my system).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can't think of anything immediately to configure... just
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speculating
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that it might add utility when needed. At the very least, I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more than one person with the ability to turn off / modify the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> email
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the mailing list, if necessary.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Being able to view the results without configuration
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> permissions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still be added value on its own, though.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Josh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this will help too. Last night's builds:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-1.6-
>>>>>>>>>>>> Integration-Tests/325/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-
>>>>>>>>>>>> Master-Integration-Tests/272/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If you use Chrome, I don't think they accept StartCom SSL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> certs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trusted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (so you'll get the crazy-scary red warning page), but it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trusted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by default in FF.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Presently, you can see the full workspace for the last
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> job that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd have to look into Jenkins permissions, but what
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exactly do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you would need to configure?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christopher wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That might only be valuable if we could log on to it to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> view
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> results and/or configure the jobs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Josh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For those who don't know, I run a Jenkins instance on a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> VPS I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> own.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running ITs for 1.6 and master nightly for some time
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> really nice to get these results. It has just enough
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resources to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> through them reliably (some of the really heavy-handed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fail on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it),
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but personally it feels like a good baseline for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ensuring the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> runnable by anyone.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If others feel like they might get value from it, I can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> set
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> emails
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sent to the notifications@accumulo.apache.org list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instead of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> myself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thoughts/Opinions?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
Re: More jenkins results
Posted by Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>.
Ok, test email from jenkins as "me" went through. Just kicked off ITs
for 1.6 and master which should go to notifications.
This has blown up to be so much more painful than necessary. Sheesh.
Josh Elser wrote:
> Weird, you did get my message? I thought it had bounced. Odd.
>
> I'll see what happens if I try to send with my apache.org.
>
> Christopher wrote:
>> So, I don't think you'd have to use your ASF password unless you
>> wanted to send using the ASF SMTP. That may not be necessary, unless
>> the mailing lists check the origin to prevent spam, or something
>> (would probably need to check with INFRA for info on that). The "From"
>> line is not actually part of the SMTP protocol itself, so you should
>> be able to just tell Jenkins to use anything. If there is a check in
>> place, I *think* all you'd really need to do is subscribe to the list
>> with the email address you wish to use, and ensure that the MX record
>> is properly set up for your domain.
>>
>> Best thing to do is probably to create an INFRA ticket explaining what
>> you're trying to do (with the from address you want to use and host
>> you are trying to send from) and see if they can just whitelist the
>> address.
>>
>> FWIW, I did see your test message from elserj@apache.org to the
>> notifcations list...
>>
>> --
>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I do not want to configure my server to do that, as it would require
>>> me to
>>> share my ASF password there. I haven't spent enough time to convince
>>> myself
>>> that it's secure enough to do that.
>>>
>>> If you can find why exactly it isn't working (I can't even mail from
>>> elserj@apache.org), I'm all ears. I've just spent too much time
>>> already (in
>>> addition to wasting some of Billie's) to continue trying to figure
>>> out why.
>>>
>>>
>>> Christopher wrote:
>>>> I'm not a fan of putting it on the dev@ list. There must be a way to
>>>> add the email to a whitelist. Or... can you configure Jenkins to just
>>>> send as your from address as elserj-builds@apache.org?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> So, posts to notifications@ requires an apache.org email addr. I've
>>>>> lost
>>>>> interest in trying to make it work any further.
>>>>>
>>>>> Are people interested in getting the notifications to this list
>>>>> (dev@a.a.o)
>>>>> instead of notifications@? I figure most people probably use
>>>>> filters of
>>>>> some
>>>>> form to move things around anyways.
>>>>>
>>>>> LMK, I won't set this up without a general ack from everyone since it
>>>>> would
>>>>> increase the traffic here dramatically.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>> Update on this: I had worked with Billie and little bit to try to get
>>>>>> ezmlm to accept message from my server (as it's not subscribed
>>>>>> through
>>>>>> normal means).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We haven't figured it out yet, but we're both a bit swamped this
>>>>>> week.
>>>>>> Hopefully we'll get it figured out eventually.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Meanwhile, 1.6 ITs were blue last night and we only have 7 test
>>>>>> failures
>>>>>> on master!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (big ty to Christopher and Eric as they helped those numbers)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>>> Frak.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Realized that I need to make sure ezmlm accepts the emails I send
>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>> my server...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>>>> Ugh, brain didn't catch up before<enter> was hit.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Send me a ping if you'd like to have control to configure the
>>>>>>>> Accumulo
>>>>>>>> jobs and I can add an account for you.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Christopher, I'll send you an email shortly with your credentials
>>>>>>>> since
>>>>>>>> you brought up this discussion.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Ok, I figured out how to do jenkins roles so that I can limit
>>>>>>>>> things
>>>>>>>>> down to a specific set of jobs.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'll change my nightly 1.6 and master branch IT jobs to send to
>>>>>>>>> notifications@ and we can go from there. I won't duplicate
>>>>>>>>> normal UT
>>>>>>>>> jobs from apache jenkins.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Mike Drob wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> If it goes to notifications@ that is inherently a noisy list
>>>>>>>>>> and I'm
>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>> worried about Josh taking a week off and a nightly build
>>>>>>>>>> failing and
>>>>>>>>>> sending an email.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Christopher, would a set of keys held in escrow cover your
>>>>>>>>>> concerns?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Josh, thanks for doing this and keeping it running on your own
>>>>>>>>>> dime.
>>>>>>>>>> A
>>>>>>>>>> real
>>>>>>>>>> mensch!
>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 13, 2015 2:43 PM, "Christopher"<ct...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not suggesting to impose external control. I just think
>>>>>>>>>>> it'd be
>>>>>>>>>>> nice to know that, if the worst were to happen, and the service
>>>>>>>>>>> started behaving badly while you were on vacation, we'd have
>>>>>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>>>>> recourse to control the automated notices to the email lists.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [ If you do get hit by a truck, I *will* call you out on it ;) ]
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>>>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Josh
>>>>>>>>>>> Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> If I wasn't clear the first time, anyone can view the results
>>>>>>>>>>>> right
>>>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm still not sure why you feel the need to impose external
>>>>>>>>>>>> control
>>>>>>>>>>>> over
>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>> system that I'm paying for and offering to provide as a
>>>>>>>>>>>> service to
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> project. Unless I get hit by a truck, it's not like I won't be
>>>>>>>>>>> responsive --
>>>>>>>>>>>> and if I do rescind on that promise, you are more than
>>>>>>>>>>>> welcome to
>>>>>>>>>>>> call me
>>>>>>>>>>>> out on it. Being unresponsive is one criticism that I don't
>>>>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>> I've
>>>>>>>>>>> been
>>>>>>>>>>>> given WRT Accumulo.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> IMO, the real question here is are people going to be
>>>>>>>>>>>> looking at
>>>>>>>>>>>> these
>>>>>>>>>>>> results and doing anything with them? If they're just going to
>>>>>>>>>>>> /dev/null,
>>>>>>>>>>>> it's not worth it to me and I'll just do triage/fixing as I
>>>>>>>>>>>> find
>>>>>>>>>>>> time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Christopher wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Looks fine in Chrome to me (but my Chrome is using my
>>>>>>>>>>>>> shared NSS
>>>>>>>>>>>>> certificate store for my system).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can't think of anything immediately to configure... just
>>>>>>>>>>>>> speculating
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that it might add utility when needed. At the very least, I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>>>>> want
>>>>>>>>>>>>> more than one person with the ability to turn off / modify the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> email
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the mailing list, if necessary.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Being able to view the results without configuration
>>>>>>>>>>>>> permissions
>>>>>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>>>>> still be added value on its own, though.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Josh
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this will help too. Last night's builds:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-1.6-Integration-Tests/325/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-Master-Integration-Tests/272/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you use Chrome, I don't think they accept StartCom SSL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> certs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trusted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (so you'll get the crazy-scary red warning page), but it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trusted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by default in FF.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Presently, you can see the full workspace for the last
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> job that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>>> run.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd have to look into Jenkins permissions, but what
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exactly do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you would need to configure?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christopher wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That might only be valuable if we could log on to it to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> view
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> results and/or configure the jobs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Josh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For those who don't know, I run a Jenkins instance on a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> VPS I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> own.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running ITs for 1.6 and master nightly for some time
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>>>> been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> really nice to get these results. It has just enough
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resources to
>>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> through them reliably (some of the really heavy-handed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fail on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it),
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but personally it feels like a good baseline for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ensuring the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> runnable by anyone.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If others feel like they might get value from it, I can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> set
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up
>>>>>>>>>>> emails
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sent to the notifications@accumulo.apache.org list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instead of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> myself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thoughts/Opinions?
>>>>>>>>>>
Re: More jenkins results
Posted by Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>.
Weird, you did get my message? I thought it had bounced. Odd.
I'll see what happens if I try to send with my apache.org.
Christopher wrote:
> So, I don't think you'd have to use your ASF password unless you
> wanted to send using the ASF SMTP. That may not be necessary, unless
> the mailing lists check the origin to prevent spam, or something
> (would probably need to check with INFRA for info on that). The "From"
> line is not actually part of the SMTP protocol itself, so you should
> be able to just tell Jenkins to use anything. If there is a check in
> place, I *think* all you'd really need to do is subscribe to the list
> with the email address you wish to use, and ensure that the MX record
> is properly set up for your domain.
>
> Best thing to do is probably to create an INFRA ticket explaining what
> you're trying to do (with the from address you want to use and host
> you are trying to send from) and see if they can just whitelist the
> address.
>
> FWIW, I did see your test message from elserj@apache.org to the
> notifcations list...
>
> --
> Christopher L Tubbs II
> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I do not want to configure my server to do that, as it would require me to
>> share my ASF password there. I haven't spent enough time to convince myself
>> that it's secure enough to do that.
>>
>> If you can find why exactly it isn't working (I can't even mail from
>> elserj@apache.org), I'm all ears. I've just spent too much time already (in
>> addition to wasting some of Billie's) to continue trying to figure out why.
>>
>>
>> Christopher wrote:
>>> I'm not a fan of putting it on the dev@ list. There must be a way to
>>> add the email to a whitelist. Or... can you configure Jenkins to just
>>> send as your from address as elserj-builds@apache.org?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> So, posts to notifications@ requires an apache.org email addr. I've lost
>>>> interest in trying to make it work any further.
>>>>
>>>> Are people interested in getting the notifications to this list
>>>> (dev@a.a.o)
>>>> instead of notifications@? I figure most people probably use filters of
>>>> some
>>>> form to move things around anyways.
