You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "The Alchemist (Commented) (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2012/03/24 18:08:25 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-1410) PFOR implementation

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13237604#comment-13237604 ] 

The Alchemist commented on LUCENE-1410:
---------------------------------------

Out of curiousity, is the PFOR effort dead?  I was thinking about running some newer benchmarks using Java 7, and see if that makes a difference.  

Do you guys think that's worthwhile?
                
> PFOR implementation
> -------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1410
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1410
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: core/index
>            Reporter: Paul Elschot
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: Bulk Postings branch
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-1410-codecs.tar.bz2, LUCENE-1410.patch, LUCENE-1410.patch, LUCENE-1410.patch, LUCENE-1410.patch, LUCENE-1410b.patch, LUCENE-1410c.patch, LUCENE-1410d.patch, LUCENE-1410e.patch, TermQueryTests.tgz, TestPFor2.java, TestPFor2.java, TestPFor2.java, autogen.tgz, for-summary.txt
>
>   Original Estimate: 21,840h
>  Remaining Estimate: 21,840h
>
> Implementation of Patched Frame of Reference.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org