>>>>
>>>> LMK, I won't set this up without a general ack from everyone since it
>>>> would
>>>> increase the traffic here dramatically.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>> Update on this: I had worked with Billie and little bit to try to get
>>>>> ezmlm to accept message from my server (as it's not subscribed through
>>>>> normal means).
>>>>>
>>>>> We haven't figured it out yet, but we're both a bit swamped this week.
>>>>> Hopefully we'll get it figured out eventually.
>>>>>
>>>>> Meanwhile, 1.6 ITs were blue last night and we only have 7 test failures
>>>>> on master!
>>>>>
>>>>> (big ty to Christopher and Eric as they helped those numbers)
>>>>>
>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>> Frak.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Realized that I need to make sure ezmlm accepts the emails I send from
>>>>>> my server...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>>> Ugh, brain didn't catch up before<enter> was hit.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Send me a ping if you'd like to have control to configure the Accumulo
>>>>>>> jobs and I can add an account for you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Christopher, I'll send you an email shortly with your credentials
>>>>>>> since
>>>>>>> you brought up this discussion.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>>>> Ok, I figured out how to do jenkins roles so that I can limit things
>>>>>>>> down to a specific set of jobs.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'll change my nightly 1.6 and master branch IT jobs to send to
>>>>>>>> notifications@ and we can go from there. I won't duplicate normal UT
>>>>>>>> jobs from apache jenkins.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Mike Drob wrote:
>>>>>>>>> If it goes to notifications@ that is inherently a noisy list and I'm
>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>> worried about Josh taking a week off and a nightly build failing and
>>>>>>>>> sending an email.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Christopher, would a set of keys held in escrow cover your concerns?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Josh, thanks for doing this and keeping it running on your own dime.
>>>>>>>>> A
>>>>>>>>> real
>>>>>>>>> mensch!
>>>>>>>>> On Mar 13, 2015 2:43 PM, "Christopher"<ct...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm not suggesting to impose external control. I just think it'd be
>>>>>>>>>> nice to know that, if the worst were to happen, and the service
>>>>>>>>>> started behaving badly while you were on vacation, we'd have some
>>>>>>>>>> recourse to control the automated notices to the email lists.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [ If you do get hit by a truck, I *will* call you out on it ;) ]
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> If I wasn't clear the first time, anyone can view the results
>>>>>>>>>>> right
>>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm still not sure why you feel the need to impose external
>>>>>>>>>>> control
>>>>>>>>>>> over
>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>> system that I'm paying for and offering to provide as a service to
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> project. Unless I get hit by a truck, it's not like I won't be
>>>>>>>>>> responsive --
>>>>>>>>>>> and if I do rescind on that promise, you are more than welcome to
>>>>>>>>>>> call me
>>>>>>>>>>> out on it. Being unresponsive is one criticism that I don't think
>>>>>>>>>>> I've
>>>>>>>>>> been
>>>>>>>>>>> given WRT Accumulo.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> IMO, the real question here is are people going to be looking at
>>>>>>>>>>> these
>>>>>>>>>>> results and doing anything with them? If they're just going to
>>>>>>>>>>> /dev/null,
>>>>>>>>>>> it's not worth it to me and I'll just do triage/fixing as I find
>>>>>>>>>>> time.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Christopher wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Looks fine in Chrome to me (but my Chrome is using my shared NSS
>>>>>>>>>>>> certificate store for my system).
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I can't think of anything immediately to configure... just
>>>>>>>>>>>> speculating
>>>>>>>>>>>> that it might add utility when needed. At the very least, I would
>>>>>>>>>>>> want
>>>>>>>>>>>> more than one person with the ability to turn off / modify the
>>>>>>>>>>>> email
>>>>>>>>>>>> to the mailing list, if necessary.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Being able to view the results without configuration permissions
>>>>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>>>> still be added value on its own, though.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this will help too. Last night's builds:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-1.6-Integration-Tests/325/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-Master-Integration-Tests/272/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you use Chrome, I don't think they accept StartCom SSL certs
>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>> trusted
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (so you'll get the crazy-scary red warning page), but it should
>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> trusted
>>>>>>>>>>>>> by default in FF.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Presently, you can see the full workspace for the last job that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>> run.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd have to look into Jenkins permissions, but what exactly do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you would need to configure?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christopher wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That might only be valuable if we could log on to it to view
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> results and/or configure the jobs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Josh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For those who don't know, I run a Jenkins instance on a VPS I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> own.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running ITs for 1.6 and master nightly for some time now and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>>> been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> really nice to get these results. It has just enough
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resources to
>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> through them reliably (some of the really heavy-handed tests
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fail on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it),
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but personally it feels like a good baseline for ensuring the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> runnable by anyone.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If others feel like they might get value from it, I can set
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up
>>>>>>>>>> emails
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sent to the notifications@accumulo.apache.org list instead of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> myself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thoughts/Opinions?
>>>>>>>>>
Re: More jenkins results
Posted by Billie Rinaldi <bi...@gmail.com>.
I've added the address to the allow list for notifications. There appears
to be some secondary check that prevents the mail from getting through
since it's not from apache.org. I don't know if there is another whitelist
beyond the allow list that moderators can control.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Christopher <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
> So, I don't think you'd have to use your ASF password unless you
> wanted to send using the ASF SMTP. That may not be necessary, unless
> the mailing lists check the origin to prevent spam, or something
> (would probably need to check with INFRA for info on that). The "From"
> line is not actually part of the SMTP protocol itself, so you should
> be able to just tell Jenkins to use anything. If there is a check in
> place, I *think* all you'd really need to do is subscribe to the list
> with the email address you wish to use, and ensure that the MX record
> is properly set up for your domain.
>
> Best thing to do is probably to create an INFRA ticket explaining what
> you're trying to do (with the from address you want to use and host
> you are trying to send from) and see if they can just whitelist the
> address.
>
> FWIW, I did see your test message from elserj@apache.org to the
> notifcations list...
>
> --
> Christopher L Tubbs II
> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I do not want to configure my server to do that, as it would require me
> to
> > share my ASF password there. I haven't spent enough time to convince
> myself
> > that it's secure enough to do that.
> >
> > If you can find why exactly it isn't working (I can't even mail from
> > elserj@apache.org), I'm all ears. I've just spent too much time already
> (in
> > addition to wasting some of Billie's) to continue trying to figure out
> why.
> >
> >
> > Christopher wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm not a fan of putting it on the dev@ list. There must be a way to
> >> add the email to a whitelist. Or... can you configure Jenkins to just
> >> send as your from address as elserj-builds@apache.org?
> >>
> >> --
> >> Christopher L Tubbs II
> >> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> So, posts to notifications@ requires an apache.org email addr. I've
> lost
> >>> interest in trying to make it work any further.
> >>>
> >>> Are people interested in getting the notifications to this list
> >>> (dev@a.a.o)
> >>> instead of notifications@? I figure most people probably use filters
> of
> >>> some
> >>> form to move things around anyways.
> >>>
> >>> LMK, I won't set this up without a general ack from everyone since it
> >>> would
> >>> increase the traffic here dramatically.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Josh Elser wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Update on this: I had worked with Billie and little bit to try to get
> >>>> ezmlm to accept message from my server (as it's not subscribed through
> >>>> normal means).
> >>>>
> >>>> We haven't figured it out yet, but we're both a bit swamped this week.
> >>>> Hopefully we'll get it figured out eventually.
> >>>>
> >>>> Meanwhile, 1.6 ITs were blue last night and we only have 7 test
> failures
> >>>> on master!
> >>>>
> >>>> (big ty to Christopher and Eric as they helped those numbers)
> >>>>
> >>>> Josh Elser wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Frak.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Realized that I need to make sure ezmlm accepts the emails I send
> from
> >>>>> my server...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Ugh, brain didn't catch up before<enter> was hit.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Send me a ping if you'd like to have control to configure the
> Accumulo
> >>>>>> jobs and I can add an account for you.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Christopher, I'll send you an email shortly with your credentials
> >>>>>> since
> >>>>>> you brought up this discussion.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Ok, I figured out how to do jenkins roles so that I can limit
> things
> >>>>>>> down to a specific set of jobs.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I'll change my nightly 1.6 and master branch IT jobs to send to
> >>>>>>> notifications@ and we can go from there. I won't duplicate normal
> UT
> >>>>>>> jobs from apache jenkins.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Mike Drob wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> If it goes to notifications@ that is inherently a noisy list and
> I'm
> >>>>>>>> not
> >>>>>>>> worried about Josh taking a week off and a nightly build failing
> and
> >>>>>>>> sending an email.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Christopher, would a set of keys held in escrow cover your
> concerns?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Josh, thanks for doing this and keeping it running on your own
> dime.
> >>>>>>>> A
> >>>>>>>> real
> >>>>>>>> mensch!
> >>>>>>>> On Mar 13, 2015 2:43 PM, "Christopher"<ct...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I'm not suggesting to impose external control. I just think it'd
> be
> >>>>>>>>> nice to know that, if the worst were to happen, and the service
> >>>>>>>>> started behaving badly while you were on vacation, we'd have some
> >>>>>>>>> recourse to control the automated notices to the email lists.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> [ If you do get hit by a truck, I *will* call you out on it ;) ]
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
> >>>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Josh Elser<josh.elser@gmail.com
> >
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> If I wasn't clear the first time, anyone can view the results
> >>>>>>>>>> right
> >>>>>>>>>> now.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I'm still not sure why you feel the need to impose external
> >>>>>>>>>> control
> >>>>>>>>>> over
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> system that I'm paying for and offering to provide as a service
> to
> >>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>> project. Unless I get hit by a truck, it's not like I won't be
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> responsive --
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> and if I do rescind on that promise, you are more than welcome
> to
> >>>>>>>>>> call me
> >>>>>>>>>> out on it. Being unresponsive is one criticism that I don't
> think
> >>>>>>>>>> I've
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> been
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> given WRT Accumulo.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> IMO, the real question here is are people going to be looking at
> >>>>>>>>>> these
> >>>>>>>>>> results and doing anything with them? If they're just going to
> >>>>>>>>>> /dev/null,
> >>>>>>>>>> it's not worth it to me and I'll just do triage/fixing as I find
> >>>>>>>>>> time.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Christopher wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Looks fine in Chrome to me (but my Chrome is using my shared
> NSS
> >>>>>>>>>>> certificate store for my system).
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I can't think of anything immediately to configure... just
> >>>>>>>>>>> speculating
> >>>>>>>>>>> that it might add utility when needed. At the very least, I
> would
> >>>>>>>>>>> want
> >>>>>>>>>>> more than one person with the ability to turn off / modify the
> >>>>>>>>>>> email
> >>>>>>>>>>> to the mailing list, if necessary.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Being able to view the results without configuration
> permissions
> >>>>>>>>>>> would
> >>>>>>>>>>> still be added value on its own, though.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
> >>>>>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Josh Elser<
> josh.elser@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this will help too. Last night's builds:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-1.6-Integration-Tests/325/
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-Master-Integration-Tests/272/
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> If you use Chrome, I don't think they accept StartCom SSL
> certs
> >>>>>>>>>>>> as
> >>>>>>>>>>>> trusted
> >>>>>>>>>>>> (so you'll get the crazy-scary red warning page), but it
> should
> >>>>>>>>>>>> be
> >>>>>>>>>>>> trusted
> >>>>>>>>>>>> by default in FF.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Presently, you can see the full workspace for the last job
> that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> was
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> run.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd have to look into Jenkins permissions, but what exactly
> do
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> you
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> think
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> you would need to configure?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Christopher wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> That might only be valuable if we could log on to it to view
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> test
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> results and/or configure the jobs.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Josh
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For those who don't know, I run a Jenkins instance on a
> VPS I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> own.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've been
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running ITs for 1.6 and master nightly for some time now
> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> been
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> really nice to get these results. It has just enough
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resources to
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> run
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> through them reliably (some of the really heavy-handed
> tests
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fail on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it),
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but personally it feels like a good baseline for ensuring
> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> runnable by anyone.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If others feel like they might get value from it, I can set
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> emails
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sent to the notifications@accumulo.apache.org list
> instead of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> myself.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thoughts/Opinions?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >
>
Re: More jenkins results
Posted by Christopher <ct...@apache.org>.
So, I don't think you'd have to use your ASF password unless you
wanted to send using the ASF SMTP. That may not be necessary, unless
the mailing lists check the origin to prevent spam, or something
(would probably need to check with INFRA for info on that). The "From"
line is not actually part of the SMTP protocol itself, so you should
be able to just tell Jenkins to use anything. If there is a check in
place, I *think* all you'd really need to do is subscribe to the list
with the email address you wish to use, and ensure that the MX record
is properly set up for your domain.
Best thing to do is probably to create an INFRA ticket explaining what
you're trying to do (with the from address you want to use and host
you are trying to send from) and see if they can just whitelist the
address.
FWIW, I did see your test message from elserj@apache.org to the
notifcations list...
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I do not want to configure my server to do that, as it would require me to
> share my ASF password there. I haven't spent enough time to convince myself
> that it's secure enough to do that.
>
> If you can find why exactly it isn't working (I can't even mail from
> elserj@apache.org), I'm all ears. I've just spent too much time already (in
> addition to wasting some of Billie's) to continue trying to figure out why.
>
>
> Christopher wrote:
>>
>> I'm not a fan of putting it on the dev@ list. There must be a way to
>> add the email to a whitelist. Or... can you configure Jenkins to just
>> send as your from address as elserj-builds@apache.org?
>>
>> --
>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> So, posts to notifications@ requires an apache.org email addr. I've lost
>>> interest in trying to make it work any further.
>>>
>>> Are people interested in getting the notifications to this list
>>> (dev@a.a.o)
>>> instead of notifications@? I figure most people probably use filters of
>>> some
>>> form to move things around anyways.
>>>
>>> LMK, I won't set this up without a general ack from everyone since it
>>> would
>>> increase the traffic here dramatically.
>>>
>>>
>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Update on this: I had worked with Billie and little bit to try to get
>>>> ezmlm to accept message from my server (as it's not subscribed through
>>>> normal means).
>>>>
>>>> We haven't figured it out yet, but we're both a bit swamped this week.
>>>> Hopefully we'll get it figured out eventually.
>>>>
>>>> Meanwhile, 1.6 ITs were blue last night and we only have 7 test failures
>>>> on master!
>>>>
>>>> (big ty to Christopher and Eric as they helped those numbers)
>>>>
>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Frak.
>>>>>
>>>>> Realized that I need to make sure ezmlm accepts the emails I send from
>>>>> my server...
>>>>>
>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ugh, brain didn't catch up before<enter> was hit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Send me a ping if you'd like to have control to configure the Accumulo
>>>>>> jobs and I can add an account for you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Christopher, I'll send you an email shortly with your credentials
>>>>>> since
>>>>>> you brought up this discussion.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ok, I figured out how to do jenkins roles so that I can limit things
>>>>>>> down to a specific set of jobs.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'll change my nightly 1.6 and master branch IT jobs to send to
>>>>>>> notifications@ and we can go from there. I won't duplicate normal UT
>>>>>>> jobs from apache jenkins.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mike Drob wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If it goes to notifications@ that is inherently a noisy list and I'm
>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>> worried about Josh taking a week off and a nightly build failing and
>>>>>>>> sending an email.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Christopher, would a set of keys held in escrow cover your concerns?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Josh, thanks for doing this and keeping it running on your own dime.
>>>>>>>> A
>>>>>>>> real
>>>>>>>> mensch!
>>>>>>>> On Mar 13, 2015 2:43 PM, "Christopher"<ct...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm not suggesting to impose external control. I just think it'd be
>>>>>>>>> nice to know that, if the worst were to happen, and the service
>>>>>>>>> started behaving badly while you were on vacation, we'd have some
>>>>>>>>> recourse to control the automated notices to the email lists.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [ If you do get hit by a truck, I *will* call you out on it ;) ]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If I wasn't clear the first time, anyone can view the results
>>>>>>>>>> right
>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm still not sure why you feel the need to impose external
>>>>>>>>>> control
>>>>>>>>>> over
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> system that I'm paying for and offering to provide as a service to
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> project. Unless I get hit by a truck, it's not like I won't be
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> responsive --
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> and if I do rescind on that promise, you are more than welcome to
>>>>>>>>>> call me
>>>>>>>>>> out on it. Being unresponsive is one criticism that I don't think
>>>>>>>>>> I've
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> been
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> given WRT Accumulo.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> IMO, the real question here is are people going to be looking at
>>>>>>>>>> these
>>>>>>>>>> results and doing anything with them? If they're just going to
>>>>>>>>>> /dev/null,
>>>>>>>>>> it's not worth it to me and I'll just do triage/fixing as I find
>>>>>>>>>> time.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Christopher wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Looks fine in Chrome to me (but my Chrome is using my shared NSS
>>>>>>>>>>> certificate store for my system).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I can't think of anything immediately to configure... just
>>>>>>>>>>> speculating
>>>>>>>>>>> that it might add utility when needed. At the very least, I would
>>>>>>>>>>> want
>>>>>>>>>>> more than one person with the ability to turn off / modify the
>>>>>>>>>>> email
>>>>>>>>>>> to the mailing list, if necessary.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Being able to view the results without configuration permissions
>>>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>>> still be added value on its own, though.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>>>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this will help too. Last night's builds:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-1.6-Integration-Tests/325/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-Master-Integration-Tests/272/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If you use Chrome, I don't think they accept StartCom SSL certs
>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>> trusted
>>>>>>>>>>>> (so you'll get the crazy-scary red warning page), but it should
>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>> trusted
>>>>>>>>>>>> by default in FF.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Presently, you can see the full workspace for the last job that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> run.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd have to look into Jenkins permissions, but what exactly do
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you would need to configure?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christopher wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That might only be valuable if we could log on to it to view
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> results and/or configure the jobs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Josh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For those who don't know, I run a Jenkins instance on a VPS I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> own.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running ITs for 1.6 and master nightly for some time now and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> really nice to get these results. It has just enough
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resources to
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> through them reliably (some of the really heavy-handed tests
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fail on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it),
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but personally it feels like a good baseline for ensuring the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> runnable by anyone.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If others feel like they might get value from it, I can set
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> emails
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sent to the notifications@accumulo.apache.org list instead of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> myself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thoughts/Opinions?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>
Re: More jenkins results
Posted by Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>.
I do not want to configure my server to do that, as it would require me
to share my ASF password there. I haven't spent enough time to convince
myself that it's secure enough to do that.
If you can find why exactly it isn't working (I can't even mail from
elserj@apache.org), I'm all ears. I've just spent too much time already
(in addition to wasting some of Billie's) to continue trying to figure
out why.
Christopher wrote:
> I'm not a fan of putting it on the dev@ list. There must be a way to
> add the email to a whitelist. Or... can you configure Jenkins to just
> send as your from address as elserj-builds@apache.org?
>
> --
> Christopher L Tubbs II
> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> So, posts to notifications@ requires an apache.org email addr. I've lost
>> interest in trying to make it work any further.
>>
>> Are people interested in getting the notifications to this list (dev@a.a.o)
>> instead of notifications@? I figure most people probably use filters of some
>> form to move things around anyways.
>>
>> LMK, I won't set this up without a general ack from everyone since it would
>> increase the traffic here dramatically.
>>
>>
>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>> Update on this: I had worked with Billie and little bit to try to get
>>> ezmlm to accept message from my server (as it's not subscribed through
>>> normal means).
>>>
>>> We haven't figured it out yet, but we're both a bit swamped this week.
>>> Hopefully we'll get it figured out eventually.
>>>
>>> Meanwhile, 1.6 ITs were blue last night and we only have 7 test failures
>>> on master!
>>>
>>> (big ty to Christopher and Eric as they helped those numbers)
>>>
>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>> Frak.
>>>>
>>>> Realized that I need to make sure ezmlm accepts the emails I send from
>>>> my server...
>>>>
>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>> Ugh, brain didn't catch up before<enter> was hit.
>>>>>
>>>>> Send me a ping if you'd like to have control to configure the Accumulo
>>>>> jobs and I can add an account for you.
>>>>>
>>>>> Christopher, I'll send you an email shortly with your credentials since
>>>>> you brought up this discussion.
>>>>>
>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>> Ok, I figured out how to do jenkins roles so that I can limit things
>>>>>> down to a specific set of jobs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll change my nightly 1.6 and master branch IT jobs to send to
>>>>>> notifications@ and we can go from there. I won't duplicate normal UT
>>>>>> jobs from apache jenkins.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mike Drob wrote:
>>>>>>> If it goes to notifications@ that is inherently a noisy list and I'm
>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>> worried about Josh taking a week off and a nightly build failing and
>>>>>>> sending an email.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Christopher, would a set of keys held in escrow cover your concerns?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Josh, thanks for doing this and keeping it running on your own dime. A
>>>>>>> real
>>>>>>> mensch!
>>>>>>> On Mar 13, 2015 2:43 PM, "Christopher"<ct...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm not suggesting to impose external control. I just think it'd be
>>>>>>>> nice to know that, if the worst were to happen, and the service
>>>>>>>> started behaving badly while you were on vacation, we'd have some
>>>>>>>> recourse to control the automated notices to the email lists.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [ If you do get hit by a truck, I *will* call you out on it ;) ]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> If I wasn't clear the first time, anyone can view the results right
>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm still not sure why you feel the need to impose external control
>>>>>>>>> over
>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>> system that I'm paying for and offering to provide as a service to
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> project. Unless I get hit by a truck, it's not like I won't be
>>>>>>>> responsive --
>>>>>>>>> and if I do rescind on that promise, you are more than welcome to
>>>>>>>>> call me
>>>>>>>>> out on it. Being unresponsive is one criticism that I don't think
>>>>>>>>> I've
>>>>>>>> been
>>>>>>>>> given WRT Accumulo.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> IMO, the real question here is are people going to be looking at
>>>>>>>>> these
>>>>>>>>> results and doing anything with them? If they're just going to
>>>>>>>>> /dev/null,
>>>>>>>>> it's not worth it to me and I'll just do triage/fixing as I find
>>>>>>>>> time.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Christopher wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Looks fine in Chrome to me (but my Chrome is using my shared NSS
>>>>>>>>>> certificate store for my system).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I can't think of anything immediately to configure... just
>>>>>>>>>> speculating
>>>>>>>>>> that it might add utility when needed. At the very least, I would
>>>>>>>>>> want
>>>>>>>>>> more than one person with the ability to turn off / modify the
>>>>>>>>>> email
>>>>>>>>>> to the mailing list, if necessary.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Being able to view the results without configuration permissions
>>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>> still be added value on its own, though.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this will help too. Last night's builds:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-1.6-Integration-Tests/325/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-Master-Integration-Tests/272/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If you use Chrome, I don't think they accept StartCom SSL certs as
>>>>>>>>>>> trusted
>>>>>>>>>>> (so you'll get the crazy-scary red warning page), but it should be
>>>>>>>>>>> trusted
>>>>>>>>>>> by default in FF.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Presently, you can see the full workspace for the last job that
>>>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>> run.
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd have to look into Jenkins permissions, but what exactly do
>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>> you would need to configure?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Christopher wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> That might only be valuable if we could log on to it to view the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> test
>>>>>>>>>>>>> results and/or configure the jobs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Josh
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For those who don't know, I run a Jenkins instance on a VPS I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> own.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running ITs for 1.6 and master nightly for some time now and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>> been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> really nice to get these results. It has just enough
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resources to
>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> through them reliably (some of the really heavy-handed tests
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fail on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it),
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but personally it feels like a good baseline for ensuring the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> runnable by anyone.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If others feel like they might get value from it, I can set up
>>>>>>>> emails
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sent to the notifications@accumulo.apache.org list instead of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> myself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thoughts/Opinions?
>>>>>>>
Re: More jenkins results
Posted by Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>.
No thanks. That's not really better than just looking at RSS results.
I'd much rather get an email from the service.
If we can't find a way to do this on the lists that everyone can deal
with, I'll just revert it back to emailing me only.
Christopher wrote:
> Or, maybe just set up Jenkins to tweet the results, and we can
> optionally follow that?
>
> --
> Christopher L Tubbs II
> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Christopher<ct...@apache.org> wrote:
>> I'm not a fan of putting it on the dev@ list. There must be a way to
>> add the email to a whitelist. Or... can you configure Jenkins to just
>> send as your from address as elserj-builds@apache.org?
>>
>> --
>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> So, posts to notifications@ requires an apache.org email addr. I've lost
>>> interest in trying to make it work any further.
>>>
>>> Are people interested in getting the notifications to this list (dev@a.a.o)
>>> instead of notifications@? I figure most people probably use filters of some
>>> form to move things around anyways.
>>>
>>> LMK, I won't set this up without a general ack from everyone since it would
>>> increase the traffic here dramatically.
>>>
>>>
>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>> Update on this: I had worked with Billie and little bit to try to get
>>>> ezmlm to accept message from my server (as it's not subscribed through
>>>> normal means).
>>>>
>>>> We haven't figured it out yet, but we're both a bit swamped this week.
>>>> Hopefully we'll get it figured out eventually.
>>>>
>>>> Meanwhile, 1.6 ITs were blue last night and we only have 7 test failures
>>>> on master!
>>>>
>>>> (big ty to Christopher and Eric as they helped those numbers)
>>>>
>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>> Frak.
>>>>>
>>>>> Realized that I need to make sure ezmlm accepts the emails I send from
>>>>> my server...
>>>>>
>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>> Ugh, brain didn't catch up before<enter> was hit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Send me a ping if you'd like to have control to configure the Accumulo
>>>>>> jobs and I can add an account for you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Christopher, I'll send you an email shortly with your credentials since
>>>>>> you brought up this discussion.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>>> Ok, I figured out how to do jenkins roles so that I can limit things
>>>>>>> down to a specific set of jobs.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'll change my nightly 1.6 and master branch IT jobs to send to
>>>>>>> notifications@ and we can go from there. I won't duplicate normal UT
>>>>>>> jobs from apache jenkins.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mike Drob wrote:
>>>>>>>> If it goes to notifications@ that is inherently a noisy list and I'm
>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>> worried about Josh taking a week off and a nightly build failing and
>>>>>>>> sending an email.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Christopher, would a set of keys held in escrow cover your concerns?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Josh, thanks for doing this and keeping it running on your own dime. A
>>>>>>>> real
>>>>>>>> mensch!
>>>>>>>> On Mar 13, 2015 2:43 PM, "Christopher"<ct...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm not suggesting to impose external control. I just think it'd be
>>>>>>>>> nice to know that, if the worst were to happen, and the service
>>>>>>>>> started behaving badly while you were on vacation, we'd have some
>>>>>>>>> recourse to control the automated notices to the email lists.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [ If you do get hit by a truck, I *will* call you out on it ;) ]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> If I wasn't clear the first time, anyone can view the results right
>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm still not sure why you feel the need to impose external control
>>>>>>>>>> over
>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>> system that I'm paying for and offering to provide as a service to
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> project. Unless I get hit by a truck, it's not like I won't be
>>>>>>>>> responsive --
>>>>>>>>>> and if I do rescind on that promise, you are more than welcome to
>>>>>>>>>> call me
>>>>>>>>>> out on it. Being unresponsive is one criticism that I don't think
>>>>>>>>>> I've
>>>>>>>>> been
>>>>>>>>>> given WRT Accumulo.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> IMO, the real question here is are people going to be looking at
>>>>>>>>>> these
>>>>>>>>>> results and doing anything with them? If they're just going to
>>>>>>>>>> /dev/null,
>>>>>>>>>> it's not worth it to me and I'll just do triage/fixing as I find
>>>>>>>>>> time.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Christopher wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Looks fine in Chrome to me (but my Chrome is using my shared NSS
>>>>>>>>>>> certificate store for my system).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I can't think of anything immediately to configure... just
>>>>>>>>>>> speculating
>>>>>>>>>>> that it might add utility when needed. At the very least, I would
>>>>>>>>>>> want
>>>>>>>>>>> more than one person with the ability to turn off / modify the
>>>>>>>>>>> email
>>>>>>>>>>> to the mailing list, if necessary.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Being able to view the results without configuration permissions
>>>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>>> still be added value on its own, though.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>>>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this will help too. Last night's builds:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-1.6-Integration-Tests/325/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-Master-Integration-Tests/272/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If you use Chrome, I don't think they accept StartCom SSL certs as
>>>>>>>>>>>> trusted
>>>>>>>>>>>> (so you'll get the crazy-scary red warning page), but it should be
>>>>>>>>>>>> trusted
>>>>>>>>>>>> by default in FF.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Presently, you can see the full workspace for the last job that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>> run.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd have to look into Jenkins permissions, but what exactly do
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you would need to configure?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christopher wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That might only be valuable if we could log on to it to view the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> results and/or configure the jobs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Josh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For those who don't know, I run a Jenkins instance on a VPS I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> own.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running ITs for 1.6 and master nightly for some time now and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>> been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> really nice to get these results. It has just enough
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resources to
>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> through them reliably (some of the really heavy-handed tests
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fail on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it),
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but personally it feels like a good baseline for ensuring the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> runnable by anyone.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If others feel like they might get value from it, I can set up
>>>>>>>>> emails
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sent to the notifications@accumulo.apache.org list instead of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> myself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thoughts/Opinions?
>>>>>>>>
Re: More jenkins results
Posted by Christopher <ct...@apache.org>.
Or, maybe just set up Jenkins to tweet the results, and we can
optionally follow that?
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Christopher <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
> I'm not a fan of putting it on the dev@ list. There must be a way to
> add the email to a whitelist. Or... can you configure Jenkins to just
> send as your from address as elserj-builds@apache.org?
>
> --
> Christopher L Tubbs II
> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> So, posts to notifications@ requires an apache.org email addr. I've lost
>> interest in trying to make it work any further.
>>
>> Are people interested in getting the notifications to this list (dev@a.a.o)
>> instead of notifications@? I figure most people probably use filters of some
>> form to move things around anyways.
>>
>> LMK, I won't set this up without a general ack from everyone since it would
>> increase the traffic here dramatically.
>>
>>
>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>
>>> Update on this: I had worked with Billie and little bit to try to get
>>> ezmlm to accept message from my server (as it's not subscribed through
>>> normal means).
>>>
>>> We haven't figured it out yet, but we're both a bit swamped this week.
>>> Hopefully we'll get it figured out eventually.
>>>
>>> Meanwhile, 1.6 ITs were blue last night and we only have 7 test failures
>>> on master!
>>>
>>> (big ty to Christopher and Eric as they helped those numbers)
>>>
>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Frak.
>>>>
>>>> Realized that I need to make sure ezmlm accepts the emails I send from
>>>> my server...
>>>>
>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Ugh, brain didn't catch up before <enter> was hit.
>>>>>
>>>>> Send me a ping if you'd like to have control to configure the Accumulo
>>>>> jobs and I can add an account for you.
>>>>>
>>>>> Christopher, I'll send you an email shortly with your credentials since
>>>>> you brought up this discussion.
>>>>>
>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ok, I figured out how to do jenkins roles so that I can limit things
>>>>>> down to a specific set of jobs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll change my nightly 1.6 and master branch IT jobs to send to
>>>>>> notifications@ and we can go from there. I won't duplicate normal UT
>>>>>> jobs from apache jenkins.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mike Drob wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If it goes to notifications@ that is inherently a noisy list and I'm
>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>> worried about Josh taking a week off and a nightly build failing and
>>>>>>> sending an email.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Christopher, would a set of keys held in escrow cover your concerns?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Josh, thanks for doing this and keeping it running on your own dime. A
>>>>>>> real
>>>>>>> mensch!
>>>>>>> On Mar 13, 2015 2:43 PM, "Christopher"<ct...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm not suggesting to impose external control. I just think it'd be
>>>>>>>> nice to know that, if the worst were to happen, and the service
>>>>>>>> started behaving badly while you were on vacation, we'd have some
>>>>>>>> recourse to control the automated notices to the email lists.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [ If you do get hit by a truck, I *will* call you out on it ;) ]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If I wasn't clear the first time, anyone can view the results right
>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm still not sure why you feel the need to impose external control
>>>>>>>>> over
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> system that I'm paying for and offering to provide as a service to
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> project. Unless I get hit by a truck, it's not like I won't be
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> responsive --
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> and if I do rescind on that promise, you are more than welcome to
>>>>>>>>> call me
>>>>>>>>> out on it. Being unresponsive is one criticism that I don't think
>>>>>>>>> I've
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> been
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> given WRT Accumulo.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> IMO, the real question here is are people going to be looking at
>>>>>>>>> these
>>>>>>>>> results and doing anything with them? If they're just going to
>>>>>>>>> /dev/null,
>>>>>>>>> it's not worth it to me and I'll just do triage/fixing as I find
>>>>>>>>> time.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Christopher wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Looks fine in Chrome to me (but my Chrome is using my shared NSS
>>>>>>>>>> certificate store for my system).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I can't think of anything immediately to configure... just
>>>>>>>>>> speculating
>>>>>>>>>> that it might add utility when needed. At the very least, I would
>>>>>>>>>> want
>>>>>>>>>> more than one person with the ability to turn off / modify the
>>>>>>>>>> email
>>>>>>>>>> to the mailing list, if necessary.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Being able to view the results without configuration permissions
>>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>> still be added value on its own, though.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this will help too. Last night's builds:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-1.6-Integration-Tests/325/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-Master-Integration-Tests/272/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If you use Chrome, I don't think they accept StartCom SSL certs as
>>>>>>>>>>> trusted
>>>>>>>>>>> (so you'll get the crazy-scary red warning page), but it should be
>>>>>>>>>>> trusted
>>>>>>>>>>> by default in FF.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Presently, you can see the full workspace for the last job that
>>>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> run.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd have to look into Jenkins permissions, but what exactly do
>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> you would need to configure?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Christopher wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> That might only be valuable if we could log on to it to view the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> test
>>>>>>>>>>>>> results and/or configure the jobs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Josh
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For those who don't know, I run a Jenkins instance on a VPS I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> own.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running ITs for 1.6 and master nightly for some time now and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> really nice to get these results. It has just enough
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resources to
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> through them reliably (some of the really heavy-handed tests
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fail on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it),
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but personally it feels like a good baseline for ensuring the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> runnable by anyone.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If others feel like they might get value from it, I can set up
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> emails
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sent to the notifications@accumulo.apache.org list instead of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> myself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thoughts/Opinions?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>
Re: More jenkins results
Posted by Christopher <ct...@apache.org>.
I'm not a fan of putting it on the dev@ list. There must be a way to
add the email to a whitelist. Or... can you configure Jenkins to just
send as your from address as elserj-builds@apache.org?
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So, posts to notifications@ requires an apache.org email addr. I've lost
> interest in trying to make it work any further.
>
> Are people interested in getting the notifications to this list (dev@a.a.o)
> instead of notifications@? I figure most people probably use filters of some
> form to move things around anyways.
>
> LMK, I won't set this up without a general ack from everyone since it would
> increase the traffic here dramatically.
>
>
> Josh Elser wrote:
>>
>> Update on this: I had worked with Billie and little bit to try to get
>> ezmlm to accept message from my server (as it's not subscribed through
>> normal means).
>>
>> We haven't figured it out yet, but we're both a bit swamped this week.
>> Hopefully we'll get it figured out eventually.
>>
>> Meanwhile, 1.6 ITs were blue last night and we only have 7 test failures
>> on master!
>>
>> (big ty to Christopher and Eric as they helped those numbers)
>>
>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>
>>> Frak.
>>>
>>> Realized that I need to make sure ezmlm accepts the emails I send from
>>> my server...
>>>
>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Ugh, brain didn't catch up before <enter> was hit.
>>>>
>>>> Send me a ping if you'd like to have control to configure the Accumulo
>>>> jobs and I can add an account for you.
>>>>
>>>> Christopher, I'll send you an email shortly with your credentials since
>>>> you brought up this discussion.
>>>>
>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok, I figured out how to do jenkins roles so that I can limit things
>>>>> down to a specific set of jobs.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll change my nightly 1.6 and master branch IT jobs to send to
>>>>> notifications@ and we can go from there. I won't duplicate normal UT
>>>>> jobs from apache jenkins.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mike Drob wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If it goes to notifications@ that is inherently a noisy list and I'm
>>>>>> not
>>>>>> worried about Josh taking a week off and a nightly build failing and
>>>>>> sending an email.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Christopher, would a set of keys held in escrow cover your concerns?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Josh, thanks for doing this and keeping it running on your own dime. A
>>>>>> real
>>>>>> mensch!
>>>>>> On Mar 13, 2015 2:43 PM, "Christopher"<ct...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm not suggesting to impose external control. I just think it'd be
>>>>>>> nice to know that, if the worst were to happen, and the service
>>>>>>> started behaving badly while you were on vacation, we'd have some
>>>>>>> recourse to control the automated notices to the email lists.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [ If you do get hit by a truck, I *will* call you out on it ;) ]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If I wasn't clear the first time, anyone can view the results right
>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm still not sure why you feel the need to impose external control
>>>>>>>> over
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> system that I'm paying for and offering to provide as a service to
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> project. Unless I get hit by a truck, it's not like I won't be
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> responsive --
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> and if I do rescind on that promise, you are more than welcome to
>>>>>>>> call me
>>>>>>>> out on it. Being unresponsive is one criticism that I don't think
>>>>>>>> I've
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> been
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> given WRT Accumulo.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> IMO, the real question here is are people going to be looking at
>>>>>>>> these
>>>>>>>> results and doing anything with them? If they're just going to
>>>>>>>> /dev/null,
>>>>>>>> it's not worth it to me and I'll just do triage/fixing as I find
>>>>>>>> time.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Christopher wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Looks fine in Chrome to me (but my Chrome is using my shared NSS
>>>>>>>>> certificate store for my system).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I can't think of anything immediately to configure... just
>>>>>>>>> speculating
>>>>>>>>> that it might add utility when needed. At the very least, I would
>>>>>>>>> want
>>>>>>>>> more than one person with the ability to turn off / modify the
>>>>>>>>> email
>>>>>>>>> to the mailing list, if necessary.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Being able to view the results without configuration permissions
>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>> still be added value on its own, though.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this will help too. Last night's builds:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-1.6-Integration-Tests/325/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-Master-Integration-Tests/272/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If you use Chrome, I don't think they accept StartCom SSL certs as
>>>>>>>>>> trusted
>>>>>>>>>> (so you'll get the crazy-scary red warning page), but it should be
>>>>>>>>>> trusted
>>>>>>>>>> by default in FF.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Presently, you can see the full workspace for the last job that
>>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> run.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'd have to look into Jenkins permissions, but what exactly do
>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> you would need to configure?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Christopher wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> That might only be valuable if we could log on to it to view the
>>>>>>>>>>>> test
>>>>>>>>>>>> results and/or configure the jobs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Josh
>>>>>>>>>>>> Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> For those who don't know, I run a Jenkins instance on a VPS I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> own.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've been
>>>>>>>>>>>>> running ITs for 1.6 and master nightly for some time now and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> really nice to get these results. It has just enough
>>>>>>>>>>>>> resources to
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> through them reliably (some of the really heavy-handed tests
>>>>>>>>>>>>> fail on
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it),
>>>>>>>>>>>>> but personally it feels like a good baseline for ensuring the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests
>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>> runnable by anyone.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If others feel like they might get value from it, I can set up
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> emails
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sent to the notifications@accumulo.apache.org list instead of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> myself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thoughts/Opinions?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>
Re: More jenkins results
Posted by Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>.
So, posts to notifications@ requires an apache.org email addr. I've lost
interest in trying to make it work any further.
Are people interested in getting the notifications to this list
(dev@a.a.o) instead of notifications@? I figure most people probably use
filters of some form to move things around anyways.
LMK, I won't set this up without a general ack from everyone since it
would increase the traffic here dramatically.
Josh Elser wrote:
> Update on this: I had worked with Billie and little bit to try to get
> ezmlm to accept message from my server (as it's not subscribed through
> normal means).
>
> We haven't figured it out yet, but we're both a bit swamped this week.
> Hopefully we'll get it figured out eventually.
>
> Meanwhile, 1.6 ITs were blue last night and we only have 7 test failures
> on master!
>
> (big ty to Christopher and Eric as they helped those numbers)
>
> Josh Elser wrote:
>> Frak.
>>
>> Realized that I need to make sure ezmlm accepts the emails I send from
>> my server...
>>
>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>> Ugh, brain didn't catch up before <enter> was hit.
>>>
>>> Send me a ping if you'd like to have control to configure the Accumulo
>>> jobs and I can add an account for you.
>>>
>>> Christopher, I'll send you an email shortly with your credentials since
>>> you brought up this discussion.
>>>
>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>> Ok, I figured out how to do jenkins roles so that I can limit things
>>>> down to a specific set of jobs.
>>>>
>>>> I'll change my nightly 1.6 and master branch IT jobs to send to
>>>> notifications@ and we can go from there. I won't duplicate normal UT
>>>> jobs from apache jenkins.
>>>>
>>>> Mike Drob wrote:
>>>>> If it goes to notifications@ that is inherently a noisy list and I'm
>>>>> not
>>>>> worried about Josh taking a week off and a nightly build failing and
>>>>> sending an email.
>>>>>
>>>>> Christopher, would a set of keys held in escrow cover your concerns?
>>>>>
>>>>> Josh, thanks for doing this and keeping it running on your own dime. A
>>>>> real
>>>>> mensch!
>>>>> On Mar 13, 2015 2:43 PM, "Christopher"<ct...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not suggesting to impose external control. I just think it'd be
>>>>>> nice to know that, if the worst were to happen, and the service
>>>>>> started behaving badly while you were on vacation, we'd have some
>>>>>> recourse to control the automated notices to the email lists.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [ If you do get hit by a truck, I *will* call you out on it ;) ]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> If I wasn't clear the first time, anyone can view the results right
>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm still not sure why you feel the need to impose external control
>>>>>>> over
>>>>>> a
>>>>>>> system that I'm paying for and offering to provide as a service to
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> project. Unless I get hit by a truck, it's not like I won't be
>>>>>> responsive --
>>>>>>> and if I do rescind on that promise, you are more than welcome to
>>>>>>> call me
>>>>>>> out on it. Being unresponsive is one criticism that I don't think
>>>>>>> I've
>>>>>> been
>>>>>>> given WRT Accumulo.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> IMO, the real question here is are people going to be looking at
>>>>>>> these
>>>>>>> results and doing anything with them? If they're just going to
>>>>>>> /dev/null,
>>>>>>> it's not worth it to me and I'll just do triage/fixing as I find
>>>>>>> time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Christopher wrote:
>>>>>>>> Looks fine in Chrome to me (but my Chrome is using my shared NSS
>>>>>>>> certificate store for my system).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I can't think of anything immediately to configure... just
>>>>>>>> speculating
>>>>>>>> that it might add utility when needed. At the very least, I would
>>>>>>>> want
>>>>>>>> more than one person with the ability to turn off / modify the
>>>>>>>> email
>>>>>>>> to the mailing list, if necessary.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Being able to view the results without configuration permissions
>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>> still be added value on its own, though.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Maybe this will help too. Last night's builds:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-1.6-Integration-Tests/325/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-Master-Integration-Tests/272/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If you use Chrome, I don't think they accept StartCom SSL certs as
>>>>>>>>> trusted
>>>>>>>>> (so you'll get the crazy-scary red warning page), but it should be
>>>>>>>>> trusted
>>>>>>>>> by default in FF.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Presently, you can see the full workspace for the last job that
>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>> run.
>>>>>>>>>> I'd have to look into Jenkins permissions, but what exactly do
>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>> you would need to configure?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Christopher wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> That might only be valuable if we could log on to it to view the
>>>>>>>>>>> test
>>>>>>>>>>> results and/or configure the jobs.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>>>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Josh
>>>>>>>>>>> Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> For those who don't know, I run a Jenkins instance on a VPS I
>>>>>>>>>>>> own.
>>>>>>>>>>>> I've been
>>>>>>>>>>>> running ITs for 1.6 and master nightly for some time now and
>>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>> been
>>>>>>>>>>>> really nice to get these results. It has just enough
>>>>>>>>>>>> resources to
>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>> through them reliably (some of the really heavy-handed tests
>>>>>>>>>>>> fail on
>>>>>>>>>>>> it),
>>>>>>>>>>>> but personally it feels like a good baseline for ensuring the
>>>>>>>>>>>> tests
>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>> runnable by anyone.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If others feel like they might get value from it, I can set up
>>>>>> emails
>>>>>>>>>>>> to be
>>>>>>>>>>>> sent to the notifications@accumulo.apache.org list instead of
>>>>>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>> myself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thoughts/Opinions?
>>>>>
Re: More jenkins results
Posted by Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>.
Update on this: I had worked with Billie and little bit to try to get
ezmlm to accept message from my server (as it's not subscribed through
normal means).
We haven't figured it out yet, but we're both a bit swamped this week.
Hopefully we'll get it figured out eventually.
Meanwhile, 1.6 ITs were blue last night and we only have 7 test failures
on master!
(big ty to Christopher and Eric as they helped those numbers)
Josh Elser wrote:
> Frak.
>
> Realized that I need to make sure ezmlm accepts the emails I send from
> my server...
>
> Josh Elser wrote:
>> Ugh, brain didn't catch up before <enter> was hit.
>>
>> Send me a ping if you'd like to have control to configure the Accumulo
>> jobs and I can add an account for you.
>>
>> Christopher, I'll send you an email shortly with your credentials since
>> you brought up this discussion.
>>
>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>> Ok, I figured out how to do jenkins roles so that I can limit things
>>> down to a specific set of jobs.
>>>
>>> I'll change my nightly 1.6 and master branch IT jobs to send to
>>> notifications@ and we can go from there. I won't duplicate normal UT
>>> jobs from apache jenkins.
>>>
>>> Mike Drob wrote:
>>>> If it goes to notifications@ that is inherently a noisy list and I'm
>>>> not
>>>> worried about Josh taking a week off and a nightly build failing and
>>>> sending an email.
>>>>
>>>> Christopher, would a set of keys held in escrow cover your concerns?
>>>>
>>>> Josh, thanks for doing this and keeping it running on your own dime. A
>>>> real
>>>> mensch!
>>>> On Mar 13, 2015 2:43 PM, "Christopher"<ct...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm not suggesting to impose external control. I just think it'd be
>>>>> nice to know that, if the worst were to happen, and the service
>>>>> started behaving badly while you were on vacation, we'd have some
>>>>> recourse to control the automated notices to the email lists.
>>>>>
>>>>> [ If you do get hit by a truck, I *will* call you out on it ;) ]
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> If I wasn't clear the first time, anyone can view the results right
>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm still not sure why you feel the need to impose external control
>>>>>> over
>>>>> a
>>>>>> system that I'm paying for and offering to provide as a service to
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> project. Unless I get hit by a truck, it's not like I won't be
>>>>> responsive --
>>>>>> and if I do rescind on that promise, you are more than welcome to
>>>>>> call me
>>>>>> out on it. Being unresponsive is one criticism that I don't think
>>>>>> I've
>>>>> been
>>>>>> given WRT Accumulo.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> IMO, the real question here is are people going to be looking at
>>>>>> these
>>>>>> results and doing anything with them? If they're just going to
>>>>>> /dev/null,
>>>>>> it's not worth it to me and I'll just do triage/fixing as I find
>>>>>> time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Christopher wrote:
>>>>>>> Looks fine in Chrome to me (but my Chrome is using my shared NSS
>>>>>>> certificate store for my system).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I can't think of anything immediately to configure... just
>>>>>>> speculating
>>>>>>> that it might add utility when needed. At the very least, I would
>>>>>>> want
>>>>>>> more than one person with the ability to turn off / modify the email
>>>>>>> to the mailing list, if necessary.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Being able to view the results without configuration permissions
>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>> still be added value on its own, though.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Maybe this will help too. Last night's builds:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-1.6-Integration-Tests/325/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-Master-Integration-Tests/272/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you use Chrome, I don't think they accept StartCom SSL certs as
>>>>>>>> trusted
>>>>>>>> (so you'll get the crazy-scary red warning page), but it should be
>>>>>>>> trusted
>>>>>>>> by default in FF.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Presently, you can see the full workspace for the last job that
>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>> run.
>>>>>>>>> I'd have to look into Jenkins permissions, but what exactly do you
>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>> you would need to configure?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Christopher wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> That might only be valuable if we could log on to it to view the
>>>>>>>>>> test
>>>>>>>>>> results and/or configure the jobs.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> For those who don't know, I run a Jenkins instance on a VPS I
>>>>>>>>>>> own.
>>>>>>>>>>> I've been
>>>>>>>>>>> running ITs for 1.6 and master nightly for some time now and
>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>> been
>>>>>>>>>>> really nice to get these results. It has just enough
>>>>>>>>>>> resources to
>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>> through them reliably (some of the really heavy-handed tests
>>>>>>>>>>> fail on
>>>>>>>>>>> it),
>>>>>>>>>>> but personally it feels like a good baseline for ensuring the
>>>>>>>>>>> tests
>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>> runnable by anyone.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If others feel like they might get value from it, I can set up
>>>>> emails
>>>>>>>>>>> to be
>>>>>>>>>>> sent to the notifications@accumulo.apache.org list instead of
>>>>>>>>>>> just
>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> myself.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thoughts/Opinions?
>>>>
Re: More jenkins results
Posted by Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>.
Frak.
Realized that I need to make sure ezmlm accepts the emails I send from
my server...
Josh Elser wrote:
> Ugh, brain didn't catch up before <enter> was hit.
>
> Send me a ping if you'd like to have control to configure the Accumulo
> jobs and I can add an account for you.
>
> Christopher, I'll send you an email shortly with your credentials since
> you brought up this discussion.
>
> Josh Elser wrote:
>> Ok, I figured out how to do jenkins roles so that I can limit things
>> down to a specific set of jobs.
>>
>> I'll change my nightly 1.6 and master branch IT jobs to send to
>> notifications@ and we can go from there. I won't duplicate normal UT
>> jobs from apache jenkins.
>>
>> Mike Drob wrote:
>>> If it goes to notifications@ that is inherently a noisy list and I'm not
>>> worried about Josh taking a week off and a nightly build failing and
>>> sending an email.
>>>
>>> Christopher, would a set of keys held in escrow cover your concerns?
>>>
>>> Josh, thanks for doing this and keeping it running on your own dime. A
>>> real
>>> mensch!
>>> On Mar 13, 2015 2:43 PM, "Christopher"<ct...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm not suggesting to impose external control. I just think it'd be
>>>> nice to know that, if the worst were to happen, and the service
>>>> started behaving badly while you were on vacation, we'd have some
>>>> recourse to control the automated notices to the email lists.
>>>>
>>>> [ If you do get hit by a truck, I *will* call you out on it ;) ]
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> If I wasn't clear the first time, anyone can view the results right
>>>>> now.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm still not sure why you feel the need to impose external control
>>>>> over
>>>> a
>>>>> system that I'm paying for and offering to provide as a service to the
>>>>> project. Unless I get hit by a truck, it's not like I won't be
>>>> responsive --
>>>>> and if I do rescind on that promise, you are more than welcome to
>>>>> call me
>>>>> out on it. Being unresponsive is one criticism that I don't think I've
>>>> been
>>>>> given WRT Accumulo.
>>>>>
>>>>> IMO, the real question here is are people going to be looking at these
>>>>> results and doing anything with them? If they're just going to
>>>>> /dev/null,
>>>>> it's not worth it to me and I'll just do triage/fixing as I find time.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Christopher wrote:
>>>>>> Looks fine in Chrome to me (but my Chrome is using my shared NSS
>>>>>> certificate store for my system).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I can't think of anything immediately to configure... just
>>>>>> speculating
>>>>>> that it might add utility when needed. At the very least, I would
>>>>>> want
>>>>>> more than one person with the ability to turn off / modify the email
>>>>>> to the mailing list, if necessary.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Being able to view the results without configuration permissions
>>>>>> would
>>>>>> still be added value on its own, though.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Maybe this will help too. Last night's builds:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-1.6-Integration-Tests/325/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-Master-Integration-Tests/272/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> If you use Chrome, I don't think they accept StartCom SSL certs as
>>>>>>> trusted
>>>>>>> (so you'll get the crazy-scary red warning page), but it should be
>>>>>>> trusted
>>>>>>> by default in FF.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>>>> Presently, you can see the full workspace for the last job that was
>>>> run.
>>>>>>>> I'd have to look into Jenkins permissions, but what exactly do you
>>>> think
>>>>>>>> you would need to configure?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Christopher wrote:
>>>>>>>>> That might only be valuable if we could log on to it to view the
>>>>>>>>> test
>>>>>>>>> results and/or configure the jobs.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> For those who don't know, I run a Jenkins instance on a VPS I
>>>>>>>>>> own.
>>>>>>>>>> I've been
>>>>>>>>>> running ITs for 1.6 and master nightly for some time now and it's
>>>> been
>>>>>>>>>> really nice to get these results. It has just enough resources to
>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>> through them reliably (some of the really heavy-handed tests
>>>>>>>>>> fail on
>>>>>>>>>> it),
>>>>>>>>>> but personally it feels like a good baseline for ensuring the
>>>>>>>>>> tests
>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>> runnable by anyone.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If others feel like they might get value from it, I can set up
>>>> emails
>>>>>>>>>> to be
>>>>>>>>>> sent to the notifications@accumulo.apache.org list instead of
>>>>>>>>>> just
>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> myself.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thoughts/Opinions?
>>>
Re: More jenkins results
Posted by Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>.
Ugh, brain didn't catch up before <enter> was hit.
Send me a ping if you'd like to have control to configure the Accumulo
jobs and I can add an account for you.
Christopher, I'll send you an email shortly with your credentials since
you brought up this discussion.
Josh Elser wrote:
> Ok, I figured out how to do jenkins roles so that I can limit things
> down to a specific set of jobs.
>
> I'll change my nightly 1.6 and master branch IT jobs to send to
> notifications@ and we can go from there. I won't duplicate normal UT
> jobs from apache jenkins.
>
> Mike Drob wrote:
>> If it goes to notifications@ that is inherently a noisy list and I'm not
>> worried about Josh taking a week off and a nightly build failing and
>> sending an email.
>>
>> Christopher, would a set of keys held in escrow cover your concerns?
>>
>> Josh, thanks for doing this and keeping it running on your own dime. A
>> real
>> mensch!
>> On Mar 13, 2015 2:43 PM, "Christopher"<ct...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm not suggesting to impose external control. I just think it'd be
>>> nice to know that, if the worst were to happen, and the service
>>> started behaving badly while you were on vacation, we'd have some
>>> recourse to control the automated notices to the email lists.
>>>
>>> [ If you do get hit by a truck, I *will* call you out on it ;) ]
>>>
>>> --
>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> If I wasn't clear the first time, anyone can view the results right
>>>> now.
>>>>
>>>> I'm still not sure why you feel the need to impose external control
>>>> over
>>> a
>>>> system that I'm paying for and offering to provide as a service to the
>>>> project. Unless I get hit by a truck, it's not like I won't be
>>> responsive --
>>>> and if I do rescind on that promise, you are more than welcome to
>>>> call me
>>>> out on it. Being unresponsive is one criticism that I don't think I've
>>> been
>>>> given WRT Accumulo.
>>>>
>>>> IMO, the real question here is are people going to be looking at these
>>>> results and doing anything with them? If they're just going to
>>>> /dev/null,
>>>> it's not worth it to me and I'll just do triage/fixing as I find time.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Christopher wrote:
>>>>> Looks fine in Chrome to me (but my Chrome is using my shared NSS
>>>>> certificate store for my system).
>>>>>
>>>>> I can't think of anything immediately to configure... just speculating
>>>>> that it might add utility when needed. At the very least, I would want
>>>>> more than one person with the ability to turn off / modify the email
>>>>> to the mailing list, if necessary.
>>>>>
>>>>> Being able to view the results without configuration permissions would
>>>>> still be added value on its own, though.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Maybe this will help too. Last night's builds:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-1.6-Integration-Tests/325/
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-Master-Integration-Tests/272/
>>>
>>>>>> If you use Chrome, I don't think they accept StartCom SSL certs as
>>>>>> trusted
>>>>>> (so you'll get the crazy-scary red warning page), but it should be
>>>>>> trusted
>>>>>> by default in FF.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>>> Presently, you can see the full workspace for the last job that was
>>> run.
>>>>>>> I'd have to look into Jenkins permissions, but what exactly do you
>>> think
>>>>>>> you would need to configure?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Christopher wrote:
>>>>>>>> That might only be valuable if we could log on to it to view the
>>>>>>>> test
>>>>>>>> results and/or configure the jobs.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> For those who don't know, I run a Jenkins instance on a VPS I own.
>>>>>>>>> I've been
>>>>>>>>> running ITs for 1.6 and master nightly for some time now and it's
>>> been
>>>>>>>>> really nice to get these results. It has just enough resources to
>>> run
>>>>>>>>> through them reliably (some of the really heavy-handed tests
>>>>>>>>> fail on
>>>>>>>>> it),
>>>>>>>>> but personally it feels like a good baseline for ensuring the
>>>>>>>>> tests
>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>> runnable by anyone.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If others feel like they might get value from it, I can set up
>>> emails
>>>>>>>>> to be
>>>>>>>>> sent to the notifications@accumulo.apache.org list instead of just
>>> to
>>>>>>>>> myself.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thoughts/Opinions?
>>
Re: More jenkins results
Posted by Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>.
Ok, I figured out how to do jenkins roles so that I can limit things
down to a specific set of jobs.
I'll change my nightly 1.6 and master branch IT jobs to send to
notifications@ and we can go from there. I won't duplicate normal UT
jobs from apache jenkins.
Mike Drob wrote:
> If it goes to notifications@ that is inherently a noisy list and I'm not
> worried about Josh taking a week off and a nightly build failing and
> sending an email.
>
> Christopher, would a set of keys held in escrow cover your concerns?
>
> Josh, thanks for doing this and keeping it running on your own dime. A real
> mensch!
> On Mar 13, 2015 2:43 PM, "Christopher"<ct...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> I'm not suggesting to impose external control. I just think it'd be
>> nice to know that, if the worst were to happen, and the service
>> started behaving badly while you were on vacation, we'd have some
>> recourse to control the automated notices to the email lists.
>>
>> [ If you do get hit by a truck, I *will* call you out on it ;) ]
>>
>> --
>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> If I wasn't clear the first time, anyone can view the results right now.
>>>
>>> I'm still not sure why you feel the need to impose external control over
>> a
>>> system that I'm paying for and offering to provide as a service to the
>>> project. Unless I get hit by a truck, it's not like I won't be
>> responsive --
>>> and if I do rescind on that promise, you are more than welcome to call me
>>> out on it. Being unresponsive is one criticism that I don't think I've
>> been
>>> given WRT Accumulo.
>>>
>>> IMO, the real question here is are people going to be looking at these
>>> results and doing anything with them? If they're just going to /dev/null,
>>> it's not worth it to me and I'll just do triage/fixing as I find time.
>>>
>>>
>>> Christopher wrote:
>>>> Looks fine in Chrome to me (but my Chrome is using my shared NSS
>>>> certificate store for my system).
>>>>
>>>> I can't think of anything immediately to configure... just speculating
>>>> that it might add utility when needed. At the very least, I would want
>>>> more than one person with the ability to turn off / modify the email
>>>> to the mailing list, if necessary.
>>>>
>>>> Being able to view the results without configuration permissions would
>>>> still be added value on its own, though.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>> Maybe this will help too. Last night's builds:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-1.6-Integration-Tests/325/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-Master-Integration-Tests/272/
>>>>> If you use Chrome, I don't think they accept StartCom SSL certs as
>>>>> trusted
>>>>> (so you'll get the crazy-scary red warning page), but it should be
>>>>> trusted
>>>>> by default in FF.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>> Presently, you can see the full workspace for the last job that was
>> run.
>>>>>> I'd have to look into Jenkins permissions, but what exactly do you
>> think
>>>>>> you would need to configure?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Christopher wrote:
>>>>>>> That might only be valuable if we could log on to it to view the test
>>>>>>> results and/or configure the jobs.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> For those who don't know, I run a Jenkins instance on a VPS I own.
>>>>>>>> I've been
>>>>>>>> running ITs for 1.6 and master nightly for some time now and it's
>> been
>>>>>>>> really nice to get these results. It has just enough resources to
>> run
>>>>>>>> through them reliably (some of the really heavy-handed tests fail on
>>>>>>>> it),
>>>>>>>> but personally it feels like a good baseline for ensuring the tests
>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>> runnable by anyone.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If others feel like they might get value from it, I can set up
>> emails
>>>>>>>> to be
>>>>>>>> sent to the notifications@accumulo.apache.org list instead of just
>> to
>>>>>>>> myself.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thoughts/Opinions?
>
Re: More jenkins results
Posted by Mike Drob <md...@mdrob.com>.
If it goes to notifications@ that is inherently a noisy list and I'm not
worried about Josh taking a week off and a nightly build failing and
sending an email.
Christopher, would a set of keys held in escrow cover your concerns?
Josh, thanks for doing this and keeping it running on your own dime. A real
mensch!
On Mar 13, 2015 2:43 PM, "Christopher" <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
> I'm not suggesting to impose external control. I just think it'd be
> nice to know that, if the worst were to happen, and the service
> started behaving badly while you were on vacation, we'd have some
> recourse to control the automated notices to the email lists.
>
> [ If you do get hit by a truck, I *will* call you out on it ;) ]
>
> --
> Christopher L Tubbs II
> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > If I wasn't clear the first time, anyone can view the results right now.
> >
> > I'm still not sure why you feel the need to impose external control over
> a
> > system that I'm paying for and offering to provide as a service to the
> > project. Unless I get hit by a truck, it's not like I won't be
> responsive --
> > and if I do rescind on that promise, you are more than welcome to call me
> > out on it. Being unresponsive is one criticism that I don't think I've
> been
> > given WRT Accumulo.
> >
> > IMO, the real question here is are people going to be looking at these
> > results and doing anything with them? If they're just going to /dev/null,
> > it's not worth it to me and I'll just do triage/fixing as I find time.
> >
> >
> > Christopher wrote:
> >>
> >> Looks fine in Chrome to me (but my Chrome is using my shared NSS
> >> certificate store for my system).
> >>
> >> I can't think of anything immediately to configure... just speculating
> >> that it might add utility when needed. At the very least, I would want
> >> more than one person with the ability to turn off / modify the email
> >> to the mailing list, if necessary.
> >>
> >> Being able to view the results without configuration permissions would
> >> still be added value on its own, though.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Christopher L Tubbs II
> >> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Maybe this will help too. Last night's builds:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-1.6-Integration-Tests/325/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-Master-Integration-Tests/272/
> >>>
> >>> If you use Chrome, I don't think they accept StartCom SSL certs as
> >>> trusted
> >>> (so you'll get the crazy-scary red warning page), but it should be
> >>> trusted
> >>> by default in FF.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Josh Elser wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Presently, you can see the full workspace for the last job that was
> run.
> >>>>
> >>>> I'd have to look into Jenkins permissions, but what exactly do you
> think
> >>>> you would need to configure?
> >>>>
> >>>> Christopher wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> That might only be valuable if we could log on to it to view the test
> >>>>> results and/or configure the jobs.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
> >>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> For those who don't know, I run a Jenkins instance on a VPS I own.
> >>>>>> I've been
> >>>>>> running ITs for 1.6 and master nightly for some time now and it's
> been
> >>>>>> really nice to get these results. It has just enough resources to
> run
> >>>>>> through them reliably (some of the really heavy-handed tests fail on
> >>>>>> it),
> >>>>>> but personally it feels like a good baseline for ensuring the tests
> >>>>>> are
> >>>>>> runnable by anyone.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> If others feel like they might get value from it, I can set up
> emails
> >>>>>> to be
> >>>>>> sent to the notifications@accumulo.apache.org list instead of just
> to
> >>>>>> myself.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thoughts/Opinions?
>
Re: More jenkins results
Posted by Christopher <ct...@apache.org>.
I'm not suggesting to impose external control. I just think it'd be
nice to know that, if the worst were to happen, and the service
started behaving badly while you were on vacation, we'd have some
recourse to control the automated notices to the email lists.
[ If you do get hit by a truck, I *will* call you out on it ;) ]
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If I wasn't clear the first time, anyone can view the results right now.
>
> I'm still not sure why you feel the need to impose external control over a
> system that I'm paying for and offering to provide as a service to the
> project. Unless I get hit by a truck, it's not like I won't be responsive --
> and if I do rescind on that promise, you are more than welcome to call me
> out on it. Being unresponsive is one criticism that I don't think I've been
> given WRT Accumulo.
>
> IMO, the real question here is are people going to be looking at these
> results and doing anything with them? If they're just going to /dev/null,
> it's not worth it to me and I'll just do triage/fixing as I find time.
>
>
> Christopher wrote:
>>
>> Looks fine in Chrome to me (but my Chrome is using my shared NSS
>> certificate store for my system).
>>
>> I can't think of anything immediately to configure... just speculating
>> that it might add utility when needed. At the very least, I would want
>> more than one person with the ability to turn off / modify the email
>> to the mailing list, if necessary.
>>
>> Being able to view the results without configuration permissions would
>> still be added value on its own, though.
>>
>> --
>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Maybe this will help too. Last night's builds:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-1.6-Integration-Tests/325/
>>>
>>>
>>> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-Master-Integration-Tests/272/
>>>
>>> If you use Chrome, I don't think they accept StartCom SSL certs as
>>> trusted
>>> (so you'll get the crazy-scary red warning page), but it should be
>>> trusted
>>> by default in FF.
>>>
>>>
>>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Presently, you can see the full workspace for the last job that was run.
>>>>
>>>> I'd have to look into Jenkins permissions, but what exactly do you think
>>>> you would need to configure?
>>>>
>>>> Christopher wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> That might only be valuable if we could log on to it to view the test
>>>>> results and/or configure the jobs.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For those who don't know, I run a Jenkins instance on a VPS I own.
>>>>>> I've been
>>>>>> running ITs for 1.6 and master nightly for some time now and it's been
>>>>>> really nice to get these results. It has just enough resources to run
>>>>>> through them reliably (some of the really heavy-handed tests fail on
>>>>>> it),
>>>>>> but personally it feels like a good baseline for ensuring the tests
>>>>>> are
>>>>>> runnable by anyone.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If others feel like they might get value from it, I can set up emails
>>>>>> to be
>>>>>> sent to the notifications@accumulo.apache.org list instead of just to
>>>>>> myself.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thoughts/Opinions?
Re: More jenkins results
Posted by Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>.
If I wasn't clear the first time, anyone can view the results right now.
I'm still not sure why you feel the need to impose external control over
a system that I'm paying for and offering to provide as a service to the
project. Unless I get hit by a truck, it's not like I won't be
responsive -- and if I do rescind on that promise, you are more than
welcome to call me out on it. Being unresponsive is one criticism that I
don't think I've been given WRT Accumulo.
IMO, the real question here is are people going to be looking at these
results and doing anything with them? If they're just going to
/dev/null, it's not worth it to me and I'll just do triage/fixing as I
find time.
Christopher wrote:
> Looks fine in Chrome to me (but my Chrome is using my shared NSS
> certificate store for my system).
>
> I can't think of anything immediately to configure... just speculating
> that it might add utility when needed. At the very least, I would want
> more than one person with the ability to turn off / modify the email
> to the mailing list, if necessary.
>
> Being able to view the results without configuration permissions would
> still be added value on its own, though.
>
> --
> Christopher L Tubbs II
> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Maybe this will help too. Last night's builds:
>>
>> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-1.6-Integration-Tests/325/
>>
>> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-Master-Integration-Tests/272/
>>
>> If you use Chrome, I don't think they accept StartCom SSL certs as trusted
>> (so you'll get the crazy-scary red warning page), but it should be trusted
>> by default in FF.
>>
>>
>> Josh Elser wrote:
>>> Presently, you can see the full workspace for the last job that was run.
>>>
>>> I'd have to look into Jenkins permissions, but what exactly do you think
>>> you would need to configure?
>>>
>>> Christopher wrote:
>>>> That might only be valuable if we could log on to it to view the test
>>>> results and/or configure the jobs.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> For those who don't know, I run a Jenkins instance on a VPS I own.
>>>>> I've been
>>>>> running ITs for 1.6 and master nightly for some time now and it's been
>>>>> really nice to get these results. It has just enough resources to run
>>>>> through them reliably (some of the really heavy-handed tests fail on
>>>>> it),
>>>>> but personally it feels like a good baseline for ensuring the tests are
>>>>> runnable by anyone.
>>>>>
>>>>> If others feel like they might get value from it, I can set up emails
>>>>> to be
>>>>> sent to the notifications@accumulo.apache.org list instead of just to
>>>>> myself.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thoughts/Opinions?
Re: More jenkins results
Posted by Christopher <ct...@apache.org>.
Looks fine in Chrome to me (but my Chrome is using my shared NSS
certificate store for my system).
I can't think of anything immediately to configure... just speculating
that it might add utility when needed. At the very least, I would want
more than one person with the ability to turn off / modify the email
to the mailing list, if necessary.
Being able to view the results without configuration permissions would
still be added value on its own, though.
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Maybe this will help too. Last night's builds:
>
> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-1.6-Integration-Tests/325/
>
> https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-Master-Integration-Tests/272/
>
> If you use Chrome, I don't think they accept StartCom SSL certs as trusted
> (so you'll get the crazy-scary red warning page), but it should be trusted
> by default in FF.
>
>
> Josh Elser wrote:
>>
>> Presently, you can see the full workspace for the last job that was run.
>>
>> I'd have to look into Jenkins permissions, but what exactly do you think
>> you would need to configure?
>>
>> Christopher wrote:
>>>
>>> That might only be valuable if we could log on to it to view the test
>>> results and/or configure the jobs.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> For those who don't know, I run a Jenkins instance on a VPS I own.
>>>> I've been
>>>> running ITs for 1.6 and master nightly for some time now and it's been
>>>> really nice to get these results. It has just enough resources to run
>>>> through them reliably (some of the really heavy-handed tests fail on
>>>> it),
>>>> but personally it feels like a good baseline for ensuring the tests are
>>>> runnable by anyone.
>>>>
>>>> If others feel like they might get value from it, I can set up emails
>>>> to be
>>>> sent to the notifications@accumulo.apache.org list instead of just to
>>>> myself.
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts/Opinions?
Re: More jenkins results
Posted by Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>.
Maybe this will help too. Last night's builds:
https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-1.6-Integration-Tests/325/
https://secure.penguinsinabox.com/jenkins/job/Accumulo-Master-Integration-Tests/272/
If you use Chrome, I don't think they accept StartCom SSL certs as
trusted (so you'll get the crazy-scary red warning page), but it should
be trusted by default in FF.
Josh Elser wrote:
> Presently, you can see the full workspace for the last job that was run.
>
> I'd have to look into Jenkins permissions, but what exactly do you think
> you would need to configure?
>
> Christopher wrote:
>> That might only be valuable if we could log on to it to view the test
>> results and/or configure the jobs.
>>
>> --
>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> For those who don't know, I run a Jenkins instance on a VPS I own.
>>> I've been
>>> running ITs for 1.6 and master nightly for some time now and it's been
>>> really nice to get these results. It has just enough resources to run
>>> through them reliably (some of the really heavy-handed tests fail on
>>> it),
>>> but personally it feels like a good baseline for ensuring the tests are
>>> runnable by anyone.
>>>
>>> If others feel like they might get value from it, I can set up emails
>>> to be
>>> sent to the notifications@accumulo.apache.org list instead of just to
>>> myself.
>>>
>>> Thoughts/Opinions?
Re: More jenkins results
Posted by Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>.
Presently, you can see the full workspace for the last job that was run.
I'd have to look into Jenkins permissions, but what exactly do you think
you would need to configure?
Christopher wrote:
> That might only be valuable if we could log on to it to view the test
> results and/or configure the jobs.
>
> --
> Christopher L Tubbs II
> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Josh Elser<jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> For those who don't know, I run a Jenkins instance on a VPS I own. I've been
>> running ITs for 1.6 and master nightly for some time now and it's been
>> really nice to get these results. It has just enough resources to run
>> through them reliably (some of the really heavy-handed tests fail on it),
>> but personally it feels like a good baseline for ensuring the tests are
>> runnable by anyone.
>>
>> If others feel like they might get value from it, I can set up emails to be
>> sent to the notifications@accumulo.apache.org list instead of just to
>> myself.
>>
>> Thoughts/Opinions?
Re: More jenkins results
Posted by Christopher <ct...@apache.org>.
That might only be valuable if we could log on to it to view the test
results and/or configure the jobs.
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> For those who don't know, I run a Jenkins instance on a VPS I own. I've been
> running ITs for 1.6 and master nightly for some time now and it's been
> really nice to get these results. It has just enough resources to run
> through them reliably (some of the really heavy-handed tests fail on it),
> but personally it feels like a good baseline for ensuring the tests are
> runnable by anyone.
>
> If others feel like they might get value from it, I can set up emails to be
> sent to the notifications@accumulo.apache.org list instead of just to
> myself.
>
> Thoughts/Opinions